Helping the Police with their Enquiries.
I heard on the radio that a ‘dangerous murderess’ had been taken for a stroll round the local ‘Toys ‘R’ Us’ and decided not to return to the secure mental hospital whence we had thought she was safely incarcerated.
We were warned that she was sooo dangerous that we shouldn’t approach her – although she had apparently been approaching us all afternoon, unbeknown to us. Never mind, I am a public minded citizen, I took careful note of her description and kept a sharp eye out so that I could phone the police if I spotted her.
The police had been careful to give me clues as to how I could distinguish her from the thousands of other ladies of ‘large build’ lumbering around the shopping centre.
She had a mole under both eyes.
Could it be this lady, I wondered?
She looked harmless enough, but I was loath to disturb her afternoon’s shopping unfairly, especially when I spotted this lady standing closely behind her……
Give us another clue folks? Ah!, a scar on her neck…..could it be….?
Nope.
Another clue then?
Wearing a red coat? Half the population seems to be wearing a red coat, doesn’t help much.
There must be something that would distinguish her from 90% of the people round her. Missing her left leg perhaps, or has a toy tricycle welded to her right ear, or walks on her hands instead of her feet, I mean its important that we find her and you do want our help don’t you?
Ah! I see you’ve finally released a photograph. Something you didn’t mention in your description instantly comes to mind.
Now which is more important – our safety and returning Patricia Gillette to a secure hospital – or your half baked politically correct agenda?
Patricia Gillette is not just large, she is a 25 stone Afro-Caribbean.
Something you might notice before you get close enough to search for itsy bitsy moles under her eyes.
That narrows the field down a bit. Give me strength.
-
1
November 15, 2009 at 16:56 -
Anna: Do keep up at the back there! She has already been arrested…
-
3
November 15, 2009 at 17:24 -
What amazes me is that she was arrested, charged and sentenced TWO years ago.
Quite how long you have to spend in prison for murder before you are allowed to wander the leafy suburbs of West Wickham is not for me to ask. Apparently
-
4
November 15, 2009 at 18:05 -
Rumour has it that Myra Hindley was taken on shopping trips in West Wickham when she was a patient at the hospital, prior to her being ‘integrated’ back into society.
-
5
November 15, 2009 at 18:12 -
When there’s a toss up between political-correctness and the safety of my daughter, I choose the latter and any scumbag that prejudices my family with their peculiar notions had better not be within striking distance of me when I learn the truth. Thanks, Anna.
-
6
November 15, 2009 at 18:23 -
I’m still waiting to go to Toys R’us
Been banged up for far too long now
-
7
November 15, 2009 at 18:29 -
Curses of our Times, No 437: polemics clouding good governance. Collect the whole set.
Other examples: the year before last, a social worker felt the term ‘dangerous psychopath’ to be undermining the human rights of a three-times murderer being transferred from jail to hospital. So he wrote on the guy’s release form ‘issues with violence’. Chummy skipped at the first opportunity, and put an old bloke in hospital within the hour.
Don’t get me started grrrrr
YM x -
8
November 15, 2009 at 18:32 -
Anna: I think even wanted posters these days have to be political correct…
OH: If she had been comitted to prison as opposed to indefinite detention in a lunatic asylum, her shopping trip would have had to be delayed for a good few years.
Ashtrayhead: Myra Hindley did go out with the female governor of Holloway whom she had a lesbian affair with. She was getting close to being secretly released, but then there was a media backlash which put paid to that plan.
-
9
November 15, 2009 at 19:58 -
On one hand there will be intrusive questions in the next census, including about racial origin; on the other Plod fails to mention the rather important skin colour of this woman.
So if mugged, am I permitted to reveal the racial identity of the mugger?
Eg, “He was tall and wearing a hood – I couldn’t see his face clearly”. This presumably implies he was black, but without crossing some PC boundary. This country, eh? -
10
November 15, 2009 at 22:18 -
…. and I’m amazed that any of you actually believe any statement put out by the combined government / plod / CPS machine without independent verification.
Mind you, much more fun to get all hot and bothered about PC, eh? I mean, PC is evil, I’ll give you that. Therefore, it should trump peaople who plain fucking lie most of the time, eh?
-
11
November 15, 2009 at 22:19 -
Amazing post. Somehow I feel none of the more establishment blogs will run with it.
-
12
November 16, 2009 at 22:12 -
How does a 25 stone woman give anyone ‘the slip’, much less two supposedly watchful psychiatric nurses?
And why was she allowed out shopping in the first place?
{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }