Jumping the Shark on Red Nose Day.
Do you remember the Headington Shark? In the early hours one day in August 1986, it burst through the Bill Heine’s roof. Naturally, it had not planning permission. Nor had Oxford City council got a sense of humour. They objected on the grounds that the shark was a ‘large and prominent feature in the street which detracts from the otherwise harmonious appearance of the terrace. It is out of place in this locality. There is no reason why such a large and prominent detracting feature should be permitted to remain’.
After four years of doing battle royal with the Planning Committee trying to gain retrospective planning consent he appealed to the Secretary of State – then Michael Heseltine. There he had more success, the inspector said at the time:
“The Council is understandably concerned about precedent here. The first concern is simple: proliferation with sharks (and Heaven knows what else) crashing through roofs all over the City. This fear is exaggerated. In the five years since the shark was erected, no other examples have occurred. Only very recently has there been a proposal for twin baby sharks in the Iffley Road. But any system of control must make some small place for the dynamic, the unexpected, the downright quirky. I therefore recommend that the Headington shark be allowed to remain.”
How about a giant red plastic nose on a roof with no planning permission? Is that unexpected, or quirky? It doesn’t have to be apparently. Oop in Blackburn, the local Planning Committee have been invited to consider the case of the red plastic nose which has appeared on top of a derelict care home without planning permission. They have decided that the red nose was a ‘prominent addition’ to the skyline, rather than the ‘prominent detraction’ which was the accusation hurled at the little shark. Besides, there was already a ‘proliferation’ of red plastic noses on the Blackburn skyline. 45 of them in fact. They have recommended awarding it planning permission.
If only Mr Heine had called his house a Pesque, and claimed to be worshipping an ancient fish therein. He would have saved himself so much trouble.
- March 15, 2011 at 22:03
-
A red nose? surely not. It looks more like a fat little pink piglet to
me.
I do hope one of Blackburn’s yoof has the inspiration to climb up their and
spray paint a nice curly tail , a snout and two beady eyes, then anonymously
phone the Guardian and declare “Banksy did it – it’s a work of art guv”.
- March 15, 2011 at 15:49
-
…and with all these windmills appearing all over the place, I’d suggest a
scaled down nuclear power station reactor dome erected on top of someones
premises would be a good laugh and might throw the local greens into panic
mode.
- March 15, 2011 at 22:05
-
Especially if it appeared to have blown open and was visibly
blackened…
- March 15, 2011 at 22:05
- March 15,
2011 at 14:26
-
They claim it doesn’t ‘detract from the local skyline’. Yeah, right.
Would it be irreligious to point out that it looks like a pimple on a pig’s
a**e?
{ 5 comments }