Maverick Meltdown.
Our mirthless, Eeyorish, lumbering dinosaur of a national broadcasting corporation has finally managed to plant its flat feet firmly in the middle of a contretemps it cannot win.
Astonishing remarks on Top Gear affair as senior BBC boss claims ‘Clarkson is like Savile’ and that ‘Jeremy has personal issues. He is self destructing… he should go into rehab’
‘Cannot win’ because it has united two warring factions in condemnation that had hitherto stood nose to nose, exchanging spittle-flecked fury, confabulation, and whinnying outrage. Now they race neck and neck to be first to demand the head of the Director General on a platter.
Those who claim to be the ‘survivors’ of victimhood by Savile ‘cannot believe’ that the BBC would seek to place the trauma, mental aguish, and debilitating post-traumatic stress of a hand placed on a bum 50 years ago on a par with the paltry fleeting pain of a split lip and a punch on the nose by an irate presenter.
Whilst those who champion the cause of the truly multi-talented Clarkson and worship the ability to drive in endless circles, consuming gallons of fuel, whilst cracking schoolboy jokes are gob-smacked at finding that a well deserved remonstrate towards an incompetent minion should ever be compared to eating babies as a midday snack and making your Mother’s eyeballs into a tasteless bling ring – long before she was dead.
I would say ‘well done, BBC’ for inciting this joint clarigation from such bitter enemies just before an election and the BBC charter renewal, it takes some doing; but I suspect it has long been in the planning.
This isn’t about Clarkson, or Savile, or even Farage. This is about the election.
This is about the progressive liberal forces that have infested the BBC and the media, promoted by Labour, who now see their previously safe position from where they decide how we should think; whom it is acceptable to hate, who to love, what we should eat, what we should be repulsed by, be in fear of, entertained by, at risk of being diluted by ‘other’ voices.
I don’t wish to sound extremist, but I have no doubt that if every signatory to this petition were boiled down for biofuel, the world would be a cleaner, smarter place.
What is Danny Cohen’s vision of ‘acceptable broadcasting’? A world where Jeremy Clarkson can get away with saying that immigrants should be boiled down for biofuel – or a world where the New Statesman can confidently suggest, as it did above, that Clarkson supporters should be boiled down for biofuel?
A Top Gear that rates cars on the ease of fitting baby seats? That focuses on the speedometer hovering at 28 miles per hour and its bio-fuel economy whilst it creeps round the track, with an earnest voice-over taking the manufacturers to task for using mercury in the manufacture of the widget that holds the gear stick in place in case future generations end up with too many filled teeth?
Grand Prix coverage dominated by Lewis Hamilton reciting his lentil and organic carrot soup recipe and humbly apologising for using 15 gallons of precious earth resources in order to reach the track – before telling us that the race is off out of respect for atrocities committed in Turkey 200 years ago?
Will they leave off the ritual humiliation of Nigel Farage if his manifesto agrees that he will make all national decisions at the behest of a committee of Mumsnet contributors, give up the evil booze and fags, and pass a law turning all pubs into free creches?
Shall they dump Woman’s Hour and have Allah’s Hour instead?
Let us have a BBC comprised of Lesbians, gay men, immigrants, disabled people, vegetarians, cyclists, smokeophobes, people who are passionate about climate change, women in general and a side order of female victims, lots of Muslims, in fact all those people who like to portray themselves as marginalised, outliers – yet are in fact the pumping, beating heart of the organisation.
But let it be a subscription service, paid for by their fellow travellers – a levy on the Guardian, the Opera Houses, the National Trust and anyone with a second home in Cornwall. They can even have their own MP if they want, just the one, to represent their interests, since they all apparently have identical interests. Member for the Republic of Guardianshire.
Never again need they trouble themselves to pour bile and hatred, masquerading as ‘cutting edge comedy’ on the rest of we unreformed dinosaurs. We ordinary folk, who still enjoy the smile on a baby’s face as we go eeeny, meeny miny moe whilst playing with their toes. Who eat steak, and drive cars because it is the only way we can get to work, and ask only to have some light entertainment at the end of the day – not re-programming.
I don’t support Clarkson thumping a colleague – assuming that he did.
I can, however, perfectly understand the frustration of finding yourself faced with one of those robotic, smirking, ‘oh purlese don’t talk to me like that Jeremy, I’ll have to report you to Health and Safety and you won’t like that’ mincing apparitions that the BBC is so fond of employing, at the end of a long hard day. There’s only so much any human being can stand – and Jeremy is a human being. He deserves to be punished for snapping – he should have kicked the hotel cat, but in luvvy-land that would probably have caused an even bigger outcry.
Never mind what Jeremy did – will someone please explain to me why my licence fee goes towards paying a wet behind the ears kiddo who can’t even make sure the star, the generator of his income, gets a hot square meal at the end of the day? What is the point of an ‘assistant’ producer if it’s not to make sure what is being produced gets everything it needs to go on producing?
The BBC executive’s comments to the Mail on Sunday can only have been made from a state of shock – to find that there are at least 850,000 individuals out there who haven’t yet been successfully programmed . They had no idea!
People’s Tribunal? We need a People’s Television Service. Whilst we’re about it, a People’s Government wouldn’t be a bad idea. Preferably headed by a People’s Prime Minister. This Establishment Leftie/Righty Aristocracy have ruled our roost and bullied everyone in their path for long enough.
This is formal warning that Ms Raccoon will in future be campaigning for UKIP. Ms Raccoon will be voting UKIP. Never thought I would say that. I suggest you all do too.
No idea where they will lead the country, none of their manifestoes are worth the paper they’re written on – but at least you get the impression that they will be leading it where the majority of ordinary people want to go. The people who earn their inflated wages, not the ones who spend them.
Common Sense and Plain Speaking.
I’m sick to death of being offended by the politically correct.
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 9:12 am -
Comparing Clarkson to a man who spent much of his life raising money for the crippled and sick, building hospitals to help the paralysed regain mobility, and stimulating a nation of lard-arses to get off their armchairs and undertake sponsored athletics events such as marathon Running…
Plainly comparing Jimmy Savile to an overweight blowhard like Clarkson who kisses BBC and Tory ass and does sweet FA for anyone but himself is a bloody insult. Poor Jimmy. The slander never ends; it’s almost biblical.
- Juliet 46
March 16, 2015 at 9:20 am -
Thank you for writing this, Ms Raccoon. I too am voting UKIP. Fed up with the PC brigade. The system needs a good shake-up.
- Stewart Cowan
March 16, 2015 at 9:36 am -
Beautifully written, Ms Raccoon, although I agree with Moor that Clarkson is a blowhard, but I haven’t paid for a TV licence in ten years, so they can remunerate these highly talented (ahem) people with as many millions as they deem necessary to keep them at their stables. It’s the mainstream’s re-programming I object to rather than Clarkson, for whom treatment for anger management and Tourette’s might possibly help.
I have been voting UKIP for years now, having seen past the fake left/right circus – both sides controlled by the same people, so we get to live in a burgeoning Marxist-Leninist prison camp by voting LibLabCon(SNP). Is UKIP independent or the “controlled opposition”? Do we have any other choice but to take a chance on them?
- Anne.
March 16, 2015 at 11:24 am -
‘The controlled opposition’ I’ve often wondered about that.
- Stewart Cowan
March 16, 2015 at 11:52 am -
The social engineers drew up their plans decades (centuries, even) in advance. E.g. the Fabian Society recognised that the only way to create their global socialist “Utopia” was to destroy the family – by very small steps (their logo is a tortoise) – so as to get away with it.
They would have known that there would have been great opposition to a federal Europe, so had a head-start in founding anti-EU organisations.
That’s the danger, anyway. Hopefully, there’s enough strong-willed “ordinary” members to hold the leaders to account, unlike the (other?) Establishment parties.
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 12:02 pm -
I’m really Kipkonfused to be honest. We know that Cameroon has promised an EU referendum (more or less) in 2017, but for the life of me I cannot see where UKIP ever declared a statute of limitations. They are currently making a lot of noise about it must all be over by Xmas, seemingly merely to make Cameron state the obvious, which would be no-can-do. Since Labour are now pro-EU, all of this tends to suggest the Kippers will be completely counter-productive unless they win a Majority of their own, at which point they would have to put up or shut up. It’s an interesting game of brinkmanship for both electorate and party.
- Ted Treen
March 17, 2015 at 12:32 am -
“…a People’s Government wouldn’t be a bad idea…”
I agree whole-heartedly, but I’m sure the establishment would never permit it.
- Ted Treen
- Moor Larkin
- Stewart Cowan
- IlovetheBBC
March 17, 2015 at 10:45 am -
‘Both sides controlled by the same people’ – I suggest you look up a short bio of Farrage. Privately educated merchant banker.
He’s no more revolutionary than rice pudding with skin.
- Anne.
- The Blocked Dwarf
March 16, 2015 at 9:40 am -
Please rush me my “I’m sick to death of being offended by the politically correct.” 100% eco-organic-fairtrade cotton hand spun by underage Asian sex slaves in a criminally unsafe building whilst being abused by Gary Glitter and 2nd hand smoke from the ghost of Jimmy Savile’s cigar T-shirt. I enclose payment of a £5 postal order and an SAE.
- sula
March 31, 2015 at 4:37 am -
On it’s way. But you’re a tenner short.
http://www.cafepress.co.uk/mf/32248829/being-politically-correct_tshirt?productId=412912750
- sula
- Engineer
March 16, 2015 at 9:44 am -
The BBC should bring back Delia Smith. At least she could cook lentils properly, and even make them quite tasty.
(PS – Cracking piece of analysis and writing. I’ve been seriously considering a UKIP vote myself; I did in the Euro elections and don’t regret it one bit.)
- windsock
March 16, 2015 at 10:04 am -
Isn’t that because the European Parliament does FA?
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 10:12 am -
I voted a couple of kippers in, in the locals…
I’m watching the pothole situation closely as I drive to work each day.
- Moor Larkin
- windsock
- Alex
March 16, 2015 at 9:47 am -
“Let us have a BBC comprised of Lesbians, gay men, immigrants, disabled people, vegetarians, cyclists, smokeophobes, people who are passionate about climate change, women in general and a side order of female victims, lots of Muslims, in fact all those people who like to portray themselves as marginalised, outliers – yet are in fact the pumping, beating heart of the organisation.”
I thought that was what we already had, and had had for a very long time. Unless anyone is in any doubt I FUCKING HATE THE BBC! – largely due to “the special way it’s funded”.
I’m with you all the way on voting UKIP.
- Ancient+Tattered Airman
March 16, 2015 at 12:48 pm -
That is indeed the composition of the box-ticking politically correct Fabian Marxists whose aim is to spin the news.
- Ancient+Tattered Airman
- windsock
March 16, 2015 at 10:03 am -
“I don’t support Clarkson thumping a colleague – assuming that he did.”
” one of those robotic, smirking, ‘oh purlese don’t talk to me like that Jeremy, I’ll have to report you to Health and Safety and you won’t like that’ mincing apparitions that the BBC is so fond of employing” – oh look, another assumption.
“I’m sick to death of being offended by the politically correct.” I agree, but I’m a bit surprised you are offended by them – wouldn’t you just write them off as cretins? Isn’t ignorance bliss? I’m also sick to death of those who seek to offend by deliberately being politically incorrect. Good manners cost nothing, knowing when to hold one’s tongue is a virtue, and one can express oneself quite clearly and forcefully about a late lunch without being forced to punch someone in the face – and the person punched did NOT make a complaint about it.
- Chris
March 16, 2015 at 10:27 am -
There is one relevant comparison to be made between JS & JS – from what I can see both became (in terms of their onscreen persona) exaggerated caricatures of themselves, and in playing up to this (‘giving the public what they want’) this was then used against them to create one-dimensional hate figures for the snivelling elite & heroes for the cuckolded general populace.
In Jimmy’s case it seems to me he fell out of love (and out of touch) with his role as a television presenter as his shows became very formulaic and age caught up with him – what remains of his pre-1977 output is testimony to that, in his day, he was both very dynamic and clearly in his element too.
In Jeremy’s case, he was one of the earliest benefactors of John Birt’s ‘BBC Branding’ so out went the motor journalist on a television magazine show, and in came VHS spin-off’s of him doing controversial things alongside the Top Gear monthly magazine, Top Gear compilation CD’s etc). Twenty years later and he’s a “dinosaur” and – as we know – we were all ‘unenlightened’ back then. http://retardedkingdom.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/twenty-years-of-sabotage.html- Chris
March 16, 2015 at 10:28 am -
First line should read ‘JS & JC’ – not Jesus Christ of course, though I’m not convinced we won’t see the return of crucifixions
- Chris
- Mudplugger
March 16, 2015 at 10:29 am -
Problem is, they are indeed cretins, but with disproportionate influence, a malign influence from which we ‘ordinary folk’ suffer every day through others incapable of spotting and resisting it.
I’m with the Landlady, although I need no further persuasion to vote UKIP, as I already do at every opportunity.- Anne.
March 16, 2015 at 11:29 am -
Agreed Mudplugger about these cretins and morons, they are too well supported by the media and other systems we are forced to live under, others are too ignorant and frightened to resist.
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 12:05 pm -
Forced to live under the Media? Only if you pay attention to them…
- Moor Larkin
- Anne.
- Chris
- Jim McLean
March 16, 2015 at 10:04 am -
I’m sick to death of being offended by the politically correct.
That was the perfect conclusion to a great article.
- Chris
March 16, 2015 at 10:04 am -
As support for Jeremy Pubehead increased, I assumed the fury of the bedwetters would result in Clarkson being likened to Jimmy Savile – he’s another blunt Northerner who doesn’t subscribe to the political correctness consensus, and must therefore is ‘wrong’. And so it came to pass – I wonder to if the ‘vested interests’ are looking for ‘things’ too – certainly they haven’t been shy at condemning him outright on Twitter. And they do so love to sacrifice their best-loved ‘brands’ at the BBC.
As for UKIP, Farage does talk a lot of sense in the interview he gave to Spiked. I’m not convinced at the rest of his party however, but his points on media collusion and his fellow politicians are amongst the most sensible things I’ve heard a politician say in a very long time http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/im-taking-on-the-establishment-and-they-hate-me-for-it/16758#.VQapxma-31I
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 10:11 am -
Yes indeed and Madame’s furious Kipkonversion exactly shows how it is the Media who lead the political consciousness in this country rather than the politicians. Somewhere in the sound & fury I swear to God I recall the Tory leader speaking up on behalf of the Pubeman. But who listens to the politicians when they themselves can get on t’internet and shout about how sick and tired they are of being sick and tired… and let’s put the loonies in charge of the asylum because the warders are getting on our collective tits…
- Engineer
March 16, 2015 at 11:11 am -
It’s true that UKIP has it’s fair share of loonies and fruitcakes, and , for all I know, closet racists as well. But – so do all the other parties, however much they spin their public pronouncements.
Who’s country is this? Does it belong to the British people, or the British political class? Ukip may be full of loonies etc, but at least you get the feeling that they’re on the side of British people in general. I haven’t had that feeling from the Westminster and Brussels crowd for some years. Maybe since Maggie.
Time the Westminster and Brussels crowd had a polite but firm kick in the ballots.
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 11:17 am -
The fact that UKIP seems to largely be feeding off the tit of the EU leaves me thinking of ungrateful, squealing piglets.
They look cute when they’re small, but they grow up to be absolute swine.- Engineer
March 16, 2015 at 11:19 am -
Got any better options, then?
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 11:27 am -
You keep telling us the Coalition are doing a pretty good job. I tend to agree. That’s why the Luvvies want UKIP to stop the Tories winning properly. If UKIP can harness the working classes up north it might be a fairer fight but so far as I can see they mostly are targetting the silver brigade who miss the Empire.
- Anne.
March 16, 2015 at 11:30 am -
I cant see how the coalition are doing a very good job?!
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 11:35 am -
Therein lies the rub…
- suffolkgirl
March 16, 2015 at 12:41 pm -
Um, I think I won’t be alone sticking with the devil I know in May. Farage has had a while to put his party together so why hasn’t he? Carswell always looks slightly shell shocked when I see him out. Maybe that’s just his look.
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 1:18 pm -
Given that the guy who got the party started was Jeremy Kyle’s dad, who was himself the bastard child of Jerry Springer, I’ve always been of the opinion that it’ll need a great persuader to smoke me out.
- binao
March 17, 2015 at 8:34 am -
The issue of UKIP’s nutters is a non issue. All parties have them but they aren’t so assiduously hunted & exposed.
Especially by the BBC; though they’ve fed greedily off Grant Shapps’ 10 years ago slip.
My own view is that the very worse thing UKIP can do is to take part in a policy bidding war. We know the core policy; everybody does. For the rest, we could do with a lot less legislation & a lot more common sense application. Promises made by minority parties, no matter how unlikely it is that they’ll have any veto or power, can bite later.
So why bother? Most electors don’t believe red yellow & blue labour on their ‘pledges’, do they?
Shame is, even in ‘give me a high six ‘ South Downs, I’ve got a good MP & at least one decent councillor. I’ll feel a bit of guilt voting against them but it won’t change anything.There has to be a way of privatising the BBC so we get some benefit from the brand. The thought of all those entitlement leeches that infest the arts & media being exposed to commercial reality brightens my day.
- Moor Larkin
March 17, 2015 at 9:51 am -
But is it the politicians who are running the country or is it the embedded Humphreys with their weird beliefs and common purposes. Yes Minister. No Minister. Three bags full Minister. It’s one thing for a political party with some depth to try and wrest democracy back, but what chance does the bloke in the pub stand.
There was a strange moment a few months back when Mark Rylance announced via the Telegraph that ACPO was to be abolished. That made sense since we now have Police Commissioners. Whatever lay behind Rylance’s belief, he was plainly wrong. The idea that in BIG Government, it is the politicians run the show is a painfully naive belief. What will happen when UKIP face the Law and the lawyers telling them they cannot pass that law because it is against some other law and it must go to Judicial Review and then the judge will ally himself on the side of “the law” and the politicians will lose again.
- Moor Larkin
- Moor Larkin
- Engineer
March 16, 2015 at 12:52 pm -
Well, compared to the other available option in 2010, the coalition have done a fair job. That doesn’t preclude ‘could do better’, though. I don’t think Ian Duncan-Smith gets the credit he deserves; he’s had the thankless task of taking a broken, disfunctional and diarrhoetic welfare system and making it fairer for both claimants and taxpayers (it’s still a work in progress), but at least he’s trying instead of just pissing away even more taxpayers’ money like the last lot did. Gove has given education a good shake-up and wrestled it back from the Education Establishment, hopefully higher standards will start to filter through. Things are beginning to look a bit better on the economic and public spending front, but I always felt it would take a decade to turn the ship after Brown’s economic incontinence, and about a generation to really recover.
On the downside, we seem to have lost the plot with defence, we’re still far too tied up to the clearly failing EU, energy policy is dictated by a load of climate nonsense, we don’t control our own borders, there seems little will to drive up healthcare standards (which are patchy – excellent emergency care on the whole, and somewhat indifferent in all other categories), we have far too many unaccountable Quangos dictating how live is lived, and there are still far too many unnecessary hangers-on sucking at the teat of the public’s money (Arts Council? Government grants to charities with huge administrative headcounts?). Oh – and gay marriage.So about 5/10, compared to a charitable 0/10 for Blair/Brown.
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 1:34 pm -
I was quite taken aback when I read that Defence Spend barely amounts to 2% of GDP. So much for the Military-Industrial Complex…. unless someone is playing numbers games here. Anyhow, as an amount of money it looks pretty static over the last few years so summat aint like wot they want us to believe. Is it because we have growth back in the economy but are merely holding Defence to Budget?
http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/spending_chart_2005_2018UKb_30t- Engineer
March 16, 2015 at 1:53 pm -
There was some rhetoric about projecting soft power (Overseas Aid budget) rather than hard power (Defence budget). Nice idea, but given the way Putin has been acting up and ISIL is going on, that call may have backfired somewhat. Also, there’s been the occasional mutterance about EU defence force, and one wonders if some defence decisions have been taken with that in mind (2 aircraft carriers with no aircraft, for example). Given the way the EU is going, that one might backfire as well.
Can’t help thinking it would be prudent to maintain full national Armed Forces capability until there is proven and dependable capability elsewhere; can’t just expect the Yanks to dig us out of holes all the time, especially as they seem to getting more isolationist under Obama.
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 1:58 pm -
Interest is interesting…
http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/spending_chart_2005_2016UKb_14c1li111mcn_90t
WTF happened in 2010?… - Chris
March 16, 2015 at 2:17 pm -
It is my humble opinion that the entire “New Labour” deal was the wholesale sacrifice of what remained of the UK political system to international big business, and carefully constructed and executed 10 year plan.
The resident ‘spin doctors’ were media experts and had the UK ready for them – be it calling time on satire (goodbye Spitting Image in 1996) or the ‘Cool Britannia’ PM photographed carrying a guitar into No.10 in his jeans. The masses – the 20-something me included – were then fattened up and distracted with easy credit and as much ‘good times’ as we could handle whilst the nation’s children had the education system usurped from ‘educating’ to ‘results and attitudes’. Most people ignored the cracks in the walls as they appeared one by one. Our PM’s veneer slowly weathered, but not enough for him not to win 3 elections.
After 10 years he stood down, and handled the premiership to his hapless chancellor. At that point, the real result of 10 years of New Labour were becoming more visible – universities full of unquestioning kiddults, a collapsing ‘boom and bust’ economy, an overwhelming feeling that the wheels were falling off.
Three years later New Labour were replaced in “power” with the ConDem Coalition – and what was this Pantomime? Career politicians playing caricatures of the kind of politics that never existed outside of comic book America – cartoons. An education secretary who upset all the teachers. A “justice” secretary who upset (and wrecked) the entire legal industry. A Secretary of State for Work and Pensions who destroyed the benefits system and encouraged a culture of ‘zero hour contracts’. These are actors employed for demolition, and they bear little resemblance to Conservatives of the pre-Blair era – but as UK politics is now a complete sham, this is the deal they have to agree to and will surely be rewarded for. Meanwhile, Labour have an unelectable clown as their candidate for PM – no doubt as they are fully aware the demolition of society is by no means completed.
In order to ensure everybody forgets about before ‘year zero’ we are now being told that all Tories were paedophiles (just as the current mob are all rotters), that Jimmy Savile ruled the world and because of that we must acquiesce to being a Police State and surrender our criminal justice system – not to mention everyone born after 1988 being unable to think about anything and accept everything they are told. Meanwhile, whoever we elect – red, blue, yellow, sky-blue pink with a purple border – only do as they are told by businesses and lobby groups, including a investment-funded disreputable law firm that is gobbling up what is left of the ‘legal industry’ like a maniacal Pacman.
And, behind the scenes, the people who sold the country out from under our noses – T.Bliar, P.Mandelson, etc and several key Tories of influence – still have major influence and are still both filthy rich and answer to no-one. - windsock
March 16, 2015 at 4:19 pm -
I find it amusing that every UKIP logo features the £ sign. It always makes me think of the Genesis album (aargh – admits to liking early Genesis) – “Selling England By The Pound” – whatever is left, Farage will flog it.
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 4:40 pm -
early genesis was the only genesis worth liking. Phil Collins was surely nulabor in the making; bland, catchy and bald.
- Engineer
- The Blocked Dwarf
March 16, 2015 at 2:46 pm -
” Ian Duncan-Smith gets the credit he deserves; he’s had the thankless task ”
I think the correct technical term is “Sisyphean”…or maybe “poisoned Chalice”. Thing is, I know that as a Benefits Claimant what spends his days on the couch in his boxers playing with his nuts (KP of course), swigging 2 litre White lightening bottles whilst watching Day Time TV, I should detest IDS but somehow I get the feeling he IS really and truly trying to solve the Gordon’s Knot that is the Poverty Trap of the Welfare State. He won’t of course, it’s impossible -unless he recants Cameronism and reverts to the One True Church of St. Margaret of Grantham.
- Moor Larkin
- suffolkgirl
- Moor Larkin
- Anne.
- Moor Larkin
- Engineer
- Moor Larkin
- Moor Larkin
- The Blocked Dwarf
March 16, 2015 at 10:19 am -
What does it say about me that I looked at the picture with this post and my first thought was: ‘my, that croissant doesn’t look very fresh and Aged Mother Dwarf would be perturbed to learn that the sort of people who read the Daily Mail now frequent the Marks & Sparks Café’ ?
Then I thought , what a shame it was that I would never again be allowed to sit in a Parisian Café, or a Caff anywhere else for that matter, enjoying a croissant, coffee and Gitanes.
- English Pensioner
March 16, 2015 at 10:34 am -
Producers believe that they are the most important part of any TV production. You have only to look at the credits at the end, those who matter are scrolled rapidly past the viewer, whilst at the end the producer’s name gets bigger type and stays on the screen longer.
I learnt that titles aren’t all many years ago as a “site engineer” who was supposed to oversee a team of wiremen, fitters and electricians. In practice, they all knew what they had to do and the site engineer’s main job was to ensure that there were tea making facilities and identify a decent pub for lunch and evening meal. Provided that this was done, all went smoothly!
Clearly this producer doesn’t understand his role in the production!- Chris
March 16, 2015 at 10:46 am -
And yet the producers – and 100’s other technical staff – employed by the BBC to make the shows we watched in the 1970s have been damned by the same BBC bedwetters as having all ‘turning a blind eye’ to heinous child abuse. I’m quite sure that the likes of Bill Cotton Jr, Roger Ordish, Robin Nash, Michael Hurll (to name but four) ran very tight ships indeed – and stood for no nonsense or breaking of strict codes of conduct. But then again, most of them are dead so who cares about their reputations?
- Engineer
March 16, 2015 at 11:18 am -
As Jeremy Paxman said not so long ago, the BBC is run by children, now. The people in production management positions with a bit of life experience under their belt are long gone – an it shows.
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 11:20 am -
I blame the parents
- Engineer
March 16, 2015 at 11:24 am -
Probably a lentil-munching civil partnership…
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 11:39 am -
with a son called Oisin presumably…
- Moor Larkin
- Engineer
- Moor Larkin
- Engineer
- Chris
- robbo
March 16, 2015 at 10:56 am -
Madam Raccoon, A friend of mine said Clarkson was a Quaker!
- dearieme
March 16, 2015 at 11:08 am -
We need more of the transgendered at the top of the Beeb. Cut off Daniel Cohen’s balls and call him Daniella.
At least that’s what Fat Jem would say, had he any balls of his own.
- Chris
March 16, 2015 at 11:11 am -
JUMPING JIHADI’S! The “producer” IS being represented by none other than Slater & Moron!!!
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/jeremy-clarkson-top-gear-producer-5336934I take it their ‘Paul Daniels’ is not the former BBC magician who was told to STFU about Yewtree in 2012….
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 11:18 am -
You really couldn’t make it up…
- Anne.
March 16, 2015 at 11:36 am -
This producer hasnt filed an assault claim..and isnt interested in the ‘limelight’..?
- Moor Larkin
- macheath
March 16, 2015 at 11:21 am -
Have you by any chance met Farage in person?
I ask because the man was out meeting the public in North Essex just before the Clacton by-election and my sources at the local bridge and golf clubs – in vino veritas and all that – report a surprising number of ladies who, having had ‘Nigel’ hold their hand and peer earnestly into their eyes, went on to vote for him despite a lifetime of Tory loyalty and the incredulity of their menfolk.
I don’t know if it’s animal magnetism or post-hypnotic suggestion, but anyone who can make ‘Eagle Elsie, the terror of the Tenth Green’ go all giggly is surely a force to be reckoned with.
- macheath
March 16, 2015 at 11:30 am -
Ooops – not ‘him’ directly, of course, but Carswell.
- macheath
- Odin’s Raven
March 16, 2015 at 11:24 am -
Here’s someone who understands why Clarkson is popular, why Lefties hate him so much and why they should be resisted.
Charlton- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 3:14 pm -
Doesn’t seem inclined to allow my comment though, so he can fuck off.
- corevalue
March 16, 2015 at 8:24 pm -
Perhaps because his book’s postscript is about Savile, and relies on the Yewtree narratives being true.
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 8:44 pm -
I never mentioned Savile. Whaddya think I am? A monomaniac?…
- Moor Larkin
- corevalue
- Moor Larkin
- Joe Public
March 16, 2015 at 12:10 pm -
It’s meant as a compliment madame:
Reminiscent of of the Readers Digest “Improve your word power” – today’s word added to this dumbo’s vocabulary is ‘clarigation’.
- Major Bonkers
March 16, 2015 at 10:35 pm -
Curmurring borborygmus.
(Thunderous tummy-rumbling).
- Major Bonkers
- Ken442
March 16, 2015 at 12:12 pm -
Shock horror! The army of professional offendees will be so upset at your compelling diatribe that they are likely to choke on their tofu. Nevertheless it needed to be said by the web’s wisest commentator and I wholly share your conversion to UKIP. Certainly it has its fair share of oddities but, overall, its policies comprise the common-sense views of the silent majority and it is entirely sound on the EU and sensible immigration policies. Now I am old and grey (aka voter) I do wonder where the country’s backbone went post Maggie’s defenestration. Perhaps, but only perhaps, The Farage and his ilk have found it.
In any event just giving the MSM & political establishment a good kicking is reason enough to vote UKIP. - Rob J
March 16, 2015 at 12:21 pm -
An ‘unnamed BBC exec’ quoted by the Beeb bashing Daily Mail. Massive pinch of salt required.
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 12:33 pm -
You mean it wasn’t Lord Birkenhead?
- Mrs Grimble
March 16, 2015 at 12:47 pm -
Waiter! A bucket of sodium chloride for this Daily Mail headline please!
I’m saddened by the braying agreement to crude generalisations here. Nobody seems to have noticed how old Blighty has really changed – public service is denigrated, education for self-improvement is sidelined in favour of education for work, everything must be sold off to the highest bidder, the man who makes the most money is king, everything must be paid for by advertising…..
But no – lesbians, lefties, muslimists, political correctedness and the limp-wristed brigade are taking over and destroying our beloved country – oh noes!!!
Oh, and before laughing at somebody for bearing such a funny foreign name as Oisin, consider your reaction should an Irish person make fun of somebody for being named Arthur….- windsock
March 16, 2015 at 1:02 pm -
If you weren’t already married, and if I were not of a different persuasion, I’d ask you to marry me.
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 1:04 pm -
I used to believe I was half-Irish and I’d never heard the name Oisin before. Hangs head in shame.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ois%C3%ADn- Joe Public
March 16, 2015 at 2:01 pm -
Ain’t that the name of the sauce you spread on pancakes before adding the crispy duck & shallots?
- Joe Public
- suffolkgirl
March 16, 2015 at 1:28 pm -
Well put and with good humour too which is more than I could manage.
Meanwhile the unfortunate Oisin, or ‘it’ as Ms A likes to call him, is lying low, the subject of a hate campaign that wont care who was right or wrong. He needs a good solicitor if anyone does. - Mr Wray
March 20, 2015 at 12:48 pm -
Poor little Oisin has been hung out to dry by the BBC. No doubt he was chosen as he was the first ‘ethnic’ to feel the full wrath of an angry, hungry Clarkson. I don’t imagine for one moment that this is all about protecting employees from ‘violent bullies’ but more about getting rid of an opponent. It is political and nothing more.
Apart from the poor chaps ‘incompetence’, if it was indeed his fault that the cook went AWOL, Oisin has been unjustly and shabbily treated by the media and especially the BBC; he has been put in harms way by his employer who should have kept quiet until they knew what was up. He should sue and, who knows, maybe it will be the BBC he goes after rather than Clarkson.
- windsock
- Moor Larkin
- GildasTheMonk
March 16, 2015 at 1:26 pm -
Great piece, Boss!
- Robert Edwards
March 16, 2015 at 1:26 pm -
That, Madam, was a damned good rant. Damned right, too; Nigel Farage, however one may regard his party, is a National treasure.
- Duncan Disorderly
March 16, 2015 at 1:27 pm -
People are voting UKIP just to spite everyone who thinks doing so is a bit naughty. Personally, the idea of Farage as PM is horrifying, and I suspect it would be horrifying to 99% of the people voting UKIP. Certainly, they would find it horrifying after a month of him as PM.
- Joe Public
March 16, 2015 at 2:05 pm -
Yeah, but it’s the anticipation that he might, just might, not be quite so bad as all the previous PMs we’ve had since Maggie.
- Wigner’s Friend
March 16, 2015 at 4:16 pm -
I whole heartedly agree; however, I am strongly of the opinion that the more votes Farage gets, the coser we are to PM Milliband and that thought truly does fill me with horror.
- Joe Public
- Chris
March 16, 2015 at 2:33 pm -
But is Farage any more horrifying a proposition than Cameron or Supersonic Sid Miliband?
3 choices – Iggle Piggle, Wallace or Homer Simpson.T’riffic, Rodders
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 3:13 pm -
I would remind the Honourable Gentleman that we are not electing el Presidente… yet.
- Cascadian
March 16, 2015 at 5:23 pm -
Really? after seeing how Bliar, Brown and Camoron have behaved you can say that!
Anybody with a modicum of decency would have resigned after the Syria vote. Brown amd Bliar were closer to dictators.
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 5:46 pm -
The Syria vote went just the way Cameron wanted. Politics isn’t a game for children.
- Cascadian
March 16, 2015 at 8:37 pm -
The problem being that politics has been a “game” in yUK for the last seventy years, which helps to explain the continual decline.
Farage with all his faults at a minimum gives the impression that he believes yUK can be much better. The other candidates are pure redistributionists, and believe in silly nonsense like windmills for a power source. I can understand people voting for a good local candidate, I cannot understand people voting for a party led by clegg, camoron, miliband or the green bint.
- Cascadian
- Moor Larkin
- Cascadian
- Moor Larkin
- The Blocked Dwarf
March 16, 2015 at 2:36 pm -
Has our David announced yet that he is on Team Jeeza and will there be “This Is What A Top Gear Presenter Looks Like ” T-shirts for all?
- Tony
March 16, 2015 at 2:49 pm -
Slightly off-topic, and on a personal note:
I have a problem now.
My current Conservative MP is a nice guy who works hard (as the cliche goes) for the community.
His majority was small at the last election, and I would dearly love him to continue in office.
But, being a simple-minded individual, I believe in voting honestly; votes should be cast for any party which appears best to correspond with our own outlooks and beliefs, which in my case is UKIP.
Unfortunately it looks dangerously possible that Labour may win the election by default; something I would abhor after their last adventure into lifestyle meddling.
So who shall I vote for?
Should I be dishonest and vote Conservative?
Or should I honestly vote UKIP?
I’ve never been a floating voter before.Answers on a postcard please (Only joking, I get enough electoral advice through my letterbox lately)
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 3:27 pm -
During peak nu-labor I didn’t vote. It’s seems that I was part of a social movement at the time.
http://www.politicsresources.net/gif/turngraph.png - Mudplugger
March 16, 2015 at 4:39 pm -
First, make sure you vote – that’s the most important thing.
In our Parliamentary system, we don’t vote for a ‘party’, we vote for an individual representative who is usually operating under a party banner. But voting for that individual does not necessarily imply wholesale support for that party’s stances.
My advice would be to invite your local Tory MP round and grill him closely on his opinions, leaving him in no doubt about yours. If he commits adequately to your overall views on the things that matter to you, then vote for him. If not, invite your UKIP candidate round and do the same. Apart from getting your own personal debate, it’s good fun to make them squirm on your own home ground.I did that 10 years ago with a then-aspiring MP – he assured me how he would behave and, despite my natural cynicism, I believed him and voted him in (along with a few thousand others). As it happened, since then he has been entirely true to his word, a rare attribute in that place. Give it a try – you may learn what they’re really like.
- Joe Public
March 16, 2015 at 5:26 pm -
I too have a similar dilemma.
The previous Labour incumbent claimed for £thousands ‘legitimately’, greedily fiddled more on his expenses, embarrassingly had to refund us taxpayers, and got kicked out.
Our current MP is as clean as a whistle* [i.e. he hasn’t been caught out (yet*)], is totally transparent & claims the bare minimum, and our local rag always has 2 -4 photos of him doing his community work every week.
He won’t rock the Tory boat, so voting for ‘him’ is just a tick to the Tories.
If he should defect to UKIP, my problem would be solved. But he won’t.
- Moor Larkin
- Bill Sticker
March 16, 2015 at 3:24 pm -
“I’m sick to death of being offended by the politically correct.”
Also lectured, hectored, patronised and belittled.
Amen to that.
- Backwoodsman
March 16, 2015 at 3:25 pm -
Wonderfull piece, Anna. Pretty much sums the situation up nicely.
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 3:51 pm -
Europe could become a much more interesting place in the next year or three.
http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21646205-frances-mainstream-parties-must-do-more-counter-far-right-national-front-resistible?fsrc=scn/tw/te/pe/ed/resisitableriseoflepen - Paul Widdecombe
March 16, 2015 at 4:46 pm -
The false choice we are presented with is between capitalism and socialism. In reality, both sides offer corporatism.
Those on the right work against those who are supposed to vote for them (the comfortably wealty / filthy rich) by flooding the financial markets with cheap credit to prop up bloated bankrupt corporations. (both public and private…)
Those on the left undermine their own putative power base (the oppressed workers / filthy poor) by flooding the labour markets with cheap migrant labour.
The corporate media obliges in two ways:
1) By fanning the flames of envy and resentment at both groups fortunate enough to be beneficiaries of such governmental largesse – hatred of those working in the financial markets for having the audacity to think they can keep some of the whale sized lumps of public cash being thrown at them, and resentment and suspicion of those brought in to service the perpetual need for cheap labour.
2) By omitting to point out the obvious, double decker bus sized holes in both worldviews. Namely that:
a) If you are on the right & believe that inefficient factories, mines, etc, closing down is a sign of a functioning free market, then you can hardly argue the case for wartime economy scale multi-generational debts to prop up an ailing outmoded banking system. Especially when the people who are going to lose are those fortunate or prudent enough to have savings.
b) If you are on the left & believe that the purpose of the welfare state is to redistribute wealth from the rapacious rich to the exploited working classes, you make an idiot of yourself when you try to claim that low income migrant workers are net contributors to the exchequer and therefore place no additional burden on public services and the welfare state that forms the backbone of the supposed “social contract” that their supporters place their faith in.I have figured out a way to fix this. It is really rather simple. It doesnt involve voting in the traditional way, or rioting either for that matter.
- Moor Larkin
March 16, 2015 at 5:57 pm -
with regards to a) – That was the act of the [admittedly faux] Socialists. I very much doubt a capitalist government would have done what Labour did in 2008. Complete red funk by Brown.
- Moor Larkin
- Tony (Somerset)
March 16, 2015 at 4:48 pm -
The BBC should be reduced to the public service it is supposed to be: BBC1, BBc2, Radio2,3,4, and Overseas Service. EVERYTHING else should go. Local radio is useful, but can be done commercially.
Then apply the same principles to the NHS – our local NHS trust hired a Sky News TV presenter to present awards at an awards ceremony. A district nurse from South Somerset won the Diversity and Equality award – need I say more ?
- Engineer
March 16, 2015 at 6:25 pm -
I’d subscribe for Test Match Special, the Six Nations rugby, the shipping forecast (usually more accurate than the land-based forecast, and it’s more concise), and a summary of the day’s news. I do recognise that some people put some store by programmes like Gardener’s Question Time and The Food Programme, and Radio 3. Pretty much everything else could go, though.
- Engineer
- adams
March 16, 2015 at 5:00 pm -
Atta girl Anna . You have said the fatal words vote UKIP . I am over the moon . How about your friend Petunia has she succumbed also ?
- The Blocked Dwarf
March 16, 2015 at 7:11 pm -
Have I read the ‘tweets’ aright and is Captn Ranty really dead? I won’t pretend I liked the man overmuch or held much truck with his ‘ideas’ BUT his last posts about being abused & martial problems were heartbreaking and my heart went out to him. I pray it wasn’t just all too much for him and my thoughts are with his family.
- Rob J
March 16, 2015 at 9:32 pm -
If you look at his recent twitter postings – the music, there are hints.
- Rob J
- Carol42
March 16, 2015 at 8:13 pm -
Great article Anna, don’t know what I would do without your regular doses of sanity in this mad world I hardly recognise any more. Re the captain, we have been emailing privately for some time and I haven’t had a reply to my last one but I knew he was thinking of visiting his boys so have not been too worried. I am now, he was very low I will try his email and I hope he is ok but definitely afraid for him.
- The Blocked Dwarf
March 16, 2015 at 8:37 pm -
” he was very low ”
That was certainly the impression I got from some of his more recent blogging . I took from his blog that he has been in some very dark places recently.
- Carol42
March 16, 2015 at 8:55 pm -
Just checked my last email from him was on March 2nd and I replied on the 5th and nothing since, he usually replies quickly. I have sent an email and will let you know if I hear anything. I hope he is ok, he was not in a good place at all.
- Carol42
- The Blocked Dwarf
- Yvonne
March 17, 2015 at 7:38 am -
I certainly hope this is rumour and not fact.
Dark times pass. Life is terminal. - Henry the Horse
March 17, 2015 at 8:11 am -
Clarkson really doesn’t come out of it very well. Forty minute tantrum and splitting an underlings lip because he couldn’t have a steak dinner after the chef had gone home just isn’t going to get my sympathy let alone make me decide to vote UKIP.
- IlovetheBBC
March 17, 2015 at 11:09 am -
Well, I’m gobsmacked. I just read a blog (linked above) which claims Clarkson is a ‘brilliant journalist’. Oh so he’s not an insufferable twat so full of himself he’s literally bursting at the seams? My mistake, obviously. And clearly I need to swot up on the definition of ‘journalist’, as it appears to have changed.
But what really amazes me about that piece is the idea the left wing BBC have been gunning for Clarkson for years, when clearly they made and promoted the programme which made him, paid him a fortune and forgave him, repeatedly, for behaviour which would have finished mere mortals. And those supposed repeated attempts to get rid of him by exposing his ‘scandals’? Fomented almost entirely by an almost exclusively right wing press….I really don’t know what some people are smoking, but stub it out, now.As for the allegedly heinous remarks about Savile – they have a point. Specifically, this point:
The BBC has been roundly condemned for allowing a presenter to continue, and to get more work with them, while rumours abounded about his behaviour. It’s claimed this happened because he was a huge celebrity, loved by the public, with friends in high places, high ratings, deep pockets and a prime place in the schedules.At this point I will put my crayons away because you are intelligent people.
- Moor Larkin
March 17, 2015 at 11:29 am -
If you were as intelligent as you like to think you are you wouldn’t have made your specious “point” about Savile. The BBC employed a convicted murderer and made him the most popular man on TV for a while. So fucking what?
- IlovetheBBC
March 17, 2015 at 11:56 pm -
Dirty Den? Wtf?
It isn’t a specious point at all. I obviously will have to get the crayons out.
The BBC has been criticised, rightly or wrongly, for giving a presenter undue power and influence, and letting him allegedly assault children, despite rumours being rife for years and despite some pretty odd behaviour, because he was popular and gave them high ratings. If they allow Clarkson to continue presenting, without suspension or investigation, after he bullied and thumped a co-worker, and after a long history of ‘transgressions’ and warnings, because he is popular, with very high ratings and a huge petition, then where exactly is the difference? Is Clarkson in effect untouchable?I like your blog Moor and have never had need to have words before, but that was a nasty reply and uncalled for.
- IlovetheBBC
- Moor Larkin
- TheyFearTheHare
March 17, 2015 at 9:39 pm -
I don’t support violence in any way, but it must be acknowledged that Clarkson sticking one on Piers Morgan is a clear indication that he’s a man of impeccable judgement, and as such, he clearly should be given the benefit of the doubt.
Some people just deserve a good kicking.
- Done it all
March 21, 2015 at 4:09 pm -
I was a bit surprised that someone called Cohen should suggest that any class of people should be boiled down to make something.
Perhaps as well as biofuel, the Clarkson supporters could be skinned, particularly if they have nice tattoos, to make ‘parchment lampshades’. Or wallets and ID card holders, and to bind books in. Then again, no doubt they could first be humiliated by having to sew a yellow badge on their clothes, or be held in camps where they could be starved while wearing striped pyjamas – but not to the point that you could no longer make soap from their body fat. We could collect their shoes and spectacles in great piles for distribution to the poor, and if they have gold teeth, recycle those into some sort of gold charms and other jewellery.
But first, let’s break their windows, forbid them to use public transport (cattle trucks should be just fine), and confiscate assets such as bicycles that are so necessary for our Green effort to overcome climate change, and their property. (Books could be burnt?)
Don’t forget that their skeletons are useful in training medical personnel for our ‘envy of the world’ NHS, although let’s not forget that they weren’t really human in the first place, so this might not be a great idea. Medical experimentation would be a good use of these subhumans too.
I wonder if Cohen wears or uses anything made by Hugo Boss?
- Jon Stevenson
April 16, 2015 at 4:03 pm -
If only UKIP, the Greens, SNP, and even Plaid Cymru would come together and form a part for the people…..that just my get my vote.
Until then, I suspect UKIP is probably the best way to go….unless like me, you’ve lost all confidence in all of them.
Another excellent article.
{ 124 comments… read them below or add one }