Suffer the little children under the EU…
Never mind David Cameron eating small roasted babies for breakfast, I’m more concerned with what the EU is doing to those wide eyed African babies this morning.
Starving them by way of penalising their parents, that’s what.
Why don’t they ‘try harder’, ‘invent things’, ‘add value’ to something instead of sitting under their Baobab tree, waiting for Europeans to do something with their abundant raw materials? Possibly because the EU has arranged things so that they are penalised if they do so.
Enjoy your morning coffee today? Kenyan was it? ‘Fairtrade’ even? The EU is quite happy to see Kenyans out in the boiling hot fields harvesting coffee beans, but they are not so happy seeing them do something mechanised and clever with the beans, like roasting and packaging them. Any upstart Kenyan with fancy ideas like that will quickly find that the EU has slapped a 7.5% tax on them – not to protect the EU’s coffee bean growers, we don’t have any, but to protect the mainly German coffee bean processors.
The United States and Australia, arguably the two biggest markets for processed coffee after Europe, don’t penalise the Kenyans – but are further away, so shipping costs are higher. Jamaica has an excuse for its swingeing 100% tax – they have their own coffee trade to protect – but Europe? Just those German factories aroasting and agrinding, preventing the Kenyans from progressing. Out of the EU, we can have cheaper coffee, and help those Kenyan parents feed their chidlren better.
How do the cocoa farmers in Nigeria fare? The EU allows them to earn a subsistence living so long as they leave their cocoa beans well alone. We have no plans to set up cocoa farms in Northumbria, so are quite content to let the Nigerians do it for us – but anything easy and profitable, like using machinery to process the beans and turn them into luxury bars of Chocolate…well can’t let them do that. Then the EU fines them 8.30%, and throws in an agricultural tariff of 18.70 % not to mention their latest wonder, the ‘sugar tax’. Why? Well there’s the American owned Cadbury’s for a start.
The Kenyans turned their hands to growing roses, that other European luxury staple. Since it had never occurred to anybody that they would do that – there was no tariff on fresh cut flowers. The industry thrived. Every night plane loads of beautiful roses arrived in Amsterdam and were sent out to flower shops across Europe. The EU demanded the right to flood the Kenyan market with tariff free EU goods in return. Can’t have Kenya developing its own mobile phone manufacturers can we. When the Kenyans refused to agree to this – the EU promptly slapped an 8.5% tax on those cut flowers; they only removed it when the Kenyans agreed not to try to make anything complicated and let the Europeans do it for them.
Back in 2009, the Archbishop of Canterbury was on the fashionable ‘carbon footprint’ bandwagon and urged us all not to buy Kenyan green beans – the following year, the UK’s Department for International Development gave Waitrose, yes Waitrose, £200,000 to swallow their fear of angering the Archbishop – and put Kenyan green beans on their shelves!
The beans are sent to Europe in 5kg boxes; once in Europe, they are repackaged in 120gm cardboard slips, given the names of fictitious farms where they have been grown, and sold onto the supermarket customers. Tescos undertake to send any ‘substandard beans’ onto frozen food manufacturers for inclusion in ready meals – good of them really, ‘cos if the Kenyans had any uppity ideas about canning their beans, the EU is ready with a tax of 12.8% to discourage them.
Don’t even get me started on the Banana wars.
So, if we leave the EU, we can stop being tarred with the EUs ‘colonial attitudes’ and start having a decent relationship with our old chums the Kenyans.
June 19, 2016 at 3:13 pm-
Don’t even get me started on the Banana wars.
Nor I on the treatment of Tobacco Farmers in the 3rd world. which is perhaps even more offensive as the EU has pretty much decimated any EU tobacco growing so there is no internal market to protect. Actually it IS more offensive as the ‘fight against Tobacco’ is entirely a dogma- thing . A hundred years ago it was Christianity now it’s the catechism of Health, there must vitamin enriched sugar free jam for all.
June 19, 2016 at 11:13 pm-
“Anglican clergymen in Virginia were routinely paid in tobacco rather than currency.”
That really was their wages up in smoke. Haha.
June 19, 2016 at 3:18 pm-
No way will this information will ever get near an MSM studio, that’s for sure….
June 19, 2016 at 3:21 pm-
Colour me ignorant.. who pays the tax? The importer or the exporter?
Do Kenyans have to export to the EU – what about Russia, or the Far East?
Isn’t this analogous to Chinese steel? The rest of the EU wanted to slap a tarriff on that because it was flooding the EU, putting its steelmakers at risk. It was the UK that said no, and look what happened to our steel next. If German coffee processors laid of workers as a result of Kenyan competition, do you not think they would complain also?
This is not an EU issue. It is a global trade issue. And there is bugger all we can do about it.
June 19, 2016 at 4:16 pm-
This is just the sort of information those who believe themselves to be well meaning towards developing countries don’t know about or choose to ignore. Thanks.
June 19, 2016 at 4:21 pm-
Your analysis is so right. However, if UK voters opt for Brexit, what grounds are there for believing that the playing field would then become more level? The lobbyists will be out in force to defend their interests, and future UK laws will be framed to accommodate their views. It happens now, within the EU, so why should it be different in future?
I have no respect for the EU in its current guise: it desperately needs radical reform. Alas, Cameron lost an ideal opportunity to re-negotiate terms and force basic reforms. (That was not a surprise: Cameron has no principles, he is a straw in the wind.)
What would Brexit achieve? Once divorced from the EU, what leverage would the UK have? A major export market for what remains of British industry is the EU. Of course, it would be possible to create links with other partners — but that will take time, patience, and products of superior quality. Meantime, exports to the EU will have to meet EU criteria. In the interim, businesses that cannot cope with the new scenario are likely to go bust, with consequent job losses.
As for imports post-Brexit, I seriously doubt that barriers would come down. The lobbyists will be working hard to safeguard the interests of the companies they represent. And, given past history, who honestly believes that UK ministers and parliamentarians will suddenly start to behave in a rational and trustworthy fashion?
I readily accept that the EU is seriously screwed up. However, for the moment, it remains a major global economic zone. I cannot see that Brexit will solve UK’s problems, nor those of the EU. What is needed is a UK prime minister with vision, backbone — and a bit of charisma. But, given the available candidates, I don’t hold out much hope on that front.
June 20, 2016 at 1:53 am-
And therefore? Given that the record of UK influence making advantageous effect within is zilch, given that the candidates to lead reform are absent, given that they retire from national politics to feather-nest in Brussels, given all you say – what do we do?
Leave. It’s dying anyway. Best unshackle from the corpse and make our case to the world.
June 20, 2016 at 7:22 am-
Lisboeta, I’m trying hard not to let my views on the EU stop my brain working, but I believe there has been a continuous and substantial decline in the EU’s share of our exports. Now less than half despite the alleged benefits of the single market and the size of it. At the same time the EU’s share of global gdp has also been declining for over a decade.
I don’t think Brexit is a problem; my own view is that it’s a cultural necessity rather than an economic risk/opportunity.
I’m struggling to understand what the EU is actually for. Regardless of the ever closer stuff, it seems to be about control and protectionism, but I just can’t see what for
As Anna points out, Africa is being exploited by the EU for cheap cash crops where and when it suits us, with tariffs against higher added value. It doesn’t have to be this way, but does perhaps culturally explain the ruthless approach to those Med rim economies daring to misbehave.
June 21, 2016 at 6:25 pm-
We export as much to Luxembourg as to Brazil (one of the largest five economies in the developing world). The EU dwarfs the rest of the world as a trade partner and that is not going to change soon.
June 19, 2016 at 5:19 pm-
Although coffee is indeed not grown in the EU, one of the biggest manifestations of the failure of the EU to act responsibly in world markets has been the growth of Fairtrade. How come?
1) Subsidies are paid by EU consumers via the CAP to EU farmers, notably French ones, to sustain their fundamentally uneconomic and usually small-scale farming industry;
2) Tariffs are slapped on imported crops by the EU to protect EU farmers, thereby locking imports out of the EU because their unsubsidised, non-tariff-protected produce can’t compete with the equivalent crops grown in the EU;
3) Along come the professional do-gooders who can see the problem, but instead of proposing the obvious solution for it (no EU subsidies or tariffs) appeal to the public’s heartstrings and ask us to pay a “fair” price for imported crops so that we may consume them smug in the knowledge that we are doing good.The net result is that EU consumers are being penalised twice: first in the cost of unnecessary subsidies to EU farmers made under the CAP, and second in the inflated prices (compared to the world market) imposed on us by Fairtrade and its NGO-linked clones for imports.
Is this sensible? (And please don’t get me started on the absurdities of wine lakes, butter mountains and set-aside grants. They are just more manifestations of EU insanity.)
June 19, 2016 at 5:23 pm-
Thank you, Anna, for another great article. The lovely, caring, sharing Greens seem particularly determined to prevent progress in Africa:
https://risk-monger.com/2016/06/08/how-to-starve-africa-ask-the-european-green-party/
h/t BishopHill
June 20, 2016 at 9:04 am-
I think they are against progress everywhere. Their ideal is a return to an idealised Middle Ages. A good example is the “Village with the Watermills” shown in Kurosawa’s film “Dreams”.
This goes back to William Morris, or perhaps to the birth of romanticism at the beginning of the 19C.
So they would like to see Africa (and Europe) populated by happy, laughing peasants, farming organically with simple tools.
June 19, 2016 at 5:29 pm-
Oh and the fact that green coffee beans last longer than roasted ones.. Hence we store the green ones, and process them as and when required.
But hey, never let facts get in the way of another “Old Whitey, yet again, keeping the blackman down” story..
June 21, 2016 at 4:54 pm-
I wondered about that. I tend towards Kenco’s Colombian. I couldn’t find anything for the UK, but a quick Google showed that Kenco’s American market is roasted by a company in New Jersey.
June 19, 2016 at 5:30 pm-
I have long believed that the answer to pull-factor immigration is that, instead of moving the workers to the work, the richer nations should engage in a process of moving the work to the workers (just imagine if Britain had done that in the 50s and 60s – we’d not have an immigrant problem now).
If this were done in a progressive way, those developing nations would gain valuable employment for their people at all levels, from managerial to sweepers and support services, delivering economic trickle-down across their countries, also bringing political stability and improved infrastructure, thus reducing the attraction of emigration and the loss of their brighter people.
Trouble is, that doesn’t sit well with the short-termist vested interests of the ‘old world’, yet they don’t see that, unless we take positive steps to spread the full economic processes more widely, then the pull-factor of unsustainable immigration will continue, and even accelerate in this increasingly globalised environment. You can’t blame the immigrants for wanting to improve their lot, but you can blame our leaders for not addressing the issue appropriately.
This is not just an EU or UK issue, it is something which all the developed nations should be actively pursuing to increase the spread of wealth, and therefore stability, across the planet. The EU just happens to work in totally the opposite way to protect its vociferous lobbies in various sectors.
It’s a pity the United Nations can’t lead on this, but then the UN can’t lead on anything.
June 19, 2016 at 5:38 pm-
What – we would have moved London Transport to Jamaica? Does not compute.
June 19, 2016 at 7:36 pm-
We can’t move the service industries, but we did move manufacturing to China (and other Asian countries).
June 20, 2016 at 8:23 am-
We didn’t move it – the assembly industry was largely taken there by the countries themselves. My point is that if, in the 50s and 60s, the labour-intensive industries like textiles etc., rather than importing cheap labout here, had set up British-owned factories out there, those jobs and trickle-down would have helped to develop those countries before the mass migration happened. They may even have enjoyed better working conditions than, for example, the Bangladesh textile companies provide for their desperate employees now.
And yes, it is true that much service industry is more difficult to outsource, but that’s not stopping many very personal services like cosmetic surgery and dentistry (albeit currently imperfect) being carried out more cheaply overseas, so even the most personal of service work is not immune from export.
It’s not a black & white situation, Britain will always have some manufacturing and assembly work, just as some service work will be done elsewhere, but if we had played it differently 50/60 years ago, both Britain and the developing nations could have been in a much better situation now.
June 20, 2016 at 9:06 am-
I think we did move it, by (as consumers) steadily pushing for lower prices on everything.
June 21, 2016 at 12:01 pm-
Thats probably true to an extent, but its at least partially about corporate exploitation (dumping a problematic, expensive and easily replaced workforce in the UK, with cheaper versions elsewhere)
June 19, 2016 at 6:38 pm-
This is just the tip of the iceberg. We have the ‘green’ NGOs and their hangers on actively trying to prevent anyone in Africa advancing beyond the ‘scratch a living from the soil’ that we see in the media because that generates the ‘living with nature’ feel good that the ‘green’ environmentalists want.
If they really wanted help the African people raise their standard of living they would be pushing for the building of coal fired power stations to give abundant reliable power – the industrial revolution only started when abundant reliable power was available from steam engines. The NGOs should be pushing for the use of modern large scale farming equipment and teaching the locals how to use and maintain it. They should be looking at improving the infrastructure which would allow the local population to mine and process the natural resources. I could go on but it will never happen if the EU greens have any say in the matter.
The Chinese, on the other hand are doing some of the things I have listed but it is considered a selfish thing because they are after the raw materials and what they are doing is considered very un-green and detrimental to the ‘natives way of life’. I have to wonder if any of the do-gooders have actually asked the locals if they are happy with ‘scratching a living from the soil’. Maybe those do-gooders should try it for 10 years without any outside support and see how they like it.
June 19, 2016 at 7:38 pm-
“pushing for the building of coal fired power stations”
Make that nuclear power stations, and I’m with you. I think Egypt is planning to build a couple, so that is a start.
June 19, 2016 at 9:38 pm-
Don, we need to start with something simple hence my saying coal fired power stations.
If you want nuclear there are ready to use units available from RR that they make for the subs. RR could start making them on a production line and provide them almost in a container – set on site, connect to power lines and you are up and running. Unfortunately the anti nuclear lobby that emerged at Greenham Common is still alive today and still against any thing that even hints that it might be nuclear – just read through the environmental regulations and building requirements for any new nuclear power plant, just make sure you have at least a week free to do so.
June 19, 2016 at 8:45 pm-
I’ll just mention this in passing as I don’t know whether it will be reported in the UK: German President Gauck has said in an interview today that the leaders of Europe must explain the advantages of further integration better and -and this almost [sic]: “Inorder to protect the ideal of a uniting-itself Europe, it is absolutely necessary to get those still hesitant populations ‘on board’ and for that reason one could take a break/have a pause in the accelerating speed (towards a united Europe)”.
Make of that what you will be it does to me like the Germans are worried , not that the Brits might leave but that others, others who matter, might follow. Most of the German I spoke with during my holiday recently were of the opinion that the sooner Britain buggers off the better…and that Britain needs the EU more than the EU needs it. Not representative of course but judging by the German celebratory reporting of today’s surge , post-cox, in the UK polls for the ‘In’ campaign , indicative (in the sense the population usually thinks the opposite of what the German MSM Talking Heads tell them they should).
June 19, 2016 at 8:47 pm-
“be it does to me” = “but it sounds to me”
June 20, 2016 at 2:58 am-
TBD,
Try these: http://www.amazon.com/Udos-Choice-Super-Probiotic-Capsules/product-reviews/B0010EEWU4
June 20, 2016 at 3:05 am-
^ Sorry, meant to post that in reply to the post in the thread where you said you have IBS!
June 20, 2016 at 7:20 am-
@tdf, thank you for the thought but I have been through the entire range of such treatments- including PRObiotics (and on a side note, according to Legiron who has impressive bits of paper after his name on this topic, PREbiotics would be where it is at ). Codeine & Immodium in industrial quantities seem to work the best for me…..although i still hold out hope that blessed St. Astaxanthin might work a miracle on my gut as he hath wrought upon my trapped nerve and other divers maladies.
June 19, 2016 at 9:47 pm-
Al Capone would be proud.
June 19, 2016 at 11:15 pm-
Great stuff, Anna.
June 20, 2016 at 10:09 am-
This is the stuff that Boris Johnson and Michael Gove should be reporting on – we’ve all heard the immigration arguments before, it’s getting old. People need to know the impact of the EU on the entire world before they can decide whether we should be a part of it. Surely people can’t see this injustice and argue against it?
June 20, 2016 at 12:01 pm-
No doubt EU & non-EU/Anglophone Foreign Policies are bad for Child Welfare in root crops, or sweat shops.
But, back home, the 400 million small minority LOUD media-mouth phoney Anglophone/UK/US/CA/OZ/SA/IE perversely self-styled ‘Best’ is sadly damned by leading agencies UNICEF/York Uni/OECD as, ‘Among The Worst In Modern West For Child Welfare’.
While coincidentally a 500 million majority WAY too modest modern EU with NO lowbrow Murdochized Media/NO Fascist Registers/NO Inhuman Taggings/NO Constant Monitorings/NO Extreme SeX Laws/NO Historic Witch Hunts/NO Mass Injustices/NO KidSeX Panic, is rightly named – “World best For Child Welfare”.
Its’ no damned coincidence!
‘Ere U! Yeah U, the punk-Farage garage band, ” UKIP if U want to – modern EU stays wide awake! ”
STAY in EU – LEAVE UK
June 20, 2016 at 1:23 pm-
A new voice–incoherent loonys for the EU:
* Murdochized Media: Created by laws controlling media. Could anyone publish/broadcast etc freely without need of state “licences” would Murdoch have the influence he has? A State Created Problem
NO Fascist Registers: A State Created Problem
Inhuman Taggings: Not sure what you mean by this –you mean criminals tagged. Worse than jail? A State Created Problem
/NO Constant Monitorings: By the scum of the state.
/NO Extreme SeX Laws: Again not sure what you refer to but “law”=A State Created Problem
NO Historic Witch Hunts: Of whom? You mean hunts of active communist scum trying to undermine the West? No problem with rounding those bastards ups in my book. Still a state created problem tho’
/NO Mass Injustices: Mostly–predominatly–the state on the job.
/NO KidSeX Panic: The state
In short –all the things you whine about are the creation and doings of the state.
And you want to kiss the arse of the EU. One of the biggest, nastiest and most expansive states in the world.
Keep taking your Meds.
June 20, 2016 at 5:08 pm-
Anna doesn’t refer directly to it in her post, but to me, the Common Agricultural Policy is and always has been an evil policy. It quite literally keeps African farmers poor, and further enriches already (comparatively) well-off European farmers.
In my country, in spite of only representing 5% of the work-force (*), farmers are accorded a status almost equivalent to what CSA survivors have recently been accorded in GB – saintly people, almost above criticism. You will not see too many critiques of the Irish farming lobby in the Irish media.
* http://www.cso.ie/en/statistics/labourmarket/principalstatistics/
June 20, 2016 at 8:25 pm-
It may be evil, but the Common Agricultural Policy is as sacred a cow in French politics to the grossly inefficient French land-holding system as the irrationally sainted NHS is to UK politics – nothing bad can be said about either of them and critical analysis or change is not politically feasible for fear of voter reaction.
But the CAP is also very popular in Britain – if only amongst a very small and select group of very wealthy landowners: landowners who enjoy massive influence in Parliament, because many of them are sitting there, so no hope of change from that direction either. It is also much-loved by some large corporates, like Tate & Lyle, who have pocketed many millions from it every year, some of which finds its way into party donations – wonder why?
And all the while, the CAP has the effect of preventing development in poor countries by making it virtually impossible for them to trade their produce with the EU – and no-one seems to care. So the farmers give up farming, start travelling and climb on the next inflatable leaving Calais. Immigration is not the problem, it is only a symptom of a wider problem of under-development and will never be fully addressed until that root-cause is rooted out – the CAP makes that impossible.
June 20, 2016 at 8:32 pm-
@mudplugger
Yep. Fully agree.
June 21, 2016 at 11:47 am-
The same old story of vested interests. Which is why these international charities are so popular, at least with the people who work for them. I don’t know what it is now but a few years ago Save The Children had 590 staff at its London office, and let’s not talk about its executive salaries, etc. Utterly scandalous.
June 21, 2016 at 5:58 pm-
Great piece that really needs to be shared around. Another point that seems relevant with all the economic migrants and refugees flooding
Europe is the west’s strip mining of the third world’s human capital since the 1970’s. It was about changing our racist immigration laws, but caught up in our own sense of virtue, the consequence was that we took lots of intellectuals, entrepreneurs, small business people and then ordinary workers – basically a large proportion of the people needed to make these countries work. I thought I read that when the NHS requested volunteers to treat ebola there were more Sierra Leonian nurses in the NHS than in the whole of Sierra Leone (but I haven’t been able to confirm that but it’s a good illustration of what I’m talking about). It seems another case of good intentions paving the road to hell.
June 21, 2016 at 6:35 pm-
Great points, Anna, but I just don’t seek the ‘Newly Independent’ United Kingdom doing anything different. It is not some unique EU drive against Africa developing processing facilities but something which British firms also have a stake in. It suits us as much as it suits the Germans.
June 23, 2016 at 1:33 pm-
Don’t know if you remember the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986 which poisoned European produce with the wind blown fallout.
Well, European companies which had a virtual majority share of the produce market in Brazil created a shortage by exporting it to replace the spoiled food. Then magnanimously imported the spoiled produce. Thank goodness for the media which found out and informed the public who were able to return the stuff to the supermarkets.
Milk, fish and meat contaminated.
Of course there was the Nestle scandal involving their powdered milk in Africa where there are few sources of clean water.
June 24, 2016 at 4:49 am-
Bloody Hell!!! Its OUT!!! Ha Ha, David Cameron! Your boys took a hell of a beating!! The Racoon Effect….
June 29, 2016 at 11:47 am-
Another brave “survivor” comes forward. She must have taken more coke than we thought.
August 13, 2016 at 1:59 am
{ 48 comments… read them below or add one }