Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Steven ‘I lied about lying, about lying, about telling the truth’ Byers has referred himself to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. It almost sounds honourable doesn’t it?
Byers was one of the queue of Ministers ‘mentioned in Dispatches’ on Channel 4 last week in which he memorably claimed that he was a ‘cab for hire’ by lobbyists who were prepared to pay between £3,000 and £5,000 for his ‘influence’ over government legislation.
At least, that is what he said at first. Then he said:
I’ve been reflecting on our discussion and I’m afraid I completely overstated the part I played in trying to secure changes to the way in which government deals with issues.
In a later e-mail to the programme makers he said:
In the context of our discussion on Tuesday (23rd February) this means that I have not spoken to Andrew Adonis, Hilary Benn, or Peter Mandelson about the matters I mentioned. I’m sorry that I indicated otherwise.
Which as the Spectator points out is a problem….for the very next day, Andrew Adonis told parliament:
“Stephen Byers had a brief conversation with me in the House of Commons last June about the East Coast Mainline. We discussed his experience in dealing with rail franchise difficulties when Transport Secretary. As regards the situation then facing National Express,” he continued, “I told him that despite the company’s difficulties I had no intention whatsoever of renegotiating the East Coast franchise on terms favourable to the company as the company was seeking in its approaches to my department.”
Now we have Byers lying about lying – you might expect a man so confused about his position in relation to taking cash for influencing government legislation to have taken some advice before he embarked on his project with the fictitious Anderson Perry.
Advice is available.
Gordon Brown appointed the life peer with the Ruritanian title of Baron Lang of Monkton, of Merrick and the Rhinns of Kells in Dumfries and Galloway to give former ministers and senior civil servants advice to ensure they don’t use their government contacts when taking up jobs in the private sector.
Lord Lang has faced criticism that his committee has no powers of enforcement, but he can still give advice. One of the things he has never been criticised for is being unavailable.
He certainly wasn’t unavailable to Steven Byers.
Who else was in the queue of former Ministers desperate to investigate the ‘cash on the side’ possibilities offered by Anderson Perry?
None other than Lord Lang of Monkton.
Lord Lang explained: “I do not charge a day rate but operate under an agreed annual fee, for which I am available as required, around a basic structure of an agreed number of regular meetings.”
Lang was not prepared to get his hands personally dirty, you understand, he wanted to hand that job offer over to his pal Jonathon Hill of Quiller Consultants, but was quite happy to submit his CV for the position of giving ‘strategic advice’.
They can’t be trusted to regulate themselves. They just don’t understand what Democracy means.
We need ordinary men and women in parliament, not career politicians.
Support Old Holborn – he’ll shake them up without fear or favour.
- Tweets that mention Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? — Topsy.com
- March 27, 2010 at 11:54
{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }
-
1
March 27, 2010 at 12:04 -
Never mind, eh! At least they’re all paying the appropriate income tax on all these fees, aren’t they?
-
2
March 27, 2010 at 14:42 -
Just had Rupert of Hentzau on the blower. He is not happy about his fair and wonderful country of Ruritania being compared with the grazing grounds of Lang and company. They do things differently in Ruritania and as Rupert says a lot better than the UK at the moment.
-
3
March 27, 2010 at 15:44 -
We are Ruritania.
-
4
March 27, 2010 at 17:28 -
It’s funny but this sort of behaviour and this sort of incestuous contact system is not new. It’s been around for ever. They are a class and a culture apart from ordinary working mortals. They reign supreme over the UK and will continue to do so as Parliament and Royalty remain. It’s our constitution you know. It makes voting once every 5 years for another version of the same lot pale into insignificance. But at least they can say we have the vote.
THIS IS NOT DEMOCRACY
-
5
March 27, 2010 at 19:00 -
I would like very much to respond to this post.
As you will know, I’ve commented on several blogs before. I also read a newspaper online and once watched Channel4 news (by mistake instead of Emmerdale). Naturally, this intimate access to the power brokers, the movers and shakers, doesn’t come cheap. Therefore I would very much like to discuss my day rate with you before giving my considered opinion.
As the Pound is practically worthless now, I’d be willing to accept some shiny trinkets and baubles which you may deposit in my Skegness numbered account.
And yes, I’m rather much like a taxi. Instead of whizzing you speedily to your destination, I’m more than happy to take the circuitous way around while discussing your recent holidays and reciting all the answers to our country’s problem as espoused by that bloke from Top Gear. Oh and that I once had that Jordan chick in the back once… although her tips are smaller than they once were according to my mate Stan who drives out of Marylebone station.
Your humble servant.
John
{ 1 trackback }