Sony with the Grinch on top.
Is it really in the ‘public interest’ that we should know that a film producer we had never heard of, thought an actress that we don’t much care for, ‘a minimally talented brat’?
I ask, because for all the talk about hackers ‘revealing sensitive information’ abut celebs we love to read about – you didn’t get to hear of Mr Rudin’s opinion of Ms Jolie from a hacker – but from the media which gorged itself on printing the information that the anonymous hacking group had thoughtfully sent to them.
The emails revealed that:
- Female film stars including Amy Adams and Jennifer Lawrence were paid less than their male co-stars.
- Sony executive Amy Pascal made jokes about black-themed movies that might be among President Obama’s favourites.
- Angelina Jolie was branded a “minimally talented spoiled brat” in a private email from producer Scott Rudin.
- George Clooney lost sleep over bad reviews for The Monuments Men and emailed Pascal to say: “I’ve let you all down. Not my intention. I apologise. I’ve just lost touch… Who knew?”
Their defence against a charge of invading data privacy by publishing this stolen data is likely to be that it was ‘in the public interest’ – not that you should just know that a theft of data has taken place, nor that it was possibly organised by a foreign state, but that (linkbait trigger coming up!) they could publish more pictures of Ms Jolie and you could snigger about someone being rude about her – that is what the headlines were centred on.
Once the media had done the hackers PR for them and ensured the story had world wide attention, they moved onto repeating an email threat to ‘kill anyone who went to see Sony’s latest film’.
Was it a credible threat? We don’t know. Who made it? We don’t know. Was it any more credible than the claim that a nuclear armed submarine was heading up the Thames to blow up the Queen – something for which its author is currently and belatedly undergoing psychiatric evaluation for having made?
As far as the media is concerned, that is no business of ours. ‘Public Interest’ only extends to frightening the daylights out of us – not knowing whether the source for their latest story has any credibility outside of Broadmoor’s assessment ward.
Once the threat was given worldwide exposure on the front page of every media outlet – how gratifying for the hackers! – the lawyers had no choice other than to warn Sony of the dangers of running the film. No further action was required of the hackers – all it would take is for someone to shout ‘bang-bang’ in a crowded cinema, and the widow of the man sitting at the end of the row who had a heart attack on hearing this would be suing Sony for every penny they had.
Sony have withdrawn a movie they had ploughed millions of investor’s funds into. That is a pretty spectacular result for a group of teenage cyber monkeys who carried out a boring and commonplace data theft – regardless of who pays them. Only made possible by a compliant western media.
At least the hackers were acting out of misplaced, or brain washed, loyalty to their leader. That does seem marginally less reprehensible than acting to fill your column inches and hang onto your sorry job for another month.
The British don’t do loyalty to our ‘leaders’ past or present. No group of anonymous hackers are burrowing into the BBC’s data to find examples of where fading TV producers have sent e-mails denigrating the actors they have the misfortune to work with in order to titivate our media into forcing them to withdraw the insult to our (past) leader.
Over Christmas the BBC will be showing our home grown version of a ‘comedy’ featuring the fictitious assassination of Margaret Thatcher. That is considered good, clean, fun, from the corporation with a mandate to ‘educate, inform and entertain’. Perhaps they could make it a two-parter, and we could all chortle with delight over the episode showing Kim Jong-un’s demise. Wouldn’t Sony be grateful if the BBC showed their film for them?
The BBC certainly doesn’t have any qualms about offending minority groups; why BBC Worldwide was planning to issue a CD with a variety of uplifting songs to enjoy your festivities with including ‘Slashed Wrists This Ramadan’, ‘That Was The Worst Hanukkah Ever’, ‘A Very Sorry Diwali’, and ‘Historic Sex Was Better In The 80s’ – but to avoid upsetting anyone, at the last minute they settled on:
Slashed Wrists This Christmas, That Was The Worst Christmas Ever, A Very Sorry Christmas, Yule Shoot Your Eye Out and Christmas Was Better In The 80s.
I don’t suppose that any of you cybernauts happen to have an e-mail address for Bureau 121 in Pyongyang do you? I just thought if those lads of theirs were bored over Christmas, they might like to get their fingers twitching over the BBCs ports. I’m sure there would be richer pickings there than at Sony.
- Chris
December 19, 2014 at 8:58 am -
Who could be depressed this Christmas? I know I fell down a rabbit hole at some point, but I’m retracing my steps & desperate to get back home, but such thoughts will be counter-balanced by the hilarious broadcasting paradox that in the year that saw several elderly men stand trial (some banished from our screens for eternity and some jailed) for “groping in the 70s” ITV3 will be repeating several episodes and all the feature films of ‘On The Buses’ over Christmas.
https://www.facebook.com/OnTheBusesTV/notes - Moor Larkin
December 19, 2014 at 9:46 am -
The enthusiastic reportage of Iran’s Press TV gave me pause for thought that if you wanted to convince the “Muslim World” that “the West” was a corrupt, depraved and possessed-by-the-devil culture and well-past time for dissolution by any means available, then you couldn’t have done a better propaganda job than the Paedo Panic of the last two years. Who needs ISIS when you’ve got the BBC?
“Press TV: Have we seen or heard the last of what has occurred here, given your familiarity with the case? Can you set the stage as to what we’re looking at overall in terms of this Jimmy Savile case?
Chandan: Good evening, brother, sure I can. First of all, I’d like to really impress upon our viewers that the piece that’s just been leading into this and what sister Narges has just said is no exaggeration whatsoever. The lead in and sister Narges has actually just very factually conveyed what this report has really found… Also, we’ve been seeing in the mainstream media in Britain, the absolute colonial arrogance in the way that they’ve been reporting the anti-female violence which is obviously epidemic throughout India. But given the impression that the British have any right to dictate to our south Asian people, they do not. Our Indian people are very well capable of dealing with this situation and they are.
If they can accuse Indians in such a colonial manner, and if they can accuse our Muslim community in such an Islamophobic manner, then what does this point to itself? It’s such a disgusting thing that’s occurred for five decades long. ”
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/01/12/283167/britain-has-institutionalized-pedophilia/- Moor Larkin
December 19, 2014 at 10:25 am -
sorry – my point being that the keenest believers of paedos in high places on the internet, frequently turn out to be rather zealous on the anti-Zionist front too and more often than not, a bit homophobic on the side. It’s ironic in that sense that our government, which seems such a fervent believer in Internet Conspiracists on the Paedo/Terrorist fronts cannot see the wood for the timber.
- Moor Larkin
- The Blocked Dwarf
December 19, 2014 at 10:22 am -
CyberNAUTS? You ARE Keith Floyd and I claim my £5!
- Ms Mildred
December 19, 2014 at 11:13 am -
There always is lots of violence and mayhem on Xmas TV. Just like there is out on the late night streets with drunken louts beeping their insults at fairly patient police. More fool the film makers for choosing such a silly subject, so that Kim Who can rattle his rockets at the evil West. No one cares any more whether what is being served up to them is the whole truth or manipulated pictorially or wordwise into a pile of utter tosh. Both yourself and Moor have put hard work into looking at the very expensive investigations by hospitals into Savile’s alleged visits. You have both demonstrated and revealed little substance in these allegations. Yet in Moor’s link we have a vicious put down of UK by an aggressive propagandist, manipulating MSM content into vile published insults against UK. Let us recall the background to a Nobel prize for a very brave and charismatic young lady. UK is so vile and evil we restore her to health and returned to her country of origin at her request. Maggie will never be allowed to RIP as she was so disliked by so many, who are delighted to see her name dragged down.
- AdrianS
December 19, 2014 at 5:22 pm -
Now then, Now then as it happens I’ll be watching Banshee. Series 1 this Xmas .
Later I’ll watch highlights from Jim ‘ll Fix it, It’s a Knockout and listen to Garry Gliter Xmas special for some Xmas cheer!
After a few tins might swap a few Rape jokes on Twitter .Boxing Day, go and watch Sheffield United play
Anything else non PC I could do ? – ah yes I could non physically cause domestic abuse to the missus, but it might be a bit of a close match as she usually gives as good as she gets
- Cascadian
December 19, 2014 at 7:12 pm -
I find myself musing how many Nobels will be apportioned to the unfortunate boys at Peshawar.
I think we already know.
- AdrianS
- The Blocked dwarf
December 19, 2014 at 12:26 pm -
“Let us recall the background to a Nobel prize for a very brave and charismatic young lady. ”
Brave? Charismatic? Malala? About the only lesson we should learn from her shooting is that the ‘quality’ of Taliban ‘hit men’ seems horribly low. 3 head shots at point-blank at a sitting target and only one hits? Should have gone to Spec Savers.
- Mudplugger
December 19, 2014 at 8:18 pm -
The concept of ‘useful idiots’ doesn’t only apply to the CND/Greenham Common/Anti-Poll-Tax/Anti-Fracking rabble by their off-site handlers, it is useful to other agencies to operate ‘useful idiots’ for their own, quite different, purposes. Malala is one such.
Not her fault that she’s presented a convenient glove-puppet for others: apart from getting an ill-fired bullet in the head, she was just at the right place and time, right gender, right age. Serendipity for some.
- Mudplugger
- Joe Public
December 19, 2014 at 12:29 pm -
UK citizens can hardly criticise Sony for its overreaction to a Twtr “threat”
Keir Starmer’s dogged pursuit of Paul Chambers is evidence of gullibility this side of the pond.
- Amfortas
December 19, 2014 at 2:32 pm -
You want ‘depressed’? How about this. Julia Gillard, she of the naive 30-something legal firm partner who operated an illegal union slush fund and syphoned some off for her house refurbishment (oh, and became PM after knifing the sitting PM in the back) then went on to a plum job as a ‘Professor’ at a Uni in Adelaide while pocketing a $200,000 (indexed) a year ‘pension’ from rorted taxpayers, (take a breath here)….. has joined the Board of BeyondBlue, the main NGO in Oz advising on….. Depression.
You cannot make this stuff up.
- Fat Steve
December 19, 2014 at 4:58 pm -
@Amfortas ..Julia Gillard
Never really took much notice of her but fascinated on looking her up on the web that she is out of the Slater and Gordon stable ……now why does that somehow not surprise me? but it does cause me to reflect a little on the media/political/legal model in Australia….. and the model that appears to be developing here. Mind you she seems to be one of those typical socialist elders and betters that we are expected to revere however they behave….most of the labour front bench, of which the Thornberry woman was a great example, seem to be from the same mould ….but why do I sense such people have been rumbled and have passed their sell by date? As Uncle Petunia might advise ‘Go back to sleep Fat Steve and wake up next may to find out’
- Fat Steve
- Mrs Grimble
December 19, 2014 at 3:29 pm -
The hacking almost certainly wasn’t at the behest of North Korea. The code of the hack has been crawled over by the tech world and their opinion is: 1) it was the work of a disgruntled employee who disguised it (badly) as coming from the DPR, and 2) it only succeeded because Sony has utterly rubbish IT security.
- woodsy42
December 19, 2014 at 4:13 pm -
I wonder what would happen if a group of extremist Margaret Thatcher supporters hacked the BBC over their choice of Book at Bedtime?
- Engineer
December 19, 2014 at 9:27 pm -
Absolutely nothing. Freedom of speech must be upheld. Had the murder victim been Gordon Brown, however, the BBC would not have broadcast it on grounds of bad taste.
- Engineer
- Cascadian
December 19, 2014 at 7:10 pm -
I could care less about much of modern “culture” particularly as it relates to film and TV, but it is amusing to see lefty-Hollywood exposed by lefty tittle-tattle purveyors. Who woulda thunk that one of the primary targets would be a female, with the fashionable adopted black baby and a UN special ambassador to boot, they are practically attacking a progressive saint.
The thought that BBC could be a target is delightful, imagine the bliss of BBC having to suspend operations as Sony have, and the angst among the Islington meejah “collussi” (stole that word-I love the irony).
That would be the best Christmas present ever. - binao
December 20, 2014 at 8:51 am -
It’s hard to be interested in the personalities who are so important to the media.
Quite a pleasure yesterday doing a noisy post pub lunch quiz.
Faced with a page of 15 lower halves of celebs faces to identify, all I could name was Mona Lisa. Even better, when the answers came I was still no wiser.
Small pleasures. - Alex
December 20, 2014 at 9:13 am -
As far as I can tell there is very little authentic investagative journalism done these days by the MSM. Let’s be honest, if you were a MSM journalist what would you rather do, especially during the winter months? Would you prefer to go out into the cold, dark, sometimes dangerous real world looking for stories, possibly involving quite a lot of hard work, or would you choose to sit in a nice, warm, safe office, surfing the internet copying and pasting any old tosh provided it was sensational enough and maybe at the same time browsing Amazon or Ebay etc., for those last minute bargains?
I gave up on all forms of MSM about 7 years ago. I got fed up with all their lies, personal agenda, invented non stories, shallowness, self promotion and so called celebrity clap trap.
I guess I first became disillusioned when AIDS came on the scene and the ridiculous government campaign and their projections of the possible numbers of deaths. Other examples that spring to mind include salmonella in eggs, the millenium bug, bird flu, global warming and the obesity epidemic. - GildasTheMonk
December 20, 2014 at 9:25 am -
A tricky one. I just don’t find the premise of the film particularly funny, nor from the scene I have heard, the execution. I find it very difficult to accept that this is arch political satire in the mode of Chaplin’s The Great Dictator.
I suppose I should launch myself onto the barricade of defending free speech and freedom of artistic endeavour come hell or high water. And yet whilst I utterly loath the North Korean regime, I can’t quite get my knickers in a twist over this. It was a silly idea executed by silly, rather juvenile and not very talented actors and writers. - sally stevens
December 24, 2014 at 10:57 pm -
Well, no surprise, the film will air in some theaters tomorrow, and I believe will also stream live to any and all television owners who care to see it today, I believe.
{ 25 comments… read them below or add one }