BrExaro means BrExaro.
The suppurating boil on the face of journalism, oozing vituperative stories, usually with a left-wing sting in the tail, that has been the internet agency Exaro, has, if one can believe a word that Mark Watts, David Hencke and Mark Conrad ever say, finally been silenced.
Six weeks ago, Mark Watts was telling the Press Gazette of an e-mail he had sent to staff, subsequently leaked to the Press Gazette:
“You have the right to know that further cuts to the editorial team are, indeed, planned, and, as you know, no proper announcement of this was made at the outset internally.”
Those ‘cuts’ proved to include Mark Watts. Exaro was ‘editorless’. We were told that Exaro was returning to its roots and writing investigative financial stories, with its usual attention to detail and truth…
The problem with hacks working in a fevered atmosphere of conspiracies as had reigned at Exaro for some time, is that they cease to look at innocent motives for any obscure threads of a story. They become over excited by leaks of ‘secret papers’ à la Wikileaks or the Panama Papers. ‘We nose fings’ they cry, and promptly work out the most duplicitous reason for every action.
Thus it was that an experienced financial journalist, Nick Kochan, set to work on some rumours coming out of Malaysia. Nick had only recently finalised a book, written in conjunction with David Hencke and Francis Bennett. The book, about Tony Blair’s life since leaving office, was described as ‘hostile and damaging’. It was published by the downmarket mass-publishers ‘John Blake’. Other books written by the pair have attracted rare praise from Seumas Milne. Fairly safe to say we are speaking of journalists welcome in the court of Corbyn. And Tom Watson. Exaro is an incestuous place, only like minds permitted to hold opinions.
The rumours that had attracted Kochen first surfaced in the ‘Sarawak Report’ an online investigative journal run by Clare Rewcastle-Brown, formerly of the BBC World Service. ‘Sarawak Report‘ has a somewhat chequered history. Whilst it has been rightly praised for its work exposing the deforestation of Malaysia, some of its work, particular its coverage of 1MDB, a strategic development company operated by the government of Malaysia, has been criticised as ‘inconsistent’ and ‘unreliable’. Certainly there are billions of pounds in circulation in and out of 1MDB’s bank accounts that require better explanation than so far offered, but these are murky waters. Journalists would be advised to tread carefully.
Into these waters, Kochen piloted Exaro; bolstered by a passport photograph of a British financier, Patrick Mahony, and some e-mails purloined from a firm of accountants in Switzerland ‘by a third party’ (naturally). The e-mails, if even genuine, purported to show that Patrick had received into his swiss bank account, some $33 million pounds. From the Boss of a Saudi oil exploration company.
So what you may say? Having a Swiss bank account is not illegal, nor is receiving money from a Saudi oil company – and what has this got to do with the price of eggs, never mind a development company in Malaysia? But, you see, stitch all that together with other allegations that the IMDB organisation had a partnership deal with Petro-Saudi the Saudi oil company, and er, you really don’t have very much going for the story except nudge, nudge, these people have more money than you and I and are obviously up to no good….
Add in the current top of the pops for rumour mongering, the Land Registry, and you can reveal that, nudge, nudge, Patrick Mahoney has also just bought a house. In London, as any sensible British financier would do. £6 million quid which is about right for someone operating at that level of high finance.
‘Sarawak Report’ is quite explicit in its efforts to paint Mr Mahoney in a bad light:
Patrick Mahony is a UK citizen and yet he poses as an off-shore, non-domicile concern when it comes to declaring the house he owns.
Hmm – he works for a Saudi Arabian company, he is scarcely ‘posing’, he is doing just what a legion of Bolton steel erectors on one year contracts in Saudi do – taking advantage of the tax law.
This is how ordinary home-owners get tax clobbered, whilst those who have got rich by stealing the money of poor countries are able to lord it up in London and pretend they don’t officially own the properties they do.
I am deliberately not linking to the BBC trained journalist behind Sarawak Report’s efforts to tarnish Mr Mahoney’s reputation – it continues in much the same tone, and worse. It also (written some six months before the Exaro piece) contains the riveting information that the man who had taken ‘company document’ and e-mails was now in prison for attempting to blackmail Mr Mahoney. What does that matter when you are knocking up a quick piece for Exaro, eh?
The Exaro article, which is still available on the wayback machine, has now been removed from Exaro’s site, to be replaced by a grovelling apology. Quite right too, contrary to the impression given by the piece, with the add of much smoke and mirrors, Patrick Mahoney has never been accused of any wrongdoing, nor has Petro-Saudi, and whatever their business together, it is none of our business. Publishing photographs of his house and his passport photograph was an unwarranted invasion of his business.
It was particularly unfortunate, for Patrick Mahoney is not the only financier with interests in Malaysia, as Petro-Saudi, for whom he works, undoubtedly has. There is another. His name is Jerome Booth. It may be familiar to you.
There will be many this morning who will attribute Exaro’s demise solely to its predilection for fantastical stories of sexual abuse by Tory politicians. Certainly I have been told many times over the past few weeks of people interviewed by Metropolitan Police officers with a particular interest in Exaro and their business methods, in the wake of Hogan-Howe’s inquiry led by Richard Henriques.
I don’t believe that is the whole story. There is a danger in owning a company which writes investigative stories – especially if you have substantial funds and are worth suing. It is a danger that newspapers have long been aware of, and guard themselves by having a phalanx of lawyers who ruthlessly spike anything which can’t be double sourced. Owning a company which takes its material from online blogs and anonymous individuals liable to make outrageous and incredible allegations is a hiding to nothing that no newspaper proprietor would dream of engaging in.
Sadly, Exaro’s latest output:
Changes at @ExaroNews . @davidhencke is now Head of Exaro. As Head of News, I’ll be running site jointly with David. Contact details on web.
— Mark Conrad (@markconradhack) July 15, 2016
had a shorter shelf life as ‘reliable news’ than a double cone whip with chocolate flake in the current heatwave.
Not for long David, not for long.
BREAKING: V sad news. Exaro closed today. Two days after announcing that is was “open for business”, with new “head”. An act of vandalism.
— Mark Watts (@MarkWatts_1) July 20, 2016
Ms Raccoon is still here. Annoying isn’t it?
- Bandini
July 21, 2016 at 1:34 pm -
I’d just finished reading Tim Pendry’s hand-wiping article on the Exaro situation when this appeared; amusingly, he is touting for someone to maintain the ‘historic archive’ of explosive articles so that they are not lost to the world. (Will the ‘historic archive’ include the ‘abject apology’, I wonder?)
“…but this is not a time to cast stones…”, says Pendry – shortly after (and just before) doing exactly this!
http://positionreserved.blogspot.com.es/2016/07/exaronews-end-game.html- Ho Hum
July 21, 2016 at 11:52 pm -
I should like to thank Bandini for posting the link to Tim Pendry’s blog
Having now read some of Pendry’s other posts, I have actually come to appreciate Mr Ecks’ prior responses to me
Both may talk out of their arses, but Mr Ecks has earned my eternal gratitude in that he is concise.
- Ho Hum
- Wigner’s Friend
July 21, 2016 at 1:36 pm -
“Ms Raccoon is still here. Annoying isn’t it?” No!!
- Oi you
July 21, 2016 at 3:43 pm -
I noticed Mark Thingummy-Wotsit was on the telly the other night, investigating a cold case. New career for him then?
:o)
- Uncle Nick
July 21, 2016 at 3:58 pm -
I think that the IMDB organisations links with Saudi oil companies indicate… shall we say, more of a hands off role?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0365737/
- A Potted Plant
July 21, 2016 at 5:31 pm -
I’m very pleased that you are still here, and they are gone I had a good laugh about that – hope you did too.
Thanks for all this Exaro info, really helps in making sense of some things.
I’ve been getting messages about super secret-ity stuff supposedly going on behind the events you’ve described for us, from someone who blows whistles apparently. (Seems a strange hobby). Here’s one: ‘Sherlock’s sidekick received a huge donation to his parliamentary office from some super rich guy, and that was supposed to “fund research on CSA”, aka: fund new Tory MP sex scandals by Exaro, but someone spent it all on donuts!” - Ho Hum
July 21, 2016 at 10:48 pm -
While we’re on the subject, anyone heard lately of the other ‘David’?
Or have the security services possibly successfully chipped his dogs, and had them drag him into the Thames, his corpse now being conveyed to deeper places, in the manner that rivers pound onwards to the ocean’s depths?
- tdf
July 21, 2016 at 10:50 pm -
Ho Hum, can you jog my memory on that, there are so many Davids at this point that I’m getting confused?
- Bandini
July 22, 2016 at 11:30 am -
Never fear, Ho Hum, David is still managing to give the assassins on his trail the slip!
We had a wide-ranging discussion the other day: hair-dye, Countess Lubienska, EU tariffs, Australians in Earl’s Court (circa 1979), Exaro, photographic memories, and – who could forget? – ‘pretty policemen’.Given David’s obstinate refusal to aim his replies at the appropriate comments it’s all but impossible to follow the tangled threads. Ordering the comments by date/time (if it were possible) would help a little… but not a lot. Presumably a tactic to throw the spooks off the scent.
I can’t therefore recommend you waste any of your time reading it all, but if you were tempted you could maybe start with his dalliance with the red-tops & ‘award winning journalist’ Don Hale, and some missing child’s hair he claimed to have found:
https://annaraccoon.com/2016/07/18/pot-pourri/#comment-18205726434445730- windsock
July 22, 2016 at 11:44 am -
You’ve gone and made me laugh again…
- windsock
- tdf
- Alexander Baron
July 22, 2016 at 9:57 am -
Are you sure it wasn’t the celebrity VIP paedophile ring that closed it down? I would like to think my e-mail to its funder a while back had something to do with it, but I’ve long learned people like that never learn.
- Justin
July 22, 2016 at 10:54 am -
8th para – $33 million pounds
Otherwise an excellent read. And I’m really glad that you’re still around.
- tdf
July 22, 2016 at 8:30 pm -
Seems that the Mail are digging.
I doubt if we’ve heard the last of this saga.
- tdf
July 26, 2016 at 1:52 am -
David Hencke, in a reply to posts on his recent blogpost, states (inter alia) as follows:
“My sources included people who were not abused and a number of people who were at Grafton but obviously I cannot reveal who they were.”
It’s an interesting comment. IIRC, Hencke did ‘reveal’ the first name of a CSA survivor on Twitter, in interactions with that survivor. Probably not a breach of the legislation (I’m just basing that assessment on a layman’s understanding – I’m not a lawyer), but it didn’t strike me as particularly nice thing to do, and it still doesn’t.
‘Fiat justitia ruat caelum’
- Bandini
July 26, 2016 at 12:51 pm -
God, that’s some shameless buck-passing he’s doing there!
While cowering behind his anonymous ‘sources’ he takes a snipe at someone daring to question his track-record of nonsense stories on the grounds that they are… anonymous!“…I had doubts… …All i can say is that I did not have personal dealings with Chris Fay and this was done by other people. Nor at that time did I have overall control of the coverage so did not see or know their sources.”
Ah, it was everyone else’s fault was it? And the ‘sources’ for HIS ‘boy-brothel’ tale were disgruntled neighbours still up in arms about all those Rollers using up their parking-spaces… twenty-five years later! What an absolute load of rubbish.
(By the way, I think Justin Sanity is out by about three years regarding the age of R20’s ‘experience’ at Elm. But it hardly matters, as I doubt sincerely that R20 ever stepped foot in the place. Just another sad soul to be shifted across the Exaro chess-board.)
I see you commented yourself, TDF; seeing as the topic there revolves around ‘sources’ you could do worse than ask him for HIS source for HIS story that DJ A7 (Tony Blackburn) was “accused of raping a 15-year-old girl, Claire McAlpine, who committed suicide a month later.”
There was no source. He made it up. With Alex Varley-Winter. He is a liar and a fraud.https://davidhencke.com/2016/07/22/exaro-what-next/#comment-18026
- Bandini
- tdf
July 27, 2016 at 3:35 am -
^ Justin Sanity might have his dates confused on that but IIRC judging from his comments on another blog seems to be generally on the ball. I think he was an Exaro sceptic from way back.
I haven’t followed recent developments on the Claire McAlpine case, so I will reserve judgement/comment until I get around to reading the Dame Jane Smith review.
- Bandini
July 27, 2016 at 10:56 am -
TDF, agreed about Justin Sanity, and it’s not always following the dates in these cases. The situation is not helped by unscrupulous journalists dropping figures such as ’15’ into stories which at first glance creates a misleading impression. It hardly matters, as an adult living in England & working as a prostitute who took a client to Elm (which I doubt happened anyway) has sod all to do with ‘VIP paedo rings’.
Back to Hencke, and that buffoon Meirion Jones & he were conducting a live love-in yesterday, hilarious in its hypocrisy:
http://oi68.tinypic.com/14blwjs.jpg
Jones explosively reveals that he turned down the chance to work for Exaro, but that he IS a fan. Indeed, it was they that ‘forced’ the BBC to publish the Smith Review, he lies, over looking the stated explanation from the police & Smith herself that there were ongoing investigations which prevented its earlier publication.The Exaro goons even put out an APB over the Twitterwaves suggesting that there was NO such investigation holding it back and ‘could their band of half-wit followers find anything’? No, of course they couldn’t – and yet there it was! The police investigation which quite obviously needed to conclude before the review which dealt in detail with the same matters could see the light of day…
Hencke is grateful and explains that it took a “lot of time and work” to “make sure it was accurate”. Ho ho ho! They’re laughing at us, TDF!
“Exaro can reveal that the diary [of Claire McAlpine] has been handed to Dame Janet Smith…”
Oh dear. No, it wasn’t!(I can’t be bothered going through this topic again after having spent a ridiculous amount of time on the subject, including before it even re-appeared to shame the front-pages once again, but don’t expect too much from Smith as she considers the BBC-bashing articles from the 1970s in the Murdoch tabloid press to be top-quality evidence. And oh-my, weren’t those skirts just a little too short?!?)
After claiming that criticism of Exaro came from “people who wanted to cover up establishment CSA”, Jones-the son-of-a-Duncroft-teacher makes a bold observation:
“David you’re fucking great reporter I know that u know that all with brain know that”.
Awwww! Plans for a meet-up are duly arranged. Don’t you just love the media Establishment?
- tdf
July 27, 2016 at 12:04 pm -
@Bandini
The Hencke/Jones love-in. Gah. Well I had hitherto been giving Meirion Jones the benefit of the doubt, I will have to reconsider that view.
The section of your post on Claire McAlpine/ the Smith review etc has jogged my memory, I do recall reading a post, probably of yours, on a blog (I forget which) which expressed the view that if anyone or any entity had caused her tragic suicide, it was probably the Murdoch rag.
- Bandini
July 27, 2016 at 12:38 pm -
Not recommending you waste your time on this, but…
https://davidhencke.com/2016/01/20/exaro-exclusive-dame-janet-smiths-criticism-of-the-bbc-over-savile/#comment-17364
I raised the matter with Peter Jukes (former Exaro scribe) in the comments-section of Byline, asking him if he couldn’t set Hencke straight (while admittedly having a gentle dig at him for copying & pasting someone else’s article – complete with misspelt name – and sticking it in one of his books) as he had of course produced (or nicked) a completely different take on the matter. But that clique of back-slapping, award-winning journalists don’t like holding one another to account.I tracked down one of those people Smith with her millions couldn’t, just to try and get a flavour of what REALLY went on on TOTP around that time & feel I’ve done as much as possible to understand what happened. As I said, Hencke’s tale is a baseless lie. Now, I’ll crack on with ‘investigating’ another load of old codswallop… there’s plenty of it about.
P.S. Hencke has in the past removed sections from my comments, not published others & also gone back and edited his own. I can’t be bothered reading through all that again, but it’s something to bear in mind…
- tdf
July 27, 2016 at 2:08 pm -
^ Not only did I waste my time on your link, Bandini, but I recommend it to all, if only for the hilarious satirical take-off on tabloid media sensationalism in the fourth paragraph.
Meanwhile I read that Herr Flick – Watty – is scheduled to be interviewed by ‘Gaunty’. ‘Gaunty’ (John Gaunt) is one of those rather irritating Angry White Guy radio show presenters that seem to model themselves on the likes of Alex Jones. Gaunty, you see, is anti-establishment AND HE CAN PROVE IT TOO BY SHOUTING A LOT BECAUSE EVERYTHING HE SAYS IS IN SHOUTY CAPS LIKE THIS. I am no particular fan of the Times commentator David Aaronovitch, but when he walked out mid-interview after being subjected to a Gaunty rant last year, my sympathies were entirely with Mr Aaronovitch.
- tdf
- Bandini
- tdf
- Bandini
- The Blocked Dwarf
July 27, 2016 at 11:01 am -
“David you’re fucking great reporter I know that u know that all with brain know that”.
In which case I , for one, am proud to be a retard from the deepest depths of NorthRetardshire (aka ‘Norfolk’) where brain is only found in cattle feed.
- tdf
July 27, 2016 at 2:48 pm -
On the question of Exaro’s finances.
I would guess rent and salaries were the main costs of the operation.
Rents in that area of London aren’t going to come cheap, unless they had a sweet deal.
I think some people are (perhaps justifiably) getting into conspiracy theory land, but I tend to counsel Occam’s Razor ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor ) at all times, until and unless proven otherwise. In my time on this planet, I have seen very wealthy people (wealthier than Booth, even) do very silly things (yes, much sillier than investing in online investigative news agencies, even) with their money.
- tdf
- tdf
August 2, 2016 at 2:40 am -
On the thorny subject of ‘false memory syndrome’, sometimes discussed in comments on this blog, I happened to come across this while reading up on JFK assassination conspiracy theories:
[QUOTE]That leaves the case hinging on Willie O’Keefe – another fictional character. In reality, Garrison’s equivalent key witness was Perry Russo, a heterosexual insurance salesman. Russo’s testimony was not particularly lively until Garrison administered a dubious “truth serum” of sodium pentothal – known to make people suggestible – and subjected him to questioning under hypnosis. At that point, Russo “remembered” all sorts of wacky things. In the movie, Garrison is conspicuously not shown jacking his witness up on barbiturates or hypnotising him. Because that would make his case look like a shoddy pile of incoherent fantasies wrung out of vulnerable people by suspect means. [/QUOTE]
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2011/apr/28/jfk-oliver-stone-john-f-kennedy
- Bandini
August 3, 2016 at 11:05 am -
An update from Hencke (cross-posted on Byline, of course!) – an interview which “was about to be put up on the Exaro News website just before it abruptly closed” is available for your viewing pleasure, although he says: ” It is rather long so I don’t expect you to listen to the lot.” Er, okay!
The interview is “with the Lebanon based Arab News Network” which according to Wikipedia “is currently owned by Siwar al Assad, a first cousin of the President of Syria, Bashar al-Assad.”
And there is more – he’s “planning to do an interview with Fabrice Bardsley on The Bunker Show for Dark City Radio on what happened since for both Exaro and Jeremy Corbyn and my hopes for the future.”
Dark City Radio seems to focus quite heavily on the medicinal properties of marijuana. Indeed, they have their own “Compassion Club” to which you are free to donate, although the previous £30,000 received seems to have, er, gone up in smoke as ‘problems’ were encountered with their aim to “START CURING THE WORLD WITH HEMP OIL”. Rising like a phoenix from the over-flowing ashes in a stoner’s lair he is!
http://www.darkcityradio.com/?page=compassionclub
- tdf
August 3, 2016 at 6:22 pm -
@Bandini
Interesting. Not the first occasion that Exaro’s rather odd Syrian links have been noted and commented on.
As for Byline, IIRC, that website was being heavily promoted by Peter Jukes on Twitter at one point. They had a rather odd story up asserting that a now former Cabinet Minister had socialised with and briefly dated an adult industry worker (I say, who cares, consenting adults etc.)
- tdf
- tdf
August 10, 2016 at 12:40 am -
Bandini or anyone else that has been following this,
To satisfy my curiosity, can you help me out with one of the missing jigsaw pieces (in my own mind) – what was the 1980s cult movie that one of the Exaro allegators might potentially have nicked part of his ‘story’ from? You put a link up to what looks like a Youtube segment in a post that you made last year on Hencke’s blog, but when I click on the Youtube file, I get the message ‘This video does not exist’.
- Bandini
August 10, 2016 at 10:28 am -
I posted a link to a Siskel & Ebert review of the film ‘The Hitcher’. Here it is:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZ8vM4UjUmM
As they describe it it was “an incredible scene”, but not in a good way – a person being tied between two vehicles which slowly pull apart to rip the victim in two. It was the ‘and did you see the bit where he cut his ear off?!?’ hot-topic of its day.- Bandini
August 10, 2016 at 10:34 am -
“And the Leigh character’s death – she is tied hand and foot between two giant trucks and pulled in two – is so grotesquely out of proportion with the main business of this movie that it suggests a deep sickness at the screenplay stage… …I could see that the film was meant as an allegory, not a documentary. But on its own terms, this movie is diseased and corrupt.”
Just the sort of VHS that young lads wanted to see!
http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-hitcher-1986
- Bandini
August 10, 2016 at 11:14 am -
Here TDF, have a mad dot: the director of The Hitcher had only previously filmed a short which probably landed him the job as he had ‘more or less already made the same film’. And the Rutger Hauer of THAT first film was the actor… Charles Napier!
http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5443/peter-righton-ordered-teenager-to-pleasure-charles-napierA coincidence, of course. But exactly the kind of tenuous ‘link’ upon which the vast majority of the nutters base their ‘investigations’. A big round of applause for former NOTW scribbler Tim Wood – described as “suberb” by his former Exaro colleagues Mark Conrad & David Hencke – for finding tripe on the Wetherspoon’s menu!
- Bandini
August 10, 2016 at 12:56 pm -
Of possible interest, a recent case of alleged rape:
“She had made the whole thing up because she was angry with her father and wanted to teach him a lesson. I asked her whether she had got all the ideas from 50 Shades of Grey. She confirmed this book, and others – which she named. After seven minutes we were finished.”
http://stedmund.co.uk/fifty-shades-incest-acquittal/- tdf
August 10, 2016 at 7:54 pm -
Ok thanks. Have never seen the movie, so didn’t draw the connection.
- tdf
August 10, 2016 at 10:00 pm -
^ From a quick look at that case, it’s difficult to see what general conclusions can be drawn. Possibly a case of the old ‘hard cases make bad law’ adage?
For example, some have proposed anonymity for accused the until charging or conviction. That is not an issue here, as the father presumably is not a public figure and was not ‘outed’ in the media
Others have favoured a statute of limitations to avoid very old cases, from 40 or 50 years ago (or more), going to court- a suggestion I think has merit, but, again, probably not of relevance here.
Unless the legal system were to go down the route of not taking forward ANY abuse cases unless the alleged victim proceeds immediately following – or soon following – the alleged attack to the nearest police station or rape crisis centre, has a statement taken, allows the police or their doctor to perform the necessary forensics, etc I just can’t see how such cases can be avoided in a general sense. How rare or otherwise they occur is hard to say.
- Bandini
August 10, 2016 at 11:10 pm -
A general conclusion might be that NO finding of guilt ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ can ever be made based solely on the say-so of an alleged victim (as alleged victims sometimes lie and therefore there will always be that ‘reasonable doubt’). Given that many sex-related cases involve only such ‘my word against his’ evidence it’s hard to see many of the ‘campaigners’ being too comfortable with this idea; innocent people saved but more guilty going free.
Regarding the father in the case above: he may well have escaped the national media but I wouldn’t be surprised if he’d appeared in the local press. His friends and family will have known of his predicament which no doubt was dragged out over many months or even years; some will have doubted his innocence. If there were other kids he’d have been removed from their home (or they’d have been removed from his). He’ll spend the rest of his life pondering how close he came to having his life destroyed & might count his lucky stars that his legal team were able to prove his innocence with the resources available to them. “My first conference with the client was on the day of trial”? It’s really not like on the telly, is it? At least not for those without money.
Maybe his daughter get caught up in the lie and couldn’t back out. Perhaps a more rigourous investigation pre-trial could have saved the BOTH of them from the experience, and made a later reconciliation easier than it’s now likely to be.
P.S. At least in the case of adults it would be useful to see a little less of the tea, sympathy & ‘your life has been destroyed FOREVER!!!’ message and a bit more brutal truth: the day/week/year afterwards is too late; you need to act NOW. I was going to mention the badly-termed ‘rape kits’ I once read were all the rage on US campuses but having checked I don’t think I’ll bother… a backlog of 200,000 or summat.
- Bandini
- tdf
- Bandini
- Bandini
- tdf
August 10, 2016 at 11:33 pm -
“Maybe his daughter get caught up in the lie and couldn’t back out. Perhaps a more rigourous investigation pre-trial could have saved the BOTH of them from the experience, and made a later reconciliation easier than it’s now likely to be. ”
That makes seems to make sense on the face of it, but what would such a rigorous investigation pre-trial look like in practice? Alleged victims being grilled by police investigators? It runs the risk of already traumatised victims being re-traumatised (in genuine cases), although certainly preferable to a return to the days when victims were subjected to overly aggressive cross-examination by defense silks, and newspaper reports routinely used expressions like ‘the judge acknowledged that the 14 year old was partially to blame, due to her seductive behaviour’ in relation to under-age rape victims. ‘The campaigners’ wouldn’t want to return to those days and frankly, on that, I agree with them.
- tdf
August 23, 2016 at 5:46 pm -
Fwiw, Exaro arose in despatches in discussions after a recent post on the Hoaxstead research blog:
https://hoaxteadresearch.wordpress.com/2016/08/22/angelas-smear-campaign-against-herself/
- tdf
September 8, 2016 at 11:21 pm
{ 47 comments… read them below or add one }