The Conference Season
Who, apart from ambitious young journalists in drag looking to snare a cheap story, actually goes to a Party Conference of any persuasion?
The Telegraph helpfully calculated, a few months ago, that it cost upwards of £700 to spend a few hours enticing a political dishonourable Member into sharing a ‘selfie’ with you. Who sticks their hands in the pockets and jiggles their spare change for this effect?
What is the point of it all?
Miliband stands up and adenoids his way through a speech that appears to describe his forays onto Hampstead Heath, in search not of Badgers, but of ‘ordinary working men and women’ to quote – apparently oblivious of the fact that he is unlikely to find many women out on the heath at night, and whilst half of the men might be termed ‘rough trade’ they are scarcely representative of the ‘tradesmen’ who might be considered his natural cache of voters. Those ‘tradesmen’ certainly won’t be forking out £700. Not unless their Union is paying for them. Who is listening to him? Surely only the people who already know what he has to say.
Cameron’s team are so sure they know what Farage is going to say that they are issuing ‘official statements’, North Korean style, for their MPs to rebut the expected Farage ‘written on the back of an envelope five minutes before he delivers it’ speech. Who is writing that style guide, and why? Ex-Journalists for the benefit of other journalists?
Conservative Ministers are told to predict that their conference will ‘demonstrate our energy, positivity and determination to secure a better future for our country’ – now there’s a handy response to queries as to why when Guido’s intern targeted 100 of them with a hook baited with selfies of a delectable young lady – only one rose to the occasion. A pic of Chris Bryant in his boxer shorts might have got a bigger response. In the name of ‘Pubic interest’ naturally.
Only UKIPs conference contained the sort of people (apart from Mark Reckless) that might conceivably be ordinary working people – the sort of people most impacted by the current austerity imposed on us, and thus swayed from a different vote, rather than the sort of people who live in Hampstead Heath and can afford to play around with politics knowing full well that nothing will really impact on their lifestyle.
Besides which – nothing, nothing at all, that they say in the manifestos grandly ‘agreed upon’ at Conference is binding on any of them.
Every word that comes out of Cameron’s mouth today will have been carefully scripted by an army of young men and women fresh out of University who have been studying Twitter and Facebook for weeks to decide which statements will make the best headlines – even the Miss Havershamish ‘Bow Group’ is now boycotting the Tory Party Conference saying:
“We feel that a genuine forum for conservatism and Conservative Party members remains absent from the event in favour of a corporate venue for press and lobbyists.”
And journalists desperate for a story.
So far, Mark Reckless has deserted to join UKIP and been accused by Boris Johnson of being the sort of man who has sex with a vacuum cleaner.
Boris Johnson has declared he is in love with a brick.
His Deputy Mayor, Richard Barnes has defected to UKIP declaring ‘it wasn’t his brick pri*k anyway‘.
Ken Clarke think UKIP voters have ‘disappointing‘ sex lives.
Brooks Newmark has resigned his portfolio for letting the Tory side down by being susceptible to female flattery.
And no doubt Cameron will ‘honour our brave men and women in the military’, who after five attempts have managed to land a £100,000 Brimstone missile on a stolen pick up truck in the middle of the Iraqi desert, by way of explanation as to why austerity means we all need to tighten our belts ‘together’.
Only £700 for a back row seat – don’t all rush at once.
- Moor Larkin
October 1, 2014 at 12:41 pm -
@ What is the point of it all? @
£3,000 per square metre perhaps…
http://www.conservativepartyconference.org.uk/Commercial/Exhibition.aspx - Ho Hum
October 1, 2014 at 1:28 pm -
Clearly, UKIPpers are those who disdain the need for manuals in their handling of a power vacuum
Sorry….
- Ed P
October 1, 2014 at 1:31 pm -
Brooks Newmark was allegedly actively pursuing the (as he thought) young woman.
- Peter Raite
October 1, 2014 at 6:25 pm -
I see Cameron has annouced tax cuts of a relatively inconsequential magnitude to the 30 million who will get them (including, as far as I can make out, myself), which presumably balances out the effective income cuts to 10 million who can least afford them announced by Gideon yesterday. Don’t you just love millionaires?
- Engineer
October 1, 2014 at 8:01 pm -
The French don’t. They taxed all their millionaires so heavily that a lot of them moved to London. The French economy is now even more b*ggered than it was before. The British economy is benefitting from their presence, though, so can’t be all bad….
- Peter Raite
October 2, 2014 at 11:56 am -
A few ridiculously over-prices shops and restaurants might be benefiting, but I doubt they’re contributing enough to the economy as a whole to make a real difference here.
- Moor Larkin
October 2, 2014 at 12:10 pm -
They have to be contributing more than all the folk getting the hand-outs from the State. That’s just simple maths.
- Peter Raite
October 2, 2014 at 1:46 pm -
That’s a different issue, although that other group still contribute to the circulation of money in the economy. The suggestion that they get benefits as smartcards would no doubt see their spending restricted to the large conglomerates (you know, those generous doners to Tory party funds), rather than the independent local economy.
- Moor Larkin
October 2, 2014 at 3:03 pm -
* I see Cameron has annouced tax cuts of a relatively inconsequential magnitude to the 30 million who will get them (including, as far as I can make out, myself), which presumably balances out the effective income cuts to 10 million who can least afford them *
So far as I can see, I’ll still be donating, just not so much. The income of “the 10 million” must not be cut but mine is fair game? Same issue so far as I can see.
If some Frog gonk wants to patronise a ludicrously expensive restaurant in NW1 and contribute 20% of the price of his scoff to help pay the income needed to be given to the 10 million so I don’t have to pay quite so much, it all seems egalite to me. Froggy’s evidently going to get just as little appreciation for his largesse as me. Dogs, hands and biting comes to mind.
- Peter Raite
October 2, 2014 at 4:34 pm -
The problem is that the 10 million households affects are not all on Benefits Street it’s a two-year freeze of child benefit, tax credits, jobseeker’s allowance, housing benefit and income support. Around half of those affected will be people actually in work receiving tax credits, while for many others it will be contribution-based JSA, because they have recently been in work long enough to qualify for it. As noted by the Independent:
“A joint-earning couple with one child, both earning £13,000 a year, would be £354.20 a year worse off through the loss of child benefit and tax credits. A family with two children and one earner on £25,000 would be £495 a year worse off.”
In contrast, increasing the tax-free allowance by £2,000 is worth £500 to anyone earning more than the full £12,500.
- Major Bonkers
October 2, 2014 at 6:35 pm -
I don’t see anything wrong with the principle that those who use public services should expect to make some contribution towards our ‘hard-working public servants ’, rather than expecting it all to be paid for by people who work for hedge funds, smokers, anyone who drives a car, or has the temerity to live in a nice house (or ‘mansion’ as politicians call it) – anyone else, in other words. This was precisely Ed Miliband’s and Ed Balls’ pitch at their conference: you can have all these goodies, comrades, and
- binao
October 2, 2014 at 9:53 pm -
The problem is surely that for a lot of people their only work opportunity is low wage.
Every time we top up those low wages we are in effect subsidising businesses that aren’t sustainable, and it really doesn’t matter if its a major supermarket or a coffee shop, they are receiving huge indirect subsidies. Not only that, these businesses have a stranglehold on local retail development land, and have the PR & planning adviser resources to bulldoze any reasoned resistance, whether from local authorities or local people. I’ve witnessed this with the ‘saintly’ supermarket in my own Downs village. Now the self pay tills are removing even those part time jobs.
I don’t know what the answer is, but the social crime against Britain of encouraging massive immigration simply to get votes & economic growth* should be engraved on Brown & Blair’s skulls. Had they tackled the real, but more difficult issue of millions of socially inactive people, we could have made progress. * more people, more economic activity; the French tried it with bigger families policies, and social crime because it drives down wages. And remember this was the reds, not the tories!
Just a view
- Major Bonkers
- Peter Raite
- Moor Larkin
- Peter Raite
- Moor Larkin
- Peter Raite
- AdrianS
October 1, 2014 at 10:12 pm -
Meanwhile 12 billion goes down the pan every year in foreign aid
- Engineer
- Ted Treen
October 1, 2014 at 9:30 pm -
“… the brick, which by this stage was attracting speculation it would be Johnson’s running mate in any future leadership bid…”
That wouldn’t happen, on the grounds that the brick would clearly show far more character, humanity, understanding and intelligence than its running mate.
- binao
October 1, 2014 at 10:14 pm -
All this stuff that’s squirted at us by the politicians & their media servants has become just like the junk mail that comes through the letterbox.
Glossy unasked for promises of things we don’t need, don’t want, or if we do are never quite as described.
At least the junk mail keeps down the cost of a stamp.
Still goes straight in the bin though. - theyfearthehare
October 2, 2014 at 1:57 pm -
Its hillariously funny, but its troubling on so many levels…
Guido’s lapdog decides to go fishing, and not surprisingly in what can only be described as a target rich environment, he catches a fish. Fair enough it was a big fat sleazy fish, and worthy of being stuffed and mounted on a plaque. But hasnt he got anything better to do other than to prove the bloody obvious ? I suppose in an age where the ability to simultaneously press control C and control V on a keyboard is the only skill that needs to be mastered to qualify and obtain employment qualify as a “journalist”, he’s lightyears beyond his peers, but I still find it troubling.
Even the cynical auld hare has to acknowledge that most politicians, despite their many failings have some human triats, and that includes sexual attraction. Are people really surprised to discover politicians are attracted to other humans ? or that politicians will abuse what limited power they are given. By normal moral standards his behaviour was a tad hypocritical, but in comparison to the political hypocrisy displayed daily by our “elected” representatives, it was small beer.
There has to be a far bigger story behind this one to explain a resignation.
As for party conferences, I think the rather crude expression “circle jerk” sums it up nicely.
- Opus
October 2, 2014 at 2:14 pm -
£30,000,000 – I calculate that that is just under 50p for each of us.
I love the Heath (and its extension), indeed were I to be able to afford to live in Hampstead I would be there every day (instead of having to walk up from Kentish Town) – so it puzzles me how The Leader of the Loyal Opposition (as he avoids the loitering males) could be misled into thinking that the dog-walkers and loungers were ‘ordinary working men and women’ – whatever that means.
My theory about UKIP is that it comprises those who were not bright enough to go to Oxbridge rather as if a talent-show television programme was to be exclusively restricted to X-factor rejects.
Wonderful writing to cheer me up AR.
- Peter Raite
October 2, 2014 at 4:38 pm -
It’s not £30,000,000 but rather tax cuts for 30 million people.The actual cost has been estimated at £7.2bn – £120 for each of us.
- Peter Raite
- Major Bonkers
October 2, 2014 at 5:54 pm -
They really are useless, these people.
Yesterday’s ‘Evening Standard’ (October 1t., page 6) quotes Dave’s speech: ‘A country where if you put in, you get out’. Yes Dave; I certainly put in, thankfully at only 40% – my mate in Poland, incidentally, pays at the top rate there of 19% – and I’m certainly looking to get out.
Good God, this man is the beneficiary of the finest education that money can buy – which seems to have imbued him with a limitless sense of entitlement, a glib tongue, and absolutely no common sense – and he still ends up mangling his grammar such that his intended meaning is the direct opposite of what he actually says. Perhaps that’s why we’re bombing Muslims again; he actually intended us not to do so, but the words just came out wrong.
Never mind; Jeremy Hunt is quoted (page 14): ‘it will be the Conservative Party that completes Nye Bevan’s vision.’ Which vision might that be: the one where he described the Conservatives as ‘lower than vermin’ or his boast that he had ‘stopped the Consultants’ mouths with gold’ when he established the NHS?
Whatever Bevan’s vision was back in 1946, I doubt that it encompassed the ghastly reality of mid-Staffs, Dr. Harold Shipman, Dr. Marietta Higgs and Professor Roy Meadows, that gormless bint in the Victoria Climbie case who didn’t notice that the child had a broken back, the everyday shambles that is A&E and the featherbedded existence of our GPs. My observations of the NHS are that is primarily staffed by foreigners treating foreigners, paid for by the British taxpayer and handing out knife and fork surgery, but then I do live in London where Tony, Gordon, Dave and Nick’s open-door immigration policy has left Englishmen a minority in their own capital city.
{ 25 comments… read them below or add one }