Chipmunk Cheek?
The saucy Ms Blears, as in "What a bloody sauce!"
Another anonymous contributor has cast a beady eye over an MP’s expenses and found this rather curious thing: Hazel Blears has overpaid her telephone bill by £55.21 … and is claiming the overpayment back! I wonder whether she also claimed for the money she’s been charged? Well, looking back at what little information there is in the ACA forms, it seems she has. Unfortunately, the released information does not include all the invoices, so it’s hard to be sure, but it looks very much like Ms Blears claimed £95.88 as a phone bill which included an overpayment and then she claimed for the overpayment as well!
If this is in fact the case, then it’s an astonishingly basic mistake for the Fees Office to approve the claim, and it’s a remarkable bit of petty chiselling from a senior member of the Labour Party.
Apropos of very little, if you have nimble fingers, have a penchant for cheesy music and are of a certain age, you will probably enjoy this.
-
1
December 17, 2009 at 17:23 -
Does the woman really imagine that gurning her fizzog into that pop-eyed simpering smirk is anything other than offputting?
-
2
December 17, 2009 at 17:42 -
Ye Gods, these self serving scum never learn. Hemp rope, lamp post and an angry mob is the only way to resolve this problem.
-
3
December 17, 2009 at 17:48 -
As a lad from Salford, I feel I am allowed to assert that Hazy Bluuurghs is the best advertisement on the planet for meritocracy….as opposed to affirmative action on behalf of daft Salford tarts.
The Gerbil from Hell should’ve stopped at local councillor (where she was always treading water) and ignored the voices in her head that bade her go to Westminster in search of the ocean floor.
As for the Clara Bow lip-pursing thing, it is not an affectation, but rather the best effort she can make at a show of intelligence.
That she lacks anything that might add up to an IQ score in double figures is amply demonstrated by the ‘poolswinner’ cheque-brandishing episode – akin in my view to Gordon Brown buying back the gold he sold at $235, but at a price now hovering above $1100.
However, I must point out that I’m against Owerr ‘azel having to pay back her expenses claims: nothing less than paying back every penny of her unearned Ministerial salary will do for me.
I understand, but the way, that she speaks quite highly of me too.
YM x
PS Her feet are abnormally large for a person of only 4′ 3″ in height. I feel a political foot thesis coming on….. -
4
December 17, 2009 at 18:34 -
Apologies for repeating myself, but all I can see is Neddie Seagoon’s sister.
-
5
December 17, 2009 at 19:51 -
John
The only tallness issue as far as I’m concerned is: are her legs long enough to hook her ankles together around the small of my back?
I guess I’m just the perve my ex said I was in the divorce court …
How is it possible to lower the tone on a thread about the ginger dwarfette?
-
6
December 17, 2009 at 19:52 -
Go on, John, have a go at a political foot thesis – I’m quite soled on the idea. Dip your toe in and see if you can nail it. Your arch comments would be right instep with the topic and you could really stick the boot in. Go on, sock it to ‘em!
-
7
December 17, 2009 at 20:49
-
-
8
December 17, 2009 at 20:51 -
Ahahahahahahahahaha
Neddie Seagoon
-
9
December 17, 2009 at 21:02 -
Are you tying to winkle him out? If he does buckle under the pressure he may use it as a platform to further his argument on Hain. I could sling back the same challenge to you. As the French shoe philosopher Phillipe Phillope said ( in a soft gallic brogue) beware of the arguments you court.
-
10
December 17, 2009 at 21:40 -
You could be right – this may be the thin end of the wedge.
Still, et tu, Brute – you’re lacing the thread with a few ideas of your own: so eyelet the matter rest. It’s probably just a load of old cobblers anyway.
{ 11 comments }