Never Mind Scrapping Cable, Scrap The Whole Department
I am not going to rehearse again in these pages my own particular tussles with the DTI/BERR/BIS that are now entering their fifth year, but needless to say any organisation that refuses to accept that French companies can have foreign shareholders, and refuses to accept that subsidiaries form part of a consolidated balance sheet, you cannot have a logical argument with.
As with Cable yesterday Business,Innovation & Skills makes its mind up first then adjusts reality to fit the decision. Refusal to accept the decision will entail personal bankruptcy for the small businessmen and catastrophic financial consequences for larger enterprises.
Cable in the section I listened to yesterday has a quasi-judicial role at BIS, in what other sphere of justice do you have a ‘Judge’ declaring war on the applicant or the defendant in a case, and being allowed to keep his job ? The other telling phrase is ‘I cannot politicise this issue, because there are legal implications’ then proceeded to spew out his bile against Murdoch.
Today, I see that Ed Davey has been recorded as well as his still boss. This is a man who has admitted that he found my particular case ‘complicated ‘ and difficult to understand. The commercial ignorance and overt politicisation of an organisation that is anti business to its very public sector core, whilst professing to be for promoting British Industry is breathtaking.
Free Marketeer Sir Nicholas Ridley, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry back in the 1980s, was one of the first in that office to wonder in public what the DTI was actually for.His solution is to abolish the post. Sadly Ridley died before he could put this into action. 15 years later, new Conservative leader Michael Howard appeared still not to have found the answer.
If the Conservatives are to lay claim to being the party of business, they ought at least to pretend to be interested in the wealth-creating sector. This is one Ministry that should have been reduced or abolished, it should certainly have not been handed over to the Social Democrats whose penchant for regulation matches that of the Labour Party.
There is no point Cameron expecting the Private sector to take up the slack of laying off public sector workers, when the nationalised banks come under BIS and Cable and are just not making vital loans to industry to allow recovery to pick up momentum. BIS is acting as it is some form of third police force, and is indeed allegedly recruiting retired policemen to beef up its activities against business, with the lucrative fines that it entails. One in seven Finance firms are looking to move to Guernsey, Jersey or Switzerland, HSBC is reviewing whether it should be headquartered in London. Not a ringing endorsement of the business environment in Britain. It is Private industry that creates real jobs not fake jobs as under Brown in the public sector.
This is another function that ought to be stripped away from Cable and given to the Treasury if there has to be regulation.
The shambles over tuition fees should be returned to County Councils and away from the Social Democrats centralising instincts.
DTI/BERR/BIS or whatever it is called this week has a terrible history.
The saga of Matrix Churchill where a nod and wink from one part of the DTI as to export licences to Iraq, was not relayed to Customs and excise who prosecuted the Directors, who faced jail. It was only when Alan Clark admitted being ‘economical with the actualitie’ did the Directors walk free. However the skills and the business had been lost.
Appointing Peter Mandelson over the mega-department that took upon itself the role of ensuring the probity of the business environment was a joke too far. His demands that the Directors of the Phoenix Consortium be investigated by the fraud squad, who politely declined. The skewed report that removed the Labour Party’s political interference from the narrative was farcical. Finally he demanded that the Directors be banned ‘forever’ from being directors on public TV.
This Department has aspirations to direct and run British Industry from a Whitehall Ministry run by just one man. This is Government control of the means of production by another route. Clause four never went away.
The fact that Cameron has allowed Cable to stay in post, where a Tory would have been out on his ear is a testament to the weakness of political resolve in Coalition.
-
December 22, 2010 at 10:33 -
Heseltine (Michael H. as he then was) started out in the right direction by adopting the correct name for the post : President of the Board of Trade.
One knew from its title what the Board was for. Certainly it had been incompetent over the years in many of its tasks — e.g. in the regulation of shipping, leading to the unnecessary loss of life aboard Titanic — but it was nowhere near as bad as its polyonymous successor.
ΠΞ
-
December 22, 2010 at 13:03 -
In the late 1960′s there was a TV programme “The Power Game” much of which was about businessmen being obliged to defer to and gain agreement of civil servants to develope and invest. This followed two decades of significant government intervention in the planning, investment and organisational needs of much of industry and commerce. One feature of this was to move work away from areas doing to well to areas with problems. Inevitably, this came to be governed by entirely short term political needs. It was a major feature of the disasters experienced by so much of British industry in the period. The firm at which my father worked went from being a world leader to broke almost entirely as a result of government direction of its location and investment policies.
-
December 22, 2010 at 14:40 -
But the department concerned with Business,Innovation & Skills is doing exactly what’s on the tin – it is controlling business, innovation and skills. Control always means regulate. You surely don’t expect they might encourage do you?
-
December 22, 2010 at 19:15 -
One must ask how much would be saved if the entire department was simply scrapped and all the meddlers therein put out to grass. That would save us a fortune surely, because there would be no-one around to boilerplate all the draft EUSSR directives to make them twice as difficult to comply with in this country as in any other in the putative superstate.
{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }