The Thick-tank.
The Raccoon Economic Thick-Tank (RETT) has reported on its representations to the government, on potential additional taxation. A precis of its findings are attached:
1. Having recently sold all our shares in Everest Double-Glazing , and bought a controlling interest in Interior Lighting Systems , the members of the thick-tank were unanimous that the government should re-introduce the Window Tax.
2. A recent survey has revealed there are roughly three billion cats in the UK, many of whom crap in our gardens and have so far evaded our shot-guns, poisoned meat, etc. It is therefore recommended that a Cat Tax be established. Owners of cats will pay up to £1,000 a year for each cat in their household, the exact amount of the tax to be graded according to cuteness. The cuter the cat, the higher the tax. Special penalties would be charged for really-really-really cute “Lolcatz” pictured on the Internet. Failure to pay would mean putting the owner down.
3. A tax on dogs was suggested, but obviously, that would just be stupid.
4. The thick-tank recommended a graduated tax on the transfer and supply of footballers, including transfers between one WAG and another. This will be known as the Slapper Tax. However, a tax credit will be allowed for each goal scored in international matches. (England players need not apply.)
5. There will be a flat-rate Art Tax on art installations such as rumpled beds, over-priced tents and displays of sandbags tossed willy-nilly. This tax will also cover paintings executed with elephant dung, virgin’s blood, etc. The members of the tank admitted that they didn’t know much about art, but that they did know what they liked.
6. A similar flat-rate tax of… oh, let’s say ten grand a throw…to be levied on all rap songs featuring references to mo-fo’s, ho’s and other fake patois.
7. Finally — sex. It was felt that every single admitted instance of legover-ness should generate a charge to tax of £20, from which Child Benefit could be paid.
Although the sex-tax would be based on admissions within an annual Self-Assessment Return, it was felt that — given the boastfulness of the average man — there would be little tax avoidance, as the results would be published on-line and open for all to see. Taxpayers may well pay more than they strictly should. Therefore, the government should be quids in.
At least, this was the view of the thick-tank’s biggest members — the really big , thick , and upstanding members, who were prepared to argue their case by plunging into any controversy, then pressing their points home repeatedly, again and again and again , until they won hands down. They would then have a cigarette, and go to sleep.
We commend the above measures to the House.
- June 30, 2010 at 10:51
-
I propose a pound of flesh tax…for every pound (or for the metrically
inclined 453.5 gms) consumed a levy of
- June 30, 2010 at 06:48
-
no tax on journalists and their scribbling volume??
- June 29, 2010 at 22:53
-
-
June 30, 2010 at 00:19
-
Many Thanks.
-
-
June 29, 2010 at 22:21
-
While we are about it, Disney to be charged a tax on every sale of Mary
Poppins as I blame “Feed the Birds” for half this trouble.
Shoot the birds
Tuppence a round
Tuppence, tuppence,
Tuppence a
round.
I know what the saints and apostles are thinking; they are thinking pigeon
guano is caustic and it is about time that Dismal Corp were obliged to pay for
their feckless attitudes. Do they have pigeons in the Magic Kingdom? Do they
heck. They have falconers and blokes with tasers. You don’t get pigeon poo on
the giant statue of Mickey Mouse.
-
June 29, 2010 at 22:13
-
A pigeon tax to be collected on commercial bird food and any one who puts
out food in such a way so as to encourage those particular feathery vermin.
Incidentally, the best thing I saw in Paris was on the steps at Sacr
- June 29, 2010 at 20:44
- June
29, 2010 at 19:37
-
I would like to propose a muffin top tax. Any overweight chav bird walking
around populated areas with her midriff both bare and bulging over her
waistband should pay
-
June 29, 2010 at 20:23
-
Ian… I believe the thick-tank could support this, so long as it also
applied to “builder’s bum” cleavage.
-
June 29, 2010 at 21:44
-
Blimey! What with my pampered cats and my muffin tops, I’m already
checking down the back of the sofa for loose change. I can’t wait till
someone suggests taxes on thick ankles, shoddy sock-drawer management and
Marmite on toast. I can’t pay for it all, you know.
-
- June 29, 2010 at 19:10
-
8. Hand-outs from the National Lottery (AKA the Idiot Tax) would be
halved.
{ 13 comments }