I should be hard pressed to imagine anything less interesting than the tax affairs of one Jimmy Carr*, a comedian â so Iâm told â of whom I had never heard till about two days ago, but, as they seem to be occupying the trivial frontal lobes of those that run the United Kingdom since the War, let me add my two-pennyworth.
I didnât imagine Mr. Heathâs making an even bigger fool of himself than he had already in the course of two years as First Lord of the Treasury but I believe that, in pontificating about Mr. Carrâs tax arrangements, he has.
Mr. Carr is well within his rights and bound by simple logic, I shouldâve thought, to minimize his tax burden. Indeed, were he director of a company of which I was a stockholder, Iâd be sorely grieved if he failed to minimize the companyâs tax liability and might even bring an action against him for squandering the companyâs commonwealth.
That some tax-payers can engage in such tax avoidance and others not is not âunfairâ : like tax avoidance itself, it results solely from the complexity of taxation. The answer is blindingly obvious (one would think) : simplify the tax system and avoidance will vanish.
Unlike tax evasion, tax avoidance is entirely lawful and in no wise morally repugnant as suggested by the politicians : one is entitled so to arrange oneâs affairs as to minimize oneâs tax burden. Mr. Carr has as much right to the relief from taxation that his particular arrangements grant him as Mr. Heathâs father-in-law has to the subsidy â much more lucrative, I suspect â he receives in respect of the useless wind turbines on his land. So, borrowing another dictum from J.C., I say to Mr. Heath, âHe that is without sin among you, â¦â
* Interesting initials although, when J.C. recommended rendering unto Caesar, the other J.C. was long gone.