Watching you, watching me, not watching ‘them’…..
I watched the news last night in utter bewilderment as a Chief Constable wrung his hands and pleaded for forgiveness – for having installed 200 CCTV cameras in what was described as a ‘Muslim’ area.
There are estimated to be around 4.2 million CCTV cameras spying on every action by the British people – they are even installed in public toilets. According to these figures, that works out at around 1 camera for every 14 citizens, and I have never before heard of any apology for this travesty of our privacy.
What precisely ‘is’ a Muslim area? If it an area that non-Muslims are excluded from? Is it an area that the British police have no right to be policing? Is it an area where ‘community leaders’ are the final arbiter of whether the inhabitants are subject to British law?
I don’t agree with any of the CCTV cameras, they are a creepy infringement of our basic right to privacy – but given that we have 4.2 million of them – I am incensed that any particular group of colour, religion, sex or politics, should be able to demand that they be removed, and not only removed, but extract a hand wringing apology for having put them there in the first place.
Innocent new Fathers and Mothers are routinely monitored by the all seeing eyes, because the occasional new born infant has been snatched from a maternity unit; innocent micurators are watched as they dribble, lest some small child be molested; decent and honest shoppers scrutinised to mitigate the loss from the occasional professional shoplifter; school children gazed upon as they eat; invigilators keep watch over passing motorists, for fear a known criminal might pass along their stretch of the motorway – yet the city which produced Parviz Kahn and his deadly plot to behead a British soldier; the city which produced Moinul Abedin and his bomb factory, is ‘outraged’ by the cameras and claims that they are targeting Muslims…..an indictment so deadly in the politically correct atmosphere of Muslim appeasement that Great Britain has become, that first the cameras are covered up – then reassuring signs are placed against them saying ‘this camera not in use’ and finally, at great expense, they are removed altogether, and a police chief is sent out into the media mob to grovel and apologise for having installed them in the first place.
Where is the apology to the rest of us? Where is the apology to the new Mothers and Fathers, the school children, the shoppers, those ‘caught short’ in public? Nowhere to be seen.
What is this ‘Muslim area’? Is there a Christian area, or a Buddhist area, or a Homosexual area, that can complain that their ‘uman rights’ are being targeted by the ever present eye of the CCTV cameras?
We should declare the entire country a ‘Libertarian area’ and take ACPO to the European Court of Human Rights for invading our privacy.
-
1
October 1, 2010 at 15:21 -
They’re also bloody useless. Following a recent incident (a serious assault and attempted robbery) CCTV in Bradford – among the UK’s most comprehensive – was unable to identify the assailants or even tell us anything bar their rough age and a guess at ethnicity.
-
2
October 1, 2010 at 15:28 -
OK thats a deal lets sue ACPO for a token £3000 for breaching Article 8 provides a right to respect for one’s “private and family life, his home and his correspondence”,
ACPO are a private limited company who do not enjoy Crown Immunity, they can then be asked for disclosure of their ‘secret funding arrangements’
Any lawyers out their prepared to be a John Adams ?
-
3
October 1, 2010 at 20:08 -
I rather like that idea, but sorry I’m not a lawyer, perhaps a letter could be sent to Cherie..
-
-
4
October 1, 2010 at 16:25 -
ACPO are a complete shower of nulab muppets , bought and paid for with the taxpayers funds and , so I am assured by a propper old time copper and excelent Chief Constable, more common purpose than common purpose.
The reason we have the current hunting act, is because acpo assured blair they would be able to enforce it – no, honestly !!! -
5
October 1, 2010 at 16:40 -
I love the CCTV. It is my only chance to do the Gene Kelly “Dancing In The Rain” routine on camera and the missus and I to do our Old Mother Riley and Kitty tribute act. Lets have more of them and brighten up all our lives.
-
6
October 1, 2010 at 17:26 -
I suspect Voyeurs Anonymous is going to sponsor a CCTV camera in Puttenham. (Your yesterday’s post)
-
7
October 1, 2010 at 19:02 -
I completely agree. Under the guise of the terror threat we are being spied on in a way which – if it had happened in Soviet Russia – we would have derided as the “1984″ society.
-
13
October 1, 2010 at 20:05 -
Perhaps we indigenous can use this Equality Act (that the coalition think is so wonderful) to demand being treated the same way as muslims
-
14
October 2, 2010 at 05:40 -
In a series of debates on socialism published in 1914, John Basil Barnhill said:
“Where the people fear the government you have tyranny.
Where the government fears the people you have liberty.”This would seem to indicate that if your are a caucasian of British origin you live in a tyranny as your Government tends to ignore and abuse you for they have no fear of you, particularly if you follow the bronze age christian viewpoint.
HOWEVER:
If you happen to have a different skin colouring to the norm and practice the medieval concepts of Islam then if by no other means than that the Government panders to you be assured they fear you.
You may practice polygamy in defiance of the law, you may reject surveillance and intimidate the police and you may preach hate and incitement with impunity.John Basil Barnhill was right in his debates on the Left but where are we left with a government which is now ostensibly Right!
Does the doctrine hold true or does it escalate to an even greater level of social fear.Regards,
Greg_L-W. -
15
October 2, 2010 at 12:03 -
I noted with interest that Channel 4 opted to do an interview with a caucasian inhabitant of the area in question protesting about the intrusion and the assumption that all the inhabitants were to be assumed to be terrorists until proved otherwise. These cameras were, moreover, dedicated national security cameras – their footage was not available to the police for non-terrorist crime detection purposes. Way to go, guys.
-
16
October 2, 2010 at 12:11 -
It surprises me not one bit that our politcally correct Police Force appologise to the Islamists. After all our entire government and civic society are populated by weak minded ignorant appeasers who love a story of victimhood. It fits nicely into their self hating world view that all white europeans are oppressors and all ethnic peoples are oppressed.
If the police are going to be looking for plots being hatched by Asian/Arabic Islamic Jihadists to attack the people of the UK then it would be absurd to be looking at areas with the highest population of Asian/Arabic Islamist. Looking in the areas where known terrorists have concregated would be absurd.
This ridiculous appology would never have happened in Northern Ireland.
“Police Chief appologies for carrying our observation of Republican familes in Republican areas of Belfast. They especially wish to appologise for having CCTV camera’s on the “Falls Road” where the IRA have a number of organisations and paramilitary peoples.”
I hope this excuse for a Police Chief is sacked the moment one of these Islamists blows something up.
Want to know more about Islamic deception and teachings then a great place to start is http://www.jihadwatch.org/islam-101.html
-
17
October 2, 2010 at 12:29 -
This reminds me of the complaints from Muslims about the usage of body scanners at airports as being offensive.
Now the scanners were put in place with the single objective of combating terrorist activities perpetuated by Islamic Jihadists who are on the whole funded by Islamic organisations and the Islamic community by way of contributions collected at Mosques and Islamic Governments.
I am not suprised that the victimhood obsessed Islamic “Community Leaders” complained about the installation of devices that “Treat Everyone Equally” and do not distinguish on Race, Colour nor Religion.
They always complain about anything that may stop jihadist attacks but never complain about the jihadist attacks and murder by their fellow Islamists.
-
18
October 4, 2010 at 13:02 -
On a similar subject, I note that the good old unbiased BBC now refers only to “International terrorism” rather than “Islamic terrorism” – is it me, or has this country gone completely bonkers?!
Davina x
{ 18 comments… read them below or add one }