Chav Media.
Admittedly the media in general are having a hard time. The Grauniad’s traditional source of income, all those lovely public sector job adverts, is grinding to a halt. Regional newspapers are in hot competition with local council propaganda puffs as the liner of choice for the budgerigar cage. The Times et al have decided to shed an estimated 90% of their readership and retreat behind a pay wall to share special secrets – shush, don’t tell your Mummy – with their special friends, and the Hell with any notion of informing the general public.
Those media outside of the pay wall are becoming ever more of a niche market. Sky, which I don’t really count as being ‘behind a pay wall’ since even benefits assume a token amount towards the cost, is becoming Chav TV.
They know where their market is, and it is with those individuals who dwell on sink estates and watch day time TV. Hence the wall to wall coverage of anything involving paedophiles, shot guns, or armed robberies. They probably dream of the day when a genuine proven ‘paedo’ – ie, one who can be named publicly and not hide behind coy euphemisms, preferably of immigrant status, holds up the wages van for Buckingham Palace, and is now holed up in the Tower of London with Madeleine McCann held as hostage. Short of Shergar being proven to be Fergie’s secret lover, it is difficult to know where they can go after the coverage of the Raoul Moat affair over the last few days.
Sky have abandoned any notion of balanced reporting, not that they were ever obliged to do so, but they used to cast a nod in the direction of the tax payers who were footing the bill for their other customers. No more. Now we have an interview with Raoul Moat’s brother, during which Raoul’s suicide was described as a ‘public execution’ – one can only assume he meant by the police, since there did not seem to be anyone else present who could reasonably be accused of having ‘executed’ him – without hint of challenge from the interviewer.
The notion that Raoul was a spineless wimp who committed suicide because he couldn’t face another spell in prison with his fellow steroid munchers was never explored.
The same interviewer calmly accepted Angus Moat’s declaration that all Raoul’s troubles stemmed from his Mother who was ‘obviously’ mentally ill for having said he would be better off dead – if Raoul’s Mother was mentally ill and responsible for turning Raoul into a psychotic nutter, did the interviewer not think to ask how come she had simultaneously turned brother Angus into a Tax Inspector, for God’s sake?
The answer is that this would not fit the narrative preferred by Sky customers, who were lapping up the sly innuendos.
Chris Brown, an innocent man murdered in cold blood, was described as ‘blasted as he ran away’……that must have gone down well with the tattooed knuckle brigade – ‘yeah, spineless git, that’ll teach him to mess with our Raoul’s bint while he’s inside’.
Angus also described Raoul as a ‘gentle giant’ who loved animals and children’ – so much so that he kicked seven shades of shite out of one of his own kids – that is why he was in prison, but this was never mentioned, we were left to assume that prison was the only way the authoritarian state could temporarily bring the hard man hero to heel, naturally for nothing he was responsible for.
Raoul himself predicted his suicidal end when he said that he blasted Samantha with a specially chosen bullet that would only leave her scarred for life so that the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board would be forced to provide for her ‘and Chantelle’ after he had gone. Another factor that Sky have glossed over.
As a commentator on my site has wisely pointed out, Samantha Stobbart is a party to those deaths and maimings with her tale to Raoul of ‘my new boyfriend’s a copper’ as surely as the ‘let him have it, Chris’ of Derek Bentley all those years ago. We have heard no criticism of her, of course, she is/was a hard man’s moll, and as such a protected species where ChavTV is concerned.
ChavPress, in the form of The Daily Mirror is no better, pandering to their clients prejudices with the obscene suggestion that Raoul didn’t actually commit suicide, it was a ‘reflex action’ caused by the reprehensible use of the Police Taser – even though said Taser didn’t actually pierce his clothing. The family are so convinced that the police ‘executed’ Raoul, that they are now demanding a second post mortem because the first showed no sign of the Taser having so much as marked his gentle giant exterior. A more realistic explanation is that having heard the sound of the Taser being fired – Raoul, the hard man of Newcastle, having offered emotive good-byes to his ‘nearest and dearest’ in the previous few minutes, and the police convinced that he was about to commit suicide – realised that he was within a hair’s breath of being returned to the safety and security of a three meals a day and plenty of time to contemplate, maximum security jail, and that would never do. Last chance to evade the consequence of his actions.
The Sun is obsessed with the stupidity of the police, having ‘discovered’ the entrance to a storm drain within yards of where Raoul was cornered, and not having been correctly informed by the police that such things existed. Judging by the fact that the police remained resolute in their belief that he was still in Rothbury, and having captured him within minutes of him appearing yards from said culvert, did it not occur to the Sun that the police knew their reader’s ‘hero’ was crawling along those drains all the time, and had merely waited by each exit for the moment when they knew Raoul ‘nobody loves me’ Moat would emerge like a common rat, to see what he could find to calm his rumbling stomach.
Now we are told that the entire affair has been referred to the IPCC, in terms that imply that the police may be found at fault, no one is mentioning that any death in custody – and surrounded by police officers, he was in custody – is referred to the IPCC, this referral is held out as a possible time when the ‘filth’ may get their arse whipped for daring to harm a hair on little Raoul head.
Meanwhile, we have heard no mention of PC Rathband, the unfortunate traffic cop on duty directing all those media satellite vans to an advantageous vantage point, when the hard man and his henchmen decided to show the ‘filth’ who is boss, and blast him in the face at point blank range. He is reportedly blinded for life, for doing no more than ensuring chavTV arrived at the bun feast in time to entertain their viewers.
I await the Moat funeral with some trepidation, for if there is any question of a minute’s silence in parliament, as there was for Derek Bird’s victims – and as there very much hasn’t been for any of the 314 fine young men killed in Afghanistan; if there is any suggestion of any official presence at that funeral, Chief Inspector, Junior Minister, or even the cleaner at the Home Office, as there very much hasn’t been in Wotton Basset for any of those fine young men, I, for one, will burst a blood vessel.
Every last one of them is worth 314 Raoul Moats.
Doted on his kids with a clenched fist he did, so he did……..
- August 6, 2010 at 22:41
-
Well said Claire,
society is full of muppets who jump on the bandwagon with their ill
informed opinions, relying on secondary information to cast their views,
perhaps if they had first hand knowledge then their opinions would be
justifiable, but since the majority dont, then they should keep it zipped! Too
many people with too much to say…..they cant tell a real thug from a fake one,
a toy revolver or a replica, the nearest they have come to death is on the
telly!!
Lets face it, im sure they are all law abiding ‘good people’ who never set
a foot wrong the sort of people we all aspire to, you all know the
ones…lawyers, priests, accountants, teachers, doctors and even police….
So good on you Claire and dont be intimidated by these muppets…
-
August 2, 2010 at 22:20
-
You people with the ill minded comments didn’t even know the bloke and are
believing everything they read in the papers and whoever copied the page for
your information it has been removed due to peathetics beings like yourselves
having an opinion about something you’s know NOTHING about.
- August 3, 2010 at 00:20
-
good on you claire i agree with what your saying
- August 3, 2010 at 00:20
-
August 1, 2010 at 10:17
-
Moat is dead… good! I dont have my taxes paying to feed him for the next ??
years. If they had connected him to the national grid I would have pulled the
swtich and toasted the louse.
-
July 14, 2010 at 12:37
-
ref. our fine servicemen, duped by Labour.
Anna – I fully agree the tragedy is that when those fine young soldiers
come home and/or leave the army, quite a few of them behave like Raoul
Moat.
Clearly they deserve the support of mental health professionals to help
them deal with the trauma they have suffered and to persuade them not to drink
like Bacchanalian demons and to help them lead constructive lives.
Just playing the Devil’s avocado………shouldn’t individuals traumatised by the
constant thoughts of their inadequacy in the ‘modern world’ be given
similar?
- July 14, 2010 at 09:50
-
Anna, a minor technical point:
“ChavPress, in the form of The Daily Mirror is no better, pandering to
their clients prejudices with the obscene suggestion that Raoul didn
- July
13, 2010 at 22:22
-
Lol…how long before we have the Moat mini series on ITV with Robbie
Coltrane as the shrink advising plod?
- July 13, 2010 at 20:11
-
This might sound a little extreme to some, but given the nature of Moat’s
crimes, the threat he clearly posed to others and the fact he was armed, I’m
still struggling to understand why the Police didn’t just shoot him as soon as
they had him cornered.
With all the assembled media looking for a juicy end, perhaps the camera
footage of Moat having his head blown clean off his shoulders by a Police
marksman would have been a tremendous disincentive to Britain’s chav community
to mess with the Police, but it would only have cost the taxpayer a single
bullet too.
Sky could also have put it on re-runs for years. Where is Ross Kemp to
narrate when you really need him?
- July 13, 2010 at 13:21
-
Would someone like to open a book to anticipate the arrival of a film based
on the life of…? Available in either DVD or Blu-Ray at your local
supermarket.
- July 13, 2010 at 07:11
-
i like to visit castles, but i,m not crossing a moat again!
- July 12, 2010 at 22:41
-
Chav TV? Too right – I overheard someone saying she stayed up really late
to watch the unfolding drama and then was “gutted” the following morning to
find that Moat had killed himself just a few minutes after she went to bed. It
seems as if some people have viewed this like a sad story line in a soap
opera.
- July 13, 2010 at 08:49
-
There are a surprising number of people completely incapable of
distinguishing between “real news” – which even the interminable hunt for
Moat technically was; ” ‘reality’ TV” – which is, of course, nothing like
reality (and is just softening us up for the introduction of ‘Chav farming’
as per ‘The Matrix’?); and the latest plotline in their favourite soaps.
Hence they want the rising tension at the end of each news broadcast and
the bitter denouement at the start of the next ‘episode’. And real petitions
to free soap characters and attacks on actors playing ‘bad people’.
It really is the ‘idiot box’ in so many ways.
- July 13, 2010 at 10:23
-
I was hoping that an enterprising TV producer would use the occasion to
reincarnate “The Golden Shot” in which lucky callers could give aiming
directions “Left a bit, up a bit” to a modern day “Bernie The Bolt”
marksman. Now that’s family viewing.
- July 13, 2010 at 08:49
- July 12, 2010 at 22:22
-
A piece along similar lines to Anna’s: The strange life and death of Raoul Moat
“He killed a man he didn’t know, seriously wounded a woman and a police
officer, and assaulted a little girl. But well-wishers wanted to grant him the
sentimentalising gestures normally reserved for the victims of crime and
accidents. Some of these, like messages left on Facebook, seemed to be from
friends; others plainly not. However incongruous it may seem, Raoul Moat had a
constituency.”
- July 12, 2010 at 22:29
-
He killed a man, wounded a woman and a police officer and assaulted a
little girl. And then shot himself, before he was shot.
What’s the
problem????
Good riddance.
Maybe, we on the continent are thinking differently?
- July 13, 2010 at 00:05
-
Have you heard the story from a few years ago about the dead chicken in Liverpool?
Where do these people come from? And don’t say Liverpool.
Perhaps there is a network of canny florists who seek out incidents and
place the first bouquet knowing the response from a minority of the public
will be an irresistible urge to join in.
- July 13, 2010 at 00:05
- July 12, 2010 at 22:29
- July 12, 2010 at 20:48
-
The Guardian has its take on it too… was it appropriate to turn tasers on a
man pointing a gun at his own head, they wonder.
If only the bill had read out Polly Toynbee epistles through a loud hailer,
to to the doomed folk hero, it could all have been so very different
- July 12,
2010 at 20:47
-
Perfect piece to finish this sorry saga off Anna, and you are absolutely
right each lost soldier was worth 1000 of him…
and they were sent out to
die on a pack of lies, yet did their duty. Quite unlike Moat who lived a lie
,lied to himself, lied to the world and then forced the situation to give him
death (however it happened), our sympathies are best placed with those who
have and are dying with honour, our troops!
-
July 12, 2010 at 19:53
-
From Peter Hitchens blog:
“We also know that he had recently been taking
anti-depressants, which is the case with most rampage killers of this kind,
yet is something nobody in authority seems to want to know about. ”
-
July 12, 2010 at 19:51
-
Just heard Alistair Stewart listening to the sister and mother of Chris
Brown for not protecting Brown and Stobbart after threats were made by media
hero Moat. Absolutely no challenge to this suggestion. So according to the
media, every single ex-prisoner who makes threats against others on release,
should have immediate 24/7 police protection. Yeah that is a great use of
resources. Alistair Stewart is the person who does the police reality TV
shows. If he does any more I suggest that all coppers tell the tw*t to f*ck
off back to media lala land.
Then we had Keir Simmons saying that Moat
COULD have been in this drain (looking all serious) and said similar ‘he may
have been just feet below the searching police’. These journalists really are
stupid arent they?
Oh and now according to the Daily Wail, some civil
servants in London are questioning the police’s tactics in Northumbria. Yep.
That clinches it. If civil servants in the capital city are questioning police
tactics in Northumbria then the police obviously got it badly wrong.
- July 12, 2010 at 22:11
-
It’s a well-known fact you are never more than 6 feet away from a
shotgun-wielding chav. Do chavs really eat game?
- July 12, 2010 at 22:11
- July 12, 2010 at 18:47
-
Anna… great post, obviously written in anger with the emotion shining
through.
Sadly, I do think, though, that you are largely preaching to the converted.
As Paul Simon (one of America’s few great men) once wrote “A man hears what he
wants to hear, And disregards the rest.”
I also agree with Gildas (above). “Don
- July 12,
2010 at 18:44
-
Raoul Moat = Supreme Twat.
Did anyone force him into these actions?
And to hear the words, ‘I’ve got no Dad…etc.etc.
the tears were just pouring down my face.
-
July 13, 2010 at 07:47
-
With me, it was my legs.
-
- July 12,
2010 at 17:59
-
‘He will always have that special place in everyone’s hearts’
That’ll be the one next to Princess Diana, no doubt, in between Little
Madeleine and Jade Goody. Looks like the Queen Mum’ll have to budge up a bit –
it’s getting awful crowded in there.
-
July 13, 2010 at 16:00
-
Don’t forget Wacko Jacko and George Best. Legends, innit?
-
- July 12, 2010 at 17:54
-
No man is an island,
Entire of itself.
Each is a piece of the
continent,
A part of the main.
If a clod be washed away by the
sea,
Europe is the less.
As well as if a promontory were.
As well as
if a manner of thine own
Or of thine friend’s were.
Each man’s death
diminishes me,
For I am involved in mankind.
Therefore, send not to
know
For whom the bell tolls,
It tolls for thee.
John Donne
- July 12, 2010 at 22:13
-
Exactly so Opsimath
Ah, John Donne. Reprobate, lover, inebriate, poet,
genius and in later life, priest.
One of the great figures of English
literature, and this is a most appropriate piece.
Gildas the Monk
- July 12, 2010 at 22:13
- July 12,
2010 at 17:48
-
An excellent post – as usual.
I was spared most of the media fuss thanks to a last-minute weekend break;
the first I saw of the saga’s sorry conclusion was the Sunday paper headlines
on last night’s ferry.
You’ve raised an interesting question with the military analogy – the
North-East has a proud long-standing tradition of military service and many
young men with a similar background to Moat have chosen to make a career in
the Army.
There’s a horrible irony in according hero status to a wife-battering
steroid abuser with a history of criminal involvement while Geordie soldiers
are risking their lives in Afghanistan on a daily basis.
- July 12, 2010 at 17:43
-
Is that The Angus “I haven’t seen him for a number of years” Moat?
- July 12, 2010 at 17:42
-
What is the real truth behind the public’s reaction to Raoul Moat? http://bit.ly/a8vSN6
- July 13,
2010 at 05:48
-
From your link:
“His belongings have been stolen from under police custody, coveted
not by ghouls but by passionate devotees, recalling the mediaeval obsession
with relics. “
Hmmm, let me think…
Nope. Ghouls. Definitely. You might want to check eBay in a few days.
Although, who knows, if those mediaeval peasants had access to the
technology, perhaps there’d have been a big trade in ‘Ye Slpinter of True
Cross, Straight Up, Bargain Geezer, Verily!!’…
- July 13,
- July
12, 2010 at 17:25
-
Absolutely right Anna, we should respec’ Raoul Moat.
You’ve got to be well hard to blow your own brains out and then go to the
internet cafe and post the video on You Tube before going to the pub and
telling your mates how you did it.
Chavs have values too.
-
July 12, 2010 at 16:39
-
Just waiting for a Facebook group to be set up so all his Chav friends can
post how much of a good guy he was together with comments about how th epolice
killed him.
To be honest, my blood pressure went through the roof when I heard the IPCC
were investigating. What needs to be investigated, he killed one person,
injured a policeman just doing his duty and shot his wife / girlfriend before
turning the gun on himself.
I think the media coverage has been very OTT but there again it is a quiet
time of year and they do need something to fill the 24 hour coverage.
- July 12, 2010 at 16:27
-
Great Post Anna.
I am amazed at how Moat is being turned into some sort of hero. He was a
thug who turned into a murderer who should be hated for what he did, not
worshipped.
Moat killed one person and has caused pain and misery to two other people,
and their families.
My thoughts are with PC Rathband and his family, I hope he gets all the
care and support he needs.
I do wonder though, how many of the Moat ‘hero worshippers’ care how PC
Rathband’s recovery is going.
- July 12, 2010 at 16:06
-
Angus Moat was in the radio this morning generally whining that the Police
agenda was to have this gentleman dead one way or another. His general
complaint was that he should have been allowed through police lines to “talk
his brother down” (his phrase). Obviously This is the brother who admitted he
hadn’t spoken to his brother in 6 or more years, and hence obviously hadn’t
visited his brother in prison. And who apparently hadn’t been in touch with
the Police in the week before, so expected the Police on his immediate say so
to believe who he was, and then interrupt an extremely tense situation to
allow him to intervene. When, of course, they have no idea of what had
previously passed between them and this is self evidently dangerous anyway.
Really? And it was all the police’s fault for shooting him with a taser,
apparently. Oh, they should have shot him in the leg, or something (maybe they
should have shot the gun out of his hand, just like they do in the cowboy
movies). Utter cobblers.
It was all nicely framed to claim for nervous
shock against the Police, Sky, anyone else.
I don’t want to see anyone
dead, not even Moat. But he killed himself, period. Giving idiots like his
brother airtime is just irritating. Advice from a lawyer to Northumbria
Police: don’t pay a penny to the irritating little sod that is Angus Moat. But
do get your acting Chief a new hairdo.
Gildas the Monk.
-
July 12, 2010 at 15:57
-
if Raoul
-
July 12, 2010 at 15:54
-
Nice writing.
I believe if somebody dies after having come into contact with the police,
in ANY circumstances then the case goes to the IPCC. I don’t believe one has
to have been ‘in custody’. Just standard procedure. I am sure the police won’t
take much stick for that one.
I must say, after hearing so many cheap commentators suggest that post-De
Menezez the police ‘shoot innocent people’ off hand will observe the
ridiculous lengths they will go to in order to prolong lives most of us would
have happily dispatched.
No doubt the full video will hit Wiki leaks at some point.
- July 12, 2010 at 15:36
-
The Mail is today reporting an allegation that Moaty was a Police
informant. That would certainly explain why this thug had been able to
flourish with a reported 11 or 12 previous arrest.
The media is always on the side of whoever fills airtime and column space
with the least effort. Moaty’s relatives are doing that at the moment.
Despite the commentary we get from the media a more realistic view can
still be gleaned from their output. Moaty was a coward. He needed steriods to
bulk himself up. He chose to shoot unarmed people, killing one. He beat a
child. He was imprisoned for that and somehow mangled his predicament into a
grudge against the Police. Not the behaviour of a brave man by any stretch of
the imagination.
-
July 12, 2010 at 15:56
-
The three people that broke into Tony Martin’s house reportedly had over
140 convictions between them. They were not police informants. No, the
simple explanation is that our criminal justice system does not do what it
says on the tin.
-
- July 12, 2010 at 15:25
-
Powerful piece of writing that, Anna, and absolutely spot on. An
illustration of why the mainstream media deride the blogosphere – they fear
exposure of their own manipulation of the public’s view of events.
- July 12,
2010 at 15:14
-
“…if Raoul
- July 12, 2010 at 15:13
-
Excellent post.
However, I suspect we will have to endure many more weeks of such as BBC
Breakfast ‘News’ Sian solemnly pleading with their audience: ‘send us your
views’.
The ‘audience’ demands it. Evidently.
-
July 12, 2010 at 15:11
-
Scumbags reporting on a scumbag.
Good piece.
- July
12, 2010 at 14:41
-
Great post Anna,
Yeah Im glad Moat is dead,he was scum,and the streets are a bit cleaner
without him.
{ 62 comments }