The Great British Whine Industry.
During the week I had recorded an episode of Piers Morganâs interview series. A case of nothing else worth recording really â the others I have seen have been a succession of women agonising over some dreadful trauma in their life, not my cup of tea at all; Piers seems to have a talent for bringing out the tears and the âahhhâ factor from the audience.
This episode was different, not just from other Pierâs interviews, but from television in general lately; this one was Karren Brady. It wasnât her achievements that galvanised me so, it was her reaction to set backs in life. âwhy did you write booksâ; âI was turned down for a journalism college, and I thought, Iâll show themâ. âHow did you come to work for David Goldâ â âI went to sell him advertising, and he offered me a job on the spotâ. Such an incredibly positive person.
Piers did his best to elicit the tears; âHow did you feel when you had a miscarriageâ. (How do you think she felt, you plonker!) But there was no âit was the worst moment of my lifeâ, or âI still weep to this dayâ, no attempt to milk the moment for all it was worth, just a dignified âincredibly sadâ and onto the next question. She wasnât traumatised for life by a footballer saying âI can see your titsâ, she just snapped back at him â âwell you wonât from Creweâ, and promptly sold him to Crewe football club. She sold her husband, footballer Paul Pecshisolido twice â thereâs a pragmatic woman! Her phone has been hacked, during tense business negotiations â but we havenât heard her wailing to Leveson. She just got on with life.
Reflecting on my eveningâs viewing, I realised what a rarity it was. Our screens are perpetually filled with whiners. When personal tax allowances are raised to bring thousands of low paid workers out of the sights of the tax inspector altogether â we donât hear the jubilation of those who benefit, we donât hear what they might do with the extra money; we are transported to Tower Hamlets to hear from a family with four children who have been out of work for two years â and canât afford a holiday, and now âfearâ (always the fear!) that they may be asked to cut back further because the council gave them a four bedroom house and now say they only need three bedrooms and this âcouldâ (always the could!) result in £7 a week being cut from their housing benefit.
The great army of whine-managers make sure of that. I once calculated that 10% of the Scottish population were fully employed holding the hand of the other 90%; listening to their tales of woe and hardship, âsupportingâ them in their needs. Fictitious dramas on television displaying some rare event, a flipping cow dying on some deserted hillside, will be followed by the announcement âif you have been affected by issues portrayedâ etc â and you know that someone is employed to sit at the end of the phone to listen to a stream of viewers who may once have heard of someone who is sure that they might have been in a village where a cow once died, and oooh, it was awful and theyâve never been able to get over the horror of it all. A child dies on holiday with its parents in a foreign land â a sad event; but before we know it, the âbereavement counselorsâ have been moved into their local school to help the children get over the trauma of little Johnny not being at that school any longer.
Every possible hurt in life is being managed by an army of trained â and paid â whine-managers. Now that Greater Manchester Police are producing statistics to show how many Goths and EMOs get shouted at in the street, you can be sure that someone somewhere is registering a charity to support traumatised Goths. Someone else will be applying for a grant to renovate a derelict building as a drop-in centre for EMOs âtoo scaredâ to dress as EMOsâ for fear of what might happen to them. No doubt the NHS are already scheduling laser operations to remove Goth tattoos for those who can show that since the age of 8 they had always known they were EMOs, and now they are 43 they wish to leave their Goth husband/wife and reveal their inner self to the public at large.
Social media is the new weapon of choice for the permanently outraged, who wish to attract the attention of the paid whine-managers. During the past fortnight, we have had the ridiculous spectacle of the Twittophobes working themselves into a lather over a man employed to ensure that men paid hundreds of thousands of pounds every week to kick a pigâs bladder round a field, actually turned up and kicked said pigâs bladder, who turned out to have parents who belonged to the Fascist party in a foreign country, half a century ago. The shadow Foreign Secretary, the son of immigrants himself, and Communist immigrants to boot, resigned his Directorship of the football club in protest at this risk of traumatising the fans in the terraces. Other footballers are âbeing supportedâ in their distress at some neuron-challenged and inebriated dork allegedly shouting âput him on the bonfireâ in their general direction. I say allegedly, because no one can actually be found who heard that cry from the terraces, but the media reported it, so it must be true, and the footballers were black, so it must be racist; âFootballers against Racismâ, in a straight nick from the âGiving Victims a Voiceâ rule book of investigating traumatic claims, says it is convinced it occurred, even without evidence, and therefore something must be done to support the precious footballers. Presumably those fans had spent âevery waking momentâ thinking about being racist, and were the most prolific racist chanters the UK has ever knownâ¦
Which brought my mind back to the Savile topic, and what has driven me on in my search for the truth about the Duncroft allegations. I was sent an excerpt from a blog post lurking in some dingy corner of the Internet during the week; it seems the writer has utterly missed the point and is labouring under the impression that I âam keen to protect the reputation of my old schoolâ, as though Duncroft was some sort of upper class boarding school â though I have seen elsewhere â was it Vanity Fair? â that the âelite were fighting to get their wayward children in thereâ!!! Hilarious stuff. I have no brief to protect Duncroftâs reputation, I wasnât aware that it had a reputation to be protected actually. What I am very keen on, and this blog has always been very keen on, dating to some years before Duncroft was ever a word the media had touched, was truth and honesty.
Honesty is not just a matter of the precise mechanics of how an incident is described, but also the depth of importance it is given in the great scheme of things. When the media persist in using words like âabusedâ to describe utterly minor and irrelevant incidents in someoneâs past â then I am deeply offended. There is real abuse, child abuse, in the world. It is not well served by parading egotistical attention seekers who were once patted on the bum by someone in the public eye as âvictims of child abuseâ. Who should we blame for this state of affairs? Should it be the sad creatures who 30 years after leaving care are still to be heard whining and bleating âthat they werenât adequately supportedâ on leaving care? Who cannot leave behind their fleeting moment of discomfort, the passing insult to their breasts, the arm that was put round them 30 years ago, which they now seek to use to see themselves included as âvictimsâ that require the services of the army of whine-managers?
Or is it the Whine-managers that we should blame? Those who seek to create a career out of parading these âvictimsâ, encouraging them to hang onto past incidents and blow them up out of all proportion in order to seek the security of a substitute mother who will kiss and make it better with a cheque? Is it fair to say âblow it up out of all proportionâ â I think it is. Remember the original Duncroft allegations came from a woman who claimed to have witnessed â and âconspired inâ is not too strong a word â an incident during which a visitor to Duncroft âmaybeâ â for was it under a blanket or not? â encouraged another girl to put her hand near his groin. Since they had arranged a code-word beforehand, you can be sure that they felt they could âarrangeâ for this to happen if she sat next to him â yet this girl chose to sit next to him. She could have sat anywhere, she could have avoided the situation, if it even happened, but no, they allegedly conspired to ensure that it did happen. Was it a dare? A teen-age bet? Whatever; 30 years later at least one of the women is still trying to make a story out of it â even though the other girl involved apparently told police that she would like to âpunchâ the first girl for dragging her into this tale!
That story has been taken up by the professional whine-managers, embellished, publicised, and used to create an industry. An industry which brings shame to Britain. âMore high profile Savile arrestsâ scream the media â as a jumped up taxi driver who may have been employed by the BBC at one time is arrested and charged with sexual offences that had nothing to do with Savileâ¦
I find it hard to believe that a country which can produce Karren Brady can also produce middle aged women so pathetic, so terminally dependent, so outrageously devoid of any backbone and gumption, that their sad world revolves around reliving such minor incidents, if they even occurred, for the benefit of those who make a living out of peddling these tales. What also amazes me, is that for all these journalists now coming out of the woodwork saying âwe knew all along he was creepy, never married, eyes too close together, those poor girlsâ who have been wasting their time hacking the phones of third rate entertainers and past customers of Los Angeles prostitutes â not one of those investigative reporters ever thought to hack Savileâs phone! Too busy hacking the likes of Kim Kardashianâs phone to see if she had broken the heel of her shoe again, or Karren Brady to see what the overpaid footballers were up to. Not one of those girls ever thought to ring Childline, even anonymously. Not one of those investigative reporters thought to contact Barnardos, surely in the same business of âchild protectionâ as the erstwhile television âchild protectorsâ.
I see yesterday that Scotland Yard commander Peter Spindler has jumped ship from the appalling Yewtree âinvestigation that never wasâ. âSpindlerâs Listâ of 12 arrests, one charge so far, has become an embarrassment to the nation. The police involvement in the whine-managers dark arts will take a long time to live down. The justice system is damaged, perhaps irreparably. The spirit of Torquemada lives on, where debate is driven by prejudice and supposition, by fear not fact; the media preferring to give air time to the unhinged armchair moralists screeching âcover-upâ whenever their chosen celebrity unaccountably fails to make the âarrestedâ list than to the likes of Karren Brady.
All I can say is God bless Karren Brady for convincing me that the entire septic isle hasnât gone stark raving bonkers.
April 12, 2013 at 10:09
-
@Moor â you know that what you are doing is 100% right when âcoincidencesâ
start to occur â like people having the same thoughts as others at the same
time ! Great stuff Mr Jung â¦..!
April 11,
2013 at 22:08
-
Hereâs the actual contents of the email from MWT on June 2, 2012.
âMorning Sally
I have no interest in James Robertson Justice.
All the
best.â
April 11, 2013 at 18:21
-
Another thing â so he started investigating JS himself at no one elseâs
behest (or bank rolling !) â¦â¦RUBBISHâ¦.. time to contact the brummies ?
April 11, 2013 at 18:19
-
Just how did this bloody program come about ? I came across this article
from the Birmingham Evening Mail wherein MWT describes being too busy to work
on the JS expose until after SJS had, rather conveniently, kicked it â¦â¦.that
the originator of the story was a journalist NOT from the BBC !!!! WTF am I
reading here ? â¦â¦..Answerâs please !
April 11, 2013 at 19:08
-
Rabbitaway,
The Sun and Sky had been chasing the same story at the time Newsnight
were preparing their piece, I think thatâs why they were so desperate to get
it out as quickly as possible without actually taking the time to
âinvestigateâ properly.
I am extremely suspicious of the Sunâ¦.
April 11, 2013 at 09:32
-
Have contacted a documentary maker, lts see if they reply.
April 11, 2013 at 10:37
-
Even if itâs true â I donât want to read anywhere that ITV has got a
bafta for that crap !
April 11, 2013 at 19:13
-
Ellen,
Once this is all sorted out it would make a good movie too, lol
April 12, 2013 at 11:01
-
Yeah, I think that also, we could all have a partâ¦â¦.. Maxine Peake for
me!
April 11, 2013 at 09:30
-
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/feb/26/itv-jimmy-savile-sex-scandal-documentary
Like the comment, about making this film if he was also alive. Wouldâve
given a years mortgage to see that. E
April 10, 2013 at 15:39
-
@Anna â re Karin â exposure was aired 3rd October 2012 â she was âoutâ â
Panorama Tuesday 22nd October inc her piece for Newshite â she was âinâ
â¦..what made her relent ? She courted more of the same attention â of course
her health had improved but still ! â¦â¦no, she wanted in on the action pure and
simples â¦.! Ker ching !
April 10, 2013 at 13:23
-
No Moor â Iâm not buying that â remember Newsnight hired MWT, Keri was
interviewed on camera for this program â Could it really be that she never
mentioned the other monster to him at the time ! Someone is lying here and I
donât need to read the blog. This version of events makes no sense. Keri Keri
gave the interview shortly after SJS died at the behest of M Jones whoâd been
snooping about for months. When the program was pulled that was that and the
boys in Scarborough could happily begin their chip, chip chipping away at that
black granite ! Somehow ITV getâs wind and itâs all systems go again but lets
dig a bit deeper shall we before letting the world know of the super scooper
(nights are gonna find meâ¦â¦!). Meanwhile, millions of children, were left at
risk from various monsters prowling the highways and byways ! BIG SMILEY
April 10, 2013 at 09:59
-
The Bloody hypocritical bastards â¦â¦dancing on Jimmy Saviles grave, âoutingâ
him to the world as a PP in the name of safeguarding âour childrenâ and all
that nonsense ! Too afraid to name a living monster but leave an investigation
that should have been BY THE POLICE to an EX COP ! Herein lies the truth as to
WHY the ITV program was made â to entertain to shock the nation NOT to
safeguard ANYONE !
I feel better now !
April 9, 2013 at 20:33
-
Re last link â when you go on this youâll get crappy ads â just click the
top right hand x â Enjoy !
April 9, 2013 at 20:29
-
Hereâs the real Have I got news from you with Jimmy Savile, Dianne abbot
etc 1999 a gem !
April 9,
2013 at 18:06
-
Just wanted to follow up on my post to Moor regarding the Daily Express
article regarding âFrances.â Frances does work, told me herself she works in a
shop while trying to find more interesting things to do workwise that meet her
qualifications. She is no more stressed than I am, btw. Unless a symptom of
stress is playing games on Facebook. Wotta lotta rubbish!
April 9,
2013 at 18:00
-
Moor, I canât find the comments section of your blog. I found it for a
minute, but now itâs gone. So, just to address the âFrancesâ issue â her last
name isnât Jennings anymore. This hilarious piece ran in the Express at the
end of January. http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/373567/Jimmy-Savile-abused-me-and-I-was-nearly-killed-but-school-did-not-ring-police.
Boo hoo, Frances, spare me! Thousands of pages of your report from Barnardoâs?
Er â no. About two hundred is the average.
April 9, 2013 at 18:41
-
Hi Mewsical,
Yes, there seems to be a blogger bug there. I find that if you âreloadâ
the page it generally then appears.
Be seeing you, I hope.
re. your Linkâ¦. Frances, possibly Angie, and now Sandra?
Could this be
why Yewtree has 600 complaints and only 200 possible crimes?â¦â¦â¦
April 9, 2013 at 15:05
-
Drip, drip â I see more people are using our links to the more obscure
sites discussing SJS !
http://blogs.channel4.com/gurublog/jimmy-savile-cold-aggressive-menacing/2749#comment-80314
April 9, 2013 at 13:04
-
Moor Larkin.
Ms E gave only 1 statement to the police and has never discussed it with
anyone in the media , so to say that she has changed her statement is
incorrect and just goes to show how people can twist things Around on websites
to suite thier own agendas
April 9, 2013 at 13:10
-
@Lisa
So presumably âSarahâ has purloined a real story?
April 10, 2013 at 13:15
-
Lisa,
Re: âjust goes to show how people can twist things Around on websites to
suite thier own agendasâ
Not just on websites, on mockumentaries, the news, the papers and
statements to the police tooâ¦.
April 9, 2013 at 12:05
-
Back on topic with la Brady and jaundiced views of the mainstream
newspapers. This Blogger might be worth keeping an eye on for the future, both
for any critique of the past and for some possible footie insider chatâ¦.
âI detest the tackiness of the Daily and Sunday Sport so Iâm glad to see
the back of their smut. But I also have some unforgettable memories of the
days I worked for the Daily Sport myself â and became the only journalist to
be involuntarily pushed out of the door TWICE.â
âI could throw in an anecdote or two about Sullivanâs protégé Karren Brady,
who also put her oar in once or twice. But Iâll leave that for another day
because Iâve kind of warmed to English footballâs first female managing
director over recent years.â
http://grumpyoldgran.com/2011/04/09/goodbye-daily-sport-you-never-were-any-good-at-figures/
April 9, 2013 at 10:12
-
@Moor â just speculating here but I got the impression that Ward âgot the
huffâ that the original BBC program was shafted â Iâm sure this is discussed
in âwhat the bbcâ¦â. remember exposure was made in a hurry, by the time the
beeb docu was made JS was the most hated man in rhe world ! Maybe, she had
second thoughts. Her reluctance to take part in another film (she was filmed
for newshite) lends weight to the set up angle ! She was also ill â¦â¦Iâve got
more on FJennings will put on your blog â¦.!
April
8, 2013 at 20:10
-
Wow, a whole article about whiners and I didnât see a single mention of
âSelf Pity Cityâ, the UK capital of whining.
I didnât watch the show but
have always found Karren Brady refreshing. People who can see what needs to be
done and quietly get on with doing it are worth their weight in footballersâ
salaries.
April 8, 2013 at 20:48
-
@Ian R Thorpe
Funny you should mention that. I just happened on Annaâs
Sept 12th 2012 blog yesterday. lol. Blogging gold.
April 8, 2013 at 22:19
-
and right on cue, they make the death of Lady T all about,
âme,me,meâ
April 8, 2013 at 19:19
-
Mewsical â Thanks for providing this â will read in full later -Great stuff
!
April 8,
2013 at 18:56
-
I recently did some Duncroft/Savile posts on my blog (click on my name to
have a look if you want) and was then attacked by a former Duncroft person in
the comments section. At first I thought Iâd leave it alone and just not
bother with the comments, as they are moderated. Then, I decided to make a
post out of her accusations. If you want to see the caliber of these people,
go on over and have a look for yourself.
Iâm glad to hear that Spindler has
decided that fishing for tiddlers is a complete waste of public and police
resources, and one can only hope that the Operation is closed down, along with
all the others that are going to come up with bugger all as well.
April 8, 2013 at 20:06
-
@Mewsical
Yes, glad to see the back of Spindler, and I agree that we
might see a winding-up of Yewtree. No doubt with a comment like, âThe press
are unfairly implying that those arrested under the Yewtree op are involved
in kiddy-fiddling (the Press, not we at the Met, oh no, no, no)â.
April 8, 2013 at 22:14
-
@Mewsical
Your Post mentioned has added a whole new dimension to one I was in the
process of writing myself.
Here it is: http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/total-recall.html
Many Thanks for letting me know, via here, that you were âback in the
gameâ.
Moor
April
8, 2013 at 23:02
-
Moor â I just read your latest post with the incredibly Photoshopped
photo of the âgirl from 1968.â I mean, come on, anyone with half an eye
can see that arm is completely out of the proportion. Savileâs head
appears Photoshopped on. Let alone, unless things changed rather quickly
after I left in late 1965, whenever a celeb/minor royal came by, we were
provided with suitable clothes to wear. If you look at the photo of
Princess Marina, weâre all wearing clothes selected for us by the staff,
and we didnât wear them on any other occasion â nor would we want to! Ugh!
I concede that by the mid-70s the girls were allowed bit more freedom to
choose their daily wardrobe, although clingy and/or suggestive was no
doubt frowned on. The photos I have seen of the girls of that era show
some individual style, but otherwise nothing remarkable. I donât give any
credence to that photo at all, sorry. Too obviously fake.
On another note, and in comment on âSarah,â the Stoke Mandeville choir
âvictimâ â she is related to a woman from Duncroft. No surprise there,
Iâll bet, let alone âSarahâ is the one who refused to go further with her
complaint. Shows good sense â all he did was kiss her inappropriately.
Since when was that a reason to begin a hue and cry which has turned the
UK upside down and cost thousands if not millions of pounds?
As to the photo of the other girl, thatâs genuine enough. I know her
identity as well. As well as telling some piffling story to the Express of
late, sheâs recently been on Facebook, slagging this blog off. And there
we were, being informed that none of them even read it!
April 9, 2013 at 00:31
-
My main point being of course that MWT presents his yellow witness as
being from 1968, which means she would have to be be six years older
than everyone from 1974, and neither he nor his fellow-producer noticed,
or had ever seen the person before, or recognised the pixellated-out
face in that old photo from someplace else?
And how come there ended
up appearing to be only two Duncroftians in Exposure, when the
newspapers, who had been evidently briefed by sources from the
production, seem to keep referring to four?
At what point does dodgy
journalism become outright fraud?
Iâm still trying to figure out why
Ms Ward got chopped. Was she under exclusive BBC contract or something?
All questions are rhetorical of courseâ¦..
April
9, 2013 at 02:08
-
Ms Ward got chopped due to the emergency injunction granted to FS
lawyers, allegedly the only reason he lost the following day was the
fact the media stated they had no intentions of revealing his
name.
April 9, 2013 at 09:41
-
@wellwisher
But it says he only got the injunction âlate on Wednesday nightâ,
which would have been October 3rd, the night of broadcast. I cannot
see how Wardâs section (which must have been large) could have been
edited out and leave enough left for the broadcast still to be made.
The piece where she implicates the âsmelly manâ would just not need to
have been included, and she would still have had plenty to say about
Savile that would have been corroborative, so I cannot help but feel
she was never included in the MWT script.
The manner in which Glitter was included suggests also that she was
never involved in the Exposure show insofar as MWT was at great pains
to have Fiona say Glitter never abused herâ¦â¦.But Wardâs story was the
front-page story for the Daily Mirror on the actual broadcast day so
itâs not like she had faded from the sceneâ¦â¦
April 10, 2013 at 19:39
-
Moor Larkin,
Iâm waiting for it to be revealed as one big hoax, though it wasnât
shown on April fools day?
Itâs definitely a fraud though. Programmes like that should be
factual, that was fiction. It would be bad enough if half your
witnesses and accusers on a so called documentary were telling
complete fantasy tales â but it looks very much like with âITV
Exposure: The otherside of Jimmy Savileâ they all wereâ¦.
April 8, 2013 at 18:20
-
Agree with everything you say and despair at the utter waste of time and
money to say nothing of reputations ruined even if no charges are brought in
Yewtree and the Levison business. There is something far wrong with people who
claim to be traumatised by trivial incidents decades ago, it is all very
depressing.
April 8, 2013 at 18:33
-
Carol42
I felt guilty posting that link but you are so right â donât
get depressed itâs just anger turned against the self â¦.big smiley face
xx
April 8, 2013 at 17:24
-
Hereâs a person who would have good reason to whine â had anyone bothered
to listen out for her â Disgusting !
April 8, 2013 at 15:49
-
Years ago I was the chairman of personnel at my local council. The
personnel department put on a seminar for councillors about workplace
harassment and how it was dealt with in our council.
The chief executiveâs
experience was shaped by discovering some time after the event that a female
employee had resigned because she was being repeatedly propositioned by her
line manager despite asking him to stop. He summed up our policy very simply:
âIf an employee is being sexually or racially harassed in the workplace, what
we want is for that behaviour to stop. The first action is for the victim, or
their friend, to ask the perpetrator to stop. Only if it persists should it
become a disciplinary matterâ.
Today, of course, such an approach neither
keeps lawyers in business nor fills newspaper columns, so would be considered
old-fashioned.
April 8, 2013 at 15:35
-
I wonder what would happen if every person in a country was simultaneously
offended by one person, prefereably a furriner.
Heck, it has happened:
Now we will see if New Zealand has to import all the âgrief counsellorsâ
from Australia to deal with the mass trauma and whether Princess Mary (who is
from Tasmania ) will be burned in efffingigy.
April 8, 2013 at 15:56
-
â..we were welcomed â¦.. with a half-naked man in a grass skirtâ
Iâd
pay to see that.
April 8, 2013 at 15:24
-
*breaking news* Hell has frozen overâ¦
Within hours of entering hell Thatcher has closed all the furnaces and
sacked all the stokers and privatised the devils work to Atos, Crapita, and
G$S.
The stokers are in uproar âitâs just not fair, what have we done to deserve
her?â
April 8, 2013 at 15:28
-
@ JonathanWilson
The Ladyâs Not For Burning
April 8, 2013 at 15:38
-
Anyone got a light ?
April 8, 2013 at 15:52
-
Her funeral is to be privatised.
April
8, 2013 at 16:17
-
I take it she is to be buried privately or otherwise. Cemeteries
are council run operations and grave diggers are, by and large council
employees. Surely Mr Serwotka would not dream of persuading other
unions to call a series of one day strikes that just happen to fall on
â¦â¦
April 8, 2013 at 20:49
-
My mate reckons they should ship her off to the Falklands and use
her as a scarecrow to frighten away the Argentines.
April 8, 2013 at 16:14
-
*BREAKING UPDATE*
Tax payers alliance say that Thatchers funeral
should be privatised to save tax payers money, Ed miliband has demanded an
enquiry, and Camoron has said he will PFI it so his chums at funerals4u in
partnership with G$S can charge 20% interest on full amount over the next 30
years and make a killing while IDS has said he could do it for 53 quid âif
he had toâ and cleggyweggy is playing in the sand pit.
April 8, 2013 at 17:52
-
Strange that you would wish to expose the low calibre of your wit, no
accounting for taste at all.
A little decorum would not be amiss, but then again perhaps that is
another characteristic that is in short supply in yUK.
April 8, 2013 at 18:14
-
Cascadian,
Re: âStrange that you would wish to expose the low calibre of your
wit, no accounting for taste at all.A little decorum would not be amiss,
but then again perhaps that is another characteristic that is in short
supply in yUKâ
Margaret Thatchers deathâ¦.?
April 8, 2013 at 14:46
-
Re: âThe justice system is damaged, perhaps irreparablyâ
I donât think it will ever be damaged irreparably, but I do sort of worry
that we may be heading in the direction of going back to the way it was in the
18th century!!
April 8, 2013 at 13:44
-
Her phone has been hacked, during tense business negotiations â but we
havenât heard her wailing to Leveson. She just got on with
life..
It would have been peculiar to give evidence to an inquiry into the ethics
of the British press if it concerned the ethics of a football club. I endorse
your condemnation of the orgiastic sentimentality that has made so much of our
culture so unpleasant to observe but if we are to uphold âtruth and honestyâ,
âwitness testimonyâ should not be confused with âwhiningâ.
Your points about the women (and the men?) who have made allegations
against Savile also leave me wondering what it is about them that you find
annoying. That they did not speak before? Yeah, that would have been helpful,
though if they were abused I could empathise with their embarrassment.
That it should not be the press to whom they speak? Yeah, I see your point.
That they should not be dishonest? Damn straight! But, and correct me if Iâm
wrong, there seems to be a note of disdain towards people saying anything,
regardless of who they speak to or the accuracy of their words. That seems
harsh. The uncritical treatment of this affair is vexing â I regret that I,
for one, was late in questioning it â but if people have facts to offer Iâd
love them to be expressed, so we can get a clearer image of this murky
business.
April 8, 2013 at 13:42
-
Blimee Thatcherâs dead !
April 8, 2013 at 15:29
-
rabbitaway,
Re: âBlimee Thatcherâs dead !â
I canât believe itâ¦.
April 8,
2013 at 12:47
-
âFictitious dramas on television displaying some rare event, a flipping
cow dying on some deserted hillside, will be followed by the announcement âif
you have been affected by issues portrayedâ etc â and you know that someone is
employed to sit at the end of the phone to listen to a stream of viewers who
may once have heard of someone who is sure that they might have been in a
village where a cow once died, and oooh, it was awful and theyâve never been
able to get over the horror of it all. A child dies on holiday with its
parents in a foreign land â a sad event; but before we know it, the
âbereavement counselorsâ have been moved into their local school to help the
children get over the trauma of little Johnny not being at that school any
longer.â
Oh, amen thrice over! How I cringe at hearing these!
April 8, 2013 at 20:09
-
You realise that back in 1940, there wouldnât have been time for schools
to do anything BUT grief counselling, if the idea is to help little children
process all theyâve seen which might be disturbing to them. Plenty of little
Johnnys and Janeys were no longer in attendance (either because they were
relocated, orâ you knowâ¦). You hope little children donât become too
hardened, like the combat veterans who tell new members of their squad
âDonât tell me about yourself, âcoz I might get to likinâ ya, and if
anything happened to ya, I might miss yaâ and thereâs way too many lads I
miss, already.â But as Anthony Hopkins observed in Shadowlands, when his
character is receiving condolences for his widowerhood, and a friend tells
him, âWell, Jack, you still have your work to occupy youâ life must go on, I
suppose,â to which Hopkins replied, âI donât know that it MUST, but it
certainly does!â, his way of telling his friend and colleague, thanks for
your concern, but bugger off, Iâm working all the feelings through, and
youâre just re-opening the wound. When is the optimum time to stop, before
all weâre doing is making children wallow in it lest they become cold and
callous? You come up with the answer to that and youâll be doing all of us a
great favour.
April 8, 2013 at 12:44
-
Of course you have to have the right sort of whine too.
Some years ago I attended a seminar by the welfare department of the
organisation that I worked for at the time. It was led by a meek-looking and
sounding man, the empathy just oozed out of him. At one point we were told
about alcoholism, the need to look out for the employee who always took Monday
off etc.and the caring, sharing response we were to adopt and the recovery
plans that the employer could put in place. A voice from the back called out,
âWhat if he has a drug problem?â. Our meek man suddenly went red in the face,
âThat is a crimeâ, he barked, âand MUST be reported to the police!â. Wrong
âwineâ mate!
April 8, 2013 at 12:42
-
Re: âNow that Greater Manchester producing statistics to show how many
Goths and EMOs get shouted at in the streetâ
Why? Lol
April 8, 2013 at 12:36
-
Iâm fairly sure that the whiners are people who have already âgiven upâ.
Once theyâve given up they find that they donât get on and canât work out why
so it must be someone elseâs fault. In self-indulgent moments I rail against
things that other people have done to me. The trick is to realise that you
canât do anything about it, so move on.
April 8, 2013 at 12:33
-
âWhere there is blame, thereâs a claimâ ran the thinking of the TV ads. We
can these days shape that to âWhere there is a feeling funny, there is plenty
of money.â
Money for the business of being hand-holders and pacifiers and listeners,
etc.
Quite an industry, really. All needing training, all needing registering,
all needing to be organised. I mean, you canât have âhelpersâ wandering the
streets just looking to help people, right? Non-sufferers would just think
that was someone being kind. Like that good Samaritan chap who wasnât part of
a registered charity for some reason.
April 8, 2013 at 12:29
-
@Anna
Yes, and âGod blessâ all who sail in this happy ship of exposition
and uncommon sense !
Going back to a comment on Moorâs blog yesterday, it
set me thinking. Why did DS Gray hold that massively OTT press conferance post
the âSavile strandâ of utree January 2012 ? Why on earth was the findings of a
report not much better than a CSE school essay paraded as some, post criminal
trial, celebration of guilt ? Onwards â¦â¦!
April 8, 2013 at 13:18
-
Savileâs interview with Andrew Neil that you pointed me towards the other
day is a perfect example of how NOT joining the Whining Industry can leave
you deemed to be suspicious and evasive however. You can see Andrew Neil
becoming increasingly infuriated as Savile refuses to *open up* to him and
reveal his innermost thoughts about his mother and why he has ânever been in
loveââ¦..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-mJ4a0ODPBM
April 8, 2013 at 13:31
-
@Moor â thank God for youtube â¦â¦ Jimmy was a great example of what it
is to get up and get on with things rather than sitting about feeling
sorry for yourself and waiting for some other bugger to build a hospital
wing ! Iâve left a comment about questions to ask DS Gray on your blog ! I
like Andrew Neil but JS as usual held his own despite some fairly strong
stuff in there !
April 8, 2013 at 13:36
-
@Moor and another thing, in this interview he dispels that crap about
spending 5 days with his dead mother in his flat. She was in Jimmyâs
sisterâs place and he was just one of many who spent time with her.
April 8, 2013 at 20:52
-
@Moor Larkin
Was it in that show that he alluded to âhaving her to
himselfâ? I have to admit, whatever he was trying to say there he did it
badly, and made it sound very strange. His own worst enemy sometimes, Iâm
afraid.
April 8, 2013 at 12:13
-
@ you can be sure that someone somewhere is registering a charity to
support traumatised Goths @
Thatâs how it started:
âGMP has worked with a charity set up following the murder of 20-year-old
goth Sophie Lancaster in 2007.â
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-22018888
April 8, 2013 at 12:14
April 8, 2013 at 13:40
-
Moor Larkin,
The thing about the way many âgothsâ dress is that they are so easily
identifiable as âgothsâ, itâs like a uniform.
And what is an âEmoâ?
April 8, 2013 at 14:12
-
Itâs short for emotional & you have it right as Emo (not EMO: itâs
not an acronym).
April
8, 2013 at 19:42
-
âEmosâ are goths who brightened up their wardrobe with a few garish
colours. Wikipedia derives âEmoâ from a music scene in America in the
mid-1980â²s, but I have also heard one version in which supposedly it came
from American police slang to describe âemotionally-disturbed persons,â
i.e., people causing a small commotion, but technically not breaking any
real laws except possibly the old catch-all âdisturbing the peace.â In the
written report, the cop would refer to the person as an EDP (whoâs usually
drunk or high, or a nutter off their meds) if they were not being violent
or abusive to anyone, or to the cop in particular, therefore not
warranting being arrested, and just in need of being run off the street,
either to their home or a shelter; however, in colloquial conversation,
Officer Smith might tell his/her Sergeant, âYeah, Sarge, took care of that
Emo call, got the person home in one piece, no problemsâ¦â The kids who
pioneered the âmovementâ apparently may have been of the sort who were
likely to require the policeâs services in this respect and may have taken
the name as a way of âowningâ it. (cf use of the N-word in the black
community.)
April 9, 2013 at 23:52
-
Having observed my daughters fellow classmates, emos are those
adolescents going through a depressive patch, able to recognise that
conforming with the majority is pointless, a betrayal of their
individuality by society, and then conform with each other hair, gear
and music wise.
April 10, 2013 at 19:26
-
Ljh,
Re: âAble to recognise that conforming with the majority is
pointless, a betrayal of their individuality by society, and then
conform with each other hair, gear and music wiseâ
Iâve noticed that, all the goths dress the exact same because they
are individuals too, lolâ¦.
April 10, 2013 at 01:03
-
@moorlarkin
âWard made the claims in an ITV documentary aired earlier this week.
Although she identified the third man, ITV was forced to edit out his name as
he is still alive and has disputed the claim.â
April 10, 2013 at 07:52
-
@wellwisher
Yes, but if you premise is correct they didnât edit out his name did they;
they edited out Karin, except I donât think they didâ¦..
Her blog says she invited MWT to come and interview her only on 2nd
October, late at night. I am no TV production expert but I cannot see how she
would ever have been expected to be edited into a documentary of that sort in
the time available. Bear in mind that she WAS front page in the Daily Mirror
on 3rd October howeverâ¦.. Was her story instead sold to the Mirror perhaps
because it was too late for Exposure?
Itâs fairly clear the Mirror were very close with the Exposure show because
they printed verbatim what âAngieâ says in the programme, but they had her
text on September 27th.
âThe Exposure show was broadcast on October 3rd 2012. On Sepetmber 27 the
Daily Mirror had the entire programme leaked to it in advance.â
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jimmy-savile-documentary-tv-star-1351439
April 10, 2013 at 09:43
-
Sorry, I think I meant âValâ not âAngieââ¦â¦.. >:-
April 10, 2013 at 09:52
-
Blimme this is synchronity at itâs best ! Moor, just sent an email on this
very matter but my point is â Why were there no arrests until AFTER exposure ?
Did they even tell the police that another, âlivingâ sex fiend walked the BBC
corridors abusing âchildrenâ ? If they didnât then surely they should be named
and shamed. Oh, and donât tell me MWT didnât know this â¦..!
April 10, 2013 at 13:07
-
@rabbitaway
I noted on the October 3rd Blog that wellwisher referred us to, that the
blogger says
âToday, I have telephoned Metropolitan police, as Mark Williams Thomas
advised me to do. I now have to wait for a local police officer to call at my
home and take a statement. This is not over; it has only just begun.â
I think this is what the legal profession would call âcovering oneâs
arseâ.
It may also explain why it is that the first MWT appears to know of
it, is on October 2nd, 2012â¦â¦..
April 10, 2013 at 13:33
-
Moor another thing â the BBC program told us that the interview was being
SHOWN for the first time â so it MUST have been the one done for Newshite
again no arrests â no police investigation ZILCH !
April 10, 2013 at 13:40
-
@rabbitaway
You cannot expect the police to go round arresting people when there is no
actual evidence whatsoever.
For heavenâs sakeâ¦..
April 10, 2013 at 13:50
-
@Moor â maybe some people will have to send their apologies for not
attending the effing baftaâs on the basis that they have been âunforseeably
detainedâ elsewhere â ha ha !
April 10, 2013 at 13:53
-
@rabbitaway
Theyâll be forever remembered as the BARFTAâs in my coal shedâ¦â¦â¦â¦â¦
April 10, 2013 at 14:00
-
@Moor â thereâs âneeâ coal in our sheds any mare â a certain lady, not for
turning, burning or owt else put paid to that â¦.but thatâs all Iâm saying
about her â¦.I have shown remarkable restraint so far in that direction â¦..!
Big Smiley
April 10, 2013 at 14:13
-
By the way Moor, I spent the whole bloody day yesterday looking for JS
wearing that sodding sweatshirt â I ended up dreaming about him !!!!!!
April 10, 2013 at 14:58
April 10, 2013 at 20:12
-
Moor â Canât wait to read this crap â no doubt it will be in line for the
Booker prize !!!!!
http://www.guardianbookshop.co.uk/BerteShopWeb/viewProduct.do?ISBN=9781782193593
April 10, 2013 at 16:09
-
@rabbitaway
Just be thankful weâre not N. Korea, or about now Mark would be shuffling
into power, and sharpening his warheadsâ¦..
April 10, 2013 at 16:30
-
Jimmyâs was ready â¦..! Great photo â crap paper !
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4595906/Royal-Marines-destroy-Savile-memories.html
April 10,
2013 at 20:11
-
The despicable conduct of Meirion Jones boggles the mind. How DARE he do
such an unprofessional thing? But then, we have Duncroftians who came over
here and published the contact information for Margaret Jones. Just a bunch of
low-lifes.
April 11, 2013 at 20:49
-
Mewsical,
Holding a badge saying âNSPCC is greatâ too, lol (bet Jimmy Savile wouldnât
be saying that now.
{ 121 comments }