It seems to me that the only thing to do with control freaks is to accuse
them of being fascists and thus make them cry. Once they are in tears and you
have told them to f*** off they should be strung up from the lamposts and
burned to death with NAPALM to make sure it hurts!!!!
Then the rest of us
can get on with our lives……

There is a well researched website that goes into details about
anti-smoking from early on in the last century unto today called perhaps
smokershistory dot com (maybe, I cannot find the link). The highly detailed
research was assembled by someone called Carol (I forget the last name) and in
it she goes so far as to point out that the early popularization of smoking
campaigns promoted by tobacco companies would do things like sponsor social
events in NYC and invite all the wealthiest socialites to show up, everyone
wearing green. Originally, back then, “green” became synonomous with tobacco,
the exact same way today “green” has become synonomous with something else,
the exact opposite of tobacco smoking and free choice, but rather conformity
to anti-smoking healthist dictates and green/healthist/fascist/conformist
totalitarianism.

She then goes deeper into her research and discovers the names of some of
the philanthropic organizations that were financing these campaigns and
uncovers some of the same names then funding tobacco smoking soires as are
today funding anti-smoking eugenics and genocide pogroms, the YouTube campaign
being the latest assault on free speech under the guise of “saving the
children”.

Her conclusion is that tobacco control is not something new that just
popped up out of nowhere but it was quite carefully planned, from the very
beginning, to first promote the use of tobacco in order to later on, when it
became a political requirement for what is trying to establish itself as the
totalitarian mainstream ideology of today, have a scapegoat upon which it
could gain its energy, in the second phase.

Tying that in with reports also found online, including from University of
Chicago School of Cancer Research, on the Richard Doll affair of the 1950′s,
which diverted attention from all the truly harmful industries gaining steam
such as nuclear, chemical, asbestos, petroleum, pharmaceutical, others and
placing all “the blame” for the world’s ills on tobacco, it may be that “the
powers that be”, the elitists with the most money, control and intertwined
incestuous relationships among one another, may have purposefully set tobacco
up, in the early stages of the last century, for the express purpose of
bringing it all back down again, to create and maintain, vis-a-vis
anti-smoking, a constant sense of rage among the people, dead-set against “big
tobacco” (whom they set up) and “the smokers” – so that later on, in the final
phase, the majority of people would willingly permit what is fascist in nature
to ascend to maximum control and become the overriding legitimate ideology,
the one we see coming into sharp focus in this, the later times of a political
manipulation started nearly 100 years earlier.

The fact that it will soon be said that control of the internet, censorship
of ideas contrary to “the one party” in control and eventually forced
submission to abortion/euthanasia/eugenics/genocidal can be twisted into
something entirely “good” and that enough of a majority will believe, endorse
and support such a way of thinking, will bully it onto others non-complying,
could well be at the root of what anti-smoking is really about and one of the
most sublime magick tricks to be pulled off in plain daylight within full view
that the world has ever seen.

Control of the internet and censorship is not that far off as the
“news”papers have already been infiltrated and controlled for years now and
there is no way to imagine that tide turning anytime soon.

It is alarming that .0000000000000001% will become the new “danger” and
“risk” that will be used to force acceptance of the final stamping out of free
discussion and exchange of ideas in this world, but it is a battle for control
of the entire globe and high-stakes for those with the most to gain, the elite
within each culture, who need their antichrist to amalgamate the entire planet
under their iron fisted fascist regime.

Imagine the internet and mainstream broadcasts of the not too distant
future when anything sourced from free opinion and thought has been replaced
by the equivalent of the Romans feeding Christians to the lions, only in this
case it will be the elite of this age submitting “the smokers” to the death
squadrons of children indoctrinated into the belief system.

Oh wait, that is already the case, as per the Cig Busters video of youths
attacking “the smokers” out in public.

I predict bad times are coming, much worse than have been seen thus far. It
is happening in broad daylight too, in front of everyones’ eyes, much the way
it happened in the 1920′s and 30′s – and the greater majority will be lured
into supporting it, fearful for their own survival, like cattle driven into
the stockyards for the slaughter.

Anti-smoking is just the vehicle, upon which all this rest comes
riding.

As Ciaran said

“They have discovered a new

Abstract
Background The internet is an ideal forum for tobacco
marketing, as it is largely unregulated and there is no global governing body
for controlling content. Nevertheless, tobacco companies deny advertising on
the internet.
Specky says ..
So they want to close down the Forest
website and any other supporting civil liberties.
Objective To assess the
extent and nature of English language videos available on the Web 2.0 domain

Grab a grant: I like the sound of that.

I can see it now. A host of hi-viz garbed researchers interviewing every
fifth driver leaving the M4 at junction 15. “Sir, did you feel like a fag when
you read the sign for the junction?”

Expert reports for the public consultation on renaming the town. Local
economy impact research in the aftermath.

Lovely!

“163 video clips dared to say something like Marlborough in their
title…”

Something like it, yes. Like Marlboro.

Yep. Tobacco controllers are mad as a skipload of jelly beans, and possibly
suffering from mental health issues to boot.

Well done for spotting their odd definition of ‘significant’. They’ve been
describing null hypothesis studies as proving a ‘significant risk’ for
decades.