#Spingate hits the buffers.
What is it with Labour? They are incapable of finding a spinmeister who can keep all his tales in the air.
Andy Coulson, for all his faults, would never have let Cameron be caught out with with a story of not taking an empty seat ‘because he wanted to sit next to his wife’ – when there was no sign of his wife anyway. A picture of the wife sitting on the floor would have engendered more sympathy than Jeremy on his beam end. Did Ms Alvarez take the first empty seat she saw on the grounds that she didn’t want to sit next to her husband? She does have a history of being ‘no chaired’ – she turned down dinner with the Queen, presumably because that would have meant her sitting next to her husband…Jeremy, not Phil the Greek.
What next? Jeremy filmed ‘sleeping’ in a shop doorway to publicise his call for more council houses; followed by BHS (for it would jsut have to be their doorway!) releasing footage of the limousine rolling up to convey him to a five star hotel?
I haven’t yet forgotten Ed Miliband’s spinmeister thinking he could convince us that Ed lived in a house with a kitchen smaller than the average council flat possesses – and failing to think that other visitors to the house would reveal that it was the second ‘save your legs when the guests want coffee’ kitchen. Utter incompetence. As for the #Edstone. Bacon butty? Words fail me.
David Miliband thoughtfully provided his own banana skin before dutifully laying it down in front of the assembled media and proceeding to skid, in a manoeuvre worthy of Eddie the Eagle, out of sight into oblivion.
Who put the words ‘We’re alright’ in Kinnock’s mouth, just before the 1992 Sheffield rally; who told him it was such a fantastic crowd pleasing phrase that he should shout it out three times, punching the air in frenzied triumphalism? Why the photoshoot on Brighton beach? How was that promoting policies – other than middle gaged man looks complete dork, flat on his face, when he fails to hold back the rising tide? Did Canute and Kinnock not sound faintly similar?
That ‘ordinary man’ piece as the cameras followed Gordon Brown on an opportunity to meet his fellow ‘ordinary voters’? Only served to illustrate a greater truth, that the Labour of Mandelson and Red Roses was deeply cynical and scathing of the fears of Mrs Duffy and her fellow citizens.
Labour stunts are all designed to portray the public school educated, privileged, white tribe, that rules Labour as ‘man of the people’ and the reason it comes unstuck so many times, is not that they are really a ‘public school educated, privileged, white tribe’ but that they cannot laugh at themselves when caught out.
Corbyn as Headmaster trying to persuade the Upper Sixth to give him the third declension of the noun ‘NHS’, while the class is convulsed by a torn sheet from the back page of ‘reader’s wives’ which appears to show ‘Sir’s’ ample wife in nowt more than a pink frou-frou, is a case in point.
They just can’t laugh at themselves. No sense of humour. Are the Tories any better? I would say yes.
When Anton du Beke wheeled a supermarket trolley loaded with an overstuffed sofa onto the floor of ‘Strictly’ and it was revealed, to gasps from the audience, that the sofa was in fact Anne Widdicombe, the former Minister for Prisons, the joke was on us. She was defying us to laugh at her, and yet encouraging us to do so. She wasn’t a pompous prat revealed to be a laughing stock (nor was she still a politician). She was a woman entirely comfortable with the ludicrous spectacle of her dancing the light fantastic.
As with Boris Johnson, suspended above the crowds in Victoria Park on a ‘zip wire’ – a gift for the headline writers. ‘Boris has zip trouble, yet again’. Boris wasn’t trying to be serious; he wasn’t doing it to illustrate a political belief. He was just playing the part of the favourite uncle who doesn’t mind making a fool of himself. He looked a prat because he was prepared to look a prat. You just know that a Labour politician would have been up on that highwire showing the news at 6pm that being part of the EU could ‘make the country fly through the air’….and then the wires would have been revealed the next day, along with the picture of him stuck up there…
One point that the appears to have escaped the media notice is the particular train that Jeremy was on. Until last year, the line to Newcastle was the one and only nationalised rail line in existence. It was known as the East Coast line and was run by the publicly owned ‘Directly Operated Railways’. It didn’t endear itself to the customers:
92. Posted byColin Walker
on27 Nov 2014 11:41
Again, we are told that the selling to private enterprise will enhance the service that we, the public are getting. Have any of these decision makers in government ever travelled on those intercity trains, (standard class of course as first is so expensive) where there are 20/30 people standing, services are unable to get through so are cancelled. Cattle trucks at least have numbers control. us?
The unions were furious when it was handed to Stagecoach (90%) and Virgin (10%) telling the world that the ‘taxpayers were being robbed’ of the £220 million profit the (nationalised) service had made the previous year – indeed they were – and being given in exchange a far from paltry £400 million!
I couldn’t understand why Corbyn hadn’t booked in advance – it is mandatory that you have a reserved seat when you do so. Then I remembered. I always book in advance because I’m spending my own money.
Jeremy is spending what’s left of those twenty-five quids the faithful sent him.
- windsock
August 27, 2016 at 11:06 am - Joe Public
August 27, 2016 at 11:43 am -
One of the few untaxed treats the proletariat of this country enjoy, is the sight of politicians of all flavours demonstrating they & their advisors are incapable of organising a piss-up in a brewery.
With nearly all the escapades, it’s the (attempted) cover-up which catches them all out.
- Fat Steve
August 27, 2016 at 12:22 pm -
Can’t comment on the Corbyn story because I am more sceptical (cynical?) about the media than I am about him (which doesn’t mean I believe him) and neither am I a fan of the antics of some Tory Politicians but you are spot on with the level of seriousness with which the ‘Left’ take themselves .
Why? Well for the little my opinion is worth they see themselves as infallibly righteous (no different than Calvin’s Elect) and not unlike many who see themselves as infallibly righteous cut themselves more slack when it comes to matters of moral rectitude such as disclosing the whole truth transparently. Ho! Ho! Ho! Anna the real world of the ‘Left’ is the Wake you attended in Hampstead not sitting on a carriage floor or eating a bacon sarnie. - Don Cox
August 27, 2016 at 1:23 pm -
Most of the Left are prigs and hypocrites, and they are the direct descendants of the Calvinists, Puritans and Covenanters who afflicted our ancestors.
Indeed they may well be literally their descendants. Is character inherited ?Every generation has its own dramas, but the same characters keep on popping up.
- Mr Pooter
August 27, 2016 at 1:30 pm -
When I’m asked to justify my (no doubt all too frequent) references to the “good old days”, one of the differences between then and now that I point to is precisely the quality of political leadership, particularly but certainly not exclusively on the Labour benches. It’s impossible to imagine people like Attlee and Ernie Bevin and others of their generation indulging in antics like “traingate”, and easy to imagine their reaction to the kind of policies that Mr Corbyn advocates.
- dearieme
August 27, 2016 at 7:17 pm -
“It’s impossible to imagine people like Attlee and Ernie Bevin and others of their generation indulging in antics like “train gate””: Attlee and Bevin I’ll give you. But Bevan and Morrison were utter twats.
- Mr Pooter
August 27, 2016 at 8:06 pm -
Yes, I completely agree. Wasn’t it Bevin who said, when someone mentioned that Morrison was his own worst enemy, “Not while I’m alive he ain’t”. Perhaps the best thing Morrison ever did was give his name to the shelter which I helped my father to erect in our cellar. Of course Peter Mandelson is his grandson which may or may not be a recommendation.
Bevan, Crossman and Morgan Phillips all lied through their teeth during the Spectator libel trial about their behaviour on a foreign jaunt, at least according to Crossman’s own later admission.
- Don Cox
August 28, 2016 at 10:13 am -
Didn’t Morrison organize the Festival of Britain ? That was a worth while accomplishment.
- Mr Pooter
- dearieme
- Roderick
August 27, 2016 at 1:48 pm -
Senior politicians of all stripes live in a self-reinforcing echo chamber, peopled by those such as SpAds whose one main wish to ascend the greasy pole themselves. Just as a CEO will get a laugh if he/she cracks an unfunny joke at the annual staff party, so the politician will be lauded by those around at every opportunity.
That photo a few years back of the then PM Gordon Brown smirking his way past a door being held open for him by a crouching assistant evokes the attitude perfectly.
- Demetrius
August 27, 2016 at 4:07 pm -
The service that Corbyn was on goes through Grantham. If the pictures were taken at that point was he actually kneeling in respect for one it’s former residents? Holy handbags!
- Penseivat
August 27, 2016 at 6:42 pm -
I forget who it was that said that in a totalitarian state, apart from freedom, one of the first casualties is humour. Not many comedians in Deash,
North Korea, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, or the Labour Party. Humour has a victim, so the SJW activists in Jeremy’s cabal decide what you can think or say and making someone a victim, even in self- deprecating humour, is a no-no. Instead they use insults in the belief that they will make their followers laugh, though they fail to realise that this, in itself, produces victims. However, these victims are Tories or UKIP so that’s alright then. Labour follower slips on a banana skin and protests take place outside the company which imports bananas. Tory follower slips on banana skin and this shows just how unjust and inward looking Tory policies are. Jeremy Corbin or Owen whatsisname for party leader? It’s a shame one of the teletubbies isn’t running as he (it?) would be a raving cert as opposed to the other two who are just raving.- windsock
August 28, 2016 at 11:45 am -
You’re seriously comparing the Labour Party to Da’esh? Since when were Da’esh “left wing”? It’s hardly socialist policy to subjugate women or hang/behead gay people.
While the left may sometimes lack humour, it seems others don’t have the facility of perspective.
- Fat Steve
August 28, 2016 at 12:26 pm -
@Windsock
Being judgemental is not the preserve of the Left or the Right ….or for that matter (pace) any particular sexual orientation.
The issue is I think the extent of rights in the lives of others or put another way what is the common ground of Society where it is legitimate for Society (or the Political Class that believes it exercises power on behalf of Society) to compel the individual in matters of morality which I use as a catch all word in this instance.Its oh so tempting to say how others should behave which leads inevitably to do as I say not as I do.
The Neo Liberalism with which we contend has always struck me as a rather toxic mix of Judgementalism and abrogation of responsibility (if that is one believes one owes duties of responsibility beyond feeding and clothing the prollies)- windsocl
August 28, 2016 at 10:22 pm -
The neo-liberalism of which you speak is an aspect of both left and right in the political context. Both delineations are irrelevant. It is “us” against “them”. But “they” have access to better propaganda.
- windsocl
August 28, 2016 at 10:29 pm -
And p.s. Sexual orientation doesn’t inform EVERY thing. (Believe me,the political arguments between gay men are more vicious than cats in a sack.)
- Fat Steve
August 29, 2016 at 10:05 am -
@windsock
The neo-liberalism of which you speak is an aspect of both left and right in the political context.
I agree and analysis of all Politics nowadays might be viewed as giving the majority what they want ‘in the moment’ …..perhaps more precisely encouraging them to a view of what they should want ‘in the moment’ and then ‘giving’ it to them. It is the poverty of the ambitions of the prollies fostered and catered to by the Political classes and Media to which I avert.The old Bread and Circuses point that the ‘Left’ priggishly claim is not part of their agenda but which they need to cater to to obtain and retain power.
As to sexual orientation I was not sniping but rather attempting to make the point that everyone (including myself) needs to constantly guard against thinking that their ‘God’ has given them the tablets and so self righteously know the answers to everthing for everybody.- tdf
August 29, 2016 at 10:23 am -
It seems that words mean different things to different people. My understanding of the term ‘neo-liberalism’ is that it is essentially a description of a political philosophy equivalent to what I would describe as free market fanaticism. Corbyn isn’t particularly left wing by historical standards, he is basically an old fashiohed type of left leaning social democrat. I would grant that his presentation of his ideas leaves a lot to be desired.
The print and broadcast media in the UK is among the most right wing in the developed world (not surprisingly, as it is mainly in the hands of tax avoiding offshore magnates, with little interest in the welfare of the middle and working classes) which is probably why the majority of commenters on this forum, amusingly, seem to think that Corbyn is somehow equivalent to the Blairite Tom Watson. To be clear, I do not mean right wing in a racist sense ( they are certainly not that ) – but in terms of being for the most part, unabashed shills for global capitalism. It is rare to read a proper critique of capitalism in even the hated Guardian.
- windsock
August 29, 2016 at 10:55 am -
I didn’t think you were sniping FS, I just didn’t get the relevance of the point at the time. (too many Aperol Spritzes on a lazy Sunday afternoon!) Thanks for clarifying.
- Fat Steve
August 29, 2016 at 12:21 pm -
@tdf ‘neo-liberalism’ is that it is essentially a description of a political philosophy equivalent to what I would describe as free market fanaticism.
You are correct that I use it to describe a political philosophy though I percieve the economic aspect of it as less important than social policy. The point I was attempting to make was that the Neo Liberalism of which I speak ‘gives’ or ‘enriches’ the lives of the prollies not at all but rather ‘keeps them in their place’. ……the ‘Left’ in my experience measure freedom allowed with care and pay it out bit by bit in exchange for power. They would not have had the opportunity but for repression in the past .I view Neo Liberal Economic Policy, in particular Monetary Policy as an instrument to maintain the status quo ……a safety valve not so different from Representative Democracy.- Fat Steve
August 29, 2016 at 12:55 pm -
@tdf Try this as a starting point of Neo Liberal Economics and what might be at its heart
“People work in order to convert their time into a unit of account,” he said. “We call that money, and it’s an invention that allows us to store time.” Most people have stored little or none. So when they receive money, they quickly purchase necessities; food, shelter, health care. “People who are able to save money inevitably purchase real estate, stocks, bonds – all of which are alternative vehicles for storing time.” One share of Google stores 30 hours of work for the average American, or 30 minutes of copying-and-pasting formation documents for the average hedge fund attorney.
“Bill Gates has stored enough time to fund a 1bln person army for 20 years.” As the gulf between people’s income has grown, the amount of stored time has accumulated in fewer hands. “Wealthy people convert their hours into financial assets so that they can accumulate excess hours relative to their fellow man. But the average worker is simply thinking how to exchange hours for dollars and then exchange those for food.” Central banks face a different problem altogether. They need to get people who’ve saved time to exchange it for something other than clever inventions that store it. They’ve largely failed. So now, everything that stores time is extremely expensive and offers little or negative return, while the pace of economic activity slows. “The problem that we face now is that there is simply too much time that’s been saved. Another way of saying it is that there’s too much capital in the world, in too few hands.” To restart the system, capital needs to exchange hands or be destroyed, spurring people to rebuild their store of time, rather than just save it. “It is an elemental truth that at some point, through inflation, war, or confiscation and redistribution, this imbalance will correct, and the system will then restart.
I suggest Neo Liberalism is designed such that it deprives the prollies of time to think and reflect….to train them to produce but not to educate them to enable them to discriminate and choose.
Managerialism and Managers are in place to keep the system producing and thereby provide both the carrot and the stick.
- Fat Steve
- Fat Steve
August 29, 2016 at 12:30 pm -
@windsock
I didn’t think you were sniping FS,
Nice of you to say windsock though as you know it is not unknown for me to be contentious (or should that more properly be a bit of a stirrer) when given half a chance. I am sure one of my none too distant puritan ancestors was seduced by a troll- Fat Steve
August 29, 2016 at 12:32 pm -
PS I have the heavy tome of Anthem on my desk before me ready to be opened once the days shorten
- windsock
August 29, 2016 at 12:35 pm -
I hope you enjoy it as much as I did – it really sucked me in.
- tdf
August 29, 2016 at 1:39 pm -
Ayn Rand? Huxley was a better predictor of the future if you ask me, but each to their own.
- windsock
August 29, 2016 at 1:46 pm -
tdf: No, “Anathem” is a novel by Neal Stephenson, philosophically inclined sci-fi.
- tdf
August 29, 2016 at 2:19 pm -
Oops! Sorry, thought you were referring to a novel of the same title by Ayn Rand! I don’t recommend Rand’s stuff. She was an interesting philosopher but a appalling writer.
- Wigner’s Friend
August 29, 2016 at 2:45 pm -
Enjoyed everything that Stephenson has written. Particularly enjoyed “The City and The City” multiculturalism taken to the extreme and a damn good murder mystery. For the long nights, “The Baroque Cycle” is an enthralling alternate take on history. Enjoy Anathema.
- windsock
August 29, 2016 at 7:41 pm -
Wigner’s Friend: His Baroque Cycle took me long weeks, possibly months. Have you also read “Cryptonomicon” or “Snow Crash”? – Also excellent. Next up in my Stephenson list is “Reamde”.
- Wigner’s Friend
August 29, 2016 at 8:15 pm -
@Windsock
Snowcrash was my initiation and I thoroughly enjoyed Reamed. I also found “Zodiac” to be quite prescient as it was written in the early 80’s and deals with a lot of th BS surrounding recycling.
- Wigner’s Friend
August 29, 2016 at 8:19 pm -
My bad, “The City and The City” was by China Mieville, still a good read though. Enjoyed “Cryptonomicon” immensely.
- tdf
- Fat Steve
August 29, 2016 at 2:48 pm -
My wrong spelling !!! Duh!!!!
But intersting how it sparked references to Rand and Huxley- Fat Steve
August 29, 2016 at 2:52 pm -
intersting possibly even interesting as well!!!!
- tdf
August 29, 2016 at 3:04 pm -
@Fat Steve While it is your fault, I cannot criticise you, as I managed “a appalling writer” in my post above.
- Fat Steve
- windsock
- Fat Steve
- Fat Steve
- tdf
- Fat Steve
- windsocl
- Fat Steve
- windsock
- Mudplugger
August 27, 2016 at 8:39 pm -
In summary, the Labour Party is a joke, the Tories can take a joke and the Lib-Dems are beyond a joke.
And as for the SNP, DUP and Plaid Cymru – a Scotsman, an Irishman and a Welshman went into a parliament …… write your own punch-line.
- Eric
August 28, 2016 at 5:48 am -
I think one of the silliest claims about this fiasco is that Corbyn could have “booked in advance” which ignores the reality of the daily lives of either a Government Minister or Opposition Leader which are fraught with last minute hick-ups that throw plans into disarray.
Imagine if he had booked and not made it ? You know very well the likes of the Daily Mail & Express aided by the Telegraph would be screeching to High Heaven that Jeremy Corbyn thumbs his nose at ordinary travelers who go to the trouble to book and turn up on time.
Agree though that Corbyn’s pubic relations guidance is quite hopeless ( and these days with Britain’s corrupt and biased media how could you ever find one who could master such Dark Arts?) but perplexed why you find that the Tory media advisor Coulson who was then found to be a criminal who oversaw a mass criminal enterprise and who the then PM was warned numerous times was such and that his employment was a major mistake – was somehow just a minor blip on the radar.
This really confirms that the media now does move at such lightening speed that one day’s shocking and criminal outrage is just a blip on the radar within a few short years.
Totally disagree with the ridiculous claim Boris Johnston’s mind-fumblingly stupid antics painted him as “your favourite uncle”..more like creepy Uncle Ernie I would say and I think the way Londoners rejected his successor as Mayor confirms this
The real questions that should be asked about the Corbyn Train Fiasco but totally ignored by a Dumbed Down Britain ( which includes the media & the BBC) is why is a foreign based billionaire like Richard Branson who avoids £100Ms in tax that ordinary waged taxpayers cannot, is not called to account when a light is shone on what appears to be shoddy service which is publicly subsidized (Corbyn’s fellow travelers on the same line confirm the service is as Corbyn painted it).
In that respect, Richard Branson has superb public relations and publicists who paint him as a sort of anti-business hero who seeks to thumb his nose at the Philip Greens of the world and comes across as some sort of folksy people’s hero when in reality he’s just another tax-avoiding carpet bagging business baron using tried & true capitalist methods to rip off the punter so he can live on his paradise island. If in doubt, ask some of the artists who suffered while contracted to his Virgin Records label who eventually found themselves tied up under contracts that made his competitors look like boys scouts in comparison.
- David Benn
August 29, 2016 at 3:20 pm -
Eric –
I’m working on the theory that you are not specifically accusing Mr Johnson of paedophilia, and there actually is another totally different ‘creepy Uncle Ernie’ to whom you are comparing Mr Johnson. At least, if you are so accusing him, please don’t pass the news on to the Surrey Police Service…..
However, I’m interested in your interpretation of the Mayoral Election which states that Londoners disliked Mr Johnson so much that they voted en masse against someone completely different…..could you please expand on this theory?
In the matter of Mr Corbyn versus Sir Richard, I fail to remember (but will no doubt be reminded) who uttered regarding the Fayed/Hamilton case something along the lines of “It was a case where one really wished that both sides could lose”
- tdf
August 29, 2016 at 3:28 pm -
@David Benn
“However, I’m interested in your interpretation of the Mayoral Election which states that Londoners disliked Mr Johnson so much that they voted en masse against someone completely different…..could you please expand on this theory? ”
Eric is correct.
Zac Goldsmith, Boris’s favoured candidate, was comprehensively rejected by the London electorate.
- tdf
- David Benn
- tolkein
August 28, 2016 at 11:58 am -
He should have booked in advance.
But he would have been better travelling on Southern in the rush hour – if he’d found a train that wasn’t cancelled! He’d have lots of vox pops with fed up passengers, played his renationalisation card and maybe been able to support the RMT.
How could he/his office be so incompetent to miss this opportunity and do something which shows him up so badly? !
- Eric
August 28, 2016 at 3:33 pm -
Hasn’t shown him badly in my mind and I suspect in probably a few million traditional Labour voters. I doubt regular train travelers are cheering Branson either.
Just because the media says he has been shown up doesn’t mean it’s true,
- Eric
- Wigner’s Friend
August 28, 2016 at 3:08 pm -
@tolkein
“How could he/his office be so incompetent to miss this opportunity and do something which shows him up so badly? !”Because they are so busy virtue signalling they cannot believe that the man in the street cannot see how virtuous they are. So far up their own posteriors that they can see their tonsils from the inside.
- Eric
August 28, 2016 at 3:31 pm -
The fact is #traingate is a media creation.
A throwaway line that would undoubtedly resonate with aggrieved commuters has been blown out of all proportion and we don’t actually know the truth do we?
We have been given two versions, one by the Corbyn crowd and one by Branson but who is telling the truth….I suspect that just depends upon who you support politically.
I think it’s a shame that so much time is spent on rubbish like this in the mainstream media. It’s as though tabloids, the majority of which support the Tories along with the sad old Daily Mirror still in awe of the Tony Blair camp, tell the public to jump and they collectively ask “how high”.As with Brexit & Remain I see no credible arguments presented by either side or any real analysis in the media of important policy rather they spend their time hyperventilating about mindless antics. That’s apart from the idiotic claim that Corbyn is wedded to some 1980s old Labour policies while Britain is being practically bankrupted by an insane Margaret Thatcher policy of selling off state assets like council housing as she worshiped the voodoo economics of Friedrich Hayek which today means billions of pounds of taxpayer funds are channeled to private landlords.
That’s reality and you may think that Thatcher policy is wonderful but the fact is there are no new ways of government doing business. You only have to look at Parliament and see what looks like a row of accountants in blue suits. There are simply no personalities (like the eccentrics of 60/70/80s Tories & Labour)- just timeservers who seem to have convinced the public at large they are actually doing things differently when they simply aren’t.
An image of Corbyn is being crafted in the media and I doubt it’s the truth. All I see is just a fairly reasonable old style Labour politician who seems quite genuine and is proposing to return to some polices like state owned assets which seemed to have served Britain well for over 100 years -you know the Britain everyone fantasises they are returning to under Brexit.
- Cascadian
August 28, 2016 at 7:03 pm -
“All I see is just a fairly reasonable old style Labour politician who seems quite genuine and is proposing to return to some polices like state owned assets”……….Agreed, another Michael Foot, in fact or a scruffier Neil Kinnock. Long may the glorious leader fumble, and long may his inept PR team provide us with photos of on-yer-bike Jeremy.
Please do not think these comments imply any approval Ms May-be.
- Cascadian
- Fat Steve
August 28, 2016 at 6:41 pm -
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-37208527
Mc Donnell is a total prat - Sackerson
August 29, 2016 at 8:40 am -
O/T or not – welcome to the Scriblerus group!
- Rossa
August 29, 2016 at 8:54 am -
I found it rather ironic that Corbyn and his PR team with a camera ready to ‘illustrate’ their point, didn’t realise that there were CCTV cameras on the train. Whatever the real truth behind #traingate, the images released by Virgin do show Corbyn and his team walking past empty seats and not all had reserved tickets on them. Not exactly ‘ram packed’ as they claimed. You can also clearly see him sitting in a seat in shirt sleeves, presumably after his little stunt, sitting on the floor with his suit jacket on reading a newspaper. His team were reported to have stood near him apparently blocking access to the toilet. And where did they go afterwards as he appeared to be sitting alone, no wife or SpAd in sight?
- binao
August 29, 2016 at 11:18 am -
Whatever we may think of Virgin’s train service, or the likelihood of Mr C. running a government, he was on a train with a camera crew with what appears to be the intent of using the journey to make a political point. His team went ahead despite the absence of evidence to support his argument on the day. Fair game perhaps as politics seems to be 90% theatre, but sloppily managed providing an open goal for Virgin, and the other bearded gentleman promptly put the boot in.
Hardly a new kind of politics, is it?
‘Know your enemy’ comes to mind.And none of the other issues about paying taxes, personal wealth, or the return to state ownership are really relevant. Either the train service is demonstrably crap or it isn’t. No doubt the BBC will bring all it’s skills to bear if it can ever draw itself away from hunting down every conceivable negative possibility which might be even remotely connected to the electorate’s recent misbehaviour.
Just a view; no political affiliations at all.
{ 49 comments… read them below or add one }