This afternoon Sandra Barr published an ‘Important Press Release’ from Robert Green to his Facebook group members.

As with so much of the information which emanates from Robert Green, a kernel of half truths have been nurtured into a forest of conspiracy theories and defamatory lies.

Since those defamatory lies concern myself and have now been broadcast to his entire 27.000 strong Face book group, I intend to set the record straight.

The purpose of disseminating the information concerning myself was, we are told, a retaliatory action because of something neither carried out by me nor endorsed by me. The Press Release is clearly preceded by the words ‘no action required at present’. The clear threat implied by those words is that the information contained in the press release will be needed if members of the group are required to take ‘direct action’ in the future.

I will not be intimidated by these tactics. No blogger should be.

Unlike Mr Green, I have always linked to my sources in order that readers are able to make up their own minds regarding my articles. I will continue to do so.

The passage in the Press Release concerning myself is as follows:

In another strange coincidence on the same day, Mr Greg Lance-Watkins, owner of the self-appointed Hollie Greig website, has now been exposed as a UK government agent, hence his rant of today, June 4th http://www.facebook.com/l/e4bc4;stolenkids-hollie.blogspot.com/ see pdf. Both he and Anna Raccoon, fellow blogger (real name Susanne Nundy nee Blackie), worked at the Court of Protection see email address susannenundy@chcourtofprotection.co.uk view “Links to Old Scholars’ Pages” http://www.facebook.com/l/e4bc4;oldscholars.info/links.htm Is this a coincidence? Also ex-employee of the Lord Provosts Dept. Does she come from Scotland? Another coincidence? We don’t think so. Since Anne and Hollie’s address has been divulged on http://www.facebook.com/l/e4bc4;stolenkids-hollie.blogspot.com/ by Mr Watkins, it seems fair that we should reciprocate the compliment. Susanne Nundy nee Blackie (Anna Raccoon), now lives at
Rue de l’Ancienne Poste,
Issigeac 24560
France.

Seriatim:

I am not aware that Mr Lance-Watkins ever worked at the Court of Protection. Certainly not in my time. To the best of my knowledge this claim is untrue – though Mr Lance Watkins would be best placed to confirm or deny this.

No. I did not work ‘at’ the Court of Protection. I was Lord Chancellor’s Visitor for Wales. I worked in conjunction with the Court of Protection and the Public Trustee.

No. The e-mail address given is not and has never been a genuine e-mail address. It has been lifted from the mailing list of a school I attended almost 50 years ago and still contains the spam avoidance filters.

No. I am not an ex-employee of the Lord Provosts Dept. I have never worked for any government office in Scotland, nor in any other public or private capacity in Scotland.  The legal system in Scotland is not the same as the legal system in England.

Yes, my grandfather was Scottish.

Yes. Susanne Nundy is my correct name – however my maiden name is Cameron-Blackie.

No, that is not my current address although it is a property that I did own.

Already since this press release has gone out I have received e-mails such as this:

[…]Also, I am coming to believe theres support from your quarter and Watkins quarter in deriding this case because YOU ARE PAEDOPHILES YOURSELVES OR HAVE KNOWLEDGE WHILST WORKING FOR THE COURT OF PROTECTION WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN MADE PUBLIC ABOUT PAEDOPHILIA WHICH HAS BEEN KEPT QUIET AND OUT OF PUBLIC SCRUTINY, meaning that paedophiles were exposed AND NOT PROSECUTED.[…]

First of all the Court of Protection has no conceivable connection with the prosecution of paedophiles. It was until long after I left concerned solely with the financial and legal affairs of those with limited mental capacity.

Secondly, the person responsible for this malicious intimidation may or may not be aware that I live in France and blog under an assumed name as a result of having been stalked and assaulted by a particularly dangerous and violent mental patient. The consequences of even the limited amount of correct information which has been published about me tonight are profound, and for that reason both the English and the French police have had to be involved. Their response has been magnificent and heart warming. This in turn may well have consequences beyond my control. They are totally the responsibility of the person who decided to hit back at Mr Lance-Watkins by ‘outing’ me.

The Internet has become a dangerous world. As a Libertarian I do not wish to see it regulated. I trust all honest bloggers will join with me in condemning those who give the government sound reason to want to impose restrictions on what can and cannot be said on the Internet.

Comments are open, however two of the most notorious members of Mr Green’s Facebook group will find that their comments go directly into moderation and I will only release those comments which contain no libel or defamation.

Intimidation only works if the victim is prepared to be intimidated.

I am not.

https://www.annaraccoon.com/madeleine-mccann/robert-green/

https://www.annaraccoon.com/madeleine-mccann/robert-green-hollie-greig/

concerned June 8, 2010 at 19:58

i would also like to add that i also advocate for people who have been
falsly accused of abusing children as well as being a victim myself but i like
to see actual evidence i have been stung in the past so i know from both sides
had i been in robert greens situation i would have produced the evidence or
instigated a private prosecution until such happens people should not be
attacked for wanting answers especially when they have neglected their own
campaigns and fights for the hollie campaign .

concerned June 8, 2010 at 19:47

i am not posting to slag anyone else off i did an awful lot for the hollie
campaign but did all without seeing evidence i have since seen paper work from
drs in respect to examinations done and they do not signify abuse as has been
previously claimed.i have seen no other evidence. i was abused by a family
member and had to make a video statement to the police about it the member was
arrested but cps said owing to the fact it was historical no further action,i
would have presumed hollie would have made a video statement but this has
never been mentioned tho it is practice to do so.i also question that if
robert green and team are that sure of their evidence why they have not bought
a private prosecution against the alleged abusers,i also think that anne has
alot to answer for whether true or untrue the exposure hollie has had is
unacceptable and places her at risk of actual abuse from paedophiles intimate
details of vaginal examinations of her being posted on the net is unacceptable
and as much as im no fan of social services or police they have a serious duty
to investigate hollies exposure it is no conspiracy the police and social
services being involved anne has bought this on all by herself for allowing
her daughter to be exposed in such manner. as for all the bitching on the net
from what i have seen all are as bad as each other and robert green cannot
attack people for thinking differently calling them pro paedos etc robert
green has stuffed things up big time for hollie and anne greig is more to
blame than anyone else for allowing this to happen. i believe this will do
alot of damage to robert green , brian gerrish etc and they are more concerned
about that than hollie.poor hollie. anne greig cannot now moan about social
services involvement she needs to start accepting what she has done to hollie
is abusive in itself

Zoompad June 8,
2010 at 19:11

Hi Shona,

Yes, thats me. I am just trying to do my bit.

I met Senator Stuart Syvret last year, with some of the people who were
abused at Jersey as children, we met up at the British Library to look at the
Magna Carta, and went for a meal together. We wanted to cheer him up a bit
really, because he has been hounded left right and centre for sticking up for
the people who were abused at Haut de la Garenne, and like you say, it’s
dreadful what is happening there, farcical even.

There’s a few of us making little videos to just try to keep people
informed about stuff that is going on in these British Isles, well, the BBC
are not really doing a very good job, there are some fantastic reporters but
they are being sat upon, same as a lot of newspaper reporters, some of them
are feeling pretty frustrated.

I can’t wait for the day to come when folks like me don’t have to do our
little videos any more, because there won’t be any need for any of this home
spun grass roots news stuff, if that day is ever going to come. I hope so.

Vimes June 8, 2010 at 15:19

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gb_qHP7VaZE

GMK June 8, 2010 at 17:06

ha ha the best thing here today,thanks.

J Ellis June 8, 2010 at 14:28

This is really getting out of hand to the point of becoming dangerous.
I
can think of no other reason for someone to publish GMK’s number except to
cause distress which is evident by the preceding posts on here and other
sites.

George, thanks for your support it’s much appreciated.
I’ve seen good,
well meaning folk on both sides of the fence insult, defame and threaten each
other and unfortunately it is obvious that the ‘Army’ have caused the MAJORITY
of the problems.
Posts getting mis-read and denial to face FACTS are what
is causing this whole sorry saga to descend further down the spiral.

As I said in my letter to Robert he IS accountable for the mess and many
have pinned there hopes on him and the story he has presented to the
world.

The scottish establishment have also handled this badly, with no effort at
all to stem the public ire save for flexing there muscles and compounding the
confusion.

This will go on and on unless Robert proves his case in an open debate.

-J Ellis

GMK June 8, 2010 at 17:10

thank you Jim you are a fair bloke,good luck

g m k June 8, 2010 at 13:53

Moderator
Whoever you are, Observer, GMK or anyone else

g m k June 8, 2010 at 13:45

What is it ok to pretend to phone me showing me you have my nr and for gabe
nelson to post my details?

g mk June 8, 2010 at 13:44

I got a call from France claiming to be from Anna Racoon a person I dont
know looking for a Mr Daly of the BBC,the numbers arent even close ,my deatils
have been put up on facebook ,if someone is using these to intimidate me does
that not warrant being mentioned is that not what this thread is about? I put
the nr up missing the last 3 digits so that Mrs Racoon could make sure her
number was not being used by others

Moderator:
I don’t care what your motivation is for putting up
personal details, nor whose details have been put up elsewhere – they will not
appear on this blog. full stop.
Any further attempts to publish the details
of anyone will result in the poster being banned.
What goes on at other
sites is not our conern.
If you wish to contact Ms Raccoon, her e-mail
address is annaraccoon.newshound@gmail.com
as published on the contact page.

GMK June 8, 2010 at 13:32

as you now have the details whoever you are any futher calls logged will be
considered harassment ,I am sure all right minded people will agree

Moderator
Whoever you are, Observer, GMK or anyone else –
personal details will not be released on this blog.
Keep your petty
arguments to your own blogs.

GMK June 8, 2010 at 13:08

Haha, I am Observor now, well lets see if I can get through this without
swearing!

I agree with my alter ego on many things not least posting under my own
name though I can see why he/she did not do that, the words, pot kettle and
black come to mind .At least Tom G and Shona do.

I am sorry I didn’t support Tom when the GLW /Drockton thing kicked off,
but as can bee seen from Shona’s post we all have let each other down and hurt
each other, a pity but there we have it.

I didn’t think we had much choice if we believed there was a case to
answer, which I did and still do. Unlike Tom and GLW, I was never that close
to the parties so I cant say what they were told.

As for the Stolenkids blog, I cant say any-more than its aggressive stance
and abuse is mind blowing. Threats about having mercury tipped bullets and
guns, and comments about GBH. I await my abuse which no doubt will be coming
and which I so richly deserve, thank you sir may I have another.

The only thing I have read on it of merit was the piece by James Ellis
which was fair and reasonable, and I sent him a text on that. To be fair to
Robert his lack of leadership could have been because he was banged up or
without a computer, in fact I remember when Pabs had all the grief with the
paypal, he said he wasn’t going to disturb him about a face book fight so
maybe thats why?

So whats my big crime then, why am I scum and vermin?

Because I swear or was it the wrongly and dishonestly reported Fred West
joke, is that it, or was it because I wasnt prepared to bin Robert Green as
quickly as others believed him?

I have said to Robert Green and to many others I support him because I cant
for the life on me understand why my government is treating him this way. I
dont know what happened to Anne or Hollie I wasnt there ,and if this is a
fantasy then Anna and GLW are right then the two adults deserve everything
they get, but it seems to me this whole thing smacks of Stasi tactics to crack
a small nut ,something a skilled legal person could do in half an hour

Radical Review
June 8, 2010 at 15:44

GMK said ..’I have said to Robert Green and to many others I support him
because I cant for the life on me understand why my government is treating
him this way. I dont know what happened to Anne or Hollie I wasnt there ,and
if this is a fantasy then Anna and GLW are right then the two adults deserve
everything they get, but it seems to me this whole thing smacks of Stasi
tactics to crack a small nut ,something a skilled legal person could do in
half an hour’.

I second this paragraph. I would also like to say if GMK is the next
subject of dirty tactics, where will it end? There is no honour left in what
started out as a good cause.

GMK June 8, 2010 at 17:08

thank you ,my big crime so far apart from swearing,I belived my
government were persecuting a man out of all proportion to his
alledged”crime”,If you tollerate this whats and who is next?

Zoompad June 8,
2010 at 10:30

“I hope Anne and Hollie will get the intensive and professional

Shona, the Weegie
Burd June 8, 2010 at 15:28

Rog June 8, 2010 at 10:26

Blimey, bit late but for what’s its worth full support from me. Power to
your elbow.

Majic
June 8, 2010 at 10:16

Anna, first off this is just plain and simple bullying and intimidation.
It

Zoompad June 8,
2010 at 10:10

“I think it is very insulting to Hollie to suggest that she has more up top
than a chimp! ”

Obviously I meant less up top. Anyway, Hollie is certainly more than
capable of being able to speak for herself, if she is given a proper
opportunity to do so.

Shona, the Weegie
Burd June 8, 2010 at 15:22

Hi there,

Are you the lady who does those videos on YouTube? If so (and feel free
not answer), I admire what you do. Especially the ones that keep us up to
date with the cases being dropped in Jersey. (An unbelievable scandal!)

I had no idea you were a survivor. (Apologies if I should.)

Luv

Shone

Zoompad June 8,
2010 at 10:07

Mr Greig Lance Watkins

Actually, yes, I do understand perfectly well what has happened to Hollie,
too well, as I am one of the Staffordshire Pindown survivors, and have first
hand experience of how institutional child abuse victims are subjected to
decades of malicious vindictive persecution in this country.

Hollie has not been exploited by anyone except bad people like you, who set
up a blog in her name. and pretended to be helping her. We had people like you
on out Mothers for Justice website, and they were pretending to be mothers who
were being persecuted in the secret family courts, but we found out that they
were secret family court lawyers, paedophile psychologists and all sorts. The
Lord Jesus helped us to find out all about them, praise Him! The Lord Jesus
hates child abuse and other wickedness, so he helps us when we are being
persecuted by wicked people. I was tortured in the secret family courts, and
the Lord Jesus looked after me. Anyway, He sees everything, so all the bad
things that people do (and all the good things) always come to light
eventually, praise Him!

Hollie has Down Syndrome, which means that she does have a communication
disability. But Hollie is not a brain dead stupid person! I don’t think you
know anything about Downs Syndrome – have you ever even spent any time with
Hollie? I bet you’ve never even met her have you?

This is what people like Hollie are up against all the time – this attitude
of “well she only has a mental age of 4 years old”. Chimpanzees and parrots
apparently have a mental age of a 5 year old human infant, and I think it is
very insulting to Hollie to suggest that she has more up top than a chimp!

People make these crackpot assumnptions about things they don’t know
anything about. The one about goldfish having a 5 second memory makes me
laugh. Tell that to my daughter’s fish, who follow her round the fishtank when
she gets the fish food jar to feed them. If they only had 5 second memories
they would hardly be doing that, would they?

I have no doubt that the people who abused Hollie and all the other
mentally disabled children thought to themselves that they would never be
found out, because people like Hollie are dim, stupid, gormless pieces of
trash and they would never be able to tell anyone what happened, and even if
they did, no-one would believe them anyway. Well, just like those arrogant men
who made the unsinkable Titanic were wrong, so were those wicked abusers. The
Lord Jesus saw what really happened, the truth is breaking out all over the
place, not just with what happened to Hollie, but other abuses, Haut de la
Garenne for example, Dr David Kelly for example, all sorts of wicked things
that happened where arrogant wicked people thought they would never be found
out.

I think you ought to apologise to Hollie Greig and her mother, to Robert
Green and Brian Gerrish and all the other people you have called “nutters” and
written wicked bad things about. Also, you ought to apologise to Jesus Christr
for being so horrible to all those people. That’s what I would do if I were
you. Of course, I’m not you so I can’t tell you what to do can I?

Observer June 8, 2010 at 09:12

I thank MR Tom George for his comments and now we know where he stands I
admire him for being so forthright and clear.

I have no problem with people who dont believe this case,its THEIR
right
but I dont like the way this has descended into character
assassination by
either side.

Its a pity others cannot be as clear and magnanimous ,while I can
understand his hurt at being duped I cannot see that Mr GLW is a better option
other than he is NOW opposed to Mr GREEN,his current attacks on people do not
serve anyone other than himself.

Unlike Mr George he appears to have been closer to the parties and he in
fact published names,why does he not just admit he was wrong and leave the
arena,if he is right the full might of the state will crush Mr Green and break
up Anne and Hollei and he can sit content that he was right again.

However I am absolutely convinced that he will not.

Assuming no more attacks on people I will take a leaf from Mr Georges book
and let the matter drop here and post no more.

Surely we can all agree no one should be in fear for their safety from
posting on a blog?

opps stop press http://stolenkids-hollie.blogspot.com/

seems MR GLW thinks he knows who I am ,well I will be happy to reveal it as
soon as all his friends above do like wise,as I said before…

Shona, the Weegie
Burd June 8, 2010 at 15:17

“I cannot see that Mr GLW is a better option other than he is NOW opposed
to Mr GREEN,his current attacks on people do not serve anyone other than
himself.”

Time for a new leader, or a committee, or perhaps no leader at all eh Mr
Observer?

Tom George, Edinburgh June 8, 2010 at 07:04

Tuesday 8 June 2010

Thank you for your comments Shona – https://www.annaraccoon.com/madeleine-mccann/intimidation-and-coercion/comment-page-1/#comment-20077

For the record, and as I told you quite emphatically, I did “come to the
defence of your name” with Greg. So, yes, “thanks for something Tom” is
perhaps now in order … we can all be sarcastic you know, Shona. As I also told
you, Greg is very much his own man and I cannot stop him from posting what he
does on his blog. I asked him to refrain and that’s all I can do. I would have
preferred he didn’t post it as he did, but I am not his keeper or master. How
many times do I have to tell you and others that? If you and others have any
issues with Greg, then I suggest to you (yet again) that you either phone him
up or email him to call him to task with your many unresolved issues you
obviously still have with him.

I agree with you entirely that this is all terribly sad. But, perhaps,
rather than imply this is somehow all or partly my fault, you and others
really should be calling the ruthless and reckless (in my personal experience)
“Guru Green”; the “slanderous filth” Drockton; and those others who have that
“cult status

Shona, the Weegie
Burd June 8, 2010 at 14:59

“For the record, and as I told you quite emphatically, I did

Lesley June 8, 2010 at 15:14

Enough is enough Shona! Calm down. I’ve no idea who you are, and I’ve
never even spoken to Tom let alone met him but over the months I’ve been
observing this story quite closely, choosing only now to get involved
(again). In that time I’ve ended up with the conclusion that out of the
lot of ye Tom George is by far the most rational, balanced and HONOURABLE
individual by a very long way. All he has done as far as I can see is
simply change his opinion and for VERY good reason. If I was in a crisis,
he would be my first port of call…in fact are you actually aware of the
good he does in the community? Ach, why do I bother….

I’d also thank Anna Raccoon for tolerating this incredible mayhem – it
reminds me of a toddler group. I hope at least she finds it moderately
entertaining as I have over the weeks …. albeit with a very serious
element!

Shona, the Weegie
Burd June 8, 2010 at 15:48

I am calm Lesley.

Am I not allowed to defend my good name? I have now been called a
liar multiple times by GLW. As the slanders initially took place on
these pages (previous Hollie story), should this not be where
rectifications and apologies are made?

How would like to be let down terribly by someone you thought was
your friend, and who was one of the few who could vouch absolutely that
you were not lying?

Anyway, that really is all I have to say on the matter.

PS Just because I have avoided the spotlight (deliberately so!) that
does not mean my own contributions to this whole ‘disaster’ were
insignificant!

Shona, the
Weegie Burd June 8, 2010 at
15:50

PPS Not that I contributed in any way to it being a disaster I
hope!

Lesley
June 8, 2010 at 15:59

Hi Shona, in no way did I want to upset you. I only wanted to
defend a good lad..and gosh yes I’ve been shat on by friends believe
me over the years (REAL ones, not just facebook ones) I actually think
Tom was backed into a corner and was only doing what anyone would do –
defending himself, though he can speak for himself of course…. and I
think it’s better taking this sort of thing up in private rather on a
blog wotsit.

Angel June 8, 2010 at 01:49

I feel a bit sorry for the writer of this blog, who has had her identity
revealed and (okay wrong) address printed on the internet, as well as her
comments section ambushed in what seems to be those who believe Hollie was
abused and those who do not.

I would call for some sort of calm here and ask people to truly look into
their hearts. Forget the name calling and the infighting. Remember this is the
internet. Many people will be deliberately using false names to stir up
trouble. Stop fighting with thin air and think of Hollie.

Mr Greig Lance Watkins DID reveal identities and addresses of campaigners
on his blog, in a very spiteful manner. This retaliation against Anna Raccoon
does not cancel that out. It makes it a hundred times worse as it gives self
important fools such as Garibaldi the moral high ground. For now.

Back off, let them all spit and jeer and condescend themselves into
oblivion. The truth will out.

Roger Stevens
June 8, 2010 at 00:24

I have been following this Holly Greig story since it appeared on the
internet – on YouTube to be precise.

Trying to remain sensible and objective is a nightmare because much of what
is written on Blogs such as these, is , to say the least, juvenile and
childish. I personally stopped this sort of personalised name-calling and
childish character assassinations when I was about 15.

The whole thing has degenerated into a Whitehall Farce and has become quite
pathetic.

Very sad for all concerned on both ‘sides’ of the arguement.

NINA LEACH June 8, 2010 at 00:09

I am totally confused about the whole issue concerning Hollie Grieg. Can
anyone kindly explain to me what all the negativity is about? I have been
Googling for some time now and finding all sorts of stuff….some badly written
and seemingly misinformed stuff….but as it has been acknowledged that Hollie
was abused, I cannot get my head round why anyone should be arguing about
anything, other than the people who are actually involved in the conspiracy. I
choose the word “conspiracy” carefully as I can think of no other in these
circumstances. I know full well that people who abuse children can get away
with it by using the flimsiest of excuses and the law as it stands does not
help the victim. I don’t know anything much about Robert Green other than what
Google tells me and I can’t find anything to support the accusations that he
has an ulterior motive…maybe I am naive. Hollie’s mother just seems to be
trying to get justice and Robert Green just seems to be helping her. I am not
looking for an argument, I am searching for the truth. Everyone can have their
own opinions and see things from their own point of view but it’s still
essential that everyone be aware of the facts, so that they can make their own
minds up. Can someone help?

Observer June 8, 2010 at 00:02

Ignorance in that you did not ascertain the arrangement by which this blog
was set up and Anne’s request that I run it as if I was Hollie – a situation
which continued largely until I heard 3rd. hand that Anne Greig had been
telling lies and supporting defamation about me behind my back – aided by a
claque of low lifes such as Robert Green, Brian Gerrish, Sandra Barr, Matt
Quinn, Stephen Milne, Paul Drockton, George McKendrick, John Taylor, + Butlin
Cat and a plethora of similar scum hidden behind false names in their
cowardice.

Mr GLW these all look real names unlike half the names here,how can that
be,you really seem to have been upset.

Mr George are these people all really scum?

No point in asking as you wont reply,

Observer June 8, 2010 at 00:04

Sorry really ALL scum,I know how the biscuit likes it tidy,no crumbs

Observer
June 8, 2010 at 00:15

sorry MOST foul it is very late here ,

Observer June 7, 2010 at 23:53

Good time to pony up,really the whole sewer stuff is language must
foul.
BTW looking through Mr GLW s blog I see he had no compunction in
outing a MR J Taylor ,talk about Hyporacy!

As a result of last week`s Tony Legend Show, in which Mark Daly was a
participant, I would like to clarify certain points as I know that there have
been some concerns expressed by those who wish Hollie well. I have been away
from home much of last week, including two days in Scotland for another Court
appearance.

When participating in the programme, I understood that the basis be that
Mark Daly wished to offer his explanation for the BBC`s sudden decision, on
10th June last year, not to proceed with the commissioned programmes. I
thought that this was entirely fair, in view of the public criticisms I have
made. Mark deserved a chance to speak.

As the programme progressed, however, it seemed that the prime reason was
not so much to defend the BBC`s position, but to make a more general attack on
the credibility of Anne and me.

Mark highlighted a number of facts that he considered were incorrect.
Notwithstanding that we may well dispute these issues, it is significant that
at no time during the seven weeks that the BBC held all the documentation did
Mark or any of the BBC team every query any aspect of the information placed
before them. It is reasonable to suggest that if there were any errors, which
would have been made entirely in good faith, the BBC would have queried them
at the time before sending down three investigators from Scotland to
Shropshire to spend five and a half hours inteviewing Anne, Hollie and me on
4th June last year.

Moreover, at the end, Mark gave an unequivocal assurance that the
commissioned programmes would go out in August or September and that a camera
crew would come down to complete the requirements. At no time was any doubt
ever expressed over the facts, nor about the competence or integrity of Hollie
and Anne. We were categorically assured that everything was “in the bag”.

That said, one point brought up by Mark on the programme was the question
of the relationship between one of the women named and the sheriff. The woman
was a close friend of a relative of Anne`s who described her as the named
sheriff`s sister. Anne had therefore always accepted this in good faith,
having no reason to query it. Unfortunately, we do not have the vast publicly
funded resources of Mark and his team, but our investigations since allude to
the woman being the sheriff`s sister-in-law. Certainly Hollie, in her
interview with the police on 8th September last year which I witnessed, told
them that the woman`s husband was the sheriff`s brother. Much of this
interview centred on the home of the woman and her husband, which appeared to
have been used as a centre for much of the sexual abuse. I had assumed that
Hollie meant brother-in-law.

However, this relationship question cannot possibly be central to the
nature of the offences committed.

We were puzzled by Mark’s query about the ages of some of the children,
which appeared to be another attempt to muddy the waters. Again it would seem
that any question of this type should have been dealt with when the BBC had
the documents. Most of the victims, like Hollie, are now mature adults.

It should also be remembered that the commissioned programmes were not just
about Hollie, but other cases of paedophile crime in Scotland that his team
had discovered, according to Mark. He told us about one defenceless girl in
the Glasgow area with Down’s Syndrome who was being repeatedly raped. What has
happened to this and other cases as far as the BBC is concerned?

Mark attempted to ask me about the victims I had made contact with. As an
experienced investigator, he knew full well that I could not possibly discuss
such an issue on air.

Of all the issues brought up, by Mark, nothing could have revealed his
black propaganda agenda more than discussion of the death of Roy Greig. As
this issue was simply not on the table when our discussions with the BBC took
place as we did not receive the autopsy until more that six months after the
BBC had left the scene, Mark’s attempts to cast aspersions about this had
nothing whatsoever to do with the planned programmes and could only be
described as deliberately malicious.

However, I should clarify that Roy’s suspension at the time was not a cause
for any significant concern and was not a worry for Roy. He talked to Anne
about it and because of the nature of Roy’s position of bar manager,
responsible for stock and a numbers of staff, this type of action is far from
uncommon in Roy’s trade. He had also been given support and assurances from
his union that he had nothing to worry about. What is significant is the
discovery by Roy of Hollie being sexually abused by her father just a few
weeks before his death.

Mark suggested that Roy’s bone fractures may have been caused by attempts
at resucitation. Roy was a strong, healthy middle-aged man. The sternum is one
of the strongest bones in the body. To break that is virtually impossible in
the circumstances and is only possible had the victim had, for example, been
very elderly with brittle bones.

Furthermore, how could Mark Daly engage in detailed comments about a
document he had never seen?

The autopsy is a highly confidential document belonging to Anne, who had to
battle for twelve years to obtain it.

Finally, Mark was extremely selective on the new “facts” he claimed to have
unearthed. He made no reference to the financial irregularities surrounding
the considerable wealth of the family estate following Roy’s death concerning
the solictor, later to be named as one of the ring and Hollie’s father. It is
a matter of public record that Anne won a case over this with the Scottish Law
Society. Mark seems to have missed this. Perhaps it just did not fit in with
his agenda.

Investigations into this financial fraud continue with the help of Anne’s
specialist in this field.

I do hope that this will clarify matters for those concerned and trust that
the forces of distraction do not succeed in their attempts to deny justice and
protection for Hollie and the other defenceless victims in this horrifying
case.

Thank you all for your wonderful support throughout on behalf of Hollie,
Anne and myself.

Robert Green

Tom George, Edinburgh June 7, 2010 at 22:11

Continue to blindly follow your “Guru Green” (who is a pathalogical liar,
charlatan and a fraud) and continue to swim in that sewer with all the
“slanderous filth” in you so desire – I no longer can stomach that very
pungent stench. You’ll hopefully find your hero Green out soon enough and
learn from the folly of your ways – as I did.

My views on that public menace are now very well known and well publicised
…

http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=133427480001015&topic=130

Good luck with your hero and swimming in the sewer.

In future, kindly phone me if you wish to put your questions to me (I won’t
engage with you further on Anna’s blog) and I’ll be sure to let you know more
about the hidden (narcassistic) behaviour and very corrupt and devious
practices of your very own Guru …

07791-226-490

ScotsVInjustice@aol.com

Observer June 7, 2010 at 21:27

Ha ha who is Garibaldi ,talk about taking the biscuit.

Perhaps he,Mr Watkins should have asked Sandra Barr how she would have felt
before plastering her face all over his blog and being very insulting , two
slanders dont make a right,surely

He was abusive to MANY people whos only crime,to believe what he himself
had written and still proclaims on his site.

I was not aware that Robert Green had slandered Mr George,what did he say?
I thought he had limited access to a computer perhaps that is why he did not
step in?

However does this mean that Mr George does not believe Hollie Grieg was
abused and that her mother and Mr Green has made the whole thing up as Ms
Racoon does?

Zoompad June 7, 2010 at 19:34

So we who support Hollie Greig’s right as a disabled person to be allowed
to have the same access to the justice system as non disabled people are sick?

Surely you don’t mean that!

Why should Hollie Greag not have access to the justice system? Are Downs
Syndrome people inferior to the rest of the human race then?

Greg_L-W. June
7, 2010 at 23:21

Hi,

Zoompad – you read me wrong, be in no doubt I believe exploitinga Downs
Syndrome Patient with a mental age of about 4 based on information you have
never seen, a complete lack of valid evidence, and denying them the care of
the Justice and Social services that are essential for her.
What will
happen to Hollie when Robert Green, Brian Gerrish, Pauls Drockton and their
ilk are banged up or hide when their exploitation is over?
Zoompad, with
respect have you the vaguest idea what is going on here.

Now may I again remind you that this blog is Anna Raccoons and she was
forced to write this blog to clarify when a very dangerous grade A Nutter
published and disseminated her address out of malice because she had seen
through his exploitation.

AR does have extreme experience of Nutters like Green, Gerrish, Butlin
Cat, Drockton and their ilk having constructed an identity and address to
protect her from another grade A weapons grade nutter who was stalking her
with intent to kill her – another nutter just like those who are leading the
braying asses of Hollies Army and the fool Peter Eyer, who last I heard was
scribbling green ink articles about Margaret Thatcher stealing Nuclear bombs
in her handbag with Regan & Botha almost as plausible as the fantasy
pieces in The UKColumn and as irresponsibly bereft of evidence.

Now perhaps Zoombat and all your chums who want to discuss THE FACTS you
are welcome at:
StolenKids-Hollie.

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

Tom George, Edinburgh June 7, 2010 at 19:07

Can I suggest that “Observer”, or anyone else for that matter, simply gives
me a ring to attempt to slander me (and hear some very unpalatable TRUTHS too)
rather than posting under an alias.

For the record: G L-W did not say that Ms Barr was abused by her father –
you really should learn to read and interpret properly Mr / Ms “Observer”.

I see none of “Hollie’s Army” coming out in “condemnation” of the public
menace that is “Guru Green” – for failing to publicly and unreservedly
apologise to myself, Pabs and others over recent weeks. The only ones who
condemned that or Drockton’s unfounded “slanderous filth” against me were
Pabs, Greg and a few others – who I prefer not to name to protect their
identities … you know who you are and I’m very grateful for your support.

Get your FACTS (remember those!?) right before you attempt to have a very
sly and sleekit go at me in future – and at least have the courage to put your
name to your diatribe and phone me up to challenge me.

I look forward to your call …

07791-226-490

ScotsVInjustice@aol.com

http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=133427480001015&topic=130

END.

Radical Review
June 7, 2010 at 21:42

No like button here so …LIKE!

Shona, the Weegie
Burd June 8, 2010 at 01:09

“The only ones who condemned that or Drockton

Shona, the Weegie
Burd June 8, 2010 at 01:21

“Continue to swim in that sewer with all the

Mrs Trellis June 7, 2010 at 17:08

That’s a good question.
It has been noticeable of late that a lot of
those pushing Green’s version – and Twittering about it incessantly – are
people commenting and Twittering on the Mccann case too. I have no idea why
this should be, but it definitely is. They are conspiracists by nature,
perhaps?

Eleanor June 7, 2010 at 17:55

No, not conspiracists. Just sick. Ill beyond redemption. They get their
daily kicks out of this. And from threatening people who won’t go along with
what they do.

But it is all getting a bit out of hand now. Too many people are fighting
back. How bloody dare they.

Them and whose bloody army?

Garibaldi
June 7, 2010 at 19:55

Observer, GLW did not in any way imply that she was abused by her
father!! As I said before most of the Greenites are pretty illiterate.

Worded carefully, he was trying to get across the point that if it was
SANDRA instead of Hollie, how would SHE feel if it was HER pictures
plastered around the damn world? Use my name instead of hers – I don’t see
it as a problem! I understand that perfectly and have used that argument
myself.

Radical
Review June 7, 2010 at 21:48

Garibaldi at last, someone is interpretating the piece as it was
written. GLW can be hard to read, very lengthy but that his style and
his god given way to write. (mine is short and crude, God made me that
way). … LIKE!

Observer June 7, 2010 at 16:53

Not good form to publish names and addresses but no condemnation apparently
from Mr Tom George of Mr GLWs slanderous and untrue comments about Sandra Barr
being abused by her father when she was young apparently morality is a one way
street

GLW still has the names of the accused on his blog, surely that is wrong,he
named them without checking surely that is wrong ,to sign your blog Hollie
,surely that is wrong?

Greg_L-W. June
7, 2010 at 21:12

Hi,

Observer – this is not the place for you to publish ill informed
lies.

No wonder you act in anonimity to ashamed to put your neme to your
falsehoods and defamation.

I question if you have any morality even that of the street!

I have answered your dishonest mischiefmaking in some detail for you
at:
http://stolenkids-hollie.blogspot.com/

Anna R. can hardly be expected to correct every malicious rumour the
batty and the sad circulate!

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

David June 7, 2010 at 14:18

Why is this story about Hollie Greig in the Madeleine McCann category?

Eleanor June 7, 2010 at 14:18

Gosh. Sorry I missed this yesterday. I was having a break from The World
Wide Web. It helps, you know.

But as far as I can see, and apart from the suggestion of threats, this all
has been a very good result. Now, even more people know that the Green Man is
a liar, and is perpetrating even more abuse on Holly Greig than ever seems
likely by the people who are purported to have abused her originally. Let
alone her Mother, of course.
I don’t know if she was abused, the whole
point being that Holly could not meet the standards required to prove it in a
Court of Law, or even to me. In fact I somewhat doubt that she was, in her own
head.

I am so sorry that you have been threatened, Anna, but you are a brave
soul. They have done their own case no good at all. And you have done no
wrong.

Uncle
Marvo June 7, 2010 at 11:22

Another brilliant expos

Zoompad June 7,
2010 at 11:08

I don’t expect my comment will be published on this page, but here
goes:

As a survivor of institutional child abuse (Staffordshire Pindown) I have
every sympathy with Hollie Greig and her mother. No-one can possibly fully
understand what institutional child abuse victims suffer unless they have
experienced it for themselves. The cover up of institutional paedophille
activity in the British Isles is the shame of these islands.

I have met Hollie Anne and Robert, and all I can say is that if those three
people are lying then Hollywood ought to get a shift on and snap them up, as
they would have to be the most accomplished actors in the world. Robert Green
is a rare kind of man, he reminds me of another man, my old solicitor, Richard
Wise. Richard Wise was a very brave and lovely man who was so incensed by the
corruption and injustice in this country that he threw himself heart and soul
into doing something about it. He was loved by the ordinary people of Stoke on
Trent, and hated by those who were doing wicked things to make those people’s
lives an absolute misery. I am very sorry to say that Richard Wise is dead,
according to the newspaper reports of the time,. he had been ill for a long
time, which I find quite strange, as I knew him – he was my solicitor, and not
only did he never say a word about his illness to me, he also looked as fit as
a fiddle until roughly two weeks before his VERY SUDDEN death.

Now, as a Christian, I am praying that Jesus Christ will watch over Robert
Green, and keep him, Hollie and Anne and all those who are supporting these
people safe from all harm.

I am not going to make any remarks about the behaviour and comments of the
people who have decided to attack these three people apart from a plea to
those who have a heart to just look at what Hollie has herself said, and ask
yourself if you feel that it is right to join in a mud slinging match against
this lady, or wether it would be a better thing to just walk away from this
mess instead?

Hollie IS going to get justice, she will be justified, and not because of
Robert Green but by the power of Almighty God, who witnessed all the things
that have happened, as nothing escapes his watchful eye. My advice would be to
those people who have got themselves dragged into this big row, who do not
really understand it, educate yourself to the FACTS of this case, and then you
will be in a better position to make a valid and worthwhile contribution.

Reply to
Zoompad June 8, 2010 at 17:07

I am not sure 100% where the truth lies and I wish we all did, but the
FACT is that the quesions about FACTs/evidence are not being answered/shown
or proven, is what the problem is.

Dalai Lada June 7, 2010 at 04:29

Dear Ms Racoon, it’s been almost 4 months since I commented on what I
perceived then a cold attack on the case, being very upset at the way things
appeared to be. As they say hindsight is 20/20, so here I am with humble pies
in both hands coming to offer sincere apologies… as much I do regret the
suffering of quite a number of people involved, this whole unfortunate affair
has been quite a learning curve for me in many a way, and I just wanted to say
thanks for your part in revealing the truth and keeping a cool head. Chapeau
madame! X

Spiral Architect
June 7, 2010 at 01:32

I have only been reading the thoughts of ‘Anna Raccoon’ for 6 months or so,
but enjoy her pieces immensely. I have been very pleased to note that her
views and values largely correspond with my own.

Moreover, said views have never sought to sensationalise and have always
been supported by facts and founded in integrity.

I am grateful to Ms. Raccoon for expressing herself so cogently and
sensibly, giving an eloquent voice to educated, middle-class British people –
a class of people who have disenfranchised by political correctness and and
the dishonesty of New Labour.

In this case, as usual, her actions seem beyond reproach.

pablo June 6, 2010 at 22:55

Stick to your guns girl

David C June 6, 2010 at 21:18

Your courage in pursuing this shames the rest of us with our heads below
the parapet.
I hope this business does not slow down your astonishing rate
of output of interesting posts.

Garibaldi June 6, 2010 at 21:09

One clear thing I’ve noticed over the weeks of observing this catastrophic
story and the dozens and dozens of people who have been writing about it is
that…and strike me down for being a terrible snob … the Greenites are
(possibly without exception) painfully illiterate and ‘limited’. Whereas the
Rationalists are educated and articulate. And it has nought to do with the
quality of the typing.

The Grim Reaper
June 6, 2010 at 21:08

Very nicely put, Miss Raccoon. Don’t let the bastards grind you down.

jo June 6, 2010 at 20:43

Ms Raccoon,
Thanks for not only the recent piece on this subject, but
your previous, which I only read tonight.
I am stunned at the behaviour of
the supporters of Green, your posts and subsequent replies were obviously
unread, only lambasted with more ludicrous accusations as time went on. Such a
shame, as the posts and replies probably stated what most rational people
thought. Well, those with the capability of reading without the knee jerk
knocking them off their chairs.
They are not supporters of H, imo, when
they resort to these tactics and accusations; it does nothing for her
cause.
Can only add to the comments of others, wishing you safe and
well.
jo

Dick the Prick
June 6, 2010 at 20:42

Dear Ms Racoon

Geez, what a twat. All the best and regards a nutjob tracking you down and
assaulting you – crikey! I’m really glad he got your address wrong (even if
that little git Malfoy is currently neglecting it) but FFS, that really is
sewerage dwelling disgracefulness.

All the best Ms Racoon and all my best wishes.

DtP

Caratacus June 6, 2010 at 17:00

Now I know why I like your site so much Anna.

If fools like Green et al feel the need to stoop to this level then you
must be getting something right. Well done.

You have my e-mail address, if you can think of anything an ageing but
still mildly useful Harry Brown type could help with, tell me.

Ed P June 6, 2010 at 16:21

Mr Grim Low-Wattage is a sub-humanoid and must be resisted. Stay strong
Anna, we need your clarity and incisive wit.

My only comment
June 6, 2010 at 15:41

We seriously need to be using Lie detector tests in Paedophile cases. They
should be recognised in Courts of Law as in other countries.
Where there is
no evidence, we waste huge amounts of public money, looking for it.
The
court costs are ridiculously high and very distressing for the victims and
their families.
Information is withheld from the jury of any similar
previous offences, of the accused, to maintain a fair hearing. There is no
cure for paedophiles, they will always reoffend and deny their crimes, they
are known liars.
Let them deny it via the Lie detector test.
97/98%
accurate. How accurate is any jury?
Costs around

reply to my only
comment June 8, 2010 at 17:00

An excellant idea in reality (apart from no jury- they would love that,
and what we need to avoid) but again in reality I believe they should also
be, if guilty, possibly publicly stoned but definately publicly hung. Its
cheap and puts out a message – do it and die (but this also leaves the
question, what deserves to be hung for, where is the line ?)
But as for
all your other points, this is why the system takes so long or is spread
out, I believe anyway, because it generates more money for ‘them’ and their
Corporation, all Solicitors, Barristers, Judges, etc are all sworn by oaths
to the Law Society (Temple Bar, The City of London), whivh is a corporation
and a Corporation is a Registered business, and so operates for
profit.
Possibly that is why.

But alot of other factors would need to be taken into effect with using a
lie detector aswell; mind control, people that can ‘beat the test’, the 2-3%
failure – hence still the need also for a Jury, the fact that evidence in
cases that benefits the elite or ‘Society’ member can still be ‘rigged’ to
their advantage if need be anyway…etc, etc.

Chalcedon June 6, 2010 at 15:10

Keep upthe good work Anna. Stay safe and, as the Chinese used to say, “Ten
thousand years”.

Sarah June 6, 2010 at 15:04

The truth always hurts.
Thousands of people, myself included were taken
in with the story and taking it at face value, always a mistake. Eventually,
the truth comes out but not without casualties, the biggest casualty in all
this is the young lady herself. The adults around her are not doing a very
good job in keeping her physically and emotionally safe. She is being abused
all over again each and every day. How sad.
AR, you have my support for
what it is worth.

Sue June 6, 2010
at 14:17

What a bunch of c*nts!

You have my support too
x

Subrosa June 6,
2010 at 14:17

Congratulations on handling this so well. I was pleased to hear the police
service, in both countries, understand your concern. They will do their
job.

Onwards and upwards. Please do ensure you keep yourself safe though.

Kind regards as always.

Doc Trough June 6, 2010 at 13:30

M(r)s Raccoon, you display freat dignity in the face of vile behaviour. My
support is yours fwiw.

Ancient and Tattered
Airman June 6, 2010 at 13:21

Anna, of course you have my full support and respect. I fondly think of you
as a bright younger sister who expresses herself well and reports cases I
would not otherwise get to hear or read about. You were the first blogger I
ever read and remain the benchmark of the genre.

Katabasis June 6,
2010 at 13:16

What can I add to what other people have already written here?

This is ugly and despicable and the resort of an online coward. I find it
utterly depressing that whatever actual abuse that may have been suffered by
Hollie is simply going to play second fiddle to this man’s ego.

For what it’s worth, as someone who has had direct experience of a case
similar to Hollie’s I’d like you to know Anna that you have my full support
and am willing to help in any way I can.

David
Chiverton June 6, 2010 at 12:48

You can always judge someone by their enemies Anna, so wear the B.S coming
from Green as a badge of honour. You know we’re all behind you- you’re one of
the best bloggers out there.

Plato June 6, 2010
at 12:38

Well said.

Woman on a Raft
June 6, 2010 at 12:34

I fail to see how attacking Anna Raccoon furthers Hollie’s case. That
Hollie was a victim of abuse isn’t in dispute, but the extent and
perpetrator(s) of that abuse is by no means established.

Contrary to the Scottish legal advice, I’d now like to see Green in civil
court and told to put up or shut up. I don’t believe people like Green can be
dealt with in ‘reputation damage limitation’ ways; lawyers give poorer advice
than PRs when it comes to how the public will view things. His arrest was
particularly crass; it made the case look like it had a credibility which it
lacks on closer inspection. Green won’t give up this case and will pursue it
for years, so it’s best if he is obliged to put his money where his mouth is
now. Anything else will just look like a cover-up.

If Green can make his case, I’ll apologise, but this has all the hall marks
of another damaging panic in the manner of Bryn Estyn and others.
http://www.richardwebster.net/brynestynintro.htm

Best wishes to Anna Raccoon.

Johanna June 6, 2010 at 12:31

Why does every controversial topic have to end in a vile war between good
and evil, black and white? Why is the victim so easily forgotten in the fight
of egos?

I am only interested in the truth – and truth cannot be achieved when
secrecy reigns and free speach is impeded by libel lawyers.

As long as the case is not investigated independently in EVERY direction,
as long will the war go on, the frontiers will harden and everything on the
back of a disabled woman abused again to bolster up egos.

My support goes to Anna, dirty warfare is to be condemned.

A Guy June 6, 2010 at 12:30

Sandra Barr is a delusional moron looking for meaning in an otherwise
meaningless life. ignore her. If she keeps this up i wont be surprised if she
is either sued or has a mental breakdown as she is obviously mentally
damaged.
She is now trying to turn her slandering and fear peddling into a
income generator. This is the group for it http://www.facebook.com/pages/Belfast-Wake-Up-Call/110668105644696?ref=ts

But on the other hand amongst her other social group she is trying to
present herself as “love and light”
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=158743024466&v=wall&ref=ts

Double standards if you ask me…..

Mrs R June 6, 2010 at 12:28

If they took a moment to read other articles here on your site they would
learn you carefully research facts before putting pen to paper, and sometimes
you do court controversy.

To attack in such a way only discredits the attacker, and questions more
than their motives. Maybe all our names will end up on their list of
conspirators, because it would seem that to disagree or question them equates
to conspiracy.

Ray June 6, 2010 at 12:13

Regular reader and very occasional commenter here, but I have to offer
support in this. These kind of attacks and (incompetent) outings of peoples
addresses and details etc. are wrong, full stop.

The Penguin June 6, 2010 at 11:57

Good for you, Anna Raccoon. Vastly more power to your paw.

The
Penguin

Brownian Motions
June 6, 2010 at 11:50

Oh dear. They have indeed misjudged you. No surprise to read such a
forthright response. I wish you well.

g1lgam3sh June 6, 2010 at 11:47

Who would I trust more…You or them….no contest.

Best wishes and any support I can provide.

lenko June 6, 2010 at 11:46

Only just getting up to speed with the story on this. What a load of
tossers you have to deal with! The sort of people who used to burn witches,
and not so long ago, without ever listening to any facts.

Seems like Mr Green has taken a tragedy and is attempting to convert it to
a farce — but nothing about this is funny. The words “conniving”,
“unscrupulous” and “bastard” all spring to mind.

As advised by a previous commenter here, just tell them to fuck off.

measured
June 6, 2010 at 11:43

You seem just the lady to take them on. Regulation or rules may prove a
necessary evil if people are malicious and it just takes a few rotten apples….
you may have uncovered some.

Schlumpf23 June 6, 2010 at 11:32

Anna, I’m a long time reader but this is my first comment. You have an
excellent well researched blog, that is a pleasure to read. You have my
complete support & I wish you all the best. Don’t let them get to you
& stay safe.

Carton de Wiart
June 6, 2010 at 11:11

Hi Anna,

I am trying to take a moderate and open-minded look at the whole of the
‘Greig Affair’ without taking sides. Anne and Hollie seem to be decent people
who have had some dreadful things happen to them. I don’t know enough about
Robert Green to make a judgement on whether he is honourable or not. Likewise
Gregg Lance-Watkins or Tom George. I have taken an interest in this case
because I personally know of other cases where trusted members of society have
allegedly abused children and are now allegedly using their positions to
‘muddy the waters’ to stop the truth from getting out.

In order to try and build up my understanding of this particular case,
could I please ask you how you first became involved and what interests, if
any, do you have?

Thank you

Carton

opsimath June 6, 2010 at 11:10

Good on you, Anna! For what it might be worth, you have my support – keep
telling the truth about them and people WILL get the message

The Filthy
Engineer June 6, 2010 at 11:06

Well done Anna. They really are a nasty bunch aren’t they?

Bugger (the
Panda) June 6, 2010 at 10:52

Gerrimtaeremm!

I thought you were a Blackie.

I grew up on their books, given at Xmas by a neighbour who worked
there.

Clarissa June 6,
2010 at 10:47

I can only echo what everyone else has said: keep up the good work! With
arguments they put forward vanishing in the harsh light of day they fight like
cornered rats to keep their conspiracy theory alive.

Tom
Paine June 6, 2010 at 10:42

An admirable post. Keep on keeping on.

RantinRab June 6,
2010 at 10:28

If there’s anything I can do, not that there’s much, just drop me an e
mail.

Full and total support from me, be strong and keep safe.

Gloria Smudd
June 6, 2010 at 10:26

As Cato says, this is appalling. Stay strong. x

Ch June 6, 2010 at 10:20

Dear Anna, It isn’t the first time you put your finger on a sour spot and
got “hit” for it with veil threats. Good for you to involve the police. If you
need me to send in my dogs, let me know
Bon
courage & bisous.

JohnRS June 6, 2010 at 10:11

Nil illegitamus carborundum!!

Keep up the (very) good work.

GreatScot June 6, 2010 at 10:00

Well done Raccoon, keep up the good work and don’t waste a second worrying
about Green and his revelations, for him to post a veiled threat or incitement
to his deluded apostles publicly just shows how stupid and small he really
is.

Empty vessels and all that.

QM June 6, 2010 at
09:56

Whilst I don’t agree with everything you blog about, your integrity and
honesty has never been in doubt in my mind. In this case your expos

Mr
Eugenides June 6, 2010 at 09:46

All very bizarre – a right hornets’ nest of lunacy you seem to have poked
there. Full support from this quarter.

In Awe June 6, 2010 at 09:44

My heroine

The King of
Wrong June 6, 2010 at 09:31

Anna,

I’d just like to add my support to the comments you’ve received so far.
I’ve no idea even what the dispute was originally about, but Mr Green’s
actions are unconscionable and indefensible. Stay strong!

– KoW

Garibaldi June 6, 2010 at 09:31

I’ll second that.

Catosays June 6,
2010 at 07:44

Anna,
I’ve only just seen this. I am appalled at such behaviour.

You have my (for what it’s worth) full and unwavering support. I shall post
on this today urging people to come here and stand with you.

‘Never let go’

Cato

Bill
Sticker June 6, 2010 at 06:12

What very unpleasant people you have to deal with Anna. “No action required
at present”? What sort of ‘action’ might this be? Or are they simply hollow
people with hollow threats?

Sounds like desperation on their part, going after the messenger like this.
Good work, you’ve got them frothing.

Alan June 6, 2010 at 04:42

A strange logic is afoot in that ‘press release’.

“Does she come from Scotland?”

A lot of people do.

“Another coincidence? We don

Tom George, Edinburgh June 6, 2010 at 04:52

“To fairly retaliate shouldn

JuliaM June 6,
2010 at 04:37

As Fred Thrung says, you’re obviously doing something right, but what a way
to have your actions validated!

Keep up the good work, but stay safe.

“I trust all honest bloggers will join with me in condemning those who
give the government sound reason to want to impose restrictions on what can
and cannot be said on the Internet.”

You’re not wrong there.

Old
Holborn June 6, 2010 at 03:50

Once again, a nutter unable to provide proof himself insists that you prove
your innocence instead. Or else.

Didn’t we have stuff like this in the Middle Ages?

http://www.facebook.com/#!/claire.khaw?v=wall&story_fbid=122777847759967

Radical Review
June 6, 2010 at 07:18

cant see this link, it must be inside the secret society demanding
openness from everyone except them.

For my tuppence worth, Ms Raccoon I echo the sentiments of the many who
have already commented.
Best Regards.

Clarissa June 6,
2010 at 10:44

Yikes, it would seem she thinks of herself as a philosopher to judge by
all those quotes she attributes to herself.

Tom George, Edinburgh June 6, 2010 at 02:58

Dear Anna

The ruthlessness and recklessness of Green / My Unreserved Apologies to all
concerned …

I am so very sorry to read that through the recklessness, yet again, of Mr
Green … (and I have experienced the same inconvenience and alarm due to that
recklessness too, some 4 months ago – and should have realised back then that
this man was indeed a self-serving public menace) … and his very demented,
deluded and duped followers, that you have been put in to danger once again. I
do hope Green and his “Team” are very proud of themselves for their latest
“Press Release” – Green used to get me to do these by the dozen and I
foolishly did so convinced of the veracity of the story. But I now know that I
was duped and that he is just a very callous, ruthless, reckless, selfish and
plausible charlatan who is quite prepared to cast aside anyone who dares to
challenge him (as I recently have) and discard them like a piece of dirt. I am
truly sorry I ever came across this impostor and his very devious and ruthless
ways.

Below are a couple of emails I recieved from the BBC investigative
reporter, Mark Daly. It should be noted (before all the conspiracy theorists
think I was in cahoots with Mark at the time) that Green and Tony “Legend”
were fully aware I had contacted him again leading up to his appearance on
Tony’s show on Sunday 25 April 2010 – where Mark undoubtedly tore the case
apart and left Green and Anne Greig stumbling for words and only getting more
angry in the process.

I would like to publicly and unreservedly apologise to Mark for any
inconvenience or trouble I may have caused him as a result of my very foolish
and naive involvement in the Hollie Greig fiasco over the past year and I
profusely and unreservedly apologise to anyone else who I may have
inadvertently offended or defamed as a result of being suckered by the ever so
charming Mr Green – who is a public menace and will use, abuse and defame
anyone who dares to question him and call him to account. He is a nothing more
than a charlatan, fraud and a pathalogical LIAR.

Once again, I am so very sorry that Anna has been put in to possible danger
due to the recklessness of Green, his “Team” and their few remaining demented
followers and I hope they will pay very heavy consequences for putting an
entirely innocent lady to such inconvenience and in possible jeopardy.

What a disgusting bunch of vermin they have all now turned out to be.

My sincerest and best wishes to you Anna – stay safe and keep well,

Tom
Edinburgh
ScotsVInjustice@aol.com
07791-226-490

Garibaldi June 6, 2010 at 04:25

Tom, I think more and more people will be hanging their heads in shame at
being sucked in by Green – but you have, in the time I’ve known you,
conducted yourself in impeccably and are a true gentleman. I’m also appalled
but not surprised, that Anna Raccoon has had to deal with this nonsense …
simply for holding an opinion… and would like to thank her for allowing
people to air their views on her blog.

Tom George, Edinburgh June 6, 2010 at 04:47

Thank you for these very kind words Garibaldi.

I agree entirely with your words about the disgusting treatment of Anna
and think you have also caught the current public mood about the charlatan
that is “Menace Green” and the tragedy that is the Hollie Greig debacle in
all your recent postings on Anna’s blog.

My grateful thanks for those words of support once again.

Take good care.

Tom

Greg_L-W. June
6, 2010 at 05:08

Him

my apologies Madame La Raccoon – some things just have to be said!

My unreserved Respect for Tom George who I very much hope I may oneday
have the privilege of meeting. It takes great courage to stand out in front
of a Lynch Mob and speak out in defence of Justice and admit in public that
one has beed duped by a vile, but very smooth and plausible, con artist –
whether that con man is psychopathic or a psychotic sociopath or merely
venal it takes that same degree of courage to admit you were wrong and
apologise to those you may in turn have innocently in good faith misled.

Thank you sir for such an excellent example why these United Kingdoms are
so very special – it was real men like Tom George who set the world its
standards. Not the braying asses of the lynch mob following the bells on the
tumbrills of the witch finders, in the hope of the sight of blood – the more
noble the blood the more hysterical the mob!

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

Tom George, Edinburgh June 6, 2010 at 06:06

Thank you too for those very kind words sir.

I will never be able to match your eloquence, nor your dogged
determination to get to the truth – however unpalatable that may turn out
to be … especially to those poor deluded and duped souls who have followed
or been involved in the very sad and tragic story of Hollie and Anne
Greig.

My respect for you too sir. For, although I don’t always agree with
what you may say and the way you go about saying it, I will defend your
right to do so – and, given the sustained and vicious attacks you have
been under for daring to cast doubt in this very sorry saga over the past
5 weeks, I cannot blame you for seeing red at times and giving your
detractors a damn good good tongue lashing. No-one deserves to have death
threats or being in fear for their personal safety (like Anna) for merely
speaking their mind in a very reasoned, rational and logical manner.

Thank you for these kind words again sir.

I wish you good health and hope that the very foolish braying masses
will finally see sense in this tragedy and have the decency, humility and
courage to one day mend their ways … and apologise to you too.

Regards,

Tom

PS. I’m still waiting for my big fat pay cheque – from the Scottish
Crown Office, the Scottish Government and the UK Government … hopefully
you, Pabs, Anna and myself will be moved to our new assignments very soon!
(an in joke for the uninitiated – just in case anyone is thinking I’m
actually serious!).

Maria June 6, 2010 at 16:09

Tom,

You have been accused of many things over the last few weeks and you have
handled it all with dignity. Hold your head high and with pride. Robert
Green is a fool and his lack of response and apology not only to you, but
everyone else he has accused, is utter folly. Robert Green had the
opportunity of presenting H’s case twice and refused. Why? He has lied about
knowing Paul Philips and his girlfriend, even after several phone calls with
them. Why? Robert Green has failed to contact the other named victims. Why?
He has also failed to do his own investigation. Why?

Robert Green, Stuart Usher, Paul Drockton owe you an apology, along with
everyone else of course, and also including many of the supporters of the
case on FaceBook.

Laurent (des fraises et de la tendresse)
June 6, 2010 at 02:08

A recent discoverer of your writings, and liking it a lot, its freedom, its
irony, etc. (I found out that we are/were almost neighbours) You have my
unconditional support. A French reader.

Kitler June 6, 2010 at 00:57

If your windows get licked more than usual its because I have been using
your Robert Green writings to try and explain to the David Icke Forums that
this case is not entirely as it seems. This whole thing stinks and I have
taken it personally because I got caught up in the initial hysterical web-mob
nonsense and am of the opinion that anybody who considers themself an
anarchist/libertarian should never ever allow their thinking or actions to be
swayed by a mob. That is the exact opposite of what we are supposed to be
about.

mister_choos
June 6, 2010 at 00:55

For what its worth, you have my full support AR

Jiks June 6, 2010 at 00:27

Anna,

I’ve always been impressed by the standards you stick to on your blog and I
hope these nutters do not cause you too much worry or distress.

Take care and keep up the good work.

Motherof2 June 6, 2010 at 00:15

Ms Raccoon

Although I have commented on this blog in support of the campaign for
Hollie Greig I am absolutely AGAINST anyone’s personal details/identity being
published online without their permission.

Mr Lance Watkins did this to a lady involved in the campaign a few weeks
ago and then printed H’s last week sparking outrage. It would be wrong if
people were not outraged at this.

I am sorry you have been caught up in this, I do not agree with what you
say but I hope this does not lead to any problems for you.

Truly

Dark
Lochnagar June 6, 2010 at 00:10

Don’t let them intimidate you Anna, you have my full backing and I am sure
all the Scottish bloggers.

The
Fat Councillor June 5, 2010 at
23:55

Anna, just tell these hopeless turds to fuck off.

Oddballs, to a man…

Vimes June 5, 2010 at 23:52

As your token pinko liberal, we may disagree on various things, but I don’t
doubt your integrity – all the best and don’t let the bastards grind you
down.

P T Barnum June 5, 2010 at 23:49

Anna, the more they squeal and bite, the closer your investigative rapier
is getting to the bone. You make carefully reasoned arguments. They make
threats. Says it all, really.

Brian June 5, 2010 at 23:39

Anna,
You are Anna Raccoon on this blog and that is all I expect to know
about you. I’ve read this blog for some years now and would unhesitatingly
vouch for your raccoon-like ability to weasel out the truth, honesty and
brilliant sense of humour.
Let me know if I can do anything legal to help
that doesn’t involve running.
Good luck and best wishes.

David June 7, 2010 at 14:11

How have you been following this blog for years? The domain name was only
bought in January 2009. This blog isn’t “years” old yet.

Greg_L-W. June 5,
2010 at 23:22

Hi,

I have read AR’s blog on and off for an age – sometimes I may disagree with
her conclusions but I have NEVER found her blog to be wilfully wrong.

A measure of the utter stupidity of Robert Green’s threat is that I have
NEVER worked for ANY Government department of ANY government since leaving The
Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, when I purchased my discharge after 3 years
in The Army as I was unwilling to uphold the standards and values of the then
Government.

I am accused of hosting an organisation on a web site – which incidentally
is not nor ever was mine or under my control, I am accused of closing down The
Magna Carta Society Ltd. of which I was NEVER a member and it was closed by
its two directors Irdris Francis & Ashley Mote MEP (rtd.).

I will refrain from permitting Anna’s blog from turning into a defence of
my reputation which I am happy to defend on my own blog.

Suffice to say I know and have irrefutable proof that Anne Greig &
Robert Green are both dishonest, irresponsible and criminal – thus a dangerous
menace to society.

I can with absolute certainty vouch that I have never seen or heard of a
breach of integrity or an act of malice or dishonesty on the part of Anna
Raccoon under her bloggers identity or that identity as she has been forced to
use as a result of a previous dangerous nutter!

Good luck and I am easily contacted if I can help.

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

Garibaldi June 6, 2010 at 09:30

A controversial character you may be Greg, but I doubt if I’ll ever come
across a more open, determined and scrupulously honest one. Not only that
but you are willlng to share information and knowledge with anyone who asks
for it, as long as they are seekers of the truth…a rare thing these days.
And you have helped many vulnerable people by doing that.

David June 7, 2010 at 14:17

Greg Lance-Watkins, in one of your videos on Google Videos you make many
bold claims about politicians being paedophiles. Where is your evidence or
proof? Why do you want to hold Robert Green to a higher standard? You make
claims about foot and mouth disease and you publicly defame Tony Blair and
Gordon Brown. Where is YOUR evidence and how come you’re not a nutter for
making such claims?

ivan June 5, 2010 at 23:14

Anna,

If you think I can help in any way, just shout, you have my e-mail
address.

It is rather obvious this Green bod has a guilty conscience for some reason
and so hits out at those that make him think about it.

Nil carborundum est – don’t let the blighters grind you down.

Indyanhat June 5,
2010 at 22:55

Hey Anna, New as I am to the blogosphere, I have come to regard your work
as highly informative, nicely insightful and often amusing.
If you need a
vote of confidence , then I hope this will serve!
Keep up the excellent
work you do and keep yourself safe , I am certain that there are many like
myself and the others above who value you highly!!!
Namaste.

Old Slaughter June 7, 2010 at 10:46

I’m with this guy.

ie. with you.

cynicalHighlander
June 5, 2010 at 22:46

Hi Anna I read your blogs on a regular basis and have found that your
integrity appears/is sound.

The Hollie story was very easy to be sucked into knowing how we are treated
by the MSM in Scotland but truth will win in the end, more power to your
keyboard.

Andrew Withers
(LPUK) June 5, 2010 at 22:36

We live in an increasingly disturbing world where the age old threat of ‘
we know where you live’ can be transmitted electronically in intimidate those
who will not indulge in group think.

I had a similar one conveyed to me this morning by a public servant no
less, as with most public servants he got the address wrong as well.

anoneumouse June
5, 2010 at 22:29

“No. The e-mail address given is not and has never been a genuine e-mail
address. It has been lifted from the mailing list of a school I attended
almost 50 years ago and still contains the spam avoidance filters.”

“50 years ago”

hmm mm…. even Al Gore who claims he invented the Internet wouldn’t venture
that it was fifty years ago!

Anna
Raccoon June 5, 2010 at 22:30

anoneumose,

It is an ‘old scholars’ mailing list!!!!! I attended the school 50 years
ago – the mailing list was made up about 10 years ago.

SadButMadLad
June 5, 2010 at 22:40

I think it means she atteneded the school 50 years ago, and in recent
times gave her personal details to them (possibly for school reunion
purposes) which included the spam blocked version of her email address.

alf stone June 5, 2010 at 22:27

I hardly ever comment on blogs but I have read yours for a long time and I
am convinced of your integrity. For what it is worth you have my full
support.

Anna
Raccoon June 5, 2010 at 22:29

alf stone – all support is worth a great deal.
Thank-you.

Snowolf June 5,
2010 at 22:22

I’m trying to think of something pithy and aposite to write about this, but
am failing miserably.

I’m completely bemused.

Even if it isn’t a conspiracy theory. Even if what you say, Anna, is
incorrect. Why the opprobium in your direction? What will your blog do to
alter/preserve the situation? Not to run down your blog, which I think is
excellent, but at the end of the day, they are just words on a screen.

All very odd.

There are some very strange people out there.

microdave June 5, 2010 at 22:13

Well said. I wonder how they would like it if you published their names and
addresses????

Will June 5, 2010 at 22:03

Thanks for your determination in the face of adversity.

Will

Fred Thrung June 5, 2010 at 22:03

First Boateng’s friend (I’ve deleted his name from my brain). Now this.
You’re obviously doing something right. It’s just a shame there are such
creatures as Green who are prepared to make life unpleasant.

Richard B June 5,
2010 at 22:02

I am in no position to judge any of the issues here, but I have always
thought that what you said was said moderately and reasonably, and with an eye
to the truth rather than any conspiracy. For this I applaud you. Publishing
someone’s personal details (even if inaccurate) on the internet without their
permission is never acceptable. Your decision to involve the police was the
right one. Good luck, and stick with it.

Pericles June 7, 2010 at 10:43

Concur.  This is all very sad.

??

WitteringsfromWitney June
5, 2010 at 21:55

Stick with it Anna. From personal knowledge I can vouch that GLW is someone
of extremely limited cerebral ability.

Anna
Raccoon June 5, 2010 at 22:01

Thank you for your support you two, much appreciated.

WitteringsfromWitney June 5, 2010 at 22:22

Have also repeated Obo’s tweet on mine – will widen the audience a
tad!

Purpleline June 5, 2010 at 21:54

Great statement anna raccoon. Well done the truth will come out eventually.
Stay safe