The BBC on the naughty step.
I’ve been taking a look at the Foxes that John Wittingdale has chosen to put in charge of the British Broadcasting Henhouse, otherwise known as the BBC. Rather more dogs than vixens, as it happens, so lets take a look at the ladies first.
Lopa Patel. Better get her in first – Lopa founded the Diversity UK thinktank where she spearheaded the first ever public appointments survey conducted among ethnic minority individuals. Daren’t leave her out. She also runs redhotcurry.com a portal website for all things Asian if you are not minded to integrate…it has a TV listing site which dutifully brings news of any programmes that involve the Asian community. Right on!
Then we have Dawn Airey. Dawn launched Channel Five with the memorable strapline of ‘Films, Football, and Fu*king”. Dawn lives with her partner Jacqueline, and their two children conceived with the assistance of a gay friend. She is known in the industry as ‘Scarey Airey’. She once applied for a job at the BBC and ‘the buggers turned me down‘. She has worked for every other major player in the field. She is on record as thinking that the BBC should have some services as subscription.
Dame Bowe. Like Dawn Airey, Collette Bowe is another Liverpudlian. She came up through the ranks of the civil service, working for Norman Tebbit, then a stint with Michael Hessletine, (she was revealed to be the civil servant behind the leaking of the Westland affair) went onto work for Peter Mandelson and eventually was appointed head of Offcom.
Ms Bowe was criticised in a report by the Commons Defence Select Committee in 1986, along with four other civil servants. Her selective leaking of a classified document was, in the view of the Committee, “tendentious”. In a unanimous judgement, the report described her conduct as “improper” and “disreputable”.
She thinks the BBC licence fee should be shared with other broadcasters. A fellow colleague on the Personal Investment Authority with her said:
‘I admire her, but she doesn’t like dissension. You are either on her side or you are not. She will listen to people’s opinions: how much she will be influenced is questionable, because she will often have come to her own conclusions already, and be driving them forward. She is not a half-measures person.’
She has never married either.
We have Alex Mahon, the Jimmy Choo wearing former chief executive of the Murdoch owned ‘Shine’ group, the production house responsible for such cultural titans as ‘Broadchurch’. Prefers Alexander McQueen gowns for evening wear. Lots of useful contacts with the Murdoch group should she vote to reform the BBC out of existence.
Ranged around the table with these formidable ladies, we have:
Darren Henley, a journalist who is an expert on classical music and Chairman of Classic FM. Last year he was appointed Chief Executive of the Arts Council. His mission is to make Classic FM ‘the world’s go to website for classical music’. He is ‘concerned by the danger of unfair competition from the publicly funded BBC Radio 3’. Hmmn.
Then there is Ashley Highfield. A name well-known to local newspapers. Ashley used to be a BBC man, in charge of the online service. Then he became head of the Johnstone Press group of local newspapers. From where he exploded with rage when James Harding described local journalism as ‘one of the biggest market failures in recent years’. It would be fair to say that Ashley thinks that is the fault of the BBC. He thinks the BBC should be giving things like the weather forecast to local newspapers free of charge and helping them.
Stewart Pervis, a journalist who owes his training to the BBCs first class training schedule which gave him skills he took to Channel 4 and ITV – and later to Offcom. He now lectures in journalism at the City University.
Last but not least, we have Andrew Fisher. Andrew is the billionaire CEO of ‘Shazam’. Shazam was set up to provide the technology to answer the all important question of ‘what is that song’ when you are kicking your heels in a deserted shopping centre, listening to music on your mobile. Obviously they had their finger on the pulse of modern life, and a lot of people are doing just that and troubled by just that question – 100 million active users. If you have the app, potentially you can listen to a tune in an advert, identify it, and have a direct link to the advertiser who might offer you a discount on a pair of Nike trainers for instance. Not a lot of application to the BBC – not unless they are forced into the advertising route….
It’s beginning to sound like the ultimate Islington dinner party, a cackle of media types with a sprinkling of vested interests. I don’t see anyone who is likely to represent the views of the bulk of British households that have always funded the BBC.
If this is the shape of the committee I fear the resulting BBC will have more humps than legs…
- Moor Larkin
July 31, 2015 at 9:17 am -
* Ashley thinks that is the fault of the BBC. He thinks the BBC should be giving things like the weather forecast to local newspapers free of charge and helping them. *
Presumably Ashley has yet to discover the internet…
- Alcibiades
July 31, 2015 at 9:42 am -
Sadly Darren Henley is right about Radio 3. It used to be the most distinguished classical music and arts radio station in the world. In the past few years it has whored after listener figures with the result that it increasingly resembles Classic FM. It might have numbers which make it look popular but it is no longer distinctive.
- Chris
July 31, 2015 at 10:24 am -
Which is all very well – but making Classic FM ‘the world’s go to for Classical Music’ would also mean the calming and rewarding experience of listening to classical music is interrupted by dire adverts, and also mean the market forces which have combined to make 99% of all commercial pop radio generic repetitive tedium can wave their wand of idiocy over classical broadcasting. When broadcasting is held ransom to advertisers, the advertisers dictate the terms – and what has happened to UK commercial radio over the past 20 years… well, to call it execrable would flatter it.
Which is not to absolve the BBC from criticisms of ‘dumbing down’ – but in a population beginnning to view 1980s & 1990s popular music as almost ‘highbrow’, Radio 3 should be given a preservation order as the demand for it will die with most of it’s present audience.Not that there is any real hope. http://retardedkingdom.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/the-death-of-cool.html
- Demetrius
July 31, 2015 at 1:12 pm -
For classical listeners it is interesting to see that during the BBC Proms Classic FM have competed directly in the their Full Works 8-10 slot. The BBC Proms are required to be relatively diverse in programming but there are many evenings when the obligation to put in new composers or little known or more international means they are up against a tailored more traditional Classic FM offering. For the determined listener this means juggling timings between the two, or if able some “boxing” where relevant. As Radio 3 do attempt to offer broad provision, although decreasing in some sectors it is a difficult area. I am not optimistic about what this gang will come up with.
- Mrs Grimble
July 31, 2015 at 1:23 pm -
Radio 3 resembling Classic FM? I beg to differ.
My husband listens to ClassicFM most of the day, and it drives me nuts. The daytime output appears to be limited to a “Top 50” playlist of popular classics and pseudo-classics – Beethoven, Bach, Mozart, that Adagio thing, that Boccherini thing, that Karl Jenkins thing, John William’s greatest movie soundtracks, the greatest classical-music advert soundtracks etc etc, all lasting no longer than five minutes each and, with a screamingly irritating ad every 20 minutes. I used to love some of the tracks they play – but constant repetition has made me loathe them. Yes, there are one or two decent programmes on in the evenings, like Friday’s Full Works Concert (blissfully uninterrupted by ads) and Alex James’ Saturday show, which has introduced me to some really good stuff.
By contrast, Radio3’s output – in the daytime at least – seems to be largely of esoteric and obscure works, some of them so esoteric as to be unlistenable. I like hearing new music, but would be nice if they sprinkled in just a little bit of “Top 50 Classical Hits” now and then.- Chris
July 31, 2015 at 1:56 pm -
Don’t forget that ‘Dancing’ tune of The Snowman throughout December & early January, several times a day (pleasant and evocative though it is)
- Chris
- Chris
- Justin
July 31, 2015 at 10:03 am -
re Shazam
” ‘what is that song’ when … listening to music on your mobile”Actually not really. I already know what I’m playing on that. It’s when you’re in a cafe and something on their cd player, or more frequently radio/tv which the bar staff don’t recognise catches the ear. Press the button and Shazam tells you within a few seconds. Yes it is commercialised, but it usually only tries to sell you the song playing, or in a lot of cases offers to play it using Spotify (free). There are other adverts, but the non-free version of Shazam doesn’t have them. I’m happy to suffer that for the utility it gives me.
I also use it occasionally when watching TV series on Netflix/Other, which sometimes have great background music. I was surprised that it still works with ongoing speech/fx, unless there is a big disparity in volume. Also seems to work (sometimes) in foreign languages; Spanish in my case.
- Poptart
July 31, 2015 at 10:22 am -
I wonder what the Twentysomethings think of all the BBC fuss.
Even I, in my sixties, have tired of it all. I binned the TV over a year ago and will never pay the compulsory tax again.
It is so crass. BBC Radio 3 in the morning…….. ‘Tweet, Text or e-mail us with your favourite Beethoven………BLAH, BLAH, BLAH……….this mornings puzzler……what is THIS music we are playing BACKWARDS?? ………..BLAH, BLAH, BLAH’
This week they have spent an hour EVERY MORNING interviewing Helen Lederer. FIVE hours of crap. I could interview her in 5 minutes and still have time to take the dog for a walk.
Give me strength.
Anybody with any sense is doing as I do; listening to Internet Radio on an iPod through Bluetooth on a Soundbar. Radio Classique from Paris, Chilltrax from LA, Celtic music from Toronto………it is all there. Free and uninterrupted.
The BBC days are numbered.
- Mrs Grimble
July 31, 2015 at 1:33 pm -
“…all there, free and uninterrupted…”
So how are the musicians and composers getting paid?- Poptart
July 31, 2015 at 5:02 pm -
The stations to which I refer presumably have a mechanism for paying for their output. They are pukka, not pirate.
Here are just a few:
http://www.listenlive.eu/classical.html
- Poptart
- Mrs Grimble
- Alex
July 31, 2015 at 10:30 am -
Yep, the usual luvvy suspects. The list of new appointees reads like a Private Eye spoof article, sadly it’s not.
As I’ve said on several previous occasions I loathe the BBC. Personally I’ll only be satisfied when the corporation is broken up and the licence fee abolished. I think I’m enough of a realist to accept that isn’t going to happen any time soon. All those who are quite happy to pay the viewing tax would surely be just as happy to pay the same sum as a subscription. It should be quite easy for the BBC to scramble the signal so that their broadcasts could only be viewed by those paying a subscription fee.
Whoever happens to be in government at any given time has always threatened to get tough with the BBC, but I firmly believe that it suits the two main parties, despite their protests, for the BBC to carry on in the same old way.
- Moor Larkin
July 31, 2015 at 11:06 am -
About time the government reviewed tax on newspapers as well. The unregulated book market has long outgrown the privilege and the idea that The Daily Star is a public service is truly comic, as are most of the rest of them.
- the moon is a balloon
July 31, 2015 at 12:11 pm -
The notion of a TV is itself almost broken. The TV schedule certainly is and so the idea that the watching of ‘live’ TV is the trigger for a TV license is comical. And the idea that all this subscription and scrambling has any sort of future is also mistaken I think. The model is broken by the sheer ubiquity of free digital access. Kids are accessing content directly and missing out the carriers’ badging and branding. They don’t even know half the time if their access is legal or not and they don’t care. It is not an issue for them. it’s not that they don’t want to pay but that it is just already easier not to. (Google is the biggest TV station in the world and they’re not even interested in their own TV product.)
TV is an app you’d pay $5. The BBC, daft buggers, should be selling their library at a few cents per view. They’d rake in zillions. Sadly, they have not the wit nor the courage to be able to even get the stuff online. The world will do it for them eventually and they’ll get peanuts. It’s all over. The BBC is another zombie movie.
- Henry Wood
July 31, 2015 at 6:59 pm -
“The BBC, daft buggers, should be selling their library at a few cents per view. They’d rake in zillions. Sadly, they have not the wit nor the courage to be able to even get the stuff online.”
You are right there. If they made their whole library available at a small cost per view all their problems would be solved. I’m not sure about them not having the wit – I’m sure the necessary personnel could be hired in an instant. *However*, having the courage is another matter. I fear that far too much of their library would be classed as “unsuitable” for release these days.
- JonD
July 31, 2015 at 8:03 pm -
Like almost everything in Britain the BBC is run by people with extremely limited technical competence. As a consequence they have no idea of the range of capabilities of even the available platforms, never mind those in development or those that are currently just a novel idea, nor of the options that those capabilities might offer them. The idea that they might spontaneously come up with a technology based wheeze to generate income is just laughable; that such an idea might arise out of a business process aimed precisely at that sort of outcome is only slightly less so. Technological innovation comes from organisations that are run by business minded technocrats not from organisations run by people like these.
It’s still who you know not what you know that gets you to the top. Until that changes we will continue to lag behind countries like Germany; where the top brass of a company typically actually understand in detail what the company does and don’t regard the technicalities as something only fit for the lower ranks. This is the modern face of English snobbery where an education in the Arts is preferred and knowledge that is actually useful is disdained; rather too much like ‘trade’.
Feel better now; off for a cuppa….
- Mudplugger
July 31, 2015 at 8:33 pm -
As far as I know, Richard Branson has absolutely no ‘technical competence’ in any of the subject areas in which he has made billions, created thousands of jobs and massive export value. He’s not a telecoms techie, or a banker, or a fitness trainer, or an airline pilot, or a recording artist. On your scale, he would never get a start – so for a technical no-hoper, he’s done rather well for himself and his valuable brand.
Managing any enterprise is a mix of the technical and the strategic: from my experience, few of the ‘technical’ stream have much strategic vision: similarly few of the ‘strategic’ stream are actually interested in the base nuts & bolts of the product or service. The trick is to have strategic leadership which can motivate the technicians – that’s what Branson does with almost every enterprise he touches (and then releases, once it has served his purpose – another mark of strong strategic skill).
I am not a Branson fan for all sorts of other reasons, but I do recognise and acknowledge his successful record of enterprise – and all achieved, apparently, without any ‘technical competence’ at all.But I don’t believe he’s gay, so that almost certainly eliminates him from any chance of re-forming the BBC into an organisation fit for its audience and its paymasters.
- Alex
July 31, 2015 at 9:03 pm -
Aren’t you forgeting the £60,000 interest free loan Branson got from his Aunt to start his mail order record company? In today’s money it would be the equivalent of getting a £3,000,000 interst free loan. Also 2 of the World’s most successful companies, Apple and Microsoft, were started by tech-savy people
- Mudplugger
July 31, 2015 at 9:47 pm -
But both Steve Jobs and Bill Gates were not alone, they both has co-founders who were actually far more ‘technical’ than they were – what Jobs and Gates both had (and their techie-geek mates didn’t) was the vision and marketing flair to lead their companies to their eventual scale (although Jobs had a short interruption in his Apple service record). (In fact, Bill Gates didn’t even originate MS-DOS – he nicked it, as it was originally an operating system called Q-DOS which he ‘acquired’ and just re-branded to do a back-of-a-fag-packet deal with IBM – that’s marketing flair, not unlike Branson.)
And Branson’s start-up loan helps to prove my point – he is not a ‘technically competent’ one, merely one who was smart enough to use his resources, both financial and personal, to get others to provide the technical necessities for his businesses, not just once but many times and in many different arenas.- the moon is a balloon
August 1, 2015 at 12:11 am -
The Beeb not long ago pulled the plug on the digitisation project of their library. It is said that they had spent £150m on it by the time they understood that the process was a crock. That’s a lot of money, isn’t it? Well, no. It’s pennies. Compared to the potential revenues if they had done the job right, it was nothing. And it’s not a difficult project to define. In fact, it is horrendously easy project to define. I just did. (“Digitise it, Bloggs. All of it. Begin now.”) That’s the strategic bit.
The delivery of it would be a rather tedious business but such has been undertaken countless times across the globe. Just look at online books. There are more formats, more free libraries of existing works than a man can count but the data is there. And any TV programme episode can be watched online at anytime, anywhere. Yesterday’s new episodes from America are online here today. The aunties at the Beeb do just not get it. The control, the compulsion, the protection is all wrong. Access is the name of the game. They’d rather get their money by having the postman deliver threatening letters to single mums – all the while preaching their Hampstead socialism-lite.
- the moon is a balloon
- Mudplugger
- JonD
August 1, 2015 at 12:38 am -
Granted Branson has been a phenomenal success. As far as I am aware, however, none of his success came on the back of technological innovation, which is what my comments were in reference to.
- Alex
- Mudplugger
- JonD
- Henry Wood
- Moor Larkin
- Chris
July 31, 2015 at 10:39 am -
Call me extreme, but since this Cultural Armageddon began I have gone all out to build myself an “entertainment bunker”.
As well as thousands of albums worth of music – a lifetime of music uninterrupted by “news” propaganda & jarring adverts – I am stockpiling recordings of television – from archive music shows to the decent history shows broadcast by the ailing BBC in recent times. Documentaries on all manner of things, supposedly ephemeral broadcasts from more discerning times, films by the few remaining worthy film-makers such as Adam Curtis …. Hopefully the second half of my life I’ll be able to live free of the unculture of the present day. After all, you only live once.If the BBC survives the decay of the nation it will be a miracle. http://retardedkingdom.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/bbc-sos.html
- Alex
July 31, 2015 at 12:27 pm -
Oh, I’m almost certain an organisation called the “BBC” will survive for many years yet to come. I’m almost equally certain that it will continue to decline in quality and standards, even from this current low point.
- Alex
- Ms Mildred
July 31, 2015 at 10:59 am -
I suppose I am biased for the BBC .I have grown old in its company. Deaf without an expensive aid…..text is wonderful. Few others provide text. As a couple we may have paid far more licence money than many who post on here. Now it is free to us and advert free too…yippee. The extended childhood of youngsters now may mean they get free TV for far longer than we did. Of all genres too. I dislike adverts like the big bummed flouncing guy in high heels and ones that one puzzles over like cryptic clues. I quite like a cat singing to a budgy if not aired too often. As for music right down your lugoles, bending those delicate hairs that take up sound. Beware the ides of deafness guys and gals from those tunes from so many tempting sources. The disconnection from tedious humans around you. What is that all about? With deafness you do hear ,but miss the key word ,but hear the stock phrases around it. In company, one cackle, clucking or raucous laughter can exclude you from the chit chat. You are as deaf as a post in a big supermarket. I get my groceries on the Internet. I do not care who is in charge. Vive la or le BBC. Shudder at the thought of a claque of precious persons dismembering the Beeb.
- Alex
July 31, 2015 at 12:23 pm -
” I dislike adverts……..”
Well the BBC does well enough plugging its own output, a form of advertising no? I especially took exception to that example of self aggrandisement wherein several of those who benefited enormously from sucking at the corporation teat, lectured the hoi-polloi about the marvellous BBC and the special way it is funded. By that of course they meant the licence fee or, as prefer to call it, compulsory viewing tax.
- Moor Larkin
July 31, 2015 at 12:39 pm -
The BBC adverts used to drive me more nuts than the itv ones. At least there was some purpose to the ones on itv.
- Moor Larkin
- Alex
- Edgar
July 31, 2015 at 11:55 am -
The committe that designed the camel at least had a common agenda, to create a horse.
- Moor Larkin
July 31, 2015 at 12:10 pm -
Even then they couldn’t agree and so we got minority Bactrain Report as well as the more mainstream Dromedary version.
- Moor Larkin
- Daft Lassie
July 31, 2015 at 1:58 pm -
Fascinating – a balanced committee consisting of all the diversity they could muster: different skin colours, different cultural backgrounds, different likes as to give and receive sexual pleasure including drinking at the furry cup, whistleblowers, liars and no doubt cheats and whores … with just one common factor between the lot of them, they all suck on the state teat.
- Cascadian
July 31, 2015 at 8:52 pm -
It is concise insight such as this that keeps me coming back.
“drinking at the furry cup”…….and…… ” suck on the state teat” in one sentence. Well done indeed, a more concise description of British acumen rarely appears, and these were chosen by the conservatives, gawdelpyah.
- Cascadian
- Lisboeta
July 31, 2015 at 4:19 pm -
This is probably off-topic, because it doesn’t impact on domestic viewers/listeners. However, from personal experience, I can say that the BBC World Service, and the BBC’s foreign language broadcasts, are valued around the globe. There are many countries where local “news” consists solely of what the President/Emir/Whatever said or did today, which visiting dignitaries he met, or his current overseas tour. For residents of those countries, the BBC’s output — degraded though it might now be — is their go-to source for real news. It is still considered more reliable than the US and Russian equivalents (however, Al Jazeera is fast making inroads on the BBC’s eminence).
It could be argued that the BBC World Service and its foreign language broadcasts are an anachronism, a throw-back to the colonial era, and irrelevant in this interconnected era. Except that not everyone is “connected”. A radio is cheaper than a computer/tablet — nay, even a smartphone. Were the World Service and BBC foreign language broadcasts to become subscription-supported, only a tiny minority of overseas listeners would be able to afford that. So, lacking funds, those services would inevitably be culled.
I know that many people object to the BBC licence fee. And the BBC isn’t doing itself any favours right now: the quality of its programming is definitely declining. But is the Murdoch alternative the right way to address the problem? I have my doubts. Because putting things behind a paywall does not, per se, improve the quality of the output.
- Moor Larkin
July 31, 2015 at 4:29 pm -
I listen to the World Service mostly and sometimes when listening to their talk-back shows from such as Nairobi, with someone grizzling about the programming, I have found myself thinking, Oh shut up, you’re getting it for free… But then I remind myself that as a non-TV viewer, so am I… State Radio is a great leveller…
- Alex
July 31, 2015 at 5:13 pm -
The World Service is in many ways the propaganda arm of the UK government, irrespective of the party in power. I think you’d need to very blinkered not acknowledge that the BBC has it own very recognisable biased agenda.
- Henry Wood
July 31, 2015 at 6:53 pm -
“However, from personal experience, I can say that the BBC World Service, and the BBC’s foreign language broadcasts, are valued around the globe.”
From personal experience of a lifetime working abroad in the oil industry I would qualify your comment and make it read, “[…BBC…] used to be valued around the globe.”
I still keep in touch with many people I worked with around the world (ain’t this Interweb thingy grand!), people from the Middle East, South America, North America, Scandinavia, and the Far East and most of them now hold the same opinion as I do about the BBC World Service. “It was once the most trustworthy source of world news but no longer.” And in this day of worldwide access to the BBC’s online domestic “news” output, many are astounded at what they read, just as I am.
I’m now in my 70’s and my fervent wish is that I see the demise of the BBC in its present format before I depart. (Especially R4’s “Today” and “PM”, but I fear it will be an unfulfilled wish as no government of any shade has the cojones to do the necessary.
- Alex
July 31, 2015 at 9:05 pm -
Very well said!
- binao
August 1, 2015 at 7:22 am -
Agreed.
I think I’d keep R4X for the old stuff, IF we could filter out the on message nonsense from more recent years.
Yeah, I know we can turn it off, but radio is a bit like aural wallpaper.
- binao
- Alex
- Moor Larkin
- Moor Larkin
July 31, 2015 at 5:26 pm -
Not sure it’s necessarily the political party in power, but certainly an “Establishment”. That is inevitable I guess, given that any society inevitably creates an establishment. The British one has a clear gay obsession just now, which is quite amusing when the culture clashes in Africa and other parts of the world crop up. Womens rights is another obsession and that one is actually much more febrile with the African/Indian tales of horrors seeming to make the European women quite hysterical bout their own patch. It’s a strange beast at times. It has noticeably changed in tone post savilisation I would add. A cultural revolution has plainly been underway at all levels within the beeb.
- Pericles Xanthippou
July 31, 2015 at 6:29 pm -
In the circumstances it’s rather unfair of Mz. Airey to complain of buggers’ turning her down; at least one has obviously not done so.
On a more serious point: I can understand the addition of Barrow Boys’ Chatter to the licence fee: it sets the income stream in the corporation’s control. What I cannot understand is the support of it amongst others: it’s an incredibly wasteful way of funding a public-broadcasting system.
The licence fee — an inefficient and now relatively ineffective means of raising a tax — ought to be replaced by a precept. Parliament could debate the size of this as oft as it would and, once it was decided, the corporation would have no need to worry about its revenue (other than the sales &c. in which it already engages) again. It would have only to plan its activities in line with its determined income.
ΠΞ
- Daft Lassie
July 31, 2015 at 7:53 pm -
Is the choice of sculpture apt? Ariel and Prospero by Eric Gill, the man who sexually abused his daughters (and his dog, by all accounts) …
- binao
July 31, 2015 at 7:55 pm -
This BBC issue is difficult, & like the Royal Mail (remember the Consignia fiasco?), there is huge brand value.
My view is that there should be a basic state broadcasting service covering available media, free to access. The sad remains of the World Service I so appreciated in earlier days when working abroad ought to be a targeted service funded as de facto government propoganda. As for the rest, it should be subscription, which will hopefully reform both content & remove a rest home for the overpaid leftie luvvies currently funded by licence payers they have so little in common with, & I suspect despise.
Quite how a subscription service conversion could be managed I don’t know, but let’s remember the huge value built up in the BBC is OURS.
You bet I’m prejudiced & every BBC leftie comedian or professional handwringer I hear spouting bo**ocks, or makes me more so. - Poptart
July 31, 2015 at 9:51 pm -
The right on inclusive tentacles of the BBC are currently stretching out as far as rural Suffolk where, tonight, we were treated to BBC Radio Suffolk’s ‘Georgey Spanswick’ featuring a lengthy item on ‘Pride’.
A special ‘Heads Up’ (unfortunate choice of words) from a functionary reporting from Brighton.
Anybody vaguely aware of ‘Pride’ would be in the pub with their tractors parked outside and couldn’t give a flying ferret about what the Gay Army is up to on the Sussex coast. The less fortunate Octogenarian listeners, many of whom have rarely strayed far beyond the County Boundary, are probably utterly confused. To them ‘Pride’ means something completely different.
- windsock
July 31, 2015 at 10:59 pm -
Between Petunia’s comment yesterday and Mudplugger’s reply:
. Guess I’m just a big poofy nancy boy.REPLY
Mudplugger July 30, 2015 at 8:04 pm
That’s Windsock’s joband
and Mudplugger’s comment today:”I am not a Branson fan for all sorts of other reasons, but I do recognise and acknowledge his successful record of enterprise – and all achieved, apparently, without any ‘technical competence’ at all.But I don’t believe he’s gay, so that almost certainly eliminates him from any chance of re-forming the BBC into an organisation fit for its audience and its paymasters.>
I am so sick of your snide anti-gay “witticisms” that I suggest you all go fuck yourselves. Don’t worry, I’ll never darken your door again. But you are shits. Libertarians? Ha!
- Henry Wood
August 1, 2015 at 1:30 am -
Sorry, no flounces allowed on a Friday night
- Henry Wood
- windsock
July 31, 2015 at 11:27 pm -
Oh andI missed this one: ” Gay Army ”
Excuse me while i shoot mysel fwith a pansy. Fucking halfwit
- Poptart
August 1, 2015 at 8:05 am -
So what is the problem with ‘Gay Army’? I am sorry you seem to take the term as some sort of personal insult.
I am not sorry, however, that this ‘Fucking halfwit’ does not need to resort to disgusting language to make an irrelevant point.
- Poptart
- FormerBBC
August 1, 2015 at 8:44 am -
I take the Whittingdale committee to be an attempt at mounting the case for the prosecution (the BBC has after got dozens of full-time staff tasked to defend the organisation). That seems fair enough, just so long as people don’t expect it to be “balanced”.
But what about the people chosen? You have them just about spot on, well done. There are two highly successful women executives in today’s TV world who are total phonies – and Dawn Airey is one of them, kudos to the BBC for (presumably) seeing through her at an early point. She owes her rise to her ability to flatter elderly men, who didn’t spot that she has little to offer except gab, the sisterhood has imho played less of a role (btw she hid her bent for years, hilariously claiming a boyfriend who lived in another town).
{ 57 comments… read them below or add one }