Mackerel and Mutiny.
Back in September 2013, Chris Grayling was spawning Cod at a rate of knots. He would protect young girls from sexual abuse whilst in his care by incarcerating them in ‘secure colleges’ along with hundreds of 17 year old males…all in the name of efficiency.
Grayling was asked by the Treasury to cut the Ministry of Justice budget by 1%. That would be £142 million. The man who had already switched parties to ensure his speedy progress up the political ladder responded by offering to cut £220 million. Has any other Minister volunteered to cut 50% more than he was asked to?
He introduced a programme to the prison service known as ‘New Ways of Working’ – a euphemism much like the ‘Liverpool Pathway‘. It involved locking up prisoners in their cells for twice as long, halving the number of staff available, and expecting everyone to be delighted about the obvious outcome of this move.
Martin Prince, Cory Stewart, Peter Gafney, Oshane Gayle, Callum Hollingsworth, Sam Davies, Anuar Niyongaba, Jordan Rowe, Charlie Dempster, Nathaniel Johnson and Nicholas Carlton, all guests of Her Majesty in High Down Category B prison in Banstead – were less than amused.
Prison was supposed to be their punishment for crimes that were not in the highest category of danger to the public. Not isolation without access to a shower, cigarettes and the company of other human beings from time to time. They complained. And complained again.
Nobody listened.
So they locked themselves in one cell, on one of the rare excursions outside their cells, and in a faintly humorous manner, pushed a letter under the door saying that they would not come out until they were given ‘Mackerel and dumplings’ for their tea. One can only imagine how poor their diet must have been up until then that they should consider Mackerel and dumplings an improvement.
Actually, you don’t have to imagine; their two hot meals a day had been cut down to one – both the local MP, Crispin Blunt and the Independent Monitoring Board had voiced their concerns about conditions inside the prison.
The ‘Custodial Officer’ – a lady – was deputised to come and speak to the 11 men through a hatch in the cell door. The men told her to ‘Fu*k off – “We don’t want to speak to the monkey, we want to speak to the organ grinder” – another two ‘trained negotiators’ were spat at through said hatch.
Now you might think that it would have been wise for the Governor to put in an appearance around now – the men had sent him a note directly:
It read: ‘The reason for these capers is we are not getting enough food, exercise, showers or gym and we want to see the governor lively’ and that they were ‘not getting any association and banged up like kippers’.”
Instead of the Governor, some 40 members of the riot squad known as the Tornado Team were assembled outside the door. The men had broken the sink in the cell – “The cell was totally trashed. The furniture in the cell was totally destroyed through to the sink which had been smashed off the wall leaving shards of porcelain everywhere.”
So in order to show the men how they should be behaving – the Tornado Team smashed the door off its hinges, and with four heavily protected riot squad members to each prisoner, returned them to their own cells. That’s the way lads….
The CPS continued with this heavy handed approach, and instead of disciplinary proceedings which usually result in time added to a sentence for the dastardly crime of demanding Mackerel for your tea and smashing up the sink in your cell – all 11 defendants were charged with Mutiny under Section 1 of the Prison Security Act (1992).
Mutiny on the High Down rather than Mutiny on the High seas….
The Chief prosecution witness was Ian Bickers – the Prison Governor. Surely he told the court how the prisoners were utterly unreasonable and had overreacted to a minor change in procedure. Er, no actually.
“Prison governors to some degree have less discretion about what they can do and when. They follow a standard process and every prison is benchmarked against another. The core day is 7.30am to 7.30pm. Less prisoners are actively involved in work or education and they spend more time locked up.” Prison governor Ian Bickers told the court during the three week trial that the prison moved from serving two hot meals a day to one, prisoners spent more time locked up and staff numbers had dropped. Earlier this year a damning report revealed a prison “pared to the bone and beyond” where staff cuts had sparked safety fears, undermined rehabilitation and left prisoners in their cells for long periods. The report, by the Independent Monitoring Board (IMB), described 2013 as “a dreadful year” and said many changes had produced an “unhappy prison”.
They were in fact 28 staff short. Even the Prison Governor conceded that the ‘protestors’ did have a point that made it difficult for a jury to believe that this was a mutiny ‘intended to make a prison, or part of prison, ungovernable’.
The men have been found ‘not guilty’. The trial took up three weeks of court time at Blackfriars court. All eleven men were entitled to legal representation at the State’s expense. The Prosecution also employ expensive legal brains – or expensive legal entities anyways. Half a million quid you reckon?
Every prison in the country will be buzzing with the news that you can smash the sink in your cell and demand Mackerel for your tea – and it doesn’t constitute a Mutiny – just a ‘protest’.
Now that Chris Grayling has achieved the impossible – and got the entire legal establishment and the prisoners on the same side, I wonder who he thinks is going to support him?
Why aren’t the main stream media covering this? I never thought I’d be singing the praises of the Sutton Guardian of all papers, but they are to be commended on this occasion.
- Moor Larkin
November 27, 2014 at 10:13 am -
In another place, someone was grouching about “society” and mumbling about violent revolution being the only solution. I remarked that violence was most certainly not the answer, but instead bloody-minded awkwardness to the authorities and refusal to follow their puerile ‘rules’, because whilst “the government” could most certainly kill us all, it most certainly could not lock all of us up.
- Robert the Biker
November 27, 2014 at 10:23 am -
The Governor was in an impossible situation here though wasn’t he? Give in to demands from what are after all criminals, and you are always giving in. Take no notice of the more stupid ‘suggestions’ from the PTB and you come bottom of the league tables with all the effects on staff morale (low enough already) and funding, not to mention your own hopes of promotion, pay and pension.
So, he did what was probably best in the circumstances, he sent in the riot squad, because there can only be one Governor and he isn’t one of the blokes in cells. He preferred a charge based on the rule book, and then he quite rightly came to the prisoners defense in the open court and thet were found not guilty. He defended them from a position of authority, not one of weakness, kudos to him.- VftS
November 27, 2014 at 10:50 am -
That was my interpretation of the Governor’s action, RtB. Akin to a white mutiny. Shrewd man.
- VftS
- Ed P
November 27, 2014 at 10:53 am -
“Why aren’t the MSM covering this?” They have been instructed to suppress it, like so many other unreported events which do not fit the illusion.
- Ancient+Tattered Airman
November 27, 2014 at 11:00 am -
I assume he won’t be one Tory who isn’t considering a switch to UKIP…….
- Mr Ecks
November 27, 2014 at 11:39 am -
Grayling is an esp vile member of a vile government sitting in a vile HoC. Cares nothing what havoc he causes if he can promote his own “career”.
The fish-faced Home Secretary is another one. Announcing one piece of tyrannical carp after another (to solve a problem created by the state in the first place). Trying to “position” herself as a new Thatcher but with only arrogance and tyrannical tendencies in place of the originals character.- Robert the Biker
November 27, 2014 at 11:54 am -
“The fish-faced Home Secretary is another one. Announcing one piece of tyrannical carp”
Well, she is just a plaice holder after all…- Ed P
November 27, 2014 at 1:50 pm -
She’s a chubby too. And she’s not Koi about her chances of reeling in Cameron and netting the top job.
Cod is not mocked- Robert the Biker
November 27, 2014 at 1:54 pm -
Well, she wants to be a bit more porpoise-ful or she’ll have jumped the shark.
- Ho Hum
November 27, 2014 at 2:01 pm -
Any good in her sole was filleted out a long time ago, so the Wrasse of Cod will sinker in due course
- Ho Hum
November 27, 2014 at 2:04 pm -
Unless she whales about hake speech and has us done up like kippers first.
- Robert the Biker
November 27, 2014 at 2:07 pm -
We should probably demand a Public Herring
- Ho Hum
November 27, 2014 at 2:14 pm -
There’s fish in the barrel,
dear Lisa, dear Lisa,
There’s fish in the barrel,
go get my gun- Mudplugger
November 27, 2014 at 8:19 pm -
Let’s skate over all this and get back to the hard-core prawn, or is that just me being shellfish ?
- Mudplugger
- Ho Hum
- Robert the Biker
- Ho Hum
- Ho Hum
- Robert the Biker
- Ed P
- Robert the Biker
- Furor Teutonicus
November 27, 2014 at 11:41 am -
Locking the scum in their cells for LONGER?
I thought, according to them, they were already 23 hours per day in lock up?
Or has Grayling extended the day to 30 hours, or something?
- Robert the Biker
November 27, 2014 at 11:52 am -
Furor:
It’s badly explained as usual, what there are are a higher percentage of prisoners locked up for twenty three hours instead of being at work, classes or whatever. Not just the nutters and nonces, but the regular low risk types too- JuliaM
November 27, 2014 at 6:03 pm -
Oh, if only there was a way these poor unfortunates could avoid such treatment…
- windsock
November 28, 2014 at 10:07 am -
Becayse rehabilitation for minor offenders is a waste of time…. Commit one crime and you’re written off for life?
- JuliaM
November 28, 2014 at 1:25 pm -
Yes. Why not? It’s not difficult, is it?
- windsock
November 28, 2014 at 3:02 pm -
Maybe not for you, maybe not for me. But not everyone is blessed with a good upbringing, education or intelligence and peer pressure counts for a lot. Teenagers create their own “families” when the parents aren’t interested/have lost control and that can lead to trouble. Sometimes all it takes is a bit of support and kindness and people can change. Still, let’s just chuck people on a scrapheap eh? so we’ll feel so morally superior. It’s good for the soul
- windsock
- JuliaM
- windsock
- JuliaM
- Robert the Biker
- Chris
November 27, 2014 at 12:03 pm -
All this regarding prisons should concern us all, not least due to the drive to criminalise and persecute the non-criminal classes we’re witnessing at the moment. Have faith in this system at your own peril.
The long-term plan (as ever) is to copy the US model of privately-owned prisons funded by the tax payer, when every prisoner will represent £££ to the prison, and the tax-payer will foot the bill. “Super Jails” I think the term is…
- Moor Larkin
November 27, 2014 at 12:42 pm -
On the BBC World Service the other day, there was a report about how Norway’s jails are full and their convicted criminals are being sent to Holland. Holland apparently had a prison-building frenzy a few years ago (maybe they had a paedo-scare) and have huge over-capacity. As enterprising as any Amsterdam merchant ever was they held out the offer of sanctuary to Norway. It struck me that Transportation is now back on the judicial agenda…
- Moor Larkin
- Ms Mildred
November 27, 2014 at 12:15 pm -
Agree with RTB…get the mackerel men out, clad in riot gear, good practice for worse to come perhaps? Sort out a suitable charge and get them to court, even if it does cost loadsa money, that’s what lawyers are for. To sting the taxpayers like me, ancient old lady, looking on at this crazy Twitterinies twentifirst century world through expensive new specs. The politicians will not stop elbowing their way into powerful positions. Nor will those naughty men in prison stop yearning for for mackerel and dumplings…absolutely scrumptious…what! Just reading Marr on the political years since 1945, so I’m sort of well informed on what is alleged to go on in the world of politics. I do not quite like what I read politicians get up to, the cliques, promoting chums, falling out etc. Neither do I like rule by Twitter either. In fact the Rochester nonsense is a poisoned chalice handed to ordinary man to have a go at just about anyone, to wreck a persons career over practically nothing, but 3 ENGLISH flags and the word Rochester! Are there no respectorati left? What a mad old, sad old world we live in. It must be better than rationing, austerity, sugar rationing, the fifties, impetigo, nits nurses, mother and baby homes and borstal ?
- Ho Hum
November 27, 2014 at 12:34 pm -
Sure, knocking the bad guys down is necessary, and civilised
Kicking them repeatedly when they are on the floor isn’t.
Chris Grayling doesn’t seem to know the difference.
- Oi you
November 27, 2014 at 12:36 pm -
Thing is, we are continually sold the picture that the current system is a democratic one and worse will come about if we lose it. This has got to be the biggest lie in Christendom. I propose that we disestablish the HoC, sack the politicians and put in power someone to run the country. Someone who is a self-made type, from a relatively ordinary background, someone who has no time for red tape or fannying about. Lord Sugar will do. Well, he can’t do any further damage to the country than has already been done.
So…..(drum roll) Lord Sugar…..you’re HIRED.
- Ho Hum
November 27, 2014 at 12:37 pm -
I thought that the country was already being run by the barrow boys?
- Oi you
November 27, 2014 at 12:50 pm -
Barrow boys had to work for a living for pittance pay.
- Ho Hum
November 27, 2014 at 1:00 pm
- Ho Hum
- Oi you
- Moor Larkin
November 27, 2014 at 12:49 pm -
I recall reading an account of when Sugar-Plum was part of the meetings about the Premier League selling itself to the highest bidder because he was Chairman of Tottingham. He was also dish supplier to BSBSKY……. The accounts of his running in and out of meetings to make phone calls left the LibConLab Treaties looking like childish scheming. I daresay it’s still on the internet someplace, unless the “right to be forgotten” clause has been implemented on Google by the EU.
- Ho Hum
- Cloudberry
November 27, 2014 at 1:24 pm -
Why aren’t the main stream media covering this?
Another blogger is asking the same question.
http://prisonuk.blogspot.com/2014/11/the-curious-case-of-media-silence.html - Peter Raite
November 27, 2014 at 4:12 pm -
I recently set my task of identifying some of the locations used in the little-known film I Vinti, directed by Michangelo Antonioni a few years before he made the much more famous Blowup. I Vinti comprises three stories – one Italian, one French, one English – loosely connected by a common theme of juvenile deliquency. The one set here has a lazy and effete poet trying to cash in on his discovery of a dead body. The location for where he finds it was particularly troublesome, being a golf course and a lot of trees, but I knew it was likely to be in the vicinity of Cheam, where some of the street scenes were shot. I eventually pinned it down to Banstead Common, confirmed by the towers of the old Banstead Asylum visible in the distance. The site of latter, sources now assure, is today occupied by two “modern prisons.” Or maybe not so modern.
- Alex
November 27, 2014 at 4:18 pm -
“I thought that the country was already being run by the barrow boys?”
Surely that should be Harrow boys…
I have very little sympathy for whining prisoners. There are many law abiding pensioners who would love to have 2 hot meals and “access to a shower, cigarettes and the company of other human beings from time to time”.
- Moor Larkin
November 27, 2014 at 5:28 pm -
Harrow Boys and Eton Rifles perhaps?
“According to a study reported in the Guardian in 2009, 8,500 former servicemen were imprisoned, making up almost 10% of the prison population.” – wiki
- Moor Larkin
- JuliaM
November 27, 2014 at 6:00 pm -
“So in order to show the men how they should be behaving – the Tornado Team smashed the door off its hinges, and with four heavily protected riot squad members to each prisoner, returned them to their own cells. That’s the way lads….”
Yes. It actually IS the way.
- JuliaM
November 27, 2014 at 6:02 pm -
I’m afraid I’m as sympathetic towards these prisoners whinging about their meal allowance (still better than most hospital patients get, and they are innocent!) as I am towards the father of the silly little cow banged up in Peru for drug smuggling and apparently having an awful time of it.
Yes. It’s called ‘consequences’.
- MTG
November 27, 2014 at 8:06 pm -
You were made for a governess role, Julia. Perhaps more Judith Anderson than Googie Withers.
- Mudplugger
November 27, 2014 at 8:21 pm -
If her googie withers, she’s really in trouble.
- Mudplugger
- MTG
- Carl
November 27, 2014 at 6:35 pm -
I would be interested in hearing the Landlady’s views on this article, treatment of male prisoners is obviously the last thing on these peoples minds.
- Moor Larkin
November 27, 2014 at 7:07 pm -
“As of 14 November 2014, the population of women in prison in the UK is 3,956. And the male population is 81,905” – wiki
- Mudplugger
November 27, 2014 at 8:23 pm -
I’m sure we can look forward to Harriet demanding equality of imprisonment any day now…….
- Mudplugger
- Peter Raite
November 28, 2014 at 1:42 pm -
The horror of “treating women in the same way as male offenders”! Isn’t there exactly the same underlying sub-text here that militant feminism seems to spend so much time trying to refute? We can’t all be equal if women in the criminal justice system somehow have to be tereated “differently” – i.e. less harshly – than men. I would have more faith in these protestations is the approach was one of, “a large proportion of people are imprisoned for X, Y or Z offence, which we don’t think merits incarceration, whether for men or women,” but instead it is specifically about, “reducing the number of women receiving custodial sentences.”
- Moor Larkin
- Cascadian
November 27, 2014 at 8:47 pm -
In summary, government attempts to make savings, fails, and spends 6% more/yr, Creates havoc, but more work for the non-productive sector.
Government announces it will cut nett immigration to “tens of thousands/year” fails, hundreds of thousands documented immigrants overwhelm all social services. Creates more work for non-productive sector.
Not only are you printing money to pay these bills, you are cutting services that the taxpayer need (yes you need jails) to subsidise the dogma that everybody is entitled to services that the indigent population have to pay into for a lifetime to receive. “What we desire for ourselves, we wish for all” is a fine socialist sentiment, it just happens not to make any economic sense unless everybody toils a lifetime to be a beneficiary.
Does anybody believe this government or a liebour government can do anything effectively?
- Ed P
November 27, 2014 at 11:36 pm -
Does anybody believe…? No, not if they’re still breathing.
But the “government” label glosses over and disguises the big problem – the civil service. For every policy announcement there are literally hundreds of faceless “servants” busy protecting the status quo and their own jobs and pensions. The very last thing they’ll do is accept and work for change. Turning a supertanker around on a sixpence is kid’s play compared to actual policy change in the civil service at all its levels – it’s designed, intended & effective at blocking, delaying, corrupting and destroying political decisions. Even Maggie was unable to overcome this resistance.
“Politicians come and go, the service is forever”- Cascadian
November 28, 2014 at 1:21 am -
And that is acceptable?
Dare I suggest that a radical change is needed. Statement of the bleeding obvious, I know. Seventy years of stagnation and poor government should be enough for even the most disinterested electorate.
The conmen are performing worse than Gordon Brown. Time to wake up!
- binao
November 28, 2014 at 11:06 am -
I don’t have a lot of sympathy with the minister or the prisoners; they made their choices.
The minister makes decisions which may or may not be sensible, but he’s not in direct or personal control of the affected activity.
There are civil service professionals advising him on the implementation of policy & it’s consequences, and others managing the process, from the prison officers upwards.
It seems to me that the risks from policy changes & running an understaffed prison would be known; running prisons isn’t a leap in the dark activity. It also seems reasonable that a prison at risk of unrest from whatever cause would be known too, and if beyond local resolution, somewhere up the tree robust action would be put in place pretty sharpish.
To avoid losing control.
I recognise the problem of trying to implement unreasonable plans from above, been there, but at some stage, somewhere between the prison officers & the minister there are these well paid professionals, seemingly invisible & dissociated from the problem.
I just don’t accept ‘sorry guv, only doing what the minister made us do.’
At a certain level, just keeping your head down isn’t good enough; we should expect a lot more from some very well rewarded & secure people.
Maybe they have kicked up, maybe this is a one off, & maybe the prisoners were on campaign, who knows?
Just a view- Moor Larkin
November 28, 2014 at 11:25 am -
Just as well it’s winter or Fleet Street would be having a ball.
http://cache2.asset-cache.net/gc/82083743-prisoners-on-the-rooftop-of-strangeways-gettyimages.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=GkZZ8bf5zL1ZiijUmxa7QXtO%2B48dty4kUgBd4ym6kqzfKpb4843PvcUFU5L7axv4
- Moor Larkin
- Cascadian
- Ed P
- GildasTheMonk
November 28, 2014 at 8:29 am -
Basically, an OMNISHAMBLES
- The Blocked Dwarf
November 28, 2014 at 12:52 pm -
” ‘Mackerel and dumplings’ for their tea”
Who exactly were these cheeky chappies, these villans? Victorian Geordie tearaways? Edwardian Peaky Blinders? The Artful Fucking Dodger Of Old London Town? All a bit “when questioned the suspect, 18 black male in gang colours, replied ‘Stone the crows.It’s a fair cop, Guv’ , strike a light, yer got me bang to rights already, knees up Mother brown ” to me. Surely the men know that any decent self respecting Coster demands ‘Tubby Isaacs and a pint of Pigs” !
I have a feeling that ‘Mackerel & dumplings’ is Thieves Cant for something entirely different…perhaps ‘We wish to protest a breach of our Human Rights under European Law’ ?
- The Blocked Dwarf
November 28, 2014 at 1:04 pm -
“pushed a letter under the door ”
Huh? Why not #OberScrewbastard ? Were they all of the ‘Porridge’ generation and had been taught to read and write at school? Or, more likely, immigrants from countries that still possess an Education System, like Somalia? Are Kippers Halal?
Am I the only one who sees a need for a ‘Computer/IT Literacy’ course in HMP High Down?
- Peter Raite
November 28, 2014 at 1:51 pm -
From the names listed above, I would not expect all eleven of them to be “immigrants” or even the children of them.
- Peter Raite
- Ian B
November 28, 2014 at 1:52 pm -
Grayling appears to be a rather stupid man. These are not uncommon in politics, but a wise party leader puts them somewhere they can’t do any harm. There seems to be a shortage of wise party leaders at the moment.
Grayling and the Tories in general perhaps seem to have adopted the very American idea that the best measure of justice in a country is the number of people in prison. The more people who are in prison, the better you are doing. A Utopian outcome would be for everyone to be in prison. No doubt they will soon also adopt the American justice idea of boasting about the number of bum rapes too.
Grayling appears to be a rather stupid man. Did I say that?
- Moor Larkin
November 28, 2014 at 2:58 pm -
* boasting about the number of bum rapes *
Sounds like Wolf in Alctraz. Pass the soap Clint.
- Moor Larkin
- Moor Larkin
November 28, 2014 at 3:42 pm -
One good reason why the mainstream media don’t want to give this story any prominence is that it reflects on a consequence of something they have a high investment in promoting.
“The Justice Secretary said the “obvious” reason for a 1,600 rise in the prison population was that 700 sex abusers convicted through “historical sex abuse cases” had entered prisons in the last year. Mr Grayling admitted that the increase in these convictions had had an “impact on our prisons” but said he does not regard it as a “great problem” if prisoners are required to temporarily share a cell in certain over-crowded institutions. This week Alison Saunders, the Director of Public Prosecutions, said publicity surrounding the conviction of high–profile celebrities such as Rolf Harris for historic sexual abuse had helped have encouraged other victims to come forward. Mr Grayling offered the explanation after MPs on the Justice select committee had raised fears that prison overcrowding paired with reduced staff numbers could spark disorder over the summer.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10956561/700-new-convictions-for-historic-sex-abuse-pushing-up-prison-population.html- Ian B
November 28, 2014 at 9:05 pm -
Indeed. And in a rational society, such a phenomenon would be cause for great concern that something awry had occurred. But we aren’t much of a rational society at the moment.
- Ian B
{ 55 comments… read them below or add one }