Wilfred De’Ath – One Hypocritical Old Goat.
So the first of the Yewtree branches has crashed to the ground, a sound virtually unheard in the forest of bad news today.
The ‘famous actress’ (I had to look her up such a household name was she…) (we are not allowed to mention her name – her publicist must be devastated) who alleged that Wilfred De’Ath (I definitely had to look him up) might have fondled her when she might have been a teenager in it might have been a cinema, has decided to withdraw her allegation. She still maintains it is true, but feels that she will be lonely in court, since no one else has come forward with similar allegations about the same man. She only came forward to Yewtree, she says, in the hope that it might give others the courage to come forward.
She is of course, an employee of ITV, the company which paid Mark Williams-Thomas to make the ‘Exposure’ programme, on which Wilfred De’Ath was such a willing witness against the ‘disgusting behaviour’ of Jimmy Savile.
De’Ath can now be heard complaining bitterly about the hardship that is felt by the man ‘dragged from his home at 7am’ by seven policeman on the strength of ‘spurious allegations’ – an event that was naturally leaked to the press. Why it was Remembrance Sunday, and he was on his way to take the collection at Church….how could anybody think such a thing about such a charitable individual?
Probably in the same way that he could cheerfully report – when prompted by being dragged from the unknown to appear as star witness in the ‘Exposure’ programme, that one ‘knew for a fact’ that Savile had spent the night in a flat with a girl who was no more than 12 ‘or probably 10′. Apparently one can tell the age of a girl that one has only seen for a few moments with remarkable accuracy, for De’Ath, who has in the past cheerfully described himself as a ‘sexual predator’ – that is himself, not Savile! – is equally sure that the ‘hundreds of girls’ that he has slept with over the years were all over 16. Did they have their date of birth tattooed on their forehead Wilfred?
He now claims that he was ‘so frightened of Savile’ – ‘He was a very intimidating physical presence. He had been a boxer and a wrestler … and he was in with some very, very rough people’ – that even though he was a father of a young daughter himself, he couldn’t possibly have reported this event to the Police. So frightened, that he chose to tackle Savile in person the next morning?
He says that the Police ’failed miserably’ when they ‘could have’ got Savile, by failing to act on the very same sort of spurious allegations that he now complains he is the victim of.
In fact, he believes that Operation Yewtree ‘ has gone too far’, and agrees with Jim Davidson that ‘it is getting silly now’.
Coming from the man who was only too ready to take an appearance fee and walk the corridors of ITV one last time (such a refreshing change from his lonely bed sit in Cambridge) and see Savile’s reputation trashed by ‘spurious allegations’ that will never be tested, he should count himself lucky that nobody had ever heard of him until this – a more famous name would certainly have tempted a few other ladies from the wood work – his outburst is the most unmitigated piece of rank hypocrisy I have heard this year.
The daft old goat would have served himself better by keeping his mouth shut.
When I saw the Exposure programme, I formed the opinion that De’Ath was a bitter and jealous man. Now I’m convinced. It must be quite galling to find yourself the centre of all this publicity and no one, but no one, wants to claim that you ever groped them….
Back to your seedy bed-sit Wilfred. You’ve served your purpose.
Edited by Anna: Since posting this, I have seen two further posts by Moor Larkin and Chris Barratt, that are perfect examples of the art of blogging. Beautifully researched and written, they are essential reading for anyone following the trail of disingenuous ‘witnesses’ to the Savile saga.
Moor Larkin: http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/exposition-pt2.html
Chris Barratt: http://chrisbarratt.wordpress.com/2013/03/26/yew-turn-sudden-death/
Both fine examples of the sort of investigative work that the main stream media should be doing – but are failing to do so, for their own reasons. Do take the time to read them.
March 30, 2013 at 11:38
-
Thanks Mewsical and Rocky Raccoon for the info. Rocky R, which illustrated
news are you referring to ? Now, this is the sort of investigating yewtree
should have done on allegations (maybe they did but I doubt it !).
Here’s what I think will happen with this whole yewtree polarva eventually
altho the seeds are there already, the waste of money angle will be trumpeted
from here to kingdom come, the investigations will be dropped but Jimmy will
still be a ‘pred’ p …….(can’t bring myself to say it!). All the other’s will
be vindicated because their alive (for the moment that is !) but Jim will
still be monster incorporated ! Although some of us will still be there doing
the right thing. Nice work everyone, it’s such a pleasure to find some
intelligent life forms for a change !
- March 29,
2013 at 19:37
-
They’re going to rope in the Duke of Edinburgh, and the entire Royal family
I’m sure.
-
March 29, 2013 at 18:49
-
A certain blog is claiming that revelations to come will be ‘bigger than
Watergate’. And he is perfectly serious, claiming confidential
sources.
Fetch the popcorn please!
- March 29,
2013 at 16:20
-
One of my Australian friends on Facebook – her father was a well-known
comedian in the UK in the 50s and 60s and she’s a respected writer/producer –
is outraged that Rolf is involved in this. She immediately said that she
“knows” that Savile was a pedophile. I responded with some information and a
link to this blog.
- March 29, 2013 at 09:52
-
This’ll be interesting – someone alive and allegedly, beyond reproach – is
it true he lives in grace and favour ? The ickkies will be having a field day
!!
-
March 29, 2013 at 09:10
-
So now it’s Rolf. I know he was questioned once before but Thursday he was
actually arrested, although as yet not charged so I hear.
Is anyone’s
elderly relative safe? Only if they were never a celebrity, I suspect.
-
March 29, 2013 at 09:30
-
Its so interesting to note how opposed to this particular arrest so many
of the avid ‘supporters of yewtree’ are. Shows its true pitchforking when
they distinguish between those they like and those they don’t.
-
March 28, 2013 at 22:49
-
Have you been watching the ‘#paedobritain event on twitter? Spawned from
the Icke Savile thread and organised from an Ickey-Likey blog and involving
mostly posters who consider themselves ‘Friends of Anders’. Quite the most
libelous and over the top event for oooohhh, several weeks. Anyone hashtagging
#BrassEye was likely to be shot down in flames by a barrage of righteous
indignation.
I was amazed to see that MWT failed to put in an
appearance.
- March
29, 2013 at 00:21
-
If the only supporters that MWT has left are a bunch of Ickey-ites, he’s
jumped the shark. That’s not what he was after, I don’t think. LOL!
- March 28, 2013 at 17:38
-
Mewsical,
Re: “It’s come too late and police are arresting the wrong people. The
police feel so humiliated by their lamentable failure to get Savile that they
have come after all of us. You can tell in their faces how embarrassed they
are”
That’s a bit rich coming from him, if his account is to be believed, he was
sitting on important information for nearly 50 years, while most others have
claimed to have had no knowledge of Savile’s paedophilia. Silly man….
- March 28,
2013 at 16:20
-
From Wilf’s interview with the Sun: ” He added: “It’s come too late and
police are arresting the wrong people.
“The police feel so humiliated by
their lamentable failure to get Savile that they have come after all of us.
You can tell in their faces how embarrassed they are.“They are desperate to
get somebody and I just got caught up in the net.” Other top names arrested
and bailed in the inquiry include funnymen Freddie Starr and Jim Davidson,
former Radio 1 favourite Dave Lee Travis and PR guru Max Clifford — who all
deny wrongdoing.
Also held was convicted pop pervert Gary Glitter.
Crown
prosecutors recently revealed plans for further arrests of “very high-profile”
suspects.
However, a report by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary
has slammed cops for failing to probe claims against Savile dating back almost
50 years.”
And while you’re at it, how about finding Jack the Ripper? Yes, I bet
they’re embarrassed at having to take part in this tomfoolery to begin with,
and probably wish they didn’t have to do any of it. It’s a completely stupid
waste of money and police resources, and ultimately is going to lead
absolutely nowhere, except to MWT’s bank account.
- March 28, 2013 at 10:07
-
If anyone comes across dates etc of when JS was definately somewhere that
can be verified can they maybe either send it to me or bookmark the event.
It’s amazing what you can find out. Let’s focus on the period ‘tween 1968 and
1978 the so called ‘peak’ of his ‘performances’ as it were !
- March
28, 2013 at 16:35
-
Well, we know that he was at Duncroft for the first time in May 1974,
which is when he signed the guest book and then attended a fund-raising
garden party, along with Princess Alexandra. I believe Moor has noted the
exact date for that one. JS came to Duncroft via a recommendation from the
mother of one of the girls, which we pretty much all know, but the mother
worked at Broadmoor, which is not so well-known. Surely, if he’d been
creeping the corridors at Broadmoor and making a nuisance of himself, she
would NOT have suggested that he come to Duncroft to interfere with a group
of underage girls.
- March 30, 2013 at 11:20
-
You are Incorrect with your statement. I have written proof from my
file that states he visited around the 26th Feb 1974. He may well have
signed the VISITORS book in May 74 and that may be the first time he
signed it, but I can assure you and I do have documented proof that the
visited before that date. Your information is incorrect.
-
March 30, 2013 at 11:43
-
Carol Bonington
I would love to see any proof you have of
anything. It would be so helpful to the investigation. However, I note
you say ‘visited around’ a certain date. Sorry, but whilst that sort of
info might be useful to the yewtree crap it is NOT good enough for truth
seekers !
- March 28, 2013 at 16:51
-
The following was reported in the Illustrated News….
18 Nov 1969 Ran 27 miles from Skipton to Leeds
19 Nov 1969 at 2:30am Putting away porter’s uniform at Leeds
Infirmiry
Called on his wrestling trainer
Drove almost 200 miles,
slept in his mobile caravan at an M1 transport cafe
Made 2 radio
broadcasts, wrote and delivered a commercial
Discussed a forthcoming Toc
H brochure
Met people presenting a car to a handicapped person
Crowned
a beauty queen
Accepted a lectureship at the Regent Street
Polytechnic
Wrote his Sunday newspaper column, read & answered some
of his mail
Went to a restaurant
Drove round London looking for a 10
Hr meter, where he parked.
- March 28, 2013 at 09:36
-
Willy The Weasel is stoking the Savile Bonfire in The Sun today with more
bitter twisted bullshit
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4863409/jimmy-savile-probe-producer-wilfred-death-points-finger-at-bbc.html
Jonathan King is furious at Walter Mitty bringing him into the anti-BBC
fairystory. I wonder how much “expenses” he’s getting from Murdoch’s Vultures
to keep his bedsit going?
-
March 28, 2013 at 10:01
-
Chris Barratt
This silly old git’s gonna talk himself into another arrest ! So they
were all ‘at it’ – why pick on Jimmy Savile then. This sort of crap will
ultimately lead to our advantage !
- March 27, 2013 at 20:05
-
Hey, fantastic stuff from various contributors.
@Moor Larkin – wow your
blog is getting good, you’ve really been sharpening your knives. Hope Spindler
is looking in, he could use some detection tips.
@rabbitaway – agree
totally with a comment of yours on Moor’s blog: If only the BBC had stood up
for themselves, look what a fantastic ‘exposure of Exposure’ they could have
broadcast.
-
March 27, 2013 at 21:51
-
Mina Field Thanks for that I’ve been travelling today – so I need to
catch up with Moor’s latest gems !
- March 27, 2013 at 18:33
-
@ Moor re. Part 6. I can’t find your comment as the posts are out of order,
but everyone should read it. Very good work, again.
Btw, you are correct regarding the architecture of the BBC – at least in
the TotP area. Just a big circle going around. It was very quiet, I remember
that. The bands did go on one at a time. It didn’t last all day at all. We
went in around 1 pm, met with our clients in a very sparse dressing room who
were waiting to be called to the set, then as we were leaving, met some
American musicians, who were also appearing, had a meal with them at the
commissary and then took off. It was maybe 4 pm. Everyone else was on the set.
The corridors were deserted, nothing but closed doors and silence. This is a
good link describing the history of TotP and how the show was put together. http://asithappens.hubpages.com/hub/Top-Of-The-Pops-In-The-1960s
- March 27, 2013 at 12:22
-
Well it looks like De’ath won’t be the only one that is not charged….
Nice to know that it’s only wasted £1 million of our tax payers money!!
- March 27, 2013 at 12:24
-
I recall they spent £7M digging up coconuts in jersey.
- March 27, 2013 at 15:05
-
Could this be the Yewtree theme DLT is introducing here?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EF_O1Mcwi1w
-
March 27, 2013 at 19:04
-
Moor Larkin,
At least the digging up coconuts was possibly well intentioned, despite
the extravagant expenses etc, lol
I’m not sure the Jimmy Savile
documentary that sparked off operation Yewtree is well intentioned
though….
Thats 10 days Mark Williams Thomas hasn’t posted on Twitter now….
- March 27, 2013 at 19:19
-
Wellwisher,
Re: “Speculation mounting that Freddie Starr won’t be charged either”
Can that really be a surprise to anyone who’s heard Karin Ward’s
allegations? lol
And the papers are STILL reporting her as having been 14 at the Clunk
Click filming with Freddie Starr, surely the police have got to be aware of
the real age she was? It would be very worrying if they weren’t….
- March 28, 2013 at 09:14
-
If the case against Freddie Starr is dropped, will the CPS reveal it is
due to the age of the complainant or just say ‘not enough evidence’ and
leave it to the press to reveal with outrage in an exclusive interview
with Starr, that he’d not committed a crime due to the complainants
age.
-
March 28, 2013 at 09:41
-
Rocky Raccoon,
Re: “If the case against Freddie Starr is dropped, will the CPS
reveal it is due to the age of the complainant or just say ‘not enough
evidence’ and leave it to the press to reveal with outrage in an
exclusive interview with Starr, that he’d not committed a crime due to
the complainants age”
It should be both shouldn’t it, lack of evidence, flaws in her story,
I suppose if she didn’t concent to having her bum ‘groped’, then it’s
still non – concenial even if she was 16, and I think the age of
‘concent’ of 16 only applied to sexual intercourse before 2003 – though
I suppose they could maybe still take into account that before 16 you
legally considered a ‘child’ and after an ‘adult’, in considering how
seriously to take the complaint.
But there are flaws in her story and no witnesses have come forward
to an event that she said happened in front of quite a few people in
Jimmy Savile’s dressing room.
And at the end of the day, all I can really see she has accused him
of is grabbing her bum 38 years ago, hardly a serious sex attack? And
the evidence seems to go against the allegation….
- March 28, 2013 at
14:14
-
Having read Karin Ward’s account on her book site before it was
locked away and edited I think she may have been more upset by remarks
about her breasts, as in her book she recounted another incident at a
local firm where comments were also made about her breasts. Unless I’m
missing something there may not have been any physical contact as the
various accounts talk of ‘attemped to grop’ or attempted to grab her
breast and buttocks’.
When aged 54, one newspaper began a report thus….
‘The day comedian Freddie Starr appeared on Jimmy Savile’s Saturday
night variety show Clunk Click, 15-year-old Karin Ward couldn’t have
been more starstruck.’
Yesterday the same paper….
‘And speculation was mounting last night that Freddie Starr would
soon be told that he, too, will not be charged over claims he
attempted to grope a 14-year-old in Savile’s BBC changing room in
1974.’
Considering the nature of the allegation made public, the age of 14
becomes an important factor as to whether a crime has been
committed.
- March 28, 2013 at 09:48
-
I suspect Karin was under 16 at the time of the show; it’s just that
she was not 14. But she would still have been under-age. Presumably the
possible sentence for the one-off fumbling alleged would be pretty minor
anyway, so clearly not worth pursuing anyway.
Glitter/Gadd is accused of a much more serious crime, and he has
*form* so I wonder if we will finally get to see…. http://vimeo.com/13324887
-
March 28, 2013 at 11:43
-
Moor Larkin,
Re: “I suspect Karin was under 16 at the time of the show; it’s
just that she was not 14. But she would still have been under-age.
Presumably the possible sentence for the one-off fumbling alleged
would be pretty minor anyway, so clearly not worth pursuing
anyway.Glitter/Gadd is accused of a much more serious crime, and he
has *form* so I wonder if we will finally get to
see…. http://vimeo.com/13324887″
Well, with regard to the Freddie Starr accusation, I think it all
depends how far in advance ‘Clunk Click’ was filmed, I suspect not
that far in advance, maybe a week? I don’t know, but the Freddie Starr
episode appears to have aired on 27/4/74 and Karin Wards date of birth
appears to be 25/3/58 so by the time it was aired she would have be 16
by a month, how old she was a filming depends how far in advance it
was filmed obviously, but I think there is a good chance she could
have turned 16 by then. Of course we are quibbling about days and
weeks here which seems silly in real terms, but would maybe make a
difference to how the law viewed it, if she was legally still, albeit
by a few days, considered a ‘minor’ – but my moneys on 16 for the
Freddie Starr show – £10, lol….
With Paul Gadd (Gary Glitter), have they found this alleged
‘victim’? Because if not how can they know what age she was, if Karin
Ward can’t even remember the girls name or how old she herself would
have been at the time? Let alone whether the girl even actually
exists.
And again, Karin Ward has painted a senario, where she was not the
only person present as this was allegedly going on, so if true, there
should be other witnesses. Have any come forward or been found? If
not, unless the publicity surrounding it has inspired more accusations
against him, i’d be surprised if Gary Glitter was charged either
myself….
- March 28, 2013 at 11:47
-
@ Lucozade
You knew more than I did, but now I know what you have told me…..
-
March 28, 2013 at 12:27
-
Moor Larkin,
Happy belated birthday Karin
- March 28, 2013 at 12:37
-
I suppose she must find it quite flattering that people think she’s
only 53…….
-
March 27, 2013 at 10:08
-
Best bit of news I’ve heard, in a while, that the fraudster D’eath found
not guilty. I do not wish you success next time round Yewtree.
- March 26, 2013 at 21:11
-
@Lucozade ‘does he work for the police ?’
Nah he’s a superstar
journalist with his own web site – you could possibly hire him as an after
dinner speaker – he used to be a copper tho’. Anna has written lots about him
inprevious posts. I personally find him hard to watch since ‘exposure pt 2′
……’we now know that Jimmy Savile was a preditory p…….’ and all that nonsense
!
-
March 26, 2013 at 23:02
-
@rabbitaway
I personally can’t stand to look at him at all now, gives
me the creeps. Karma, eh !
-
March 26, 2013 at 23:54
-
Mina Field I am going to force myself to re watch the crap inc the
BBC’s contribution ‘what the BBC knew’ …..what a bloody title !
- March 26, 2013 at 20:02
-
Never mind the bands check out the record breaking intercity 125 London to
Bristol Temple Meads 1984 with good old Jim !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HePvjFRlkHA
In the 30th August 1984 show …..!
-
March 26, 2013 at 20:06
-
OOPS wrong youtube vid try this GREAT !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lM-Lw85CkN4
- March 26, 2013 at 19:51
-
They had some good bands featured though, gotta give Jimmy that much! I was
more of a Ready, Steady, Go! fan myself though.
- March 26, 2013 at 19:11
-
Any fans of the much-maligned Top Of The Pops here?
I also write a TOTP
blog covering the BBC4 repeats, a bit of a hot potato in these days of
bullshit..
http://itstotp.blogspot.co.uk/?view=flipcard
- March 26, 2013 at 19:37
-
“Any fans of the much-maligned Top Of The Pops here?”
Most definitely not, TOTP was another piece of crap from the ‘golden age’
of British television that is best forgotten…
-
March 26, 2013 at 20:01
-
Speak for yourself, I’m going to delve into some of those from the 70s
which, for some reason my dad always watched with me, mostly making just
whatever was the 70s equivalent of WTF-type noises. It will be like having
him back again.
Thanks Chris.
- March 27, 2013 at 10:40
-
I loved it.
-
March 26, 2013 at 19:56
-
@Chris Barratt
Yay, thank you. Just spent half an hour with happy 1968
memories. First time I’ve heard or thought of ‘The Fire Brigade’ since then,
when I drove everyone mad by going around singing it continuously – I was
9.
Help, someone call the police, JS made a quip about the cameraman
ogling young ladies’ legs. Couldn’t help noticing though that the very last
shot showed him scarpering away from everyone, including the excited girls
who had looked keen to try and catch a word.
- March 26, 2013 at 18:34
-
In the Exposure programme Wilfred De’Ath said the girl with Savile was 12
but could have been 13 – 14 years old, also the hotel was the Ascot. The
programme provided a B&W picture of a row of properties, possibly one them
was the Ascot, we aren’t told.
By the end of October the waif was ‘tops 12, between 9 and 12′. The
restaurant was a seedy celebrity haunt with Michael Caine & Terence Stamp
living round the corner. The hotel had become the Mascot just of Baker Street,
today I learnt it was number 8 York Street and doesn’t seem to match the photo
used in the photo.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01043bm
I did wonder if this was the girl Wilfred saw as she looked very young and
was said to be 6 and a half stone, but her story doesn’t tally with
Wilfred’s.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2212032/Jimmy-Savile-raped-I-16-year-old-virgin-mother-illegal-abortion.html
- March 27, 2013 at 10:39
-
In The Sun now she’s 10 according to the Kiss of De’Ath, AKA The World’s
Greatest Reprobate.
Times may have been different but not where a 10 year
old in your hotel room overnight is concerned.
Even for Savile, The Most
Powerful Man In Britain.
-
March 28, 2013 at 13:11
-
Oscar,
Re: “Times may have been different but not where a 10 year old in your
hotel room overnight is concerned.Even for Savile, The Most Powerful Man
In Britain”
It’s just not believable at all, and he is alleged to have met this kid
on Totps? I don’t know what the rules were but I very much doubt a 10 year
old would have been allowed in unaccompanied by an adult if they were
allowed in at all, nor would they have had the money or where with all to
go to Totps without the assistance of an adult (I suspect, given from what
i’ve seen from clips, 10 years olds weren’t allowed in, though under 16′s
over a certain age were before 1971).
And if this kid came from any sort of normal home, would they not have
been reported missing, having headed all the way from Manchester to London
and stayed over night?
I doubt the old “i’m staying at a friends”, trick works with 10 year
olds!!!
This man is obviously telling lies, lol….
- March 27, 2013 at 17:14
-
Just read the story about the unnamed 16 y.o. – what a load of cobblers!
This quote is hilarious “She has bravely agreed to release photographs of
herself as a teenager, to show how she looked when Savile assaulted her –
but she wishes to remain anonymous because she has never told her children
what happened.” Yes, right, so now Mummy’s photos from when she was a
teenager, which we’ve seen many times, are all over the gutter press, but we
don’t know who that is. And “The woman, who lives in a smart detached house,
confided in her husband about the rape, but kept it from friends and
family.” So, correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t her husband a member of her
family?? I was also amused to note that she kept the Elvis souvenirs,
despite the fact her rapist gave them to her. Then, off she goes to Top of
the Pops as a background model, wearing tight hot pants, etc. despite
knowing full well who the m.c. was, and I assume having the right to tell
her agency she didn’t have any INTENTION of going within a country mile of
Savile.
Then, there’s that dumkopf Roberts still being featured in a separate
little sidebar after the piece. That should be an indication of how much
veracity Ms. Unnamed is exhibiting. One more for the liars’ gallery.
- March 27, 2013 at 17:26
-
@mewsical
I get the feeling you may enjoy my Pt.6………
http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/exposition-pt6.html
-
March 27, 2013 at 19:45
-
Mewsical,
Re: “Just read the story about the unnamed 16 y.o. – what a load of
cobblers! This quote is hilarious “She has bravely agreed to release
photographs of herself as a teenager, to show how she looked when Savile
assaulted her – but she wishes to remain anonymous because she has never
told her children what happened.” Yes, right, so now Mummy’s photos from
when she was a teenager, which we’ve seen many times, are all over the
gutter press, but we don’t know who that is”
They really haven’t thought this through have they? lol
If they are gonna lie they could at least think about whether the lies
make sense or not. Ok, the face is blocked out, but they will still
probably have seen the rest of the picture of mum with Jimmy Savile before
(if it was actually her). I wonder if it’s even her in the picture…?
- March 26, 2013 at 18:23
-
Where is everyone’s favourite paedo man anyway? Just noticed he abruptly
stopped twittering on 17th March. Too much to hope he’s been arrested himself,
I suppose.
- March 26, 2013 at 18:40
-
Mina Field,
Re: “Too much to hope he’s been arrested himself, I suppose”
Maybe someone e.g his employers or the police, have finally told him to
put a sock in it because their fed up with the trouble it causes – it’s not
really like most of what he says is true anyway and what is it with all
these David Icke fans he attracts?
What is Mark Williams-Thomas’s job again?
-
March 26, 2013 at 18:50
-
@Lucozade
I’m not getting my hopes up. He hasn’t any employers or a
job, he’s self-employed, promoting either child molestation or himself,
whichever pays the most.
-
March 26, 2013 at 19:50
-
He’s busy ……
Mark Williams-Thomas, the child protection expert who exposed Jimmy
Savile, has offered to help catch an alleged establishment paedophile ring
that used its connections to escape justice decades ago.
In an interview with The Independent, Mr Williams-Thomas said: “If you
don’t feel confident talking to the police, then tell me, because when I
tell the police your information will be acted upon.
”He spoke with
approval of the “landslide” in the response to child sexual abuse which
followed the screening last October of Exposure: the Other Side of Jimmy
Savile, which exposed the late TV presenter and disc jockey as an
opportunistic sexual predator.
-
March 26, 2013 at 19:54
-
‘……because when I tell the police your information will be acted
upon’
Does this mean anyone else will be ignored …….Can this guy’s
head get any bigger ?
-
March 26, 2013 at 20:26
-
Rabbitaway,
Does he work for the police?
-
March 26, 2013 at 22:02
-
Yeah, Mark, a landslide of dodgy attention-seekers, very much like
yourself. Apparently, Meirion Jones is also still hand in glove,
sneaking about trying to get information for money. Is there no end to
this??
- March 26, 2013 at 19:00
-
Perhaps he realizes that the sport of paedo-hunting is not as
popular/profitable as it once was.
- March 27, 2013 at 10:36
-
well seeing he only got 900 quid from the BBC , I doubt it is an
on-going profitable enterprise.
Besides I reckon the compo quid is
going to hid a wall at some stage.
-
March 28, 2013 at 00:29
-
Oscar, that was five hundred pounds, and that was only his fee for
consulting on the first Newsnight show. He’s made plenty o’ moolah at
this point, especially for the Exposed thingy, let alone his compatriot
Jones was lately in the company of a notorious blogger who shall be
nameless here, but the obsession continues. I would highly recommend
that both Jones and Williams-Thomas stop listening to anyone who follows
the dubious Mr. Icke, and realize that this is nothing more than what
even the press are waking up to, a celebrity witch-hunt. Savile was a
great target, because he’s dead and can’t fight back, but it appears
that he has left some people behind who are capable of independent,
logical and informed thinking, and though the waters are still murky,
they are a lot clearer than in October. This is not about protecting
children, this is about making money. Why these two are shaking the
bushes regarding incidents that occurred yeeeeaaaaarrs ago? It’s not
skewed towards what is happening to children here and now. And not at
the hands of celebrities, but at the hands of anonymous thousands of
mostly men, using the internet to trawl for victims. Why doesn’t the
intrepid MWT pose as a 14 year old girl on line, lay a trap and then, on
camera, confront the abuser. We did that here in US, and very effective
it was. The police cooperated with this show, and arrested these
sleaze-bags on the air. Come on Mark and Meirion, this is the way to
protect children, not what you’re doing.
- March 28, 2013 at 09:40
-
@ Mewsical
A copycat show to the one you speak of, was exactly how MWT got
into the business in the first place.
“To Catch a Paedophile
Child protection expert and former
policeman, Mark Williams-Thomas, follows officers in the Metropolitan
Police’s Paedophile Unit. Detectives go into internet chat rooms
posing as teenage girls and investigate the startling number of
paedophiles trawling for images and sex. The programme reveals the
disturbing exchanges and tricks that the men use to entice children to
show nude pictures of themselves and meet up for sex.”
First Aired:
September 22, 2009
- March
28, 2013 at 10:15
-
Mewsical – you’re spot on their – it’s ONLY about money. As I said
in a previous post, had any of the cowards really been interested in
protecting anyone they’d have pursued Jimmy a long time ago ! Na, they
did not have any evidence then or now it seems ! As for that tv
program in America, do you not find that disturbing how they make
entertainment out of setting up and catching these losers ?
-
March 28, 2013 at 12:09
-
Rabbitaway,
Re: “As for that tv program in America, do you not find that
disturbing how they make entertainment out of setting up and catching
these losers?”
“They don’t need punishment, they need GUNISHMENT!!!” (Brass eye),
lol
If there was a programme like that, which I know there has been,
cos i’ve seen it, I would not want the likes of Mark Williams Thomas
or Meirion Jones having anything to do with it because they would
sensationalise it and remove the issue away from reality.
14 year olds are not so stupid that they cannot be taught or
encouraged to just say no, if a dodgy guy asks for nudey pictures or
if they want to meet up on line.
Can they not be taught this stuff in schools in social education
instead of watching it on senational trashy television programmes? Can
they not entrap predators withour turning it into television for our
amusement and trying to scare certain members of the public into
thinking the problem is far graver and more likely to happen than it
is?
- March 26, 2013 at 18:17
-
As Anna says, the hypocrisy is a wonder to behold. How I laughed when I
read that it had been ‘distressing’ for him. Fantastic stuff from the blogs of
Moor and Chris Barrett too.
- March 26, 2013 at 16:40
-
1.0 out of 5 stars An unpleasant book about an unpleasant life, 4 Mar
2013
By
Mrs. Mary Fisher “Mary” (Leeds, Yorkshire, England) – See all my
reviews
(REAL NAME)
Amazon Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This
review is from: Down & Out: The Collected Writings of the Oldie Columnist
Wilfred De’Ath (Hardcover)
The author seems to take pride in lying,
cheating, stealing and being dirty and unkempt. It wasn’t even funny. I can’t
think why it was promoted.
Help other customers find the most helpful
reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No
Report abuse
Permalink
Comment Comment
- March 26, 2013 at 16:38
-
I’m so NOT interested in people who whimper on about things that happened
forty bloody years ago, especially when they take money to do so. The day that
MWT and his dubious side-kick Mr. Jones can get anyone to speak with them
without crossing their wrinkled little palms with silver, I’m listening. Still
waiting.
- March 26, 2013 at 16:21
-
I was a young and nubile actress when I came across WD – ’nuff said; there
should be plenty of us in the woodwork who remember his dubious
attentions….
- March 26, 2013 at 16:07
-
Hurrah – back to Jimmy again ! You would have thought old MWT would have
looked into the background of one of his ‘witnesses’ ! Just one amongst a list
of sad f**K’s jumping on the gravy train without a ticket ! Oh well, anything
that casts any kind of doubts on the credibility of the case against Sir Jim
is good enough for me.
- March 26, 2013 at 16:10
-
Actually, I’d rather some of the witnesses had looked into the background
of self described ‘child-protection expert’ before getting themselves
tangled up with him.
-
March 26, 2013 at 16:20
-
@Anna – I am and always will be a great believer in Karma ! It does not
have to be the John Lennon variety – it get’s there in the end !
-
March 28, 2013 at 00:01
-
“The mills of God grind slowly, but they grind exceeding small.” I
believe that, over time, the truth will come out.
- March 26, 2013 at 15:57
-
De’Ath is, of course, a convicted criminal (fraud, if I remember rightly)
who once wrote an article for the Spectator about his experience of living in
a bail hostel.
A friend of mine (now deceased) who offered him hospitality in Oxford came
to count the cost not only by being maligned in a draft book by De’Ath but
also financially to the tune of several thousand pounds that he lent him and
never got back.
Being an Oxford man (Oriel) he must be feeling very much an exile in
Cambridge.
-
March 26, 2013 at 15:53
-
Moor Larkin has a fine posting about Mr Death:
http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/exposition-pt2.html
There is apparently an unpublished autobiography that suggests he might –
you will be astonished to hear this – be a Walter Mitty:
http://www.pickabook.co.uk/bookdetails.aspx?ISBN=9781857252248
“A self-confessed voyeur who was recruited by MI5 to befriend a Russian spy
at an orgy, De’Ath was a sexual predator whose victims included Susanna York,
Sarah Miles, Julie Christie, Julia Foster and Charlotte Rampling”
- March 26, 2013 at 15:57
- March 26, 2013 at 16:08
- March 26, 2013 at 17:25
-
” a memoir by England’s best-loved reprobate.”. Crikey. No-one seems to
know who he is.
This got a chortle from me though :
“young Wilfred had
to endure the spectacle of his mother giving Nazi salutes and shouting ‘Heil
Hitler!’ to her friend and compatriot, Mrs Maybury”
they all sound
barking mad.
- March 26, 2013 at 23:17
-
Thanks for the mentions.
I’m convinced Val and Angie – the two
mysterious TotP teenyboppers from Exposure, claimed to be from 1968/69, are
actually two of the Duncroft lot dressed up.
See what you make of
it.
http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/exposition-pt4.html
-
March 26, 2013 at 23:44
-
Moor Larkin,
Re: “I’m convinced Val and Angie – the two mysterious TotP teenyboppers
from Exposure, claimed to be from 1968/69, are actually two of the
Duncroft lot dressed up”
Well, there was a newspaper report back in January that said all 5
women were ex-Duncroft residents and Mark Williams Thomas posted a link to
it on his Twitter page and never denied or tried to correct that
information.
If they were all from Duncroft why didn’t he just present them as that
in the programme?
Like I need ask, lol….
- March 27, 2013 at 11:00
-
@ Lucozade
You might like Pt.5 too.
- March 27, 2013 at 11:01
-
Here’s the Link to make it easier…….
http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/exposition-pt5.html
- March 26, 2013 at 15:46
-
O wilfred, where is thy st’ing?
-
March 26, 2013 at 15:43
-
You couldn’t make it up. Sorry, sorry, I’ll get me coat.
- March 26, 2013 at
15:42
-
The ole “that’s how it was gov” excuse again eh?. Not fit for earth worms I
say
- March 26, 2013 at 15:37
-
Great minds an’ that….
http://chrisbarratt.wordpress.com/2013/03/26/yew-turn-sudden-death/
- March 26, 2013 at 15:55
{ 87 comments }