All Trussed Up Like a Ukipper…
So peace finally reigns in the old ‘Muppet show’ studio ‘D’ at Elstree, from where the BBC broadcast the local election results during the night.
They were short handed – one of their senior editors, Jasmine Lawrence, had been removed from the team after tweeting “#WhyImVotingUkip – to stand up for white, middle class, middle aged men w sexist/racist views, totally under represented in politics today.”
She was almost right – UKIPs support is predominantly white, middle class men, retired men too. The main political parties have presided over the creation of a melancholy minority; men who grew up in the shadow of their heroic fathers, with no other opportunity to display their macho wares than trudging to work every day, paying their bills, guarding their children. Mundane tasks compared to saving the world from Naziism. Yet work they cheerfully undertook whilst rebuilding both the shattered economy and the shattered buildings of post war Britain.
ex-Magistrate Ajit Atwal – the Liberal Democrat candidate for Derby.
They have been derided for their dedication to that task; undermined by Feminism, cast adrift from employment by a political elite that thought globalism was the way to go, impoverished by pension ‘raids’, and currently attacked by a legal system that cheerfully leaves them at risk of incarceration at the hands of any two hopefuls prepared to back each other as they seek to convince a jury that 40 years ago he ‘assaulted’ them. Against all this they must watch as a next generation of ‘White Dees’ claim £20,000 a year in benefits to support a champagne swilling lifestyle in Magaluf, and the streets fill with swirling figures in shalwah kameez whose human rights extend to cheerfully shouting ‘death to the infidels’ to passers-by.
Do you have to be ‘racist’ not to want to vote for the Liberal-Democrat candidate in Derby – or just profoundly demoralised at a legal system and political system that has unaccountably grown up around you which makes your local Magistrate or Councillor feel that this picture is perfectly acceptable? It is not the colour of his skin that offends UKIP supporters – it is the mentality that assumes this is reasonable behaviour for a British Magistrate.
Lynne Featherstone, the Lib-Dem MP, said that the reason UKIP is doing so well is ‘that they sound human. All of us have gotten to the point where we are so guarded, we are so on message, that we seem to have lost some of our humanity’. She may be right, that this is the reason they are ‘doing so well’ – but the reason they exist at all is that politicians were so far off message and displaying attributes which the man on the Clapham omnibus saw as far from humanity.
It was Stephen Milligan, the Conservative MP, with a subsidised tangerine stuffed in his mouth, taking a mid-morning break from constituency matters to try on his new fishnet tights and relieve his sexual frustrations, that created the vacancy in Eastleigh which first saw Nigel Farage enter the political fray. The electorate went for David Chidgey – and eventually Chris Huhne. Is it any wonder that a ‘normal bloke’ with a pint in one hand, and a fag in the other gained traction?
Farage went on to take advantage of the wonders of the internet, with a broadside in the European parliament against the new ‘President of Europe’ as a ‘damp rag’ and a ‘low grade bank clerk’ – forced to apologise he did – to low grade bank clerks everywhere for having the temerity to compare them to the lack lustre new President of Europe. The Youtube clips went viral and ‘normal blokes’ everywhere had a new hero.
Straight talking, straight dealing, he didn’t look like the sort of bloke who would take a mid-morning break to check that his seams were straight, nor lie on the kitchen table trussed up like the Christmas turkey. Nor the type who would lie when caught speeding. Or who would endorse family values right up to the election then run off to Marrakech with an interior decorator called Justin.
This morning the politicians are confused – don’t the electorate want lesbians and gays to be able to adopt children snatched from their parents by social workers, or to have free IVF on the NHS? Don’t they understand that if Magistrates come from a community where it is normal to pose proudly with your AK47 then we must embrace their culture? Don’t they want to see Poppies burned on Remembrance Sunday? What is the matter with them?
‘What is the matter with them’ is that the fastest growing oppressed minority – the white heterosexual middle class male – and female – would prefer to be ruled over by people who embrace old fashioned values; if that means embracing all UKIPs manifesto, so be it. They’ve been putting a tick at the very bottom of the ballot paper, the bit they tried to fold over, in their droves all day yesterday – its called ‘none of the above’.
The ‘Muppet show’s’ commentator in chief, Nick Robinson said: “It is worth remembering that once every vote is counted UKIP will not run a single council, they will still have far fewer councillors than their rivals, they will not, of course, have an MP but – in the words of one Labour council leader – they will have caused mayhem.”
Or in the words of Nigel Farage: ‘The UKIP fox is in the Westminster hen house’.
Thank God for that.
- Alvan Eames
May 23, 2014 at 9:12 am -
Absolutely bang-on. Thank you.
- Den
May 23, 2014 at 9:24 am -
Very well said. Completely agree. My little vote went to Nige and his crew.
- Stilyaqi
May 23, 2014 at 9:29 am -
Super stuff as usual – I fit your profile to a T.
- David
May 23, 2014 at 9:48 am -
Spot on Anna.
- SpectrumIsGreen
May 23, 2014 at 9:51 am -
Hit the nail on the head as usual Anna. Though listening to the comments from the other political parties this morning, the message still doesn’t appear to have sunk in yet.
- Moor Larkin
May 23, 2014 at 10:01 am -
Strange to recall how it all got started … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38IVbEJqghQ
- John Galt
May 23, 2014 at 10:57 am -
Sorry to disappoint, but Robert Kilroy-Silk was a rather Jonny-come-lately character, albeit being a UKIP MEP from 2004.
UKIP was founded in 1993 by Alan Sked and other members of the cross-party Anti-Federalist League, a political party set up in November 1991 with the aim of fielding candidates opposed to the Maastricht Treaty.
UKIP leader Nigel Farage is a founding member of UKIP.
- John Galt
- GildasTheMonk
May 23, 2014 at 10:03 am -
Absolutely spot on. As many more insightful than me have observed, UKIP are the anti politics party, at least in the sense that as you rightly point out, the agendas of the mainstream parties has no real resonance with the man in the street. UKIP benefits from saying things that the now endangered species of mammal – the ordinary guy who lives in Stoke, Burnley, Leeds or wherever – actually thinks but the three main political parties forbid saying. Things like: I am actually worried about immigration and the pace of change. Remember Gordon Brown’s revulsion when that life long Labour supporting woman Gillian Duffy when she expressed concerns about the pace of Eastern European immigration. He branded her a bigot. “Call me Dave” likewise harangued UKIP and its voters as nutters. Such is the zealous, never to be questioned faith of the Westminster elite.
Leaving aside the specific points of policy, what I feel is that there is a total disconnection between the lifestyle and personality of the political elite and the ordinary guy. I can’t imagine “Beaker” (as Ed is so commonly referred to on “Social Media”) or Cam-moron or the ghastly LibDem fop ever going for a pint of Sam Smiths, let alone being decent company. Self aggrandising automatons with auto cue brains and papier mache personalities, none have ever had real life experience of holding down a proper job (I don’t count anything any of them have ever done as a proper job) or living any kind of existence outside of an elite bubble.
Farage might be a tosser, but he is a tosser I could have a fag and a beer with.
Cam-moron recently famously pronounced “We get it”. No, he doesn’t. He could never “get it”. None of them could.- David
May 23, 2014 at 12:25 pm -
Agreed wholeheartedly though I’m not so sure that “UKIP are the anti politics party” Gildas. I think its more UKIP are the “anti the creatures that have infested our politics these days party”. Its a small distinction but to me its an important distinction. Personally, I’m not anti politics at all, politics matters. I am however completely anti the Cameron, Milliband and Clegg types of politicians (and all of their many minions) that have foisted themselves upon us.
- GildasTheMonk
May 23, 2014 at 1:02 pm -
Noted
- GildasTheMonk
- Engineer
May 23, 2014 at 3:13 pm -
UKIP benefitted from my vote as well, mainly because I have the feeling that the main parties, if not actually telling bare-faced lies about the European Union, and doing their best to conceal what’s really going on. UKIP may well be a bunch of nutters, but at least they’re nutters who are being absolutely straight with the electorate about where they stand on the EU. They seem to me to be the only political party (of any significance) that are.
- David
- Ed P
May 23, 2014 at 10:04 am -
Farage not Farrage
I hope this is the beginning of real change, but fear so many will forget and revert to (mindless) type before the GE in one year.
- Clarissa
May 23, 2014 at 10:42 am -
Whilst I opted to spoil my ballot papers rather vote for any person or party, it is quite amusing to watch the panic UKIP is apparently causing amongst the Establishment.
- GildasTheMonk
May 23, 2014 at 10:46 am -
Exactly
- GildasTheMonk
- Ho Hum
May 23, 2014 at 10:45 am -
Sure, we want freedom from the current political establishment’s progressively repressive – you can swap the order of those two words to get the flip sides of the same point – PC prejudices
But do we just want to exchange those for what seems to verge on the sort of small minded, ignorant, prejudices that rear their head in the Daily Mail most days? And which even fear their heads here on occasion
With our political system, and lack of any firm constitution providing for real liberties for all – not just those you happen to like or agree with – all this is ever going to achieve is swapping one lot of authoritarian vermin for another
- Ho Hum
May 23, 2014 at 10:46 am -
I ‘fear’ that should have read ‘rear’
- Ho Hum
- Eric
May 23, 2014 at 10:57 am -
You are of course correct but I guarantee the dogs will be set upon the hapless fox and it’s fate is preordained. No matter what the merits , reasons or failings of the UKIP they should enjoy their time in the sun for it will be brief. The Establishment will have it no other way.
- prog
May 23, 2014 at 11:06 am -
….and the hens are starting to run around headless. If UKIP is denied influence, even more disgruntled voters will support it. Truth is, we shouldn’t really have to vote UKIP, which is more or less a consequence of government shifting inexorably to the left these last couple of decades.
- Dick Puddlecote
May 23, 2014 at 12:34 pm -
<- This. Excellent comment to add to Anna's straightforward article. Shame we have very few politicians brave enough to stand up for the public instead of their civil servants and state-funded quangos.
- Dick Puddlecote
- Ho Hum
May 23, 2014 at 11:12 am -
There is some irony in this, in that it seems that quite a few people will have woken up this morning to find that, because they voted for UKIP, they now have a Labour council. I would guess that made the scrambled eggs taste a bit less savoury at breakfast time
- Engineer
May 23, 2014 at 3:16 pm -
Sometimes, you have to take short term pain for long term gain.
- Ho Hum
May 23, 2014 at 4:20 pm -
True, but I have always been of the opinion that, if people want to stab themselves, they should do it at some place and time when it doesn’t result in unnecessary suffering being also inflicted on those others who are merely standing by.
- Ho Hum
- Wombat
May 23, 2014 at 6:17 pm -
Alternatively….”it seems that quite a few people will have woken up this morning to find that, because they voted Conservative, they now have a Labour council.”
In any case, there’s really not much more than fag paper between the legacy parties.
- Engineer
- Wigner’s Friend
May 23, 2014 at 11:23 am -
This post should be required reading for all MPs and most of those commenting on CiF.
- binao
May 23, 2014 at 11:27 am -
Thanks Anna, seems a pretty fair assessment, and it’s true that policies are a bit of a mystery at best, and worrying at worst..
Let’s see what they come up with for 2015. Even sol nobody believes the mainstream party manifestos anyway, so does it matter any more?
Yes age is part of it
As a lad, when The Eagle came out, Dan Dare put his space suit on and rocketed off to meet oddly coloured & odd looking aliens, Treens and more. Now we have a class of scary orange faced aliens in identical suits running our country. Or perhaps they’re not running the country and it’s their impotence that’s the problem?
Sorry, must be the tablets.
Budgets will now massively increase because ‘we aren’t getting the message across’, i.e. the electorate simply haven’t ‘got it’, which is why it would be foolish to let them have a say.
I don’t think that will be said publicly though this time. - English Pensioner
May 23, 2014 at 11:29 am -
To my mind, the worse thing about these local elections is the turnout, with only around a third of the electorate bothering to vote, which means that the winning candidate is supported by a sixth or less (depending on the number of candidates) of the electorate.
Hardly a resounding vote of confidence for those elected or for our democratic system, when two thirds of the eligible voters simply don’t care who is elected. - Dai Brainbocs
May 23, 2014 at 12:56 pm -
Well articulated as usual. The fox in the hen house comparison is perfect, but you still need to ask “and then what?” No doubt the fox feels good after the slaughter, but does anything constructive follow from it?
What if the first “and then what?” is that the UK leaves the EU and the next is that major investors resite to within the EU – Nissan, maybe? Maybe seduced away by a deliberately aggressive EU policy. And the next “and then what?” is how to cope with the breakdown of social order that comes from millions more out of work left paying sky-high mortgages on worthless property. People looking for someone else to take it out on, now the hens have all been done away with.
Meanwhile, if you can still afford a week in Spain you’ll have to get a visa.
- Moor Larkin
May 23, 2014 at 1:42 pm -
The ‘then what’ is that UKIP’s success gives one or other of Labour or Conservatives the excuse they need to change their own direction. The most likely is Conservative since it is they who will suffer the squeeze in proper Politics otherwise. UKIP could be the best gimmick Labour have come up with since Max Clifford invented Tory sex & questions sleaze. If call-me-Dave doesn’t use the opportunity then he’s not so clever as I think he might be. Bear in mind that he has already promised a referendum on Europe IF we vote for him next time. He’s a young chap and has time on his side.
- Ho Hum
May 23, 2014 at 2:42 pm -
Indeed, and if that was all it would do, fine
But this generation of politicians seem utterly unable to avoid exponential growth in their jousting, probably best summarised as ‘look, my willy is bigger than his’, and who knows what sort of insanity that might lead to next, or for whom?
- suffolkgirl
May 23, 2014 at 4:42 pm -
Mmm, both Euroscepticism and anti immigration feelings have votes in them, but then so do the opposing points of views. The trouble is that other parts of the UKIP agenda are not going to play so well with the public at large. Lesbian and gay adoption is just not a vote changer for many, and, it’s all very well slagging off the Romanians and the Muslims, but there are plenty of Brits now committed to multicultural families who will go so far, and no further down that road.
Above all, when you strip away all of Anna’s wit and vigour from this piece , what she is really expressing is a lament for the male baby boomer. That plays very well here, but I wouldn’t like to try it on with a Generation X,Y or Rent person! I would not be at all surprised if some of these younger people adopt hard line right politics eventually, but I cannot see them voting to leave the EU and I cannot see them giving Nigel anything but a novelty vote. Longer term he just isn’t their type.
I’m not so sure that he’s all that foxy either. That Radio London(?) interview was a car crash. Calling him a racist is a soft ball: he doesn’t know how to turn his bat for the hard ones. And, where did all the other senior kippers go?
- Ho Hum
May 23, 2014 at 6:58 pm -
Yep
- Ho Hum
- Ho Hum
- Engineer
May 23, 2014 at 3:33 pm -
Given that Britain has a history of trading with the whole of the known world – not just Europe – for the latter half of the last millenium, the argument that we’d have sudden mass unemployment if we left the EU is utter codswallop, with brass knobs on. The mantra that ‘three million jobs would go if we left the EU’ is trotted out to scare the plebs regularly, and I have never seen a shred of evidence to support it. Businesses grow, shrink, move and go bust every day. Maybe some would move out (though I doubt many would – you don’t shift a successful car assembly plant easily) but others would be delighted to take advantage of a freer business environment – and make no bones about it, the EU is not very pro-business. That’s one reason why the Eurozone is stagnating economically.
- suffolkgirl
May 23, 2014 at 3:57 pm -
Why would there be a ‘freer business environment?’ Surely the reverse would be truer?. Once out of the single market we would be facing the same regulations which dog our trade with the rest of the world. Are you suggesting that because we are in the EU we are unable to exploit other trading arrangements? How does that work.
- VftS
May 23, 2014 at 4:26 pm -
‘… because we are in the EU we are unable to exploit other trading arrangements?’
Precisely so. Trade external to the EU is a ‘reserved competence (sic)’, handled exclusively by the Comissariat. No EU country can enter into its own trading agreement.- suffolkgirl
May 23, 2014 at 7:12 pm -
Yes, but we do actually trade with the rest of the world, both purchasing and selling, so we do have other trading arrangements. In fact, isn’t it a UKIP argument that Eurozone trade is a relatively small part of our overall activity. It would seem that the ‘reserved competence’ isn’t currently stopping us trading with the rest of the world. If you think it does, then how so?
Like a lot of others I am inclined to keep tight hold of nurse, for fear of finding something worse…
- Engineer
May 23, 2014 at 8:17 pm -
Well, we used to trade extensively with something called ‘the Commonwealth’, but are not now allowed to make our own agreements with them for the reasons VftS outlined. Similar now applies to the BRIC countries, and to other rising nations.
I don’t really know where the truth lies – some say the majority of our trade is with the EU, some say it’s with the rest of the world. Somebody’s either badly misinterpreting data, or telling fibs. I do know that ‘the rest of the world’ is a thumping big potential market, and the EU won’t stop buying stuff off us or selling stuff to us if the deal is acceptable, whether we’re in the club or out. So ‘three million jobs will go’ is pure, unadulterated, bulldroppings.
- David Reculver
May 24, 2014 at 3:24 am -
Keep in mind that when people say things like “50% of our trade goes to the EU”, they can be a little loose with their interpretation of what they mean by “goes to the EU.” Some of that percentage is “going to the EU” simply as a transit destination, not a final destination. My understanding is that some of our exports are sent via Rotterdam on their way to the rest of the world. The opportunistic among us bundle that percentage into their “goes to the EU” figure and hope nobody notices. Politicians who think there is a difference between telling a lie and not telling the truth are happy to exploit this.
Just to comment also on Suffolkgirl’s question of Eurozone trade vs rest of the world trade – Engineer is absolutely correct in saying we can’t make our own trade agreements as an EU member. We have to go via bureaucrats in Brussels, and any trade agreement for us has to meet the needs of and have the approval of the other 27 member states of the EU. It is also worth noting that “rest of the world” markets are growing, if not thriving, while the EU is a dwindling and over-regulated market. A couple of years ago a businessman of Chinese extraction (Sir David Tang) commented on Newsnight that China doesn’t care whether Britain is in or out of the EU…..all it cares about is what we are selling. We don’t need to be shackled to a dwindling customs union in order to trade successfully.
- David Reculver
- Engineer
- suffolkgirl
- VftS
- suffolkgirl
- binao
May 23, 2014 at 4:19 pm -
Come on Dai. Never going to happen.
Clegg’s constant droning on about 3 million jobs is just that. The eu on the mainland isn’t doing so well that it can afford to turn away the sizeable net surplus it currently has on trade with us. EU share of world trade may be big, but it declines every year( I think ). Nor would it be necessary on exit to roll back all beneficial aspects of membership; we’ve all moved on since the 1940s. If the eu chose to be nasty after exit, that would be mutually bad.
I think it’s never going to happen because it’s too late. Does anyone seriously think DC will, if returned to power, either reform the eu or our terms of membership? Who will do it and why would they? Lessons will also have been learned from the campaign against Farage, next time will be nastier and more subtle.
So it will all have to wait until it goes belly up. Let’s just hope it’s peaceful.
- Moor Larkin
- suffolkgirl
May 23, 2014 at 2:18 pm -
Well, I hate photos of men bragging with semi automatic weapons on aesthetic grounds, but since the web is awash with pictures of gun owners brandishing them I’m not quite sure what the special problem is with the photo of Mr Singh Atwal on his hols in the Punjab . AK 47s are working guns legal in many parts of the world: you can own them in many states in the USA. I suspect however that a picture of a ‘typical ukipper’ holding such a weapon on holiday in Florida wouldn’t get the juices working in the same way.
Is Anna hinting that Mr A is in fact a Sikh terrorist? Or a wannabe gangster? Or posing as either? The only story I can find about him apart from this one is that he and his son claim to be have-a-go heroes, seeing off a burglar from their premises. Should we be banning all public officers from holding guns wherever they may be, and for whatever reason?
Mr A lost his seat to Labour, who pounced on the pic in the first place. Same old, same old.
- Dai Brainbocs
May 23, 2014 at 2:32 pm -
I’d never heard about this case before seeing it here, but why the loaded (no pun intended) term “pounce”? Anyone bringing a photo like that to attention is performing a public service IMHO, whatever the gun culture in the place it was taken and whenever.
- Ho Hum
May 23, 2014 at 2:33 pm -
But who cares for truth and context these days?
Now, why does that remind me of a little known school in Surrey…..
Maybe I’m getting old, but I get a tad uneasy when people want things both ways.
- Dai Brainbocs
May 23, 2014 at 2:37 pm -
Surely “truth and context” here is just “is he the man in the picture holding a gun or what appears to be a gun?” It doesn’t even matter if it’s real or a replica.
- Ho Hum
May 23, 2014 at 2:43 pm -
I love the smell of libertarianism in the afternoon
- Ho Hum
May 23, 2014 at 2:48 pm -
BTW, as you seem to have missed the point, ever seen the pic of Jimmy Savile with those young ladies at Duncroft?
- Dai Brainbocs
May 23, 2014 at 3:01 pm -
You are reading far too much into my comments. It just boils down to a photo like that – repeat, whenever and wherever taken – helping inform a decision on whether this man would get my vote if he sought it, or whether I think it makes him an inappropriate person to be magistrate.
It’s a while since I joined in a thread here, but my views on Savile pretty much coincide with those of Anna (who I know only through this site) and I’ve gleaned more information on that subject that I trust here than in the rest of the print and electronic media laid end to end.
- Ho Hum
May 23, 2014 at 3:10 pm -
So, as I implied, here, for you, the real context means nothing. Judge away. It’s a free world.
Well, sort of
- Dai Brainbocs
May 23, 2014 at 3:14 pm -
We are going round in circles. Define “the real context” in your terms?
- Ho Hum
May 23, 2014 at 4:00 pm -
How about something more informed than… ‘I’d never heard about this case before seeing it here’
- Dai Brainbocs
May 23, 2014 at 4:44 pm -
I’ll try again. Define “the real context” in your terms.
- Ho Hum
May 23, 2014 at 7:02 pm -
There’s a point in any discussion at which it becomes pointless to continue. We’ve reached it.
And my tea is in danger of burning
- Ho Hum
- Dai Brainbocs
- Ho Hum
- Dai Brainbocs
- Ho Hum
- Dai Brainbocs
- Ho Hum
- Dai Brainbocs
- Dai Brainbocs
- suffolkgirl
May 23, 2014 at 3:25 pm -
‘ Don’t they understand that if Magistrates come from a community where it is normal to pose proudly with your AK47 then we must embrace their culture?’
Um, well as long as all those Americans and Europeans don’t bring their weapons with them I’m fairly happy with that. I don’t think Sikhs routinely pose proudly with AK47s over here either, or do they? Just a little thought… I suppose Anna does mean the Sikh community? The ‘singh’ was left out of the report she linked to, and that beard plus brown face combo can be so confusing.
- Ho Hum
May 23, 2014 at 4:10 pm -
If he’s Sikh, he may well have a picture with a dagger too
Long ago, there was a cartoon by Giles showing a row of immigrant Sikhs being met by a policeman who, writing in his notepad, was saying “Right, let’s start off with ‘Failure to wear a Crash Helmet’.
Nowadays it would be ‘You’ve got Funny Hats and a Long Beards, so let’s start with the Terrorism Act’ .
- Machiii
May 24, 2014 at 8:09 am -
Anna, I’m with Suffolkgirl on the AK47 point. Context matters. Just holding one, with no suggestion that it was wrong to do so in the place the photo was taken, should not, without more, make you unsuitable for the bench. If only we voted for magistrates and judges.
Machiii
- Ho Hum
- right-writes
May 23, 2014 at 3:57 pm -
Couple of corrections Anna…
It’s Farage as in Garage, (one “r”)…
It was the ebullient Winston McKenzie that used the UKIP fox in the Westminster henhouse”, everyone else has been repeating it ever since.
Finally…
Don’t you know that this is just a protest vote?
So move along now, nothing to see here.
- backofanenvelope
May 23, 2014 at 5:00 pm -
Mr Farage summed it all up this morning. The leaders of the mainstream parties are all identical. They have all emerged from the school-university-politics-government system. They have never had a “proper” job. He didn’t mention that they are all much richer than me.
Something that really struck me, was how the press, to a man, turned on UKIP. The Daily Telegraph even had its city cartoonist on every day rubbishing Farage. So this week, after about 60 years, I have stopped reading the Daily Telegraph.
I voted UKIP because I want them to create a shambles in the politics of this country. I have no idea how it will all end – but it will be interesting.
- Cascadian
May 23, 2014 at 5:27 pm -
It’s a good start, and I cannot deny I am enjoying the comments emanating from the establishment party leaders. Camoron-we are the conservatives we don’t do pacts or deals-FFS. Cleggover-we actually did quite well where we bothered to campaign properly (my interpretation). Both of them totally detached from reality or the necessity for hard work.
These morons run your country, yet we have commentors here worrying about the quality of UKIP candidates. Absolutely hilarious.
The real fun, should occur Sunday when the Euro votes are revealed, then later when the Scots referendum results are declared.
People such as the Jasmine Lawrences and Nick Robinsons are finally hearing from the silent majority who are seething at supporting the country through long tough times, then watching the national systems of pensions and welfare they have involuntarily been taxed to support used by free-loaders encouraged by the major parties to abuse them. The silent majority of Essex and Northumbria, hard-working people, abused by the “system”. Of course Liverpool passes all this by and elect their welfare-overlords, I expect Newham and Tower Hamlets will do the same.
- Judd
May 23, 2014 at 5:53 pm -
Farage couldn’t have done a better job id he’d chucked a live hand grenade into the Wetsminster (not a typo) bubble.
The trouble they’ve gone to rubbishing UKIP has been superb, and about as counter productive as it could have been.
My old mate (another working class geezer, like me by the way) summed it up nicely, he said ”do not let a rich man tell you who your enemy is”, well that applies here, the three cheeks of the same arse party haven’t sold their ideas, all they and their media acolytes have done is preach anti UKIP (and its supporters) hatred…thats negative politics and we’ve had bloody years of that and it no longer works chaps.
Farage speaks the truth, us bloody minded Brit types are funny buggers, we don’t care what we’re told so long as its the truth, tell us we’re in the deep crap and we have to work twice as hard for the next twenty years to dig ourselves out, and we’ll roll our sleeves up and do it cheerfully, tell us lies laced with propaganda and spin that the money trees are in full blossom and we’ll hate you for it.
The three cheeks lied to us for decades and they will not be forgiven, ever.
Hopefully the other parties and their media stooges will continue to attack UKIP even more ferociously, another year watching them shoot themselves in the foot, telling people they’re protest voting or racists, should just about do it.
Judd
- Joe Public
May 23, 2014 at 6:17 pm -
“They have been derided for their dedication to that task; …………….”
Not forgetting: Their slavishly earned savings-interest surreptitiously stolen via the process euphemistically known as ‘quantitive easing’.
- Tom Mein
May 24, 2014 at 5:05 am -
Great article, could we please have a “Share” button so that we can have a wider audience for your blog.
- Ms Mildred
May 24, 2014 at 9:58 am -
Yeah Judd, I just hate being told I’m a racist. Recently went in the PO, just got new owners, and asked for a hundred quid, shoved my card in the slot. The guy behind the glass spoke to me. I said tenS please and was handed a £10 note and a receipt for £10. Hey diddldeedee! I crawled meakly away and went to Barclays machine the next day. I long ago went to Ghana with a long time friend to see her august relatives in what amounted to a palace. I had a fiance who was half Asian. His mum wore a sari and a red mark on her forehead in the mid fifties, in deepest Cheshire. I don’t know what that proves. All I know is I tactically voted UKIP. I KNOW that they will do their best, along with the LBC clever clogs who went to a private school, uni, and got a newspaper job, due to his dad being a journalist on the same paper, to put down Farage and annoy people like myself; who may vote UKIP next year, which was not my intention at all.
- JimmyGiro
May 24, 2014 at 5:24 pm -
The only thing that made the slightest twinge of sadness whilst voting UKIP, was that I missed not voting for Dan Hannan; but then he’ll get through anyway, due to proportional representation.
Whereas Nige is the ‘Thomas Paine’ in the back-side of the establishment; Dan is the ‘Edmund Burke’ of cultural eloquence. Both are needed to the extent that our State is so dilapidated, that old opponents should unite against a common problem.
{ 77 comments… read them below or add one }