Why the internet opposition must unite against the counterfeiters
When David Miliband told the media the other day that there had been “no quote-unquote deal” to obtain the release of Peter Moore, one could almost see his claymation hands making the inverted commas sign: he is, truly, that naff. But chiefly, he is so utterly lacking in credibility that I doubt anyone beyond his wife and mum believes a word he says.
After the Iraq War, troops ‘did not at any time’ land on British soil on their way to Guantanamo. Until somebody found an email proving they did. There were ‘absolutely no grounds at all for suspecting torture of POWs’ by Britain. Until a judge suggested we hear such cases in public; ever since when, this banana-chomping Mr Bean-Nerd has tried (amid increasing horror among libertarians) to stop the truth coming out.
This curious mixture of naïve cynicism is probably what historians will remember the new century’s first decade for. It has been a decade in which – above anything else – all trust in government statements has been liquidated.
“The truth lies in there somewhere” a great QC once said. Take out ‘truth’, stick an apostrophe in ‘lie’s’, and you have every citizen’s reaction to trends, rises, falls, cuts, investments and any other form of statistic issued by the Establishment today: ‘Where’s the whopper this time?’ people think.
It is of course what every feather-bedded elite does: issue Good News that nobody believes. But the unique thing, historically speaking, about the UK’s slide into bored disbelief is that ours is not a One Party State.
The problem exists, I think, at three levels. What Marx would’ve called the Uberbau lie about everything. Beneath them is a dumbed-down Fourth Estate too ignorant or idle to catch them at it regularly. And further down the food-chain still is the demos: fixated by money and fame, obsessed for years by shopping, terrified by the debt it now has, and distracted by talent shows where the overriding entry visa is a dearth of even competence, let alone talent.
Nor are these levels mutually exclusive: the Establishment uses – and if necessary, bullies – the media into slavish reproduction of its altered reality as truth; while both leaders and media affect a genuine interest in the circuses laid on for the entertainment of those too busy or ignorant to know the genuine article when they see it. The entire celeb-mag sector is based on gaping at the ersatz creatures they themselves have created. Gordon Brown pulls a mournful face to suggest that he really cares about the demise of Jade Goody. These two things were manufactured for money and power respectively, but they are no different for all that.
The central dilemma for all those with insight and foresight is that despite this being a multi-Party system, the UK has a unitary Establishment. There is no challenger of any influence opposing that elite….or threatening to displace it. And the situation has reached that stage where those of a truly pernicious bent persuade the gullible that alternatives are in fact threats.
My own bitter experience at the hands of Mandelson, Bradshaw, Balls, the Guardian and Channel Four was for me the great lesson of the story about Brown’s health problems I ran at the end of September 2009. One after another, they repeated blatant lies about my site being an ‘extreme right-wing’ hotbed of complete falsehood. In the end, even Andrew Marr dared not ask the Prime Minister about anti-depressants, choosing to ask him (for reasons that remain unclear) about ‘prescription painkillers’ instead. Not one media commentator had the cojones to demand a straight denial of either blindness or depression.
This is a profoundly dangerous and disturbing state of affairs: it is as near as damn it the exact scenario outlined by Plato as the inevitable precursor to dictatorship….and Plato’s despots didn’t have cameras, phone taps or internet monitors.
As for the years 2000-2010, they will be written off by future analysts as The Counterfeit Decade, The Age of Unreality, or some other such term. Government and all its works have indeed been a forgery – and not even a very good one. But forgery will escape discovery when people’s attention is elsewhere. We badly need an internet coalition to put aside differences of outlook and emphasis, and print a relentless currency of Truth before that liberty is taken away from us.
A million blogs – too easily dismissed by Mandelsod as ‘the fantasies of extreme right-wingers’ – will not be enough. Only a form of online Solidanarsk will stop them now.
Copyright John Ward 2010
-
1
January 1, 2010 at 15:50 -
you know what John,
i’ve been reflecting on the notion that for many right wing minded people the only solutions to their dilemmas are notions of ‘the collective’, the ‘revolution’ and a political praxis that is substantial and challenging the state/establishment orthodoxies – which, of course, have mainly been the province of left wing minded people.
as an avid reader of many blogs, I detect this notion of – it’s all very well moaning and groaning but what can we realistically do? – and it’s as if what was left is now right and what was right is now left…..but the heart of the state/establishment remains the same.
just how many establishment figures are, in any real way, peturbed by the recession? in what way are the limits to our freedom of expression, of movement and our civil rights hindering them from going about their business? I would argue not one iota.
and on and on it goes. In an election year, with the false hope that brings, this is a timely piece and the reality is we are a long way from real answers to change
-
2
January 1, 2010 at 15:51 -
David Miliband is not a Cynic, he is a fantasist and confidence trickster. Selfish and easily detected stupidity are not features of any anyalytical capability.
-
3
January 1, 2010 at 16:08 -
Fraser Nelson called them ‘Brownies’.
I call them lies. Milliband must think that every single one of us has just come down with the rain. He’s as delusional as his puppet-master.
-
4
January 1, 2010 at 16:11 -
Yet who is going to step into power ? The great righter of rights Mr Cameron?
Next decade same as last decade. -
5
January 1, 2010 at 16:24 -
Great piece John.
-
6
January 1, 2010 at 19:16 -
ours is not a One Party State…
Indeed it isn’t – as well as NuLab there’s… let me see, the LibDems, there’s the Greens, there’s UKIP, there’s the BNP – have I left anyone out? Nope, that’s about it!
-
7
January 1, 2010 at 19:21 -
Is there nothing we can do? I suspect so.
Most people don’t read Blogs, and don’t even try to inform themselves.
Who any one chooses to vote for these days doesn’t really matter. They have all lost the plot in the process of self agrandisment.
They put noughts on the end of an ordinary household budget, and think they can go on being in debt.
Unfortunately, most household budgets are in debt these days. And can you really blame them? What incentive do ordinary people have to stay out of debt?
It is all quite appalling. I don’t owe anyone anthing, but it is the likes of me who suffer because my savings have been decimated.
Those who owe will just go on owing. -
8
January 1, 2010 at 20:16 -
The bloggers have one massive problem in their quest for freedom,
they speak to each other and read each others blogs with the occasional
swipe from the Politicos. They have become a self restricting debating
society awaiting the forthcoming clampdown with increasingly paranoic
rhetoric. Idiots vote but do not read blogs,how do they know that
somewhere in the ether ,support awaits them. TV and Newspapers
control the minds of the majority, the bloggers just each other.
How do you reach the profaneStreetfighter
-
9
January 1, 2010 at 21:07 -
A Warmist going on about the horrors of totalitarian elites and how dangerous it is to have a blanket media consensus. Now that’s funny.
-
10
January 1, 2010 at 22:03 -
A warmist talking about an electric blanket media consensus would be even funnier… to my mind, anyway.
-
11
January 1, 2010 at 22:39 -
Well said, Gloria. We warmist scum must stick together.
I’m with Parsifal. Less jerking each other off, more jerking those who have lost hope into action.
YM x -
12
January 1, 2010 at 23:13 -
I’m afraid I also have to say that Parsifal (even at Covent Garden) is one helluva long and (for me) a not entirely enjoyable opera. So in that respect I’m not with Parsifal, in that I wouldn’t ever, ever, ever go and see that opera again. Wild swans couldn’t drag me.
-
13
January 2, 2010 at 01:02 -
On the other hand, I can see what Parsifal is on about: with one hand I glibly tap out my most heart-felt opinions to a solely blog-based audience yet with the other hand I offer myself a tissue with which to wipe away my tears of frustration, prompted by my knowledge that what I or anyone else posts online makes not one jot of difference.
One side of me nurses a warm glow within, knowing that I trumpet my opinions out to the http://www., enjoying the glorious benefits of freedom of speech, yet at home another side of me stridently checks my teenagers for speaking to me as if I have had made no contribution to their lives thus far.
I am a contradiction, my cerebral life is one thing and my familial life quite another. And at home it’s always the spotty youth who has the last word as he/she slams the door triumphantly shut. And so, maybe, it should be – I can be firm in my opinions about today’s world and what it holds for my children but it isn’t my ‘age’ (that was the 70’s/80’s/90’s and that time is well and truly gone) so who am I to say what should and shouldn’t be done in the name of my children (one of whom has already mentioned I need to tell her if I’m prepared to be put in a home because she doesn’t want to fight about it later)?
Ever since I sat with my grandmother (b. 1898, d. 1994) and asked her how she felt about the enormous changes that had taken place in her lifetime, I have thought her words were so simple yet so true: “It doesn’t matter what was before or what comes after – everyone has to live in their age.”
-
14
January 2, 2010 at 02:25 -
Most people simply don’t care. Their interest in politics goes as far as ‘Labour isn’t working, vote Tory’. I spoke with many people in my work about the Climategate thing and most hadn’t heard of it. When I presented them with what the emails presented they simply took the attitude ‘I suspected there was something dodgy about the science but I’m not that interested in it, leave them to it’.
I suspect the same is true for politics. Apart from a porn-film, duck-house and possibly moat cleaning what could the majority of Britons tell you about the hottest political story of the last year?
{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }