The Kiev Chickens Coming Home to Roost.
Ukraine was once the 3rd largest bearer of nuclear weapons in the World, after the U.S. and Russia. This all changed with an agreement to scrap all its nuclear weapons in 1992. By 1996 Ukraine was free from nuclear weapons. Let us not forget that those weapons were not just held in the Ukraine, they were made in the Ukraine, by Ukrainians. Ipso, the technology is still there. Ukraine still has fifteen operating nuclear reactors, which contribute half the country’s electricity. Chernobyl was a mere 60 miles from Kiev. When Gorbachov signalled the end of the cold war, the Ukraine had some 1,900 nuclear warheads – stored at the Krasnokamensk military base in the Crimea.
Would any of you like to hazard a guess as to how long it would take ‘American thugs’ to ‘storm’ the ‘British base’ at Lakenheath or Mildenhall, in the event of a rag tag and bobtail group of demonstrators installing a disorganised government in Birmingham composed of neo-communists supported by Moscow? The Americans also have a long-standing agreement, similar in every way to the agreement the Russians had happily been abiding by with their Ukrainian partners, until the fluffy-wuffy EU in the form of Catherine Ashton decided that they would try a bit of expansionist aggression.
Suitably poked, and threatened with finding themselves cut off from access to the black sea and deprived of their military bases in an area which is strongly Russian; Russian speaking, Russian supporting, and mostly Russian fully employed, The Russian population held a referendum and decided that their economic interests were best nurtured by Russia. This isn’t the sort of ‘democratic decision’ that the EU approves of. Ms Ashton and her backers have retired clutching ‘victim’ status. ‘Ooh those evil Russians wouldn’t let us take their toys away from them’ – No! They wouldn’t – and whatever gave you the half-baked idea that they would?
There is a lot of talk recently that Russia has ‘violated the Budapest agreement’ under which Ukraine, Russia, the United States, and the United Kingdom promised each other, reasonably faithfully, but not giving any guarantees, that they would never threaten or use force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine. They also pledged that none of them would ever use economic coercion to subordinate Ukraine to their own interest.
That means you, Ms Ashton, offering to give Ukraine 11 billion to bail out their bankrupt country, if they would just join your blasted EU. That means you William Hague, supporting demonstrators against a democratically elected government.
The agreement merely requires that the signatories would ‘consult in the event a situation arises which raises a question concerning these commitments.’
So how are we doing, consulting wise? So far we’ve kicked Russia out of the G8 meeting, turning it into the G7; and we’ve stopped a few Russian oligarchs wives from doing their shopping in London. Scarcely surprising since we were the first to contravene this non-binding agreement of which the western media only seem to be interested in quoting the bit that appears to put Russia in the wrong for ‘using force against the territorial integrity’.
How is Russia doing on this obligation to consult? So far they’ve hung onto their bases and their weapons in the loyal Russian speaking Eastern territory of Crimea, and reluctantly, oh so reluctantly, ‘let go’ of the largely unemployed and bankrupt, to say nothing of heavily indebted, Western part of Ukraine. It must have broken Russian hearts, er, I don’t think so. A western part of Ukraine which is full of a ‘suicidal nationalism‘, with far right nationalists and neo Nazi’s jumping for joy at the idea of the West now ensuring that they have all the money they want, new Mercedes for everyone, and entry into Britain if they need medical attention.
People do realise that Babi Yar, which is credited as the site of the single most obscene act of holocaust in WW2, some 200,000 Jewish and other ‘vermin’ souls sent up in smoke, is in Kiev, don’t they? That the Banderas, supporters of whom – I’m looking at you Julia Tymoshenko – were responsible for the murder of some 500,000 Polish souls. Somehow, the Banderas escaped trial at Nuremberg for crimes against humanity.
“Ukrainian genocide committed against the Poles during World War II surpassed German and Soviet genocide …. [It] was marked by the utmost ruthlessness and barbarity, and … up until the present day, it has been denied or, at best, presented with reminders that all is “relative’ or other such evasions.”
Yet history is being whitewashed in front of our very eyes.
Yesterday, Oleksandr Muzycko, better known by his nom de guerre Sashko Bilyi, a prominent Ukrainian ultra-nationalist who played an active part in the recent anti-government demonstrations, was shot dead in Rivne after opening fire at police during an attempt to arrest him. Ukrainian Police say Muzychko was sought for organised crime links, hooliganism and for threatening public officials. Last month, in a scene captured on video, he assaulted employees at a prosecutor’s office in Rivne, grabbing one man by his tie and beating him.
So, even the Police, now loyal to the new ‘authorities’ accept that this man was a right-wing thug that they were trying to arrest, yet the western media chose to speculate ‘that Muzychko had been targeted by Russian special forces in a Mossad-style assassination’.
Why is the west so keen to ratchet up fear of the ‘Russian Bear’? Why are we so keen to hand over 11 Billion in order to inherit the responsibility of millions of unemployed agricultural workers, currently ruled over by a bunch of unelected, murderous, right-wing thugs?
Remember the ‘hated’ warmonger George Bush? Gosh how the left were happy to see him deposed from office; how jubilant they were when the fluffy-wuffy Obama arrived on the scene.I’ve just been looking back at some of Bush’s ‘inflammatory speeches.
“No longer must all the world serve as a stage for superpower stand-offs.” July 30, 1991
“Americans will not support those who seek independence in order to replace a far- off tyranny with a local despotism. They will not aid those who promote a suicidal nationalism based upon ethnic hatred.” August 1, 1991
Compare that with fluffy-wuffy’s latest effort:
President Obama expressed his deep concern over Russia’s clear violation of Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity, which is a breach of international law, including Russia’s obligations under the UN Charter, and of its 1997 military basing agreement with Ukraine, and which is inconsistent with the 1994 Budapest Memorandum and the Helsinki Final Act.
The United States condemns Russia’s military intervention into Ukrainian territory.
President Obama made clear that Russia’s continued violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity would negatively impact Russia’s standing in the international community.
Not a mention of the EU using economic coercion to subordinate Ukraine to their own interests. Not a mention.
Mitt Romney has said that ‘Russia is the US’ principal geopolitical foe’. I wonder if it isn’t the EU that is the US’ principle geopolitical foe – they are the ones who rang the door-bell, and who are now hiding behind Obama’s skirts.
Can anybody explain to me the logic of the EU getting involved in the Ukraine in the first place? It’s looking more and more like what the footballing world would call an ‘own goal’.
- Moor Larkin
March 26, 2014 at 11:49 am -
There is a delusion in the west just now that government’s solely exist to apply “the will of their people”. The Americans especially still seem to believe this to be true. Perhaps for Americans it can still be true, so long as they stay in America – just as the British Isles were once set in a silver sea. For the Continentally-land-bound Europeans, what one people want to do is often diametrically at odds with what a neighbouring people want to do. The solution is a reliance of the cohesiveness of the nation-State, so that each people do whatever they like, so long as they stay where they currently belong. The balkanisation of Europe may have some way yet to run. I’m only amazed it has never set in, in America. Perhaps it’s because of the federal government’s massive military machine and the Yanks know that resistance is futile..
- Margaret Jervis
March 26, 2014 at 12:29 pm -
Excellent piece Anna. No I don’t have a clue either though no doubt lots have. Thing is the main line of attack on Russia and its orthodox mignons in the media appears to be the liberal culture wars. Pussy Riot may have received a harsh sentence but the fact of the act of desecration took place appears not to warrant any censure – imagine the reaction here if pro-Palestinians staged an anti-Zionist demo in a synagogue. And of course while gay rights maybe an article of faith in the west, the rights of others are routinely trampled on by the state to general acclaim, the msm mute either in ignorance or frozen in fear. Meanwhile our adversaries in Iran gleefully sport news coverage of the ‘monster’ scandals we manufacture indicting our entire culture in the eyes of others!
And here’s a little titbit – many moons ago in Ukraine – the 70s – young teens, encouraged by their mothers posed proudly in erotic photos for a magazine called LS . It was all perfectly legal then and there. Laws changed and the magazine folded. But somehow these grainy fantasy pics found their way onto the internet and constitute a significant proportion of ‘what’s out there’ often intermingled with the multiple re-directs thumbnail menus and hidden images on free-toview sites (these being Western entrepreneurial endeavours – designed to attract advertising and inducement for pay-per-view). It’s often claimed that the purveyors of KP on the net are ‘Russian gangster/paedophiles’ etc. Well porn and fraud are intimately acquainted as with fake pharma sites. But there’s no money in KP other than by blackmail for the most part. The sexting pics are home grown endeavours by teen sharing that don’t go on the free-to view websites. So while Ruskie gangsters and far Eastern potentates may use porn sites in connection with fraud and boiler-room scams – (not exclusively an eastern phenomenon) the actual production of such stuff in Russia is likely – for commercial purposes – to be virtually nil. The LS pics (could Russian be confused with Ukraine here?) are of course of an earlier vintage in a foreign land.
But in the new western-style Ukraine I would suggest for the sake of law and order and economic well-being the first move is for Ceop to advise on setting up a free-for-all appeal to LS victims in the 70s . A gallery of mug shots ‘It could be YOU’ with the appropriate legal consultation on hand. Ukraine is broke – but think of all the countries where this stuff has landed on the base data delete strings of harddrives ? You can guess the rest. And the followthrough. Fortunately we have the perfect expertise on hand here to export….
- Smoking Hot
March 26, 2014 at 12:40 pm -
Ah but Yulia Tymoshenko has the answer … she’ll nuke the 8 million Russians in the Ukraine. Strange how the West’s media missed that news
- Carol42
March 26, 2014 at 2:14 pm -
When I lived in Germany late 70s early 80s there was plenty of KP around all made in the Scandinavian countries or Holland, I mean kids around 7 or 8 not young teens. It seemed to be perfectly legal and the law wasn’t changed until a child died in Holland. Can’t remember all the details but I think it was a little girl about 4 or 5 and had something to do with her being given drugs. Europe has the right to lecture other countries? Once in favour I have come to loathe what the EU has become.
- Margaret Jervis
March 26, 2014 at 2:45 pm -
Did you come across any Carol? The mount of actual KP around at this time was vastly exaggerated and it was pre-internet. Naturist stuff was prevalent, but it was not intended as KP. But then we used to take pics of toddlers in the bath and and naked on the seashore didn’t we – though our parents might have objected.
A couple of years ago I was walking the Jurassic section of the south-west path – (just gorgeous – whatever’s left of it after the storms) and we were obliged to plod with our backpacks and hiking boots across the most frequented naturist beach in the UK. It was a boiling hot June Sunday – and packed out with – disproportionately- Prince Albert pierced flauntabouts though there were some women. There were even one or two families with small children. These of course sweated in black wetsuits from head to toe – while their parents breezily bared and flopped all their bodily parts around in the sunshine. Strange times.- Carol42
March 26, 2014 at 3:01 pm -
Yes I did, my husband and I bought some adult porn in one of the sex shops, a novelty for us! They had magazines from which you could order KP, it was not on shelves. Looking through the various mags. There were pictures showing you what was available, including kids having actual sex with an adult male and being instructed by a woman the girl was about 8, others boys and men and children together.these were all made in Norway I think. I couldn’t believe it, I wonder if they are still out there somewhere, I expect it would not be too hard to transfer video tapes in the internet. If we saw that in a legal shop there must have been a lot around, I can’t say we knew much in those days but I was astonished that it was legal to buy.
- Moor Larkin
March 26, 2014 at 3:34 pm -
Norwegian Blue?
http://www.trust.org/item/20140304161923-p1e2k/ - Margaret Jervis
March 26, 2014 at 4:32 pm -
Interesting – but was there a lot that was different or a lot of the same stuff repeated? Research suggested the latter and the appropriation of claims vastly inflated in the US for the Senate hearings on pornography in 1977. (There was a similar legislative move in the UK), You are right that much of the old stuff did get uploaded on to the internet which is why you see such astonishing claims about the amount available – alot is the endless repetition of this old stuff. In the US it was claimed that children were being exploited commercially for this purpose in a ‘multi-billion dollar’ industry. But this was never the case. It was a never a commercial enterprise of note for all sorts of reasons and by the mid 80s stone dead.
- Carol42
March 26, 2014 at 5:22 pm -
We didn’t look at enough to see how much was different, surprised it was available at all, there seemed to be quite a lot advertised for sale though they could have been a lot of the same people, needless to say we didn’t buy any, couldn’t see why it would appeal to anyone grown up. Yet I never forgot the child in the picture, I can see her to this day, she did not appear afraid or hurt but I expect would be trained to act like that anyway. I was glad to hear the law had been changed though, certainly never saw any in later years. Funny I think we were more surprised than horrified as we likely would be now but there wasn’t the hysteria then.
- Carol42
- Moor Larkin
- Jonathan Mason
March 26, 2014 at 7:30 pm -
I remember seeing kiddie porn magazines openly displayed on street vendors’ carts in Amsterdam in the summer of 1969. Not sure if it was naturism stuff or not, but I also remember some time betweeen 1967 and 1972, my memory is not good regarding the year, seeing definite (gay) sexual kiddie porn on display on the shelves of a Soho (London) dirty magazine shop. However I only saw it one time, and the next time I passed the shop it was not on display. Although I don’t remember the exact year, I still remember feeling shocked.
- Carol42
- Margaret Jervis
- libertybelle
March 26, 2014 at 2:53 pm -
Fascinating reporting Anna! Long ago in America, we had “reporters”, the nature of which you recently penned an excellent piece. That standard response to any assignment involved getting out there to investigate and then line up your facts as to: who, what, when, where, why and how. Now, they seem to rely on political hacks or subject matter “experts” and there’s an amazing lack of curiosity among this new breed of highly-educated “journalists”.
Reading your blog has become part of my daily routine. Your NHS nightmare left me wondering how long it will take for America, under our new Affordable Healthcare Act, to reach Britain’s level of bureaucratic incomprehensibly, but on a personal level Anna, my thoughts and prayers are with you. Yes, I can tell you don’t want heaping outpourings of sympathy, so I’ll leave it there (know the cancer battle personally – survivor of uterine and a unusual ovarian cancer here).
- Duncan Disorderly
March 26, 2014 at 3:00 pm -
I’ve linked to this before, but it is well worth reading:
http://www.thenation.com/article/178344/distorting-russiaWhat do you bet this fine gentleman is a natural supporter of some of the dodgy characters in the Maidan:
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/ukrainian-student-admits-murdering-birmingham-6216485 - binao
March 26, 2014 at 6:04 pm -
Thank you Anna.
I don’t have your detailed background knowledge, but your analysis of the Ukraine/eu fiasco is the first I’ve seen that makes sense.
The EU’s provocative meddling on Russia’s doorstep is a danger to the security and economic stability of us all. Worse to come yet, I’m sure. - Robert Edwards
March 26, 2014 at 6:04 pm -
‘Paradise and Power’ by Robert Kagan is a very good primer on US/EU relationships and contrasts. On the one hand, we read how it is; on the other, how certain folk wish it to be. The EU is shitting on its own doorstep by its own incompetence.
- JimS
March 26, 2014 at 9:00 pm -
I read somewhere else:
“How does the EU commission plan to celebrate World War 1? By starting Word War 3!”
When the Cold War ended we should have kept Russia close, with continual political engagement. We should also be running our own foreign policy. Yet what do we do? Let the EU loose and have silly childish snubs over Russia’s ‘Section 28’ and now we are breaking up the G8.
Idiots! - Luther Blissett
March 26, 2014 at 10:53 pm -
“Why are we so keen to hand over 11 Billion in order to inherit the responsibility of millions of unemployed agricultural workers, currently ruled over by a bunch of unelected, murderous, right wing thugs?”
You answer your question correctly at the end, Ms Racoon. It is indeed an own goal, but one contrived and forced on it by the US with the purpose of (further) preventing the development of the EU as an autonomous global financial and economic power. Do not imagine the US is a friend of the EU; it is waging a financial and economic war against it, a war which was stepped up a gear after the 2008 crisis. But wait! they have a peace treaty. It goes by the name Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership.
- Moor Larkin
March 27, 2014 at 9:50 am -
The IMF loan for Ukraine was announced as approved by the BBC World service this morning.
- Moor Larkin
- Sigillum
March 27, 2014 at 8:31 am -
A very enlightening piece, Madame. And very shrewd. I have long thought that what “the West” should be doing is cementing relations with Russia – and China – to form a united axis against the real and common enemy – militant Islam.
Of course, that wouldnt be PC, so the “EU” institutions won’t do that.
Meanwhile , it promotes non entities like “Baroness Ashton”. Appalling. - Mike
March 27, 2014 at 9:24 am -
Anna
There was a poem written at the start of WW2 that ran something like ‘It is the logic of our times, no subject for immortal verse/that we who lived by honest dreams, defend the bad against the worse.’
Yes Ukraine is bad, but Russia has already waged a ghastly war twice in Chechnya which Europe and the west largely ignored, and more worryingly, carried out cyber attacks on the Baltic States and Putin has made some worrying remarks about Russian minorities in those countries. Surely the examples of history going back to Babylon (Israel gave up building war chariots to save money and went into captivity as a nation as a result) are that aggression, however dressed up must be stopped, earlier rather than later, and yes, it costs. Yes Ukraine is not a very pleasant bedfellow, but …- Moor Larkin
March 27, 2014 at 9:44 am -
Unpleasanr remarks? OMG… let loose the dogs of jaw.
- Mike
March 27, 2014 at 10:50 am -
Since his justification for intervening in Crimea was defence of Russian minorities, yes, I think remarks about Russian minorities in Dneistra (sp?) Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania are worrying. The latter three are NATO members, and ‘protected’ by article five, although there wouldn’t be much we, NATO, could do.
- Duncan Disorderly
March 27, 2014 at 11:32 am -
If we invade Russia now we will certainly get the job done before the winter. If history has taught us anything, don’t wait until June to invade Russia.
- Duncan Disorderly
- Mike
- Moor Larkin
- Moor Larkin
March 27, 2014 at 11:01 am -
Chinese whispers maybe?
The constant invocation of Hitler is ridiculous. His expansionist policy were largely based around having an enormous and thrusting industrial powerhouse and not enough Lebensraum. The one thing neither Putin nor Russia need is more territory. It’s a logical absurdity to propose any similarity between a tyrant of the past and the man whom Russia now respects for giving them their pride back after the Yeltsin years and the triumph of the Oligarchs, many of whom now live in London and have plenty of reason to finance media dissent against Putin and his governance.
- Mike
March 27, 2014 at 11:37 am -
I haven’t invoked Hitler. However, try Joseph Stalin. He annexed bits of countries to Russia, as well as imposing Russian rule on most of Eastern Europe. Not for Lebensraum just aggrandisement. Try Karelia, still part of Russia, large swathes of Eastern Poland ditto, The Kuril islands ditto? That nice Mr Putin shows no signs of giving them back.
- Moor Larkin
March 27, 2014 at 11:52 am -
Stalin was from Georgia, so wasn’t even Russian by your logic.
- Mike
March 27, 2014 at 12:32 pm -
I’m missing something, I didn’t say he was Russian, but he ruled Russia and annexed parts of countries to Russia
- Moor Larkin
March 27, 2014 at 1:36 pm -
“Russia” gave Ukraine the Crimean peninsula as recently as 1954. I daresay nobody asked the Russians living there at the time if that’s what they wanted to happen. This time, as I understand it, they have been asked, and 93% of them said they’d like to go back please. Perhaps this was because of the nature of the Ukrainian “Revolutionaries” that the landlady has been describing.
What is transparently obvious is that the “Russian” Empire failed to annex Afghanistan some while ago. I fancy that if the Crimeans generally didn’t want to be annexed then it wouldn’t be happening quite so easily. Rumsfeld’s fabulous shock & awe policy revealed how impossible it can be to annex what doesn’t want to be annexed in the modern world.
Any normal average person in Crimea would take one look at the successful foreign policies of the EU in Libya, Egypt and Syria, then compare it to the developments likely in faraway Kiev, and run like hell for the warm security of the cuddly Russian bear. Get real.
- Moor Larkin
- Mike
- Moor Larkin
- Mike
- right-writes
March 27, 2014 at 11:57 am -
Nick Clogg is suggesting today that Farage is “perverse and insulting” when he dares to suggest what you have written here.
So join the club Anna…
You are an accredited perverse and insulting blogger.
- amfortas
March 27, 2014 at 1:26 pm -
Hahahahaha. AnnaAccolades.
- amfortas
- Krokodil Gena
March 28, 2014 at 12:28 pm -
I don’t normally comment on this blog, though I am a long-time reader and admirer of the incisive wit, integrity and investigative skills of the remarkable Ms Raccoon.
Given that you are not Russian, presumably do not read or write Russian (or the artificial abortion of it called ‘Ukrainian’), I am heartily impressed by your honest, wise and accurate summation of the present situation in the Crimea and Ukraine.
I am married to a Russian, read and write Russian (badly) and have spent time in both Russia and Ukraine, so it is most refreshing and encouraging to read such a thoughtful and balanced account of events in these countries; an account which takes note of the many complexities and contradictions and sets them in their proper context. The only complaint I have is that I wish I could have written something half as good!
Top marks, Anna!
What a great pity the great unwashed will probably never read this and continue to get their ‘facts’ from the half-baked histrionics of third-rate scribblers who pass for ‘journalists’ nowadays.
- andy
March 29, 2014 at 12:50 am -
This is such a load of crap. Have some integrity, any asshole with common knowledge and history of Ukraine can tear this article apart. Now Im not here to defend the US and their actions but I am definitely here to tell your readers that Russia is no savior. Also anyone who thinks Ukrainian is a bastardization of Russian needs to hit the books again. Once again hit the books this is shotty journalism. Spend a day in l’viv and then explain to your readers where all the fascists are.
- acoustic village
March 29, 2014 at 12:21 pm -
Thank you, God, for Anna Raccoon. The most honest, insightful and interesting writer on the blogoshpere.
{ 34 comments… read them below or add one }