The Salmond and the Darling.
The Salmond and the Darling
Were watching through the night;
They cheered like anything to see
Such quantities of votes:
“So long as this were going our way”
They said, “it would be grand!”
“O Voters, come and vote for Yes!”
The Salmond did beseech.
“An increased dole, no need to work,
Life will be a ‘peach’:
We need not have no more than Oil,
To give a hand to each.”
The eldest Voter looked at him,
But na’er a word he said:
The eldest voter winked his eye,
And shook his heavy head—
Meaning to say he did not choose
To leave the feather-bed. (Or to get a brick through his window…)
But four young Weegies hurried up,
All eager for the treat:
Their hopes were high, their Irn Bru drained,
Their language coarse and plain—
And this weren’t odd, because, you know,
They hadn’t any brain.
Four other Voters followed them,
And yet another four;
And thick and fast they came at last,
And more, and more, and more—
All ranting o’er the cyber waves,
And scrambling for the door.
The Salmond and the Darling
Walked on a hour or so,
And then they rested on their morals
Conveniently low:
And all the little Voters stood
And waited in a row.
“The time has come,” the Darling said,
“To talk of many things:
Of jobs – and banks – and English rights
and many other things—
And why there’s now’t left in the pot –
And whether pigs have wings.”
“But wait a bit,” the Voters cried,
“Before we have our chat;
For some of us are out of breath,
And all of us are fat!”
“No hurry!” said the Darling.
They thanked him much for that.
“A load more dosh,” the Salmond said,
“Is what we chiefly need:
Pounds and shillings besides
Are very good indeed—
Now if you’re ready, Voters dear,
We can begin to feed.”
“But not from us!” the English cried,
Turning a little blue.
“After such supportiveness, that would be
A dismal thing to do!”
“The night is fine,” the Salmond said.
“Do you admire the view?”
“It was so kind of you to come!
And you are so very nice!”
The Darling said nothing but
“Will ye na’e take my advice:
I wish you were not quite so deaf—
I’ve had to ask you twice!”
“It seems a shame,” the Salmond said,
“To play them such a trick,
After we’ve brought them out so far,
And made them vote so quick!”
The Darling said nothing but
“The electorate’s far too thick!”
“I weep for you,” the Salmond said:
“I didn’t see it coming.”
Now ‘West Lothian’s’ reared its awkward head,
And in return for ‘Devolution’,
That Cameron’s said,
He’ll revamp the English constitution.
“O Voters,” said the Darling,
“You’ve had your night of fun!
Shall we be voting Labour again?”
But answer came there none—
And this was scarcely odd, because by then
They’d pissed off every one.
- JimmyGiro
September 19, 2014 at 1:31 pm -
“Economics is haunted by more fallacies than any other study known
to man. This is no accident. The inherent difficulties of the subject
would be great enough in any case, but they are multiplied a thousandfold
by a factor that is insignificant in, say, physics, mathematics,
or medicine—the special pleading of selfish interests. While every
group has certain economic interests identical with those of all groups,
every group has also, as we shall see, interests antagonistic to those of
all other groups. While certain public policies would in the long run
benefit everybody, other policies would benefit one group only at the
expense of all other groups. The group that would benefit by such
policies, having such a direct interest in them, will argue for them plausibly
and persistently. It will hire the best buyable minds to devote their
whole time to presenting its case. And it will finally either convince the
general public that its case is sound, or so befuddle it that clear thinking
on the subject becomes next to impossible.” [Henry Hazlitt: Economics in one Lesson]- Engineer
September 19, 2014 at 3:18 pm -
Economics distilled:
1) You can’t spend it until you’ve earned it.
2) You can spend it before you’ve earned it, but you have to borrow it.
3) If you borrow it, you have to pay it back with interest.
4) If you have to pay interest, you have to earn a lot more than you spend.Experience suggests that economists are sometimes good at explaining why certain things happened, but are dreadful at accurately predicting what will happen, possibly because they so often forget the four points above.
- Don Cox
September 19, 2014 at 4:04 pm -
When the bank borrows money from me, it doesn’t pay any interest.
You don’t have to earn more than you spend if you die heavily in debt.
- Dioclese
September 19, 2014 at 11:11 pm -
Not something that Brown or Balls seem able grasp…
- Don Cox
- Engineer
- Moor Larkin
September 19, 2014 at 1:37 pm -
- robbo
September 19, 2014 at 2:25 pm -
The thriving middle class of aberdeenshire rejected salmond, My eldest son was almost in tears, but I dont give a toss! health is more important than politics!
- Stewart Cowan
September 20, 2014 at 2:27 pm -
Economic health? Or the NHS that has refused me treatment? I didn’t vote for indepretendence either.
- Stewart Cowan
- Ron Jones
September 19, 2014 at 2:37 pm -
It’s a shame, really. I will always support political self-determination, decentralization, and Liberty.
However, if the ‘yes’ vote had prevailed, who was going to pick up the tab for the social services, the breadlines, and all the other government dependency programs that hand out Other People’s Money to the unproductive?
- Ed P
September 19, 2014 at 2:43 pm -
70% of 16 to 17 year olds voted YES
70% of over 65s voted NOOily Al just has to wait five years for a different result.
- Moor Larkin
September 19, 2014 at 2:47 pm -
We should have had an EU Vote by then, d’y’ken
- Engineer
September 19, 2014 at 3:09 pm -
Not necessarily. The young, idealistic and daft slowly learn by experience, and many of them become the older and wiser heads.
- SK
September 19, 2014 at 3:27 pm -
Not so sure under the current economic conditions and the cuts coming in (because lets not kid ourselves GO has not cut anything yet- deficit is growing) .
Its all a mess and its coming our way.
Weak Leaders, useless parties and too many interests in the line..
- Engineer
September 19, 2014 at 3:38 pm -
Well, the Scots have had a good, long look look at Salmond’s promises of a socialist utopia, and had the sense to tell him to gae boil his heid, so there are some grounds for optimism.
- Clarissa
September 19, 2014 at 4:19 pm -
The debt, not the deficit, is growing. We are getting deeper in debt but at a slower rate. The question of who is left holding the bill when the music stops has yet to be answered.
- Cascadian
September 19, 2014 at 5:31 pm -
You are correct, but that is hardly anything to be proud of. Look here
http://www.debtbombshell.com/britains-budget-deficit.htm
The camoron’s are spending like drunken sailors (worse than liebour in fact) and have just promised to fund more jockland jollies, the NHS(both) in particular is totally out-of-control.
- Cascadian
- Engineer
- SK
- AndyM
September 19, 2014 at 4:09 pm -
Does anyone know the total number of 16-17 year olds voting? I’m trying to find the percentage yes/no split for those 18 and over
- Moor Larkin
September 19, 2014 at 4:14 pm -
Radio 4 last night seemed to be chunnering about 75% oldies said Nae and the kids said Aye by the same sort of margin. I’m not sure the actual breakdown can be known other than by polling.
- Justin
September 19, 2014 at 5:37 pm -
I haven’t checked this, but I think yesterday the beeb said it was 100,000.
- AndyM
September 19, 2014 at 6:39 pm -
Thanks Justin – it doesn’t make so much difference – roughly 56% to 44% excluding those who are not deemed responsible enough to drink, fight for one’s country etc etc.
- AndyM
- Moor Larkin
- Peter Raite
September 19, 2014 at 5:30 pm -
Can’t quickly find figures for Scotland, but in the UK as a whole 16.6% of the population is aged over 65, while only 6.3 is aged 15-19, suggesting the 16 & 17 years probably only account for 2.5%.
- Moor Larkin
- Moley
September 19, 2014 at 3:24 pm -
Look up Sean Connery on Scottish independence on YouTube.
- Mudplugger
September 19, 2014 at 5:28 pm -
No doubt that loyal nationalist Connery would have turned up for the count, except he’s probably used up all this year’s limit of tax-exile days in the UK already.
- Mudplugger
- Engineer
September 19, 2014 at 3:33 pm -
Well, that’s a relief – the Union holds. Now we need to reduce (or preferably eliminate) the influence of the dead hand of EU bureaucracy over the peoples of the Union, and thrash out a fairer settlement between the four nations. Then we can get back to being one of the most positive and constructive contributors to the wider world.
Interesting times indeed.
- binao
September 19, 2014 at 10:10 pm -
My question is: why should any person, any parish, district, county or country be treated differently within Britain?
I have no trouble with special measures for areas with unusual or disproportionate problems, but we have outrageously different arrangements in terms of direct representation (thanks petulant Clegg), and structures.
Not much point ‘giving tax raising powers’ either if they are not balanced by shrinking the centre. Why add more taxes?I really don’t think Cameron has the time, power or the will to sort all this out, and being totally in thrall to Brussels won’t help.
A real chance for someone with drive, energy & ideas to reform Britain for the future.
Nobody inspiring in sight though.
Even MT wasn’t up to it.
- binao
- Ellen Coulson
September 19, 2014 at 3:50 pm -
I hope the cost of all of this was borne by Scotland not us poor tax payers this side of the border.
- Moor Larkin
September 19, 2014 at 4:20 pm -
Daen’t be silly ye wee bairn
The Holyrood Building Project was funded using conventional public funding arrangements for major Scottish capital projects – that is to say, it was funded from the Scottish Consolidated Fund, also known as the Block Grant.
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/help/61877.aspxwikileaks: In 2010-2011, Westminster paid a block grant of £26.8 billion.
- Moor Larkin
- Cloudberry
September 19, 2014 at 4:09 pm -
Love the poem!
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cartoon/2014/sep/17/steve-bell-cartoon-scottish-independence-yes-vote-alex-salmond
Check out the comments from those who refuse to get the joke. - JimmyGiro
September 19, 2014 at 5:42 pm -
This week’s buzzword of ‘independence’, will be replaced by the phrase ‘Barnett formula’, as our ‘generous’ Sassanach leaders have promised the north even more than their customary £1623 per head extra of UK Government funding.
Just how many Mars bars do they need?
- binao
September 19, 2014 at 9:33 pm -
Isn’t the wider & more serious problem the failure of Eurozone members to adopt the same kind of principles as that of the derided Barnett formula?
i.e. instead of lending to the less competitive/productive euro states, the rich boys just donate? Forever?
I can’t see Angela getting German agreement to that; so it’s obvious what’s going to happen.
Just think, the English have had the answer all along but the sprouts won’t be going for it.
- binao
- obligato
September 19, 2014 at 6:08 pm -
Latest news – Salmond after being gutted has been canned …..
- Jonathan Mason
September 19, 2014 at 6:09 pm -
Sammond has resigned! Cameron should now give him a peerage as a consolation prize if the Queen does not demand his execution.
- JimmyGiro
September 19, 2014 at 6:22 pm -
If it were a knighthood, with sword in hand, she could do both!
- Moor Larkin
September 19, 2014 at 6:24 pm
- JimmyGiro
- The Slog
September 19, 2014 at 6:43 pm -
Better than Burns and funnier than McGonagle. Excellent stuff.
Twas in the year 2014
when Bonnie Scots did vent their spleen
and tell the Camerons where to go
by somehow voting f**king No. - Carol42
September 19, 2014 at 6:55 pm -
Just glad it’s all over, as a Scot living in England I hated the idea of my family living in what would be a foreign country. Hopefully we will get a bit of peace know while they try to sort out how to make their rash promises work .
- Frankie
September 19, 2014 at 9:13 pm -
‘…as a Scot living in England I hated the idea of my family living in what would be a foreign country.’
It IS a foreign country.
Not a bad one, as it ‘appens. I think that the Scots have done us all a massive favour having this referendum – they have reminded the feeble that their vote is a powerful thing, not something to be squandered, much less not used. Would that we could inject just a little of that enthusiasm into the General Election next year. Get the political types ‘bricking it’ for a change… change the rules and the oh, so predictable and tedious outcome.
As for Salmond, I can only say that the thought of that awful man failing in his life’s dream and receiving what I believe he said at the end of his press conference was ‘a fair kick in the balls’ (I would sleep out for a month on Britain’s shittiest street for that opportunity) is Schadenfreude Max!
Salmond deserves a consolation prize, not a knighthood or peerage. Something like an all expenses paid hangliding holiday… over Afghanistan.
- Frankie
- Carol42
September 19, 2014 at 6:56 pm -
Missed that reply button again! Sometimes I hate the IPad
- Cascadian
September 19, 2014 at 6:57 pm -
The neverendum begins, English taxpayers will be funding a never-ending wishlist of jock desires, the parasite is firmly attached to your teat. Camoron’s announcement never mentioned scrapping Barnett, only increased welfare and taxation powers.
An opportunity missed.
- Mudplugger
September 19, 2014 at 9:17 pm -
Just like any addict – keep giving them their drug of choice for free and they’ll keep coming back for more. ‘Cold Turkey’ (or haggis) sounds a better idea to me.
- Mudplugger
- Jonathan Mason
September 19, 2014 at 7:38 pm -
No, now that Scotland has rejected the chance to go solo, this is time to cut subsidies to Scotland, if any,and treat it just the same as the rest of the UK. If Glasgow wishes to form a small independent republic, then let it. There are numerous smaller nations on the planet, for example Luxembourg (about the same population as Glasgow), Monaco, Andorra, Lichtenstein, Bahrain, Cyprus, Fiji, etc.
- Moor Larkin
September 19, 2014 at 7:56 pm -
18:54 – BBC World Service reporting from George Square, Glasgow. Apparently they’re having a bit of a Scottish Autumn in the Square just now.
- Cascadian
September 19, 2014 at 8:58 pm -
Most of those listed have a nodding acquaintance with how banking, taxation and investment works, do you believe Glasgow possesses any of those qualifications? Or would it be the next super-benefits haven drawing its wealth from who-knows-where?
- Moor Larkin
- Ho Hum
September 19, 2014 at 9:34 pm -
Been at the kids all week. D-i-L is working at the local food bank dealing with some of the individuals referred their way – you don’t just get to walk in the door
Like the mentally ill lady who has had her benefits sanctioned because she failed to go for an interview on the day her sister died suddenly. Try getting that reversed easily in her circs. You want to take away whatever else she might have? Certainly sounds as if it might be OK with you
BTW, this is in England. Maybe you could just have them put down instead…
- Lucozade
September 20, 2014 at 1:26 am -
The celebrations were in full swing in Glasgow George square about an hour ago:
- Wigner’s Friend
September 20, 2014 at 12:26 pm -
The Salmond and the Darling were fighting for the crown,
The Salmond beat the Darling all around the town.
Some offered devo and others offered max,
But Gordon offered everything and England pays the tax. - Ho Hum
September 20, 2014 at 4:08 pm -
Wid some po’er the giftie’d gied him
Tae see himsel as ithirs see’d him
T’wad frae mony a blunder freed him
An’ t’ foolish nation
Fit airs ‘n dress ‘n gait wid lae th’m
……
‘n e’en t’ Sassenach’s bitchin’ for e’er mair,
Moor and moor, plugged oan an’ oan
Time wi’oot end
amen ‘n amenMy Humblest Apologies to Rabbie
- Wigner’s Friend
September 20, 2014 at 4:40 pm -
Very good. Of course, in the first line in the second verse one could replace “Sassenach” with “Jock” depending on which “other” is doing the seeing.
- Wigner’s Friend
- Ho Hum
September 20, 2014 at 5:02 pm -
Fit ane ‘a thae chiels fit bide un’nr Carlisle wid say ‘ithirs’?
And, for completeness, ‘Sassenach’ is written to reflect present day common use, not its original meaning
(The pedantry exhibited is my just making sure that I maintain my role here as leading contender for the ‘Sanctimonious Twat of the Day’ Award)
- Peter Melia
September 23, 2014 at 11:54 pm -
A wonderful, and illuminating rhyme, Ms Racoon, but am I alone in being churlish about being disappointed that the author of the verse which inspired you, so brilliantly, was not mentioned, en passant?
{ 54 comments… read them below or add one }