This is another subject that cannot actually be rationally discussed.
Any mention of âfactsâ will be met with an increasingly histrionic barrage of âcounter-factsâ and allegations of violent atrocity.
But the truth of the matter is that if you look at the relative attitude of the even the most aggressive Israeli government towards Palestine is one of cowering timidity compared to the recently-elected Hamas party in Palestine. And there are such difficult questions facing the behaviour of the Palestinian âestablishmentâ towards Israel.
Why is it acceptable for Hamas to vow that they will not stop until they have destroyed Israel, but unacceptable for Israel to respond to actual, physical Hamas aggression? Why is it wrong for Israel to launch air strikes against missile attacks? Why do a million Muslims enjoy the same freedoms and protections as Israelis in Israel, when a Jew cannot safely set foot in Palestine?
There have been times in the past where Iâve thought that Israelâs response was heavy-handed, but then, if I was the one facing random missile attacks, I wouldnât be thrilled to hear my Prime Minister say that we need to âshow restraintâ. Iâd be right there screaming for the protection of my family and myself.
And if you have a missile and you shoot it at one of the worldâs most heavily armed, most militarised societies, what exactly do you expect the response is going to be? Personally, I wouldnât dream of picking a fight with the Israelis because not only are they armed to the teeth, but theyâre very used to being in a fight.
It looks to me very much like an extreme case of politics to me. There is Palestinian leadership that is largely immune to the consequences of what they say. The âlittle peopleâ bear the brunt of rash words and actions, and nobody is genuinely accountable (on the Palestinian side) for inciting war and fomenting hatred. And of course, the use of fatwa and jihad to justify the provocation further excuse Hamas from almost anything. Itâs a self-feeding cycle.
No-one dares to censure the Palestinian authorities. Indeed, large swathes of the international community seem to positively endorse militant anti-Israel cant while vilifying the Israelis for anything they say or do.
I could understand if people criticised the Palestinian authorities for fomenting trouble, or allowing an area under their control to be used for acts of aggression against the Israelis and criticised the Israelis for excessively forceful responses. But it seems to me that that the lines are drawn and comment is only on one side or the other.
I wish someone would explain this awful, messy, unpleasant situation to me.