And so, the traditions of Christmas continue
Ah yes, as the nights draw in and a chill fastens itself to the world, as the first stumbles and slips on icy pavements appear and as the horror of the Christmas songs assault our senses in the increasingly overcrowded shops, so one of the other great Christmas traditions descends upon us in a time when we are exhorted above all to be with the ones we love, for this special time:
Thousands of rail passengers will be hit with severe delays and cancellations during Christmas and New Year as some of Britain’s busiest lines are disrupted for as much as two weeks.
Only two of the network’s seven main routes will be spared from engineering works over the festive period, while the unluckiest passengers may see their journey times doubled as they are forced to use rail replacement bus services.
Disruptions will begin from 21 December and will continue until 3 January. Passengers hoping to travel between South Wales and London will be hardest hit, with no trains running between Christmas Eve and 3 January.
Yes, as ever, our wonderful rail companies will be destroying the ability of people to get to their families around the country. And notice just how carefully the dates have been chosen: 21 December to 3 January. So, unless you plan on taking leave, you will once again have no option but to face the congestion and chaos of slippery roads because they are disrupting things well in advance of any time that you might be able to sneak off without a major investment in your leave, but also keeping them disrupted well past the beginning of the New Year.
This is, of course, just the tonic for hard-pressed folks who have seen their prospects, earnings and job security eroded by our shameless masters in Westminster who might, just might, want the convenience of travelling around the country with someone else doing the driving for a change. And yet it should come as no surprise to anyone who has looked at the structure of our rail system that the benefit of the people who want to use it is of the very least importance. Have you seen anything run by the state which had the convenience of the user at its heart?
The Devil’s Kitchen has done an elegant analysis (which may contain some inelegant language, so read the source at your own risk!) of why rail companies often behave in such an apparently traveller-unfriendly way. In essence, the reason they do so is because the railway passenger is not their customer. The customer is the government, which has handed over a geographical monopoly to the train company in exchange for keeping the capital costs of running the train off the government books. The train company delivers the service at the level the government dictates, in exchange for all the captive profit it can milk from commuters.
Since the train companies can do very little to make their services more cost effective or more popular to rail users, they are left with maximising income. Which is why there’s always a surfeit of “Revenue Protection Officers” around, even when there’s a dearth of drivers. And that is why “railing” (sorry!) at the train companies is mostly just a waste of your breath. In reality, to both the train companies and to the state, your presence is just a necessary evil to be endured while they take you for all the money they can.
And since the faceless bureaucrat who gets to make the decision is on leave over Christmas, it’s obvious that this is the ideal time for the train companies to inflict misery on us all.
Bah, humbug!
-
1
December 1, 2009 at 18:43 -
Some good points there. I thought you expressed them very well, this communication has struck a chord with me. I’m glad this blog has not remained stationary and is keeping on track, and is staying at the vanguard of political writing. The crossing between yourself and Ms Raccoon has been very level.
-
3
December 1, 2009 at 18:58 -
You have established your standing on the platform very well Mr Thaddeus and I think you’ll be just the ticket to keep the blog running to the strict timetable of wit and wisdom we have come to expect. It would be so easy to run out of steam but so far it’s First Class.
-
4
December 1, 2009 at 19:05 -
I concur with Saul here. I bloody hate the trains because…well, I’m a smoker. That apart I remember, while in London, taking a train trip to see my brother, not a long trip, but long enough to be disgusted at the way commuters were being treated. Oh, and the 21st of Dec. is my birthday so the train situation does not bode well for us Sagittarians.
-
6
December 1, 2009 at 19:15 -
Thaddeus,
That will depend on the signal – stop or go. -
8
December 1, 2009 at 19:26 -
With my first great vest on and my tunnel vision I seem to have soot around the eyes as I awake from my sleeper with a ballast of horn in my ears I set forth along the tract of stats from where I can gauge this Thaddeus revolution astride its iron horse. I’d better branch off now and grab my anorak as this incline is one in a hundred heading for the buffers
-
9
December 1, 2009 at 19:27 -
We gave up on family Christmases years ago, it was all getting too much hassle on the travel. So now when we meet it is all a lot more relaxed. Who really needs it?
-
10
December 1, 2009 at 19:30 -
OK, there’s no need to be so cutting! I’m actually siding with you on this one; my last experience of rail travel was chuffin’ dreadful as it happens. It cost me £90 (single) to stand next to the train’s leaky lav for 3 hours wedged into the very close company of 7 other seatless passengers and all our baggage. One of my fellow toilet-class travellers told me that he has made the journey every Friday and returned every Monday for the last 10 months and hadn’t ever, ever managed to get a seat. How we all cheered up when an incoherent chap with his flies unzipped and crate of lager under his arm pushed his way into our throng and treated us to an account of his life and times.
-
11
December 1, 2009 at 20:15 -
Nope.
I’ve thought about it.
Why would anyone travel by train? Why?
-
12
December 1, 2009 at 20:18 -
My mate was feeling a bit depressed, so I pushed him under a steam train…..
He was chuffed to bits!
-
14
December 1, 2009 at 20:32 -
Why would anyone travel by train? Why?
…………..
Through sheer necessity OH, through sheer necessity. I had to drive my own car 200 miles then get on a train to go 200 miles back to get into someone else’s car and drive the 200 miles again. Sheesh!(sorry, I seem to have been going over the points, over the points, over the points rather a lot there haven’t I?)
-
16
December 1, 2009 at 21:50 -
OK we get the points.
-
18
December 2, 2009 at 00:43 -
Ere! ‘Ow do I e-mail you a ‘bit of a tale’ if I’ve wrote summink wot’s both jaundiced and news, like wot Mme R ‘as a ‘eader for? You is a mysterious one, you is an’ no mistake…
-
19
December 2, 2009 at 00:54 -
Did the state start this sort of sour faced ’service’ attitude or big business ?
The water board, electric and gas companies are all the same, treat you like shit and keep you at an arms length, no ones responsible for anything that goes wrong or inconvenience coursed.
You’d think their business could survive without us, I’m hiring a car, they can stick their rail replacement bus. -
21
December 2, 2009 at 01:40 -
Dear Miss Mink
It was started by the State in the 1950s, turned into an art form by the banks, utilities and all transport forms in the 1980s, and perfected by the software, telecom, ISP, Government Dept and judicial websites after 1995. All the others have since caught up with their high-handed standards. So nobody gets any service in any shape or form at all any more except in a shop. And once they all hide behind websites and deliver the wrong things to your door on the wrong day, we won’t get any from them either.
But it’s our own fault. We could stop it tomorrow by picking them off one by one and refusing to go along with their bonkers help searches and user forums and all the rest of the bollocks.
But we don’t. We just moan about it. And make puns out of railway words.
YM x -
22
December 2, 2009 at 10:48 -
Trains like planes I avoid totally now.
I find that I can get the same level of service by standing in a cold wind swept dark street for several hours plus its doesn’t require another mortgage. -
23
December 2, 2009 at 12:09 -
Trains would be so much happier travelling empty, don’t you think.
None of that nonsense with irrelevant passengers.Actually, I suppose that trains beat planes. At least you can get out half way and have a quick ten fags.
{ 23 comments… read them below or add one }