Aloo Vera!
Long time no here (sic)
Those were the days eh? When you were Solicitor-General and late at night the mood took you to try to slap down a humble blogger. Where are you now?
Ah! Pontypridd Magistrates Court.
Pontypridd? Along with all the errant husbands, the benefit cheats, the TV licence dodgers? Yep, that was you. Common or garden defendant, subject to the court’s orders. To think you used to order them around!
You put up a spirited display, I’ll give you that, all that expertise in Law, employed to try to wriggle out of from under the court’s powers.
Why you even tried to tell the magistrates their powers – not a good move that – I’ll warrant they had already checked up on them extensively – they knew who was going to be standing in the dock before them.
“But magistrates at Pontypridd, south Wales, dismissed her lengthy arguments after she admitted driving at 98mph on the M4 near Miskin.”
You see when Our Vera was still Solicitor-General, back in the good old days, when she could still orchestrate an appeal for her friend Lord Ahmed so his sentence for mowing down an innocent pedestrian ‘whilst not texting’ was overturned, our Vera took off to bring succour and cheer to another friend. In Swansea, at 98mph.
“I can only imagine that, almost at the end of the journey somewhere around Pontypridd, that I unfortunately went too fast.”
Our Vera had already been found guilty in her absence, but she wriggled out of that one by telling the Magistrates that she had never received the summons. You know how mail addressed to an MP does go missing…..amazing.
This time she turned up, and started by explaining the sentencing guidelines to the magistrates…..
“She informed them that they could impose between four and six penalty points or hand down a 28 day driving ban.”
Clever move Vera – she was asking for the ‘more serious’ 28 day ban. The last time she tried to explain sentencing guidelines to the judiciary, she was forced to apologise by the Lord Chancellor.
Whyfore? A sudden attack of Nu Liebore conscience. Not at all.
You see Our Vera already had seven licence points – and if they added the lighter sentence of five licence points to that she would end up with a six month ban not the 28 days ban she was asking for.
“Baird then took the stand in an attempt to save her licence by arguing the ban would cause “exceptional hardship”.
She said that, as the former MP for Redcar, she was still in the process of “winding up” her constituency work. “
I had to read that twice before it stopped looking as though it said ‘winding up her constituents’ – something she did so successfully that they kicked her out at the last election.
Mike Powell, prosecuting, asked whether she could afford to pay for taxis.
“It would come out of the Parliamentary winding-up allowance, unless I actually assume it on my own account, and there does not seem to be a lot of point in that, really.”
But the doughty Welsh magistrate, Liz Pearce (hats off to you Ms Pearce) was having none of it.
Liz Pearce, chairwoman of the magistrates, dismissed Baird’s exceptional hardship plea, saying it had not been proved from the evidence put before them.
She concluded by warning Baird: “From now on, do not do any car driving in any shape or form and please do not return to driving until you have your licence back.”
So that is the end of this tale. Ms Baird and her mangy pooch will be on the train for the next six months. Mind your step there now.
- June 26, 2010 at 15:38
-
Excellent bit of news!!!!! Let’s hope the C.P.S. prosecute that other man
hating feminazi bitch Harridan Harmsmen for her traffic offences and for being
a sexist cow….
-
June 26, 2010 at 03:53
-
Fantastic.
I just hope that Tory Central Office is reading these blogs – this is what
is in store if you wander off the straight and narrow.
Amazing how execrable Labour apparatchiks like Baird lost their ‘safe
seats’.
Be warned – behave like guttersnipe, expect to be washed down the
drain.
-
June 25, 2010 at 06:45
-
Oh for the PCO to have said “I know exactly who you are. Now get down with
the dog-shite where you belong”.
As to ZIL traffic lanes, she was travelling via London ? We HAVE such lanes
on the M4 already !
Alan Douglas
- June 24, 2010 at 22:51
-
I am not able to contribute, but … I had one of the best laughs of
today.
Thank you
- June 24, 2010 at 19:45
-
Unfortunately, as a ‘Banned’ driver, when she eventually gets a licence
back, her insurance premiums will rocket.
Oh dear.
-
June 24, 2010 at 18:37
-
Reap what you sow, you dreadful woman. (Not you Anna)
- June 24, 2010 at 16:38
-
NNNNNOOOOOOooooooo!
- June 24, 2010 at 16:26
-
AH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Couldn’t happen to a more deserving piece pf parliamentary dogshite.
Over-promoted and over-exaggerated sense of self-importance.
What goes around comes around. All those NuLabour bastards that screwed
this country will get theirs sooner or later…and well done to the magistrate
for not kow-towing to the apparatchik.
-
June 24, 2010 at 16:23
-
Don’t be shy, Veira. Drop in and tell us your side of the story.
We’re waiting…
- June 24, 2010 at 15:38
-
‘Ave it!
Hope she sits in on a bus seat soaked in tramp’s piss.
-
June 24, 2010 at 15:12
-
Crashing to reality with a massive bump.
The best ‘don’t you know who I was’ story of the week.
- June 24, 2010 at 14:37
-
A Doctor writes:
Recent medical research has confirmed what anecdote has long suggested.
Namely, that those who occupied high office in the New Labour machine have a
different structure to their DNA to the rest of the Human Race.
The altered sequence manifest itself in various ways. Typical aspects of
behavior include a faulty memory so that, for example, a minister may not be
able to accurately remember facts or manifesto promises, or indeed an ex law
officer may not be able to recall receiving a summons in the post. Researchers
believe that other traits exhibited by those possessed of the altered code
include extreme bossiness, manifesting itself in the compulsion to tell
everyone else what to do and how to do it, a pathological belief in their own
self importance and rectitude, and a compulsion to amass vast wealth by
obtaining highly paid public office which the subject is spectacularly unfit
to hold, such as Prime Minister, Foreign Secretary or Solicitor General. Other
typical aspect of behaviour include:
– the tendancy to live in affluent,
middle class areas
– inter marrying with those with the same New Labour
Gene,
– the prediliction to educate the evil spawn of their unspeakably
diabolical matings privately
Other physical manifestations of the altered gene code include an
incredibly thick skin, and often a hectoring or patronising tone of voice and
sinister manner such as might be adopted by a nurse in a Nazi Death Camp, this
often being referred to as “Yvette Cooper’s Condition”.
In another breakthrough, it is believed that the New Labour Gene may well
be strongly linked to “Attention To the Hyper Deficit Disorder” , or ATHDD.
Until recently this diagnosis was controversial because no one could
realistically believe either that such a huge public spending deficit existed,
or that if it did exist there were no sensible plans to deal with it. However,
recent tests on a patient known only as “GB” has shown that the syndrome does
indeed exist, with the patient completely unable to recognise that the nations
finances are in technical medical terms, fucked. The subject will typically
believe that the problem does not have to be addressed at all, or that it can
be addressed sometime in the future.
Typically a sufferer from ATHDD cannot
recognise that anything needs to be done. There is no known cure, although it
may be desirable to administer Ritalin and Warfarin to the patient. This will
not alleviate the symptoms. It is, however, simply desirable.
There are many theories as to how this genetic condition may have arisen,
but the most likely is thought to have been an unfortunate mating of a
lecturer from the LSE and a cockroach.
Sources:
The Lancet, British Medical Journal
Dr Gildas the Monk
-
June 24, 2010 at 15:10
-
Dr Gildas the Monk gets the Smudd Round of Applause for this enlightening
and informative post.
- June 24, 2010 at 15:14
-
You are too kind.
My apologies for profanity.
Gildas the Monk
- June 24, 2010 at 15:14
- June 24, 2010 at 15:23
-
Careful, Dr. Gildas : you
-
- June 24, 2010 at 14:14
-
Nice work, Anna. The Labour Party is all the evidence I need that a
round of proscriptions is long overdue : for all of them.
??
- June 24, 2010 at 13:05
-
Really, it tells you all you need to know about the total arrogance of new
liebour. What would she have looked for next? Dedicated ‘Zil’ lanes probably.
they really were the most corrupt load of suysters weren’t they?
-
June 24, 2010 at 12:44
-
It will probably turn out that she’s entitled to a chauffeur at our
expense.
Nothing would surprise me less.
- June 24, 2010 at 12:13
-
Does a traffic offence actually count as a ‘criminal record’ or not?
Laughed my socks off at this – always delightful to see the ex-Liebour elite
realise that they’re now down with us ‘little people’ Particularly those of
them that always considered themselves ‘more equal’. Well done Ms. Pearce
& perhaps now the unlovely Vera will realise the truth of the old adage
‘be nice to people on the way up because you’ll meet the same people on the
way down’. P.S. Vera, how’s the dog? And have you learned how to pick up s***
yet? Best do so as there could be a lot of it in your future.
-
June 24, 2010 at 12:29
-
I’m sure the Baird Bedlington grunts out only magic muck – the sort that
is invisible to Ms Baird. She can’t see it so she can’t pick it up.
-
- June 24,
2010 at 11:43
-
Just another ‘common criminal’, glad to see she is now where she should
have been all along, namely out of a job!
- June 24,
2010 at 10:50
-
Oh frabjous day, caloo calay.
Vera’s licence took away.
Sorry about that but I couldn’t resist it.
- June 24, 2010 at 10:28
-
So presumably “summons lost in the post” is now a precedent the rest of us
hoipolloi can use in our defence (should the need arise)?
What? Oh, silly me.
- June 24, 2010 at 10:34
-
Just like the Glenrothes By-election marked register that went missing after Labour won a surprise victory.
- June 24, 2010 at 14:40
-
It’s not a defence – but may provide grounds for the case to be
re-opened.
- June 24, 2010 at 10:34
-
June 24, 2010 at 10:11
-
She had never received the summons? I wonder what the Royal Mail say to
that, since certain court documents are issued by SD and they will have a
tracking number and signature on them.
I’m sure I read something about it being potentially a serious criminal
offence to tell whoppers to the bench …. and the penalty runs to quite a few
years in chokey, even in the Magistrate’s Court.
Perhaps somebody should investigate this with a view to a prosecution.
- June 24, 2010 at 14:39
-
Few documents are actually issued by the Court by anything other than the
regular post. And the law provides that in most cases they are “deemed
served” if sent that way.
Even so defendants who say they did not receive them can apply to the
Court to have their case re-opened.
- June 24, 2010 at 14:39
- June 24, 2010 at 09:56
-
Superb. Imagine, she’ll be spending six months travelling with the great
unwashed. Crabs, headlice, TB, bird flu, swine flu, the lot.
Breath deep Vera and mind the dog shit on the platform
- June 24, 2010 at 10:20
-
Best laugh of the morning OH! Ta very.
(Reminds me of John Cooper Clarke, “Down on the dance floor trying to get
pissed, In amongst the headlice, Old Spice, Brut and Bodymist”).
-
June 24, 2010 at 20:06
-
“she
- June 24, 2010 at 10:20
{ 37 comments }