Milking the taxpayer
The taxpayers love it, really …
The peer informally known as “Barrenness Udder” initially appeared to have escaped from charges of milking the taxpayer. In a display of asininity remarkable even for him, the perpetually useless Keir Starmer has declared that guidance issued by the Clerk of the Parliaments – guidance, mind! – rendered the law irrelevant. If anyone else ran their own company, they could simply write “guidance” that defrauding customers and suppliers was perfectly acceptable behaviour, and the towering intellect of Keir Starmer would regard that as sufficient to make a successful prosecution unlikely.
It is hard to conceive how someone with the intellectual gifts that Keir Starmer possesses manages to remember to breathe without assistance.
It does really make me wonder what on Earth you have to do to be prosecuted nowadays:
Mr Starmer said in the course of the Scotland Yard investigation, evidence had been obtained from her neighbours in Maidstone and from companies supplying utility services, such as water, gas and electricity.
So, it was pretty clear that she was never there. And yet this is not actually enough to press charges.
I do so hope that if I ever transgress, Mr Starmer gets to decide my fate.
-
1
March 14, 2010 at 09:38 -
Thaddeus, it appears that you still adhere to the fiction that the law in the UK applies to all (except the sovereign and foreign diplomats.) Try a little experiment. Next time you’re in Asda or wherever, slip a tin of red salmon in your pocket and don’t pay for it. When challenged outside the store, offer to pay for it. If you are subject to the same standards of behaviour as our Establishment, this procedure should obviate any need to take the matter any further, and should in fact restore your former reputation of “demmned good egghood.”
-
2
March 14, 2010 at 09:39 -
Is it cos I is black?
-
3
March 14, 2010 at 10:18 -
Hmm, not sure. Plenty of the troughing scum – including the four currently claiming parliamentary privilege means they shouldn’t have to stand in the dock at their fraud trial! – are as lily-white as me.
On the other hand, I remember Lord ‘Vroom Vroom’ Ahmed…
-
4
March 14, 2010 at 12:26 -
Julia,
And Baroness Scotland.
-
5
March 14, 2010 at 12:48 -
so how do we get the law to work properly?
there CANNOT be a situation where members of a cosy club are offered immunity……most of them are thick,thieving scumbahs that should be shown no deference whatsoever…….
surely there must be a way to hold them to account?
if twats like Starmer refuse to do their jobs properly then THEY TOO should face action……..we are the laughing stock of the world……..
if not then we should all disobey any law we sit fit too?
-
6
March 14, 2010 at 12:49 -
typo.’scumbags’………..angry…….
-
7
March 14, 2010 at 13:47 -
I have spotted another in bofl’s post @ 12@48
“most of them are thick,thieving scumbahs that should be shown no deference whatsoever…….”
the word “deference” is not spelled correctly,
it should read “mercy”
Is that OK for you Sir or Madam?
-
8
March 14, 2010 at 15:48 -
Sadly, bringing any rational thought to these proceedings is pure folly. No longer do the political elites have to even pretend to be public servants. They can come and go as they please, elected or otherwise, tap into the cash resources of the population and not even show receipts, or not be in the houses they say they are in, nor answer to the laws that they passed. This is truly anarchy with a fascist overtone. I am amazed that the population haven’t risen up and burnt their houses down but what do they know – we all die in the end and we can’t take anything with us.
-
9
March 14, 2010 at 15:53 -
reminds me of an incident recently when I met a neighbour. A neighbour who can only stay in this country for 20 days for tax purposes. Who has responsibilities here but seldom acts upon them. He’s too interested in the estates in South Africa and Australia and of course the money. He wants, no expects me to call him Sir J…
Different worlds, different planet, entirely different culture – that’s why lots of MPs are livid, because the natural culture of their existence has been invaded and they don’t like it!!!
-
10
March 14, 2010 at 17:26 -
panda………agreed…….
-
11
March 14, 2010 at 19:42 -
I wonder how long this will stay there ?
Quote:
Manzila Pola Uddin, Baroness Uddin (Bengali: মানযিলা পলা উদ্দিন; Romanized: Manzila Pôla Uddin; born 17 July 1959) is a British Labour politician and THIEF. (caps mine)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pola_Uddin,_Baroness_Uddin -
12
March 14, 2010 at 20:52 -
Anna – stop complaining and raise money as you did for Hogan and use the money for a private prosecution of the old Udder.
-
13
March 14, 2010 at 21:02 -
Wot about Lord Paul, then? Could you make it a double-bill:
R[acoon] v. Udder & Paul
http://eotp.wordpress.com/2010/03/14/2010-new-labours-lord-paul-parasite-repays-controversial-38000-to-taxpayer/ -
14
March 14, 2010 at 21:22 -
I’ve been wearing a polo-necked sweater ever since I saw Mr Thaddeus’s choice of piccy. Uurrgh. It’s like looking in the mirror, apart from the multiple teats and the stray bovine leg.
I didn’t know Mr Smudd had such a strong stomach. -
15
March 15, 2010 at 07:49 -
and now this
seems the guy who ‘invented’ the law is the same guy who put a gagging order on it! Apparently not in the public interest. Our bloody money IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
-
16
March 15, 2010 at 14:45 -
@Blink
Someone should simply leak the memo; the HoL employs a lot of people …
{ 16 comments… read them below or add one }