The Wolf in Sheikh's Clothing.
http://www.georgegalloway.com/fakesheikhthepictures.html
There is a fine line between the use of subterfuge and the act of entrapment in the journalistic world. It is the thin ice at the edge of the ‘juicy story’ pond – one false step, two much weight in one direction, and you get dumped in the icy water of ‘spending more time with your family’.
Mazher Mahmood, once hailed by one of his employers as a ‘senior investigative reporter’, will be lingering over his coffee and croissants this morning, his fake jellaba hanging in the hallway; the only thing that lies ahead of him this fine morning is a lengthy session with his solicitor – his latest antics may well end in perjury charges.
I have not had a lot of sympathy with the political bunfight that has been the left wing’s attempt to punish the Murdoch press for changing its political allegiance – the so called ‘hacking scandal’. Too many fine old school journalists have been hung out to dry on lengthy and demoralising police bail; mortgages have gone unpaid, marriages disintegrated under the strain – and their seats taken by young regional journalists who only know how to regurgitate a press release. We have been left with a despicable media that is mistrusted.
All over a practice that I have always felt instinctively they would neither have disclosed to their superiors – a journalist’s alleged ‘contacts’ are one of the main reasons they are employed by the main stream media; perfecting their prose, and spelling is the job of the sub-editors – nor would they have seen it as any more of a crime than many of us would should we be told by a friend that the cash machine in the petrol station would disgorge a full tank of petrol if fed a defunct oyster card instead of your debit card; we would know it was theft, but the element of ‘more fool them’ for allowing it to occur would soon overtake the most honest citizen.
Mazher Mahmood’s antics were different – and I am heartily glad that he has been stopped in his tracks by a perspicuous judge. It should have happened a long time ago; there have been warnings aplenty.
Mazher grew up in a journalistic household; he was the son of two prominent journalists – is it relevant that they practised their trade in their native Pakistan? I don’t know. Perhaps when you have to untangle the corruption that is Pakistani political shenanigans, there is an element of ‘the end justifies the means’.
Birmingham-born Mahmood, 44, says that if he wasn’t a journalist he would perhaps be in the police force, but that with both parents working as journalists he never imagined doing anything else.
Certainly Mazher employed tactics new to the British school of journalism. He didn’t wait for information that something newsworthy had occurred and dutifully report it; he dangled ever juicier carrots in front of those who might be corrupt – or debatably – corruptible, and reported on the results.
It was that element of ‘might be corruptible’ that has led him to stand accused off ‘entrapment’ today.
The trial of the singer and TV entertainer Tulisa Contostavlos over drugs allegations has dramatically collapsed after the judge ruled that the Sun investigative reporter whose evidence was central to the case had seemingly lied on oath.
In scathing comments with potentially significant repercussions for Mazher Mahmood, the veteran undercover reporter often known as the “fake sheikh”, Judge Alistair McCreath said he believed Mahmood had lied in the witness stand.
Mahmood has since been suspended by his employers.
Despite Mazher’s claims of ‘260 successful criminal prosecutions’ as a result of his methods – a claim refuted by veteran reporter Paddy French, the solicitors employed by the Leveson inquiry could only track down 94 – there has been a trail of expensive ‘unsuccessful prosecutions’ along with some damaging ‘sideswipes’ by the judges involved.
Mazher’s career started by flogging a story to the News of the World exposing some family friends who were selling pirate videos; he moved onto flogging tittle-tattle to other Sunday tabloids, eventually gaining a foothold at the Sunday Times.
Whilst at the Sunday Times, then under the news editorship of Roy Greenslade, he covered up an error in a story by amending a computer file, purportedly to show that the error originated with the news agency supplying the copy. Had he not resigned, he would have been dismissed for ‘gross impropriety‘ – it would be fair to say that Roy Greenslade, an old school journalist himself, has never missed an opportunity since to expose the ‘Fake Sheikh’s’ questionable cavorting.
Murdoch was loyal to the man who fed his audience’s appetite for salacious gossip of ‘B’ list celebrities. He sent him across the Wapping highway to the News of the World, when that closed, then onto The Sun on Sunday. He had a budget that allowed him to generously wine and dine celebrities and minor aristocracy who were clinging to the edges of supporting their ‘jet-set’ lifestyle, dangling promises of untold riches in front of them as he portrayed himself as a wealthy Arab about to transport them to financial Nirvana.
Would the Earl of Hardwicke have bought Cocaine the night Mazher took him to the Savoy Hotel to ‘sign a £100,000 deal’ with his struggling Scooter franchise without Mazher’s encouragement? The Jury didn’t think so:
They pondered over their verdict for seven hours and when they eventually returned last Wednesday they handed the judge a note: “Had we been allowed to take the extreme provocation into account we would undoubtedly have reached a different verdict.”
The judge told them: “Were it not for that elaborate sting you would not, I accept, have committed these particular offences.”
He then added: “Journalists in general, and those involved in this case in particular, should carefully examine and consider their approach to investigations where it involves no police participation, or indeed until after the trap has been sprung and the story reported in the press.”
The actor John Allford, was also jailed for supply cocaine to the Fake Sheikh; in that case the Judge said:
“You were undoubtedly motivated by the desire to earn even more money than you were earning as a successful actor, believing you would be opening a nightclub in Dubai.
“There was a strong element of entrapment but you willingly went along with the idea. You had plenty of opportunity when you left to fetch these drugs to distance yourself from it.”
Mazher didn’t just target the ‘link-bait’ celebrities who were prepared to buy cocaine for him and portray them as ‘drug dealers’ to a salivating audience on Sunday morning; he worked with a bizarre Kosovan parking attendant with a history of mental illness, Florim Gashi, who was later deported from Britain, to set up some of his most famous ‘stings’. Amongst them the ‘fake kidnap’ of Victoria Beckham – for which five men spent many months in jail before the prosecution collapsed over the ‘unreliability of the main witness’:
The judge said he was minded to refer the whole matter to the Attorney General “to consider the temptations that money being offered in return for stories concerning celebrities give rise to”.
Later Gashi admitted “I am responsible for innocent people going to jail. I tricked them, and I’m ashamed. It’s time to tell the truth.” He says he persuaded people, usually immigrants from his own Albanian background engaged in petty crime, to commit high-profile crimes that would be newsworthy enough to please Mahmood and his NoW bosses.
We have policemen who want to be journalists – and journalists who want to be policemen.
What we need are policemen who investigate genuine crimes and journalists who report factual news.
The jellaba clad ‘Fake Sheikh’ had been ‘hiding in plain sight’ all these years; engendering an atmosphere in the media that it didn’t matter how you got your story, nor whether it was factually true – so long as it sold papers. When they ran out of ‘B’ list celebrities that could be entrapped into producing a story – they started on dead celebrities.
Eventually we had the news dominated by a failed policeman – Mark Williams-Thomas – lauded as an ‘investigative journalist’ for ‘having the courage’ to libel a dead ‘B’ list celebrity as a paedophile.
Untold millions have been expended on the Leveson Inquiry, the Savile inquiries, the failed prosecutions. Now Tulisa Contostavlos’ solicitors will go looking for damages – and every penny of this will be paid for by the British public one way or another.
Wapping’s Augean Stables should have been cleared out years ago – starting with Mazher Mahmood.
We deserve better.
- Truthsayer
July 22, 2014 at 12:09 pm -
A knowingly false complaint to the police, if malice can be proven, can give rise to claim in damages for malicious defamation because it is not protected by the duty-interest form of qualified privilege. Therefore if Tulisa can prove malice then it follows she may be able to sue the Sheikh for libel. A year’s lost earnings at music industry A-List rates. Where the perpetrator is acting on behalf of an employer it is sometimes possible that the employer may be vicariously liable. So it might not be the public who pay.
On another note, have a read of the tweets that have been sent to you about ‘bulk’ Deprivation of Liberty.
- GildasTheMonk
July 22, 2014 at 12:15 pm -
Thank you for that Anna. I was wondering what to say about this story. This chap seems a thoroughly bad apple, and set up a young woman with promises of millions, if only she could persuade some one to get hold of half a gram of something for him. Well done judge and congrats to Tulisa, who actually seems quite talented to me, and has worked her way up from a rough estate to become a talented performer and a good business woman
I hope he gets a taste of his own medicine - Moor Larkin
July 22, 2014 at 12:20 pm -
We have policemen who want to be journalists – and journalists who want to be policemen.
What we need are policemen who investigate genuine crimes and journalists who report factual news.Worthy of Lord Hailsham, author of the Dilemma of Democracy.
“It will end in a rigid economic plan, and, I believe, in a siege economy, a curbed and subservient judiciary, and a regulated press. It will impose uniformity on the whole nation in the interest of what it claims as social justice. It will insist on equality. It will distrust all forms of eccentricity and distinction. It will crush local autonomy. It will dictate the structure, form and content of education. It may tolerate, but will certainly do its best to corrupt or destroy religion. It will depend greatly on caucuses or cadres to exert it’s will. Some will be directly appointed by patronage as in the increasing numbers of ‘Quangos’. Others will be elected by a tiny minority of dedicated activists and apparatchiks relying on the apathy of the rest as a passport to office. This is already happening in some unions and local authorities. It will worship material values, but not succeed in producing material plenty. When its policies fail, it will rely strongly on class divisions or scapegoats to distract attention from it’s failure.”
http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/the-undemocratic-truth.html- erichardcastlte
July 22, 2014 at 12:30 pm -
Is it just me or does ‘eccentricity’ seem to be vanishing from British life or increasingly being viewed as suspect?
- Fat Steve
July 22, 2014 at 3:13 pm -
@erichardcastle
Eccentricity
1. unconventional or irregular behaviour
2. (Mathematics) deviation from a circular path or orbit.
I reckon its alive and well though living quietly away from the morons who spend their lives spinning in circular motion around the gravitational pull of main stream media and main stream politics. My evidence for so believing ? the web predominantly with its many fine non mainstream sites such as this (there are a surprising number in the USA ) and perhaps that Society hasn’t yet totally imploded which I suspect would be the outcome if there were no eccentrics and everyone was drawn in in ever decreasing circles to the present centre of ‘Society’
- Fat Steve
- EyesWideShut
July 22, 2014 at 12:46 pm -
Interesting quote. It’s obvious from the context that Hailsham thought this state of affairs was going to come about as a result of the imposition of doctrinaire socialism in the UK. The irony is, all govts including and especially those wedded to Neo-Liberalism have produced something similar. All roads lead to Rome, lol!
I do however agree that it is fundamentally a crisis of democracy. I think Thomas Jefferson said no ignorant people could ever be free: you can’t have a democracy without unfettered access to information and an attitude of testing what you are told. What frightens the bejaysus out of me is that everything we get from the media now, whether nonsense about paedophile conspiracies or banging the war drum to take down Putin, is all spun to hell and back. You should always watch out when every mainstream outlet is saying the same thing and repeating it ad nauseam to get it through our thick heads that this is reality, this is what we should believe and anyone who thinks differently or even dares to question where they are getting their facst from or if they are facts at all is a no-account contrarian, traitor, secret pervert, whatever.
- Johnny Monroe
July 22, 2014 at 7:58 pm -
I saw something the other week (granted, online, so I can’t vouch for its authenticity) that North Korean state television were reporting the national team had progressed to the World Cup Final. I don’t think they even qualified! But is there much difference at the moment between the broadcasting tricks of a totalitarian regime and a free media in a free country that reports the same point of view over and over again with little room for voices that dissent from the consensus?
- Johnny Monroe
- erichardcastlte
- erichardcastlte
July 22, 2014 at 12:23 pm -
” Therefore if Tulisa can prove malice “. Surely Tulisa has a case against The Sun who encouraged and aided the ‘Sheik’.
Point taken with Ms Raccon and the ‘left’s’ pursuit of Murdoch (especially that goat Tom Watson) but Rupert’s rags in Australia have been utterly appalling in their pursuit of Julia Gillard & Kevin Rudd and their right-wing Labor Party.
I get the feeling Mr Murdoch is almost manipulating events so he has a whole island continent as a bolt hole in case the UK & US get serious about him.- Moor Larkin
July 22, 2014 at 1:18 pm -
Isn’t the idea of an “evil genius” somewhat redundant, given his clearly fading powers as he has aged. Going by the debacle that developed over the NotW, what seems to exist is the classic “No2” scenario. Each No2 thinks they know how best to please No1, whilst No1 is never seen by anyone else and nobody else has any idea where he is, or even what he is doing anymore. But everybody thinks they know who he is.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/posts/rupert_murdoch_-_a_portrait_of_1
- Moor Larkin
- Chris
July 22, 2014 at 12:25 pm -
How Mahmood survived and thrived the Hacking/Leveson backlash beggars belief – he symbolised everything that was wrong with tabloid journalism and the declining standards – yet throughout the ADHD “public reaction” to HackingGate, before during and after, there he was entrapping people who really are – like the present demonised ‘elite’ elderly & dead entertainers – clearly just ‘working class made good’.
And within months of Leveson, it was not only ‘business as usual’ but ramped up beyond anything that had come before – and this time all the previously warring parties caught up in recent scandals – politicians, lobby groups, wannabe hacks, police, courts and CPS made sure they were all singing from the hymn sheet.- Cascadian
July 23, 2014 at 4:01 am -
Pure and simple, ……..the race card was played.
Leveson was all about pale and male wrongdoing.
- Cascadian
- English Pensioner
July 22, 2014 at 12:51 pm -
There are few real journalists these days. If they don’t want to be news-makers, they want to be opinion formers, particularly when on TV. These days, it seems to be virtually impossible to get the real news, the hard facts, from any of the major media outlets. When you add to this the fact that those making the news are also adding their own spin, it is difficult to determine the real situation.
Gone are the days of the old fashioned reporter whose sole aim was to provide the facts and who would dig until he got them. You never had any idea what his own personal views might be, he just concentrated on providing facts.
Gone are the days when the major newspapers provided facts, and any opinions were confined to the editorial column or articles. TV news is a now mixture of facts and opinions and it is hard to find the real truth.
So I rarely buy a newspaper and just listen listen to the headlines of the TV news. If I am interested in any of the subjects mentioned, the internet is the best, as one can read a variety of sources and hopefully get a reasonably accurate overall picture.- jonseer
July 22, 2014 at 1:29 pm -
Well now E.P. Can you or anyone tell me the difference between a journalist & a reporter ? Thanks in anticipation.
- Ho Hum
July 22, 2014 at 7:33 pm -
The first has eyes that cannot see, the second ears that cannot hear. But both have mouths with a propensity to scream at you whatever will make them money
- Ho Hum
- jonseer
- Duncan Disorderly
July 22, 2014 at 12:59 pm -
Even if his case was watertight, why was he allowed to spend lavish sums of the Sun on Sunday’s money to persuade an A-fading-to-B list celebrity (she had already left the X-Factor) to purloin a few grams of cocaine? Who really cares? It’s not as though any great crime would be uncovered by a leading politician.
Also, there seems to have been a great controversy over pictures of his face. Apparently George Galloway successfully took him to court to lift an injunction on showing his face:
http://www.duchessofhackney.com/2014/07/21/im-surprised-no-one-has-taken-out-the-scumbag-mazher-mahmood/- Duncan Disorderly
July 22, 2014 at 3:13 pm -
This is an interesting article:
http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/55972.article“It appears perverse that, while the law protects against the state causing citizens to commit illegal acts, it does not protect against private parties doing the same thing, where often the participation of the private ‘entrapper’ goes beyond that which would be deemed appropriate by law enforcement officers. Many newspapers stings involve an expensive and targeted campaign on one individual, based on limited or no intelligence, where the inducement is persistent and the primary incentive is to sell newspapers, not to prevent crime.”
- Duncan Disorderly
- Gil
July 22, 2014 at 3:52 pm -
According to IMDb, the policeman turned investigative journalist had presented 2 documentaries before the October 2012 exposés, otherwise advising 46 police dramas, including 36 episodes of Waking the Dead.
The victim mentioned in the second para here (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/jimmy-savile/9623803/Jimmy-Savile-Newsnight-producer-is-nephew-of-abuse-school-headmistress.html) shares a name with someone listed on this casting agency page (http://www.ordinarypeople.co.uk/_d-base/PDF/OPBook%20Female.pdf). The Daily Mail article about a fake letter that it said played a key role in the BBC decision to ditch its Newsnight investigation doesn’t seem to have been followed up.
- Ian B
July 22, 2014 at 3:55 pm -
Were the popular press ever any different? WT Stead famously started the ball rolling with his faked kidnap of a girl for prostitution, “The Maiden Tribute Of Babylon”. And I am reminded of Orson Welles- who upset Hearst mightily with Citizen Kane- telling of how the Hearst press secreted an underage girl in his hotel room, cameras waiting, a sting he avoided because a policeman warned him not to return to the hotel.
The reality in my view is that this form of the press are scum and always have been. We might have found it in some sense amusing when the News Of The Screws revealed a new naughty vicar every sunday. We might enjoy the titillation of the display of the feet of clay of others. Paul Dacre claims it is an essential job of “shaming” to keep society on the straight and narrow. I don’t agree. I think they’re shitheads, and anyone who knowingly works in this industry is a shithead.
The current celebrity paedohysteria is the end result of decades- generations indeed- of the tabloid press generating a culture of bringing down public figures to sell newspapers. It has escalated to the highest degree now, moving up from improprieties to crimen exceptum. It seems to me that this is ultimately down to the nature of the puritanism that infects our society. A puritan is somebody who makes a big fuss about improving morals, but I don’t believe they really want to. They are really somebody who enjoys wallowing endlessly in filth, and if they can’t find any real filth, they just invent it. Nothing terrifies a puritan more than the prospect of a genuniely “cleaned up” society. They’d be out of a hobby, or a job. They’d have no filth to wallow in.
It does not reflect well on us as a people that we have fostered this by buying these tawdry rags.
- Moor Larkin
July 22, 2014 at 4:09 pm -
Somebody remarked the other day to the effect, how could we still believe in “the police” after “Hillsborough”. I was more wont to ejaculate, how could we still believe in The Sun after “Hillsborough”. I still cannot believe how The Sun gotta way wiv it. Must be down to that education, educashun, edukayshun I heard about once, in a parallel universe, long long ago.
- Engineer
July 22, 2014 at 10:37 pm -
It’s never been any different, though, has it? About two decades ago, the generally-held view in the large design office I worked in was that nobody bought The Sun to read, they bought it to look at the pictures. (On the few occasions I have ‘read’ The Sun, I found it didn’t take very long – about five minutes if I really dragged it out.)
Don’t underestimate the general pleb-in-the-street. The phrase “don’t believe everything you read in the papers” has not been common currency for as long as anybody can remember without good reason.
You cannot hope to bribe or twist
Thank God! the British journalist.
But, seeing what the man will do
Unbribed, there’s no occasion to.(Humbert Wolfe, 1930)
- guthrie
July 23, 2014 at 11:40 am -
The sports sections of tabloids are the ones where the shift workers in the factory I worked in spent most time. Page 3 was there for a bit of passing titillation, the ‘news’ for a few factoids and that was about it. People often overlook the importance of the sports section in reporting the football, horse racing, snooker etc, in driving sales of a ‘newspaper’.
(Meanwhile the slow corrosive effect of the dodgy factoids builds up on the readers, so even if they claim not to believe what they read they still end up regurgitating them)
- Moor Larkin
July 23, 2014 at 11:48 am -
I recall a comment on another post where someone remarked they only bought The Times nowadays because it had such good sports writers.
- guthrie
July 23, 2014 at 11:32 pm -
Exactly. So why does anyone buy the Telegraph?
I’m sure there’s some interesting research to be done looking at why people buy the newspapers they do, maybe I’ll go looking for it.- Mr Wray
July 26, 2014 at 4:31 pm -
I used to buy the Torygraph (pre-internet) because it was the best written of the broadsheets and was a good counterpoint to the BBC. Today, probably due to the Internet, it has sunk to depths beyond which I’m not prepared to tolerate. It’s slowly dipping towards the standard the Grauniad was at 30 years ago.
Now if you really want a laugh read the Guardian. Apparently Thomas the Tank Engine is a racist!
- Mr Wray
- guthrie
- Moor Larkin
- guthrie
- Engineer
- Moor Larkin
- Jonathan Mason
July 22, 2014 at 6:43 pm -
British journalism is worse than the US. Even in completely factual events like the World Cup, Wimbledon, test matches or the Open golf the UK press would rather report in moral terms than just relay the facts, as if each reporter is a management consultant in the sport concerned.
- Engineer
July 22, 2014 at 10:22 pm -
I don’t think that’s universally true. There are some well-respected sports journalists, and always have been. Scyld Berry comes to mind, for example. You couldn’t imagine the late and much lamented Christopher Martin-Jenkins working to anything but the highest journalistic standards.
- Jonathan Mason
July 22, 2014 at 11:59 pm -
But Berry subcribes to the cricket as morality trope. Most recent article is titled Ballance is master of old English virtues. Balance, of course is an immigrant from Africa as are most of the supposedly English team. My headline would be African Tyke Tips Scales England’s Way.
- Engineer
July 23, 2014 at 12:37 pm -
It’s hardly a major journalistic sin compared to Mahmood’s approach, though. If all you want are straight facts, you could confine your reading to just the scorecard.
- Jonathan Mason
July 23, 2014 at 11:58 pm -
Yes, but all the UK sports journalists fancy themselves as moralists without giving any real insight into the sports. No, they are not running scams, but they are not doing much reporting either. In US sports reporting you never get this stuff about old-fashioned log-cabin virtues.
- Jonathan Mason
- Engineer
- Jonathan Mason
- Engineer
- Lisboeta
July 22, 2014 at 7:47 pm -
Unbiased, factual, in-depth news reporting seems to have gone the way of the dinosaurs.
A propos of which, the sorry state of the BBC nowadays dismays me. I’m a long-term expat., and the BBC World Service used to be the preferred channel for expats and indigenous alike in places where local “news” consisted merely of the daily doings of the King/Emir/President. It was the BBC World Service that told us the truth about events (or unrest) in the country — and in enough languages to reach the ordinary people.
I was in UK recently and visited a friend there (a naturalised Brit, and one happy with his adopted domicile). He told me that, in order to get anything near a balanced view of current events, he now watches BBC, CNN, Al Jezira and Russian TV — and then goes online to find out more background. And he’s just an ordinary man-in-the-street, not an intellectual. I can’t help but wonder how many native British are that assiduous in their quest for facts?
My sister lives in UK and is neither uneducated nor unintelligent: she’s a successful businesswoman. However, her idea of ‘keeping up with the news’ is periodically catching the 5-minute on-the-hour radio snippet, and sometimes watching the evening news on TV. Her curiosity does not take her beyond that.
- Mr Wray
July 26, 2014 at 4:38 pm -
I’m not sure I follow the thrust of this one. Without doubt the ‘fake sheikh’ is a ‘wrong un’ and what he does is thoroughly wrong, if not quite evil; but aren’t those he targets guilty too? Surely if a mate of mine asks me to help him kidnap Victoria Beckham I should tell him not to be so stupid and not pitch in with an offer to drive the van? The fact that my mate is motivated by a need to please a journalist rather than a need for cash is neither here nor there?
{ 33 comments… read them below or add one }